Automation Anywhere Reviews

Our use cases for Automation Anywhere primarily started with finance and accounting, order-to-cash, supply chain processes, and then reporting areas, and now we are going towards more end-to-end automation. 

The main challenge or objective I am looking to solve with agentic process automation is that APA, again, the next step after RPA, is we're looking at more cognitive, probabilistic and cognitive solutions using NLM, which is also self-healing, self-learning. 

The primary use cases start with procurement, payment or customer management, order management cycle.

Automation Anywhere's features benefit our company since we deal with a myriad of customers, and we're talking about different security protocols, requirements, and we are a global company. That puts us in a position where we have to comply with the local regulations of each country. Automation Anywhere follows the same protocols, and they are compliant on GDPR and other areas, making it easy for us to expand.

What I appreciate most about Automation Anywhere is the high degree of interoperability, and they have both on-premises and cloud versions, which allows us to ensure that we are properly following the protocols and ensuring seamless integration with our native systems. 

In the age of agentic AI, the biggest challenges for me and my company occur when different players come up with their own copilots. The key factor that will help us from a scalability standpoint is integration. There are multiple ways to achieve this, not just through the presentation UI layer, but also through the database side or using an API. A high degree of versatility of the tool and interoperability is essential, not just from Automation Anywhere but also from other applications, because if they are too closed, it will not allow for seamless end-to-end automation.

We're doing a POC with the AI Agent Studios. It's promising. They are trying to address some of our concerns.

We have a robust AI governance approach in our company. We're trying to play with some low-risk cases. We have a good framework, and that's getting implemented alongside agentic AI.

The improvement points can be summarized as trying to provide more accessibility for those AI agents they have built so that people can start testing APA. Additionally, they should try to evangelize more APA with organizations by allowing them to try and test first before they can go for a wider option.

Document automation has been phenomenal. There have been a lot of changes and updates to it, and it is serving a very good purpose right now with document classification and document automation coming into play. Using AI enabled framework, we're able to fetch the details from it and also give input to our downstream processes.

Document automation is definitely a tool that will help us provide a better experience for our employees and our legal departments or any department that is dependent on documents that we're getting from outside parties, which are nonstandard, nonstructured. It helps us from an overall digitization of a documentation and its summarization of it. At the same time, using the cognitive abilities of an LLM, we are able to trigger actions.

For some of our purchase order processes, we did a pilot. It provided about a 90% reduction in time. You don't have to read the entire email and you don't have to read the PDF. It reads it, contextualizes it, and finds all the key areas important to the purchase order.

Automation Anywhere has been promising a lot in the last three years, and the roadmap they laid out on APA is definitely going to help businesses. A lot of work has gone into it, and the latest APA-related releases are very good. 

The key area where improvement can happen is understanding the different perspectives and different industries that they're serving in terms of industry-wise use cases. 

I have been using Automation Anywhere for six years. We started with the initial version, and now we are going towards the cloud version.

Automation Anywhere helps me overcome the specific challenges and we're working very closely with them. We did bring up some of the issues that we want to address. Automation Anywhere was able to help us by sharing best practices, how other players are doing, and how we can still use Automation Anywhere and be compliant with the requirements while respecting the security protocols and the identity protocols.

Positive

We evaluated other products, and we decided on Automation Anywhere, which was easier for us as we went towards the on-premise solution. We didn't try other products. We were thinking about it since it complied with all the requirements.

The deployment was not difficult. Automation Anywhere helped us. 

There is maintenance needed. You need to keep on updating it as it gets complicated from a security system standpoint. You have to make your software more resilient to handle hackers and to ensure that no vulnerabilities. That's a work in progress, always.

From a pricing standpoint, the value that we drove when we first hopped onto this journey was significant compared to the ROI. The ROI was significant compared to the investment we made. 

My experience with the pricing, setup costs, and licensing of Automation Anywhere has been very open in terms of what's possible and what's not possible. We are always looking at trying to play within the boundaries of budgets while delivering business impact.

Overall, the pricing strategy has been fairly good for us, and it works for us. When we're looking at adding enhancements, that's when it gets a little difficult. It's all about getting as much bang as possible for the buck that we're spending, leading to hard negotiations. However, they've been understanding. Automation Anywhere understands the business needs and tries its best to deliver.

I did not consider other products in my journey, as this work was already done by our IT team, so we didn't have to reinvest the effort.

We are moving from on-premises to the cloud. We're looking at Copilot. We expect it to accelerate and help us in the future. We don't have to start from ground zero to get to the next step.

We are not using the COE manager; we have our own tool.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

Our primary use case for Automation Anywhere began with order processing, specifically the order-to-cash process, where we manually enter orders from the customer through PDFs and other methods. 

We started from four bots and have grown to close to 60 bots at this point, expanding significantly from two or three processes to ten times that scale over the last five or six years.

Our document automation, specifically with IQ Bot as part of the automation, has significantly improved efficiency and proficiency, allowing us to be currently engaged in proof of concept initiatives aimed at further advancing the document automation process with generative AI.

Document automation has indeed been beneficial in handling large volumes of documents in our organization, where we process product-related data sheets that range from 80 to 120 pages, efficiently extracting data that would take a human several hours to read manually. I can confidently say that document automation saves us time, as it takes human effort significantly down from five to seven minutes manually per PO. It is being executed much faster by the bots.

One of the notable benefits we've realized from Automation Anywhere is a significant reduction in errors when processing data, which improves both revenue accuracy and operational efficiency.

In the age of agentic AI, the big challenge is moving to the next step. We are currently running all RPAs now. So robotic automation is the key for us now, and we are moving to the next generation of automation, which is agentic processing. We need a helping hand to make sure that our company strategy and the goal can be achieved with this agentic automation. This year, we have had a big push from our leaders to be involved, more and more, on agentic processing. That's a focus for us. 

As we evolve from RPA to APA, we are at the early stages. We're just moving over. The first step we are taking is a document automation with AI capability on top of it. That's our first step that we are doing at this point of time. Eventually, we'll get there, but it's really early.

We are using some AI. There are 20 to 30 tools at this point. So we are trying to bring in Automation Anywhere into one of those ten. It's in the evaluation phase at this point. There's a big team working on it. We want to get the right tool both legally and via a vetting process before we can bring any tool into the company. That's an ongoing process. 

Automation Anywhere can be improved by integrating self-correction capabilities into the bots, particularly as we develop RPA, where changes in environment paths require additional redeveloping efforts.

We've used the solution for around five to six years. 

There have been no downtime issues since we migrated to cloud. The availability has been good. 

Automation Anywhere is scaling well. 

As we aim to keep up with current technology trends, we are working on enhancing our growth rate moving forward.

We have around 2500 people worldwide.

The support from Automation Anywhere has been outstanding, with timely responses to submitted tickets and effective resolutions for issues that have arisen.

Positive

Prior to adopting Automation Anywhere, we used B2B automation for a long time for our needs, and the limitations of other tools in handling complex PDF transactions were significant factors that prompted us to consider a change.

I was significantly involved in the deployment of Automation Anywhere, being the sole person from my company starting this automation journey, and we faced some initial challenges, particularly with hardware setup when we transitioned from on-premises to cloud, which eventually became smoother.

I've seen a return on investment with Automation Anywhere, as we've measured time saved, starting from 50 days per quarter to about 1500 days per quarter with the deployment of bots, equating to substantial human time savings.

The pricing is average. It's not an expensive tool. The pricing is mid-range.

Before selecting Automation Anywhere, we considered several tools including UiPath, which we had set up for financial functions and Kofax for SAP automation, but ultimately chose Automation Anywhere for its scalability across the company.

For companies considering Automation Anywhere, my advice is to prioritize identifying and automating the most critical processes rather than trying to automate everything, ensuring that a thorough study backs these decisions to maximize support from leadership and demonstrate success. 

We are not utilizing Automation Anywhere COE manager, but we have developed our in-house COE manager since we started the process independently in 2019.

On a scale of one to ten, I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

The main use cases include the payment extinction process, which we have automated. It is a basic, very critical servicing process, which needs to run on stringent SLAs. We automated that before and during COVID, which brought a lot of value with less human intervention and support during the peak time. It was able to process almost all the payment extinctions effectively and efficiently, providing significant value to our servicing operations team. 

Another use case involves customer service, where the call center agents uses these bots as co-pilots, gathering real-time information from multiple subsystems, aggregating the information, and presenting it to the agent. This greatly improved the customer experience during real-time interactions. 

Those are a couple of critical use cases we have automated.

We recognized the importance of RPA automation and transitioned to Automation Anywhere, onboarding and automating over 100 processes in a short period.

Automation Anywhere has all the integrated advanced features within the platform, including basic RPA-based automation, task bots, document automation, AARI co-pilot, and now the agentic AI studio. All these come as a package allowing us to handle any kind of use case using the Automation Anywhere platform, which is what we appreciate most. Instead of using different tools to automate various test cases, we are using Automation Anywhere as a platform to automate entire end-to-end processes.

We have used document processing from the beginning. We have a few use cases running in production, processing thousands of documents. With the success rate of more than 80%, it's efficiently extracting data for us. 

The time saved with document processing has been impressive. Each document can take 10 to 15 minutes to process manually. With Automation Anywhere, we can process 40,000 in a given month.

It's a low-code platform where we deliver automations faster. Now it is coming up with all the AI features like agent AI and today has announced process engine, which are all coming part of the Automation Anywhere platform. It's great news. 

One key feature we are looking for from Automation Anywhere is the need for a fully evolved CI/CD pipeline approach within our IT organization, given that we manage multiple applications. 

We want to bring Automation Anywhere into those application stacks, ensuring easy integration from a DevOps or DevSecOps perspective. That's a recommendation I have for Automation Anywhere.

We have been using Automation Anywhere for almost five and a half years now, and we have automated 100-plus business processes that are deployed and running autonomously in the backend.

The stability and reliability of the automation bots are quite good, especially for those running in production. However, changes in end-application UIs can affect them. With the introduction of automator AI and generative recorder capabilities, they have been able to self-heal and run seamlessly in production.

The scaling potential of Automation Anywhere runs parallel to our company's growth and technology stack. It adds all the necessary AI features at the right time, allowing for a smooth experience as we expand usage.

We have great support from Automation Anywhere. Whenever we create support cases, they respond within the given timeframe, and we haven't encountered major issues so far.

Positive

Before adopting Automation Anywhere, we were using a vendor-based solution with a Cogs product that the vendor managed in their environment. We recognized the importance of RPA automation, which led us to explore building bots on-prem within our data center using our own platform.

The setup process is pretty seamless. Recently, we have introduced the API capability, the code migration utility, which we are using to deploy the bots from one environment to another. It is helping a lot.

We realized a return on investment with Automation Anywhere, especially during the COVID surge in volume within the payment process. Since we automated that process, we managed to handle the surge effectively, granting immense value to our servicing operations.

We've saved almost 2,000 manual hours a month.

The pricing is competitive right now. I'm not directly involved in the pricing discussions, however. 

Before selecting Automation Anywhere, our parent company was already using it and had evaluated it, allowing us to adopt Automation Anywhere.

We are not using the Agentic process automation yet. We're in the exploration phase and exploring tools and requirements. We may be starting the process soon.

The real benefit we are looking at from utilizing the automator AI, which we are not working with yet (but plan to) is the ability to quickly deliver the process workflows need where AI is involved, eliminating the need to integrate multiple tools and requiring various skills and programmatic knowledge.

For organizations looking to purchase Automation Anywhere, I would recommend it for automating task bots or processes requiring AI, as the platform features all flavors of automation. It covers everything from process discovery to automation deployment with integrated AI capabilities, which is a significant advantage. 

I rate Automation Anywhere nine out of ten.

Our main use cases for Automation Anywhere are anything that's end-to-end automations. We initially used to do finance and HR only, however, eventually graduated to different verticals and departments. Our use cases have been predominantly high-value, high ROI, and anything that can be repeatable, algorithmic, and automated.

The challenges we look to solve with AARI are those tasks we were unable to automate in the past. When we relied solely on human intervention for certain tasks, it led to exceptions that required human handling. With AARI, we want to build role-based, persona-based agents capable of near human-like decision-making with human oversight to increase the throughput provided by API-driven automation.

The benefits we have realized from using Automation Anywhere can be broken down into two parts: first, the basics of automation without the AI component, enabling us to orchestrate end-to-end processes such as finance or HR, providing significant ROI; and the second part pertains to AI orchestration, where we have successfully used Automation Anywhere to manage multiple AI use cases.

The most valuable feature of Automation Anywhere right now is its low-code, no-code framework, which allows us to build a lot of templates that are both repeatable and reusable over time. Additionally, being a cloud solution, it provides an intuitive development experience for developers and has been very helpful for citizen developers as well.

In the age of AARI, the biggest challenges our organization faces stem from rapid evolution and the emergence of different vendors with their products. We have effectively partnered with Automation Anywhere, utilizing the new features they continue to roll out and developing proof of concepts to navigate these advancements.

In terms of processing large data sets of documents, Document Automation has introduced many new features compared to the predecessor versions of IQ Bot, which we have used in the past; the improvements have been significant, especially with the Generative AI features that help in finding and identifying fields.

In terms of improvements for Automation Anywhere, I would prefer to see more options in packages and pricing, including a breakdown of different features and products, which would allow us to select certain products while potentially skipping others as needed. The product features and functionalities have been phenomenal with minimal issues, along with great enterprise support.

I have been using Automation Anywhere for over ten years. I play different roles in consulting, being within the product, and trying to be the implementer, leading to multiple implementations.

I would assess the stability and availability of Automation Anywhere and its bots on a scale of one to ten at a nine, as we have not encountered significant downtime since we began using the cloud platform, which I consider one of the best enterprise platforms available.

We have expanded our usage of Automation Anywhere to meet the growing business needs, planning for additional creators and runners and assessing our needs year over year. The process to add licenses has been very straightforward and seamless.

I would rate Automation Anywhere support a seven out of ten. Enhancing the support tiers might be beneficial, and pricing has been a primary challenge, with a need for cheaper options and more tiered support.

We do not have premium support. While we possess a basic support package that has been really good, we are considering premium support packages for the future, however, we have received ample assistance from Automation Anywhere for critical issues we've faced.

Positive

What stood out about Automation Anywhere during our selection process was the seamless experience in developing and deploying. We did proofs of concept when transitioning from A2019 to A360, where we noticed significant improvements in connectors and overall developer experience compared to previous versions.

My experience with pricing and setup costs with Automation Anywhere was very seamless, as our vendor management team collaborated with the partner who worked directly with Automation Anywhere. We have been using the licenses for six years without issues, and the setup in our cloud-hosted environment has been taken care of by Automation Anywhere.

In terms of deployment, we conduct our standard SDLC lifecycle for automations. It has been seamless, and though we do not usually receive support from Automation Anywhere, our self-contained team is very self-sufficient in managing these deployments.

The benefits we have realized from using Automation Anywhere can be broken down into two parts: first, the basics of automation without the AI component, enabling us to orchestrate end-to-end processes such as finance or HR, providing significant ROI; and the second part pertains to AI orchestration, where we have successfully used Automation Anywhere to manage multiple AI use cases.

I cannot share any specific data points regarding percentage increases in efficiency or hours saved.

My experience with pricing and setup costs with Automation Anywhere was very seamless, as our vendor management team collaborated with the partner who worked directly with Automation Anywhere. We have been using the licenses for six years without issues, and the setup in our cloud-hosted environment has been taken care of by Automation Anywhere.

Regarding Document Automation, we have been utilizing it as a proof of concept to compare results with other vendors, as our team is vendor agnostic and evaluates all problem statements first. Document Automation has been instrumental for us in conducting several proofs of concept.

We are not currently utilizing AI Agent Studio in our automation processes, however, we do plan to explore and conduct some proofs of concept regarding that.

In terms of achieving our automation goals with APA, we are on that journey right now, with successful use cases in AI orchestration using Generative AI and advanced techniques. With AARI, our aim is to deploy more autonomous, self-assisted agents across different departments within our company.

Regarding IQ Bot, we have been evaluating it; however, we have not deployed or implemented it within our environment yet, as we are actively working on proof of concepts with Automation Anywhere.

In terms of feedback for IQ Bot, it is still early for us to determine its learning capacity from feedback to improve automation quality over time; however, the results have been great so far, and we are actively working with the product team, providing continuous feedback and wishlist items for improvements over time as new versions are released.

We do not use Automation Anywhere CoE.

My advice for anyone considering Automation Anywhere is to collaborate closely with the engineering and sales teams during engagement, strongly recommend trying out POCs, and ensure that the tool accommodates your specific use case needs throughout the vetting process.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

I have worked on automation for several clients and organizations. In my previous organization, we automated several business processes related to governance. Currently, I am working with Nokia. Here at Nokia, we are performing data reconciliations, including financial data, procurement data, and asset-related data. To achieve this, we fetch data from systems like SAP and custom applications. Instead of manually navigating multiple screens in SAP, we use the RPA Automation tool to handle these activities. We are essentially automating these processes.

We are exploring an automated system that can help our production support system resolve tickets more efficiently. We have the data of or the history of multiple incidents raised in the past two or three years. We would like to utilize this data to resolve new tickets and provide the steps for resolution. When a ticket is there, the automated system can identify the solutions and automatically implement those suggestions to fix the ticket. We have not implemented it yet.

At the moment, we do not have any use cases for Generative AI, but we are looking into it. 

Automation Anywhere has helped us with efficiency and accuracy. We cannot achieve the same level of efficiency and accuracy through manual tasks. There are also cost savings. Manually performed tasks are financially demanding.

Automation Anywhere is easy to learn. People who are not technical can also get started with this tool. They can explore and slowly adapt to the tool. They do not need too much expertise, but having technical expertise can be an advantage. Overall, Automation Anywhere is fairly good for non-technical people.

We have integrated SAP and web applications with Automation Anywhere. We have also automated using the APIs. Its integration is good and has improved over time. It is evolving and getting easier for us to integrate with external applications.

We have had a lot of time savings. We have 40 to 50 bots.

The best aspect is the user interface. It is very user-friendly and snappy, responding quickly compared to other available tools. It is easy to learn, and the community support is good for asking questions and getting answers. Training camps are provided by Automation Anywhere. I recently attended the document automation training camp. In 2025, we are going to attend the AI agent training camp. The community and the training around the tool have been beneficial.

In Automation Anywhere, the logging process is manual. We have to manually log each instance where the bot fails or the progress of a task. Automating this through a new feature would help developers simplify their development process. That is my suggestion.

About a year or two ago, debugging was challenging in Automation Anywhere. If you had multiple task bots with a parent task and a child task, there were issues during debugging. Automation Anywhere took the feedback and fixed it in the next releases.

I have been using Automation Anywhere for over five years.

Most of the time, I do not encounter problems with the control room. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate it a nine, but I have had issues with IQ Bot. I would rate IQ Bot's stability an eight out of ten due to some service instability. For example, it sometimes fails to communicate with RabbitMQ. Automation Anywhere's control room is very stable.

It is scalable. Scalability also depends on how we code or develop the bots. We have 45 different use cases, and most of them are multi-bot, so I do not see any issues with the scalability. I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability.

I would rate it an eight out of ten. Most of the time, when I raise cases for help with the Automation Anywhere vendor, I receive good help at the right time. However, sometimes I receive automated responses, which are not helpful and cause delays. Despite this, I generally get good support, so I can rate customer service an eight out of ten, but there is room for improvement.

Positive

I have used Blue Prism and Power Automate as well. In Blue Prism, logging is simple because it is automatic. Automation Anywhere is more snappy and faster in response. It also has inbuilt document automation, whereas Blue Prism does not have the inbuilt OCR capability. Overall, Automation Anywhere is a better solution than Blue Prism.

Power Automate is a very slow tool. If you have to open any flow, it takes a lot of time to load. This issue is not there in Automation Anywhere. It is more capable than Power Automate.

Currently, we have two control rooms. One is an on-prem control room, and the other one is a SaaS or cloud control room. We are using both.

The SaaS option is evidently easier because we do not need to manage servers, issues, or restart services. We prefer SaaS for these reasons.

In terms of maintenance, the platform upgrade from one version to another version is not difficult. We started with version 21 of A360, and we are currently on version 35. Most of the updates in the SaaS environment are automatic and happen during the night hours. Most of the time, we have not seen any issues. They went smoothly, but sometimes, there were some terminations and other issues. If those issues are also taken care of, it will be very smooth.

For the SaaS control room, there is not much maintenance. We are doing maintenance only in terms of the code. In terms of platform, we do not need any maintenance for the SaaS control room. For the on-prem control room, there is a lot of maintenance. Sometimes, the services go down, or the communication between the application and database server has problems.

We have seven to eight developers and three to four production support resources. Building a bot is not an easy process. It is a lengthy process. The duration depends on the use case. It can take from one month to three to four months to develop one automation.

We have a separate platform team that helps us in terms of the platform issues. We have a development team, and we have a production support team. So everyone has their own responsibilities and roles. 

We have about 45 use cases deployed in production.

I would definitely recommend Automation Anywhere. I have been using it for the last five years, and it is one of the leading RPA tools in the market.

Their community support is excellent. If we encounter challenges, we can rely on the community for help. There are ample training programs and an Automation Anywhere university to facilitate learning. The solution is reliable.

I would rate Automation Anywhere a nine out of ten. Some features, such as automatic logging, could be improved. It has the potential to become the best tool.

I use it for a variety of shared service applications. It helps manage the volume of processing and handle many incoming ticket requests. I also utilize it for invoice processing, aiding AR collections, and some reporting. There is quite a variety of applications for Automation Anywhere.

I like the web-based development and the control room interface, which is robust and works well. Importantly, I experience fewer errors with finding screen elements to interact with when compared to other automation software. 

Automation Anywhere presents fewer maintenance issues. 

The built-in features, such as the connector builder and AI development tools, are easily accessible, keeping the software up-to-date. 

Before joining, I observed it to be a robust program with immediate visible benefits. I had fifty bots running, effectively demonstrating their workload. The hard parts, like recognizing ROI, building a backlog, and setting up internal infrastructure and governance, were already completed. Having done this elsewhere, I appreciate these accomplishments.

There are a lot of good built-in features like the connector builder. The AI aspects are very good. The software is keeping up with the times and I appreciate the new features they add.

It's easy for new users with no experience. You can learn quickly. You can also use pre-built packages that allow you to build a bot without much experience. There's Automation Anywhere University to assist as well. All of the tools are there to build a very robust robot. There is a learning curve within development. However, if you already have basic programming skills or a basic understanding of how computer science works, then it's fairly easy to build the bots that you need and can incorporate advanced logic, looping, variables, and things like that. If you understand those concepts, then it's not hard at all.

We have integrated other tools or applications with Automation Anywhere. That's one of the things that RPA is really good at. I couldn't say I've integrated other applications with Automation Anywhere so much as Automation Anywhere with other applications. We're using a lot of external vendors and automating processes for those external vendors that were problematic since they didn't integrate well with others.

The main request I have for Automation Anywhere is to focus more on technical demonstrations. They do extensive marketing and explanations of new technologies, which are great - however, often less technically focused. Common use cases are frequently repeated, such as loan processing and order fulfillment. I would like to see better and more technical use cases for the AI features, showing how to build them instead of repeated general examples.

I have used the solution for one year.

It is rock solid. Stability is great. I have never had any concerns about downtime or other issues.

The software is very capable. I am small compared to others, however, as a higher education institution, I'm probably one of the largest as a whole. The software can scale as far as I need, with no limit other than the investment of money, development time, and effort.

Initially, it took me some time to reach the right team for help, however, the support was knowledgeable and resolved the problem fairly quickly. Although it took a little over a week due to the tricky nature of the issue, I am generally satisfied with the support and have no significant concerns.

Neutral

I have used UiPath previously. I like Automation Anywhere better.

The initial setup was easy. It took me about a week or two to understand how to use it, and that's being generous. The concepts are straightforward and it's very similar to UiPath, beyond a few differences.

We haven't needed to update to a new version. The major update from on-prem to cloud was done before I came. 

The more minor upgrades were painful, yet not at all due to Automation Anywhere. ERP updates and things like that required us to test every bot. None of that was a fault or a problem with our Automation Anywhere. The rest was relatively smooth and straightforward, and the control room updates were relatively smooth and straightforward. This last update, we had a little bit of a hiccup. However, working through support, we got a workaround until the fix can get into place.

There is some maintenance needed on the bots. That's not the software's fault. The maintenance effort is quite low compared to what I was used to. 

Pricing is fine. Renegotiating our contract was challenging, however, I have a new salesperson, and I am excited about working with him.

I'm an Automation Anywhere customer. 

I have spent the last year getting a handle on Automation Anywhere, bringing five years of experience with its main competitor, UiPath. The opportunities for AI are boundless, and I am working heavily with the hospital to identify use cases. I am incorporating AI in invoice processing to extract data correctly and for image preprocessing. 

Benefits form transactions, like enrollment forms for healthcare and dependent change forms, are the next focus. 

I have yet to use Copilot, although I do have a use case that I'm hoping to build out.

In terms of seeing the benefits to Automation Anywhere, this particular job had already been using it for five years before I came. So the benefit had already been realized, and it was already a fairly robust program. I could see the benefit the first day I started. We already had 50 bots running, and it was very easy to see all of the work that they were doing. The hard part had already been completed in terms of recognizing ROI and building out a backlog of work, and having the infrastructure and the governance internally set up was already huge. I've done all those things before in other employers, and that takes significant time, a couple of years, to do it properly. Since that was already done, I could just hit the ground running, and we could just build more bots and make the bots that we had more robust.

I rate the product eight out of ten.

Our primary use cases with Automation Anywhere revolve around process discovery, where we've used that with many clients to identify areas of opportunity for automation, map those out, and build the core automation to drive the new modernized processes. We originally had done a fair amount of work with robotic process automation types of opportunities in and around revenue cycle with health system clients, ensuring that they get paid appropriately for the services they render.

One of the really interesting use cases that moving into agentic automation brings to the table are more complex use cases, where we can work with things such as medical necessity denials, where payers will deny or downgrade the payment that they provide to the health systems based on a set of medical necessity criteria. 

The introduction of the agentic capabilities allows us to ingest that denial letter, along with the criteria for medical necessity that's required to be met to be paid, and then work with the medical record itself, so the agent can scan the medical record to find out why it's denied matching to the criteria that's required to support it and determine if the criteria are met. If so, it can then draft a letter. 

Traditionally, that's been a highly manual process that requires a clinical resource, which tends to be very expensive, and they can do only about 10 a day or 50 a week. With this kind of automation, the draft letter is provided to them for review and confirmation, allowing them to increase productivity by multiples across the impact and giving them the opportunity to work more effectively in terms of the span of denials, because most health systems never even get to all of them, determining whether they'll take the time to do it based on labor intensity.

With all the things happening with AI in the market right now, one of the big challenges that clients have is ensuring the quality. There are fears around AI that people have about whether the AI will hallucinate and those kinds of things. Having a partner like Automation Anywhere, a company that is known in the industry, is a leader in the industry, brings a lot of credibility to how people look to solve those problems and drive that comfort level. 

Customers also are looking for the kinds of solutions that help enable their workforces to be more effective. Agentic capabilities bring a lot to that. If you think about not just the traditional labor savings, but how you can elevate the performance of the employees that will still be there, the agentic AI brings a lot to the table for those kinds of solutions as well.

Some of the really impactful features of working with Automation Anywhere are the ability to design and partner with their experts to come up with our solutions. Often, we're trying to push the envelope on how either a process has worked traditionally, and trying to see how the automation solutions can change the nature of that process. Automation Anywhere has been a fantastic partner to work through different ways and try different methods and approaches to solving those problems.

Document automation often comes up with our clients, where the processes we're working in still transfer faxes and other traditional documents that must be uploaded, with data extracted and input into a process, whether that's faxes for scheduling appointments or things such as benefit determination, sometimes following up on authorizations for services. Document automation is a really important feature and component to solving these problems.

In terms of areas for improvement and opportunity, Automation Anywhere has been a great partner for us. Many of our clients would want to see scalability in pricing, and while I could say cheaper, that's part of it. Finding creative and scalable pricing structures is important, especially with the move toward agentive automation, which presents challenges in getting clients on board. Clients are interested but reluctant, needing proofs of concept with minimal upfront cost or risk to demonstrate value. 

Additionally, there's potential for Automation Anywhere to integrate conversational types of tools and AI into their tool set, which would be really valuable.

We have been working with Automation Anywhere for several years and we are a partner with them, using them to support many of our solutions for clients, helping to modernize their workforce and bring the digital workforce concept to life with our clients.

In terms of reliability and stability, I have personally found Automation Anywhere to be a highly reliable and stable product, well-known in the market for that.

Many of our clients are just moving into automation, and one of the benefits with Automation Anywhere is the ability to scale and add processes as we improve concepts, helping them get comfortable with the technology while driving more value through expanded automations.

We've received great support from Automation Anywhere. We've developed some new innovative solutions with them requiring significant work from their engineering teams and their partner teams. They've been a great partner to gently vet our ideas, and they're willing to give them a try, which has been excellent.

Positive

Very few of our clients at this stage have agentic process automation in place, so in those cases, Automation Anywhere is our preferred partner. 

As we work with clients in identifying opportunities and positioning a solution, Automation Anywhere becomes an easy decision for them. In the traditional RPA space, while some clients may have other vendors, many do not have anything in place. We often work through how to move to the Automation Anywhere platform, which is made easier by their good job of facilitating the switch from other platforms.

The return on investment for our clients working with Automation Anywhere solutions typically shows at least three or four times in the first year and sometimes double that in outer years, arising from a combination of labor savings, improved quality, and reduction in process failures.

Some of the benefits that we've seen with our clients are substantial labor savings of 30% to 70%, depending on the processes that we often see in the ability to reduce labor costs. 

We see improved quality and the elimination of process failures, which can lead to multi-million dollar savings in things such as denials with our clients, addressing how much they're writing off that they can't collect from third parties. 

The elimination of process failures is a significant opportunity for savings, with typical savings being millions, if not tens of millions, for many of our clients due to areas such as insurance verifications, failure to get authorizations, and timely follow-ups on claims to ensure that we submit the required information to the payers.

With all the things happening with AI in the market right now, one of the big challenges that clients have is ensuring the quality, with fears about whether the AI will hallucinate, and those kinds of things. Having a partner like Automation Anywhere, which is known in the industry as a leader, brings a lot of credibility to how people look to solve those problems and drive comfort. They also seek solutions that help enable their workforces to be more effective, and agentive capabilities bring a lot to that. If you think about not just the traditional labor savings, but how to elevate the performance of employees that will still be there, agentive AI brings a lot to the table for those kinds of solutions as well.

On a scale of one to ten, I would give Automation Anywhere an eight depending on the day. They've been a great partner for us in developing new solutions, and when we've deployed them, we see high reliability. The brand is well-respected in the market, making clients receptive to the name and bringing credibility to our solutions. Overall, I give them high marks and enjoy working with them.

I started with Automation Anywhere version 11, which was the desktop-based version. It was the most initial cloud version. There is also a 2019 cloud version of Automation Anywhere. With some modifications and improvements, 2019 led to A360, which was again a cloud version but an improved form of the 2019 version. A360 is the current and running version of Automation Anywhere.

Most of the problems we've worked to solve have been related to business process automation. We were able to automate email - including replying to email, and capturing data.

We've also used it for website automation. We can do object cloning in PRA terms.

We were able to automate several data systems. We've automated Excel, for example, and various backbones of process systems.

It releases humans from monotonous tasks. Automating helps a lot and gives us the ability to free people for more high-end activities.

Most of the problems we have solved are related to business process automation. Ideally, in RPA, around 80% of the problems are related to business process automation. 

Processes and tasks automated compared to a manual approach offers a lot of benefits. Any RPA tool will offer good time savings. When we have to do things manually, if there is a 20 or 30-step process, as a human, we may get confused and redraw information. We make mistakes. All of these things take time. Things can be very data-intensive and this takes time for a human. They need to look it up and validate, et cetera. and there are high chances of error. A human can misread or misunderstand, this could lead to losses. With RPA, we gain time savings, and we can make everything 100% error-free.

To train a non-technical employee, it might take a bit. They need to learn the basic foundations. It might take a month or two if they give time to learning every day.

It helps increase productivity by 20% to 30%.

I can integrate tools with Automation Anywhere. We've done Excel and database automation, web applications, data tables, FTTP tables, et cetera. 

Copilot is an area with a lot of scope for improvement. It's the number one thing to improve. It just gives us a structure. It doesn't automate the workflow. This is a major area of improvement. Currently, it's still evolving. The integrations in Automation Anywhere are evolving, and going forward, they could be more beneficial for end-to-end processes. It should not be just an add-on, but it should be very well integrated.

I have been using it for close to four to four and a half years now.

The stability is okay. I would rate it 8.5 out of ten.

I would rate the solution 8.5 out of ten. It is quite scalable. 

Power Automate is quite good, and gaining ground. With Automation Anywhere, you can log into the control room and work on it.

The deployment is on the cloud. The process depends on how straightforward it is. It depends on the number of steps. The deployment time doesn't take too long, however, they could improve a bit on the scheduling. It could be a bit more user-friendly if there is a new person coming in and using the solution for the first time.

Deployments tend to take a few days once all the approvals are in place.

The solution does require maintenance. Once you have developed and deployed a bot, there could be many things that may break the bot. We need to maintain them to keep them running as expected.

The ROI may be high. It depends on the process and the number of people involved.

It's not cheap. It's expensive. Power Automate is much cheaper.