Adobe Workfront Reviews

The reporting is great and having all projects in one place has made looking at what is going on in the company much easier.

We now have several areas using the tool and since many of us work across departments it makes assigning tasks and tracking work very easy and quick.

More customization of the user interface would be nice. It would be nice to have the ability to create requirements documents and other commonly used documents for managing projects directly in the tool. Otherwise it functions great.

over 1 year

From a system standpoint no, the consultant was great. Internally yes, the users that started out did not go through all of the training which made it difficult to get everyone up and running on the same page initially.

None. The system vary rarely is inaccessible and if it is, it is very short lived. Their webiste has some great tools to see if there are issues and privde updates to them.

None. We are still scaling up and adding other division from the company globally. When we implemented the consultant made sure we designed and built it with that in mind.

Outstanding. I get replies usually the same day. They are always availabel and friendly when we call, which is not very often at all.

Outstanding. I get replies usually the same day. They are always willing to help out, offer solutions and jump in to find the best approach for your organization.

No

Complex, but that was self-inflicted. Some areas using the tool wanted to much depth and have since backed off a bit.

A vendor team and in-house. We drove most of it since we support the users and wanted to be the subject matter experts.

We did not measure it.

Over plan, you think you know how many will use it, but it will grow or others will want more capability that you initially thought.

We did, but I do not remember the names of the other tools. Workfront (AtTask back then) was far above the other tools we looked at at the time.

It is a great tool and functions well across an organization. We have many different departments using it and all really enjoy and benefit from it.

I liked the KPI functionality. I also liked that it had an open API.

I used it for 2 years

• Project templates
• Reports
• Dashboards
• I love the custom forms - the custom forms have fulfilled every need for data needs within Workfront, and the flexibility to integrate custom form fields into any report, view, filter or grouping has been wonderful

• Implemented as an enterprise service desk solution (metrics, resource management, customer satisfaction communication workflow)
• Implemented as the PMO project management solution (dashboards, metrics, resource management, project management lifecycle)
• Greatly improved enterprise workflow through the entire project management lifecycle as well as help desk functionality.

Although the reporting will get the bare basic metrics to present, Executives now want more. The ability to show high level summaries with the ease of drilling down to details within one report. With limitations in the grouping/charting functionalities - multiple charts reports are often needed for one summary presentation. Agile dashboards need improving, and they need to improve the branding on the business cases.

I've been using it for four years.

I have not had any issues with deployment.

I did not have any issues with stability.

I have not had any issues with scalability.

5/10 - it is sometimes tough to get an advanced technician to review tickets. I find I am more advanced than some of the support team and the more advanced tickets are then deemed suitable for the "contracted support" team - which costs money. The functionality I have asked them to review is pretty basic and core to a standard PM workflow so this can be frustrating.

5/10 - no further issues with technical support than otherwise noted above.

No, the organization did not use any solution prior to Workflow.

straightforward, organizations just need to plan ahead and think of how you would like to create the structure so it meets all your needs 5 years down the line. Allow for growth in the organization

We implemented it in-house.

It's worth the money it costs.

Workfront's reporting features are the most valuable to our company. Right now we have reports for our production queue, shipping queue and our customers.

Our company had a hard time tracking material used and where projects stood in our work flow. Now we have an extensive recall report that can track the material we use by lot number and job.

I would like an easier way to set up timing on templates. Right now we have cookie cutter options. Not sure what the best solution is for our company but we could use some help on the timing of pre approved projects.

We have been using Workfront for 6 years

The only problems we encountered with deployment had to do with our staff not willing to adapt to a new system. Otherwise once workfront is set up it is easy for people to use.

No, we have not encountered any issues with stability. Everything we have in place is working well. We have only had two short occurrences with wide scale performance issues

The best part of Workfront is that it is a good system for large jobs as well as smaller scale projects. Most of our projects are about the same size and scope but I can easily see how Workfront would be able to handle all job sizes.

Customer service is great with Workfront. Everyone you speak to seems genuinely interested in troubleshooting a problem or idea with you. Sometimes response times are longer than I would like.

Technical support is excellent with Workfront. Their online help desk works very well. I wish there was more of an opportunity to call someone if need be.

No, we started using Workfront back when it was called "at-task". Prior to that we would have excel spreadsheets filled with data.

The initial setup was complex. The system is robust and there are many factors to consider when setting up. Timing was the hardest part for our team as we have a lot of situations where the timing of a project is in flux.

We implemented through an in-house team. A member of Workfront came in from Salt Lake City to guide us through, but we did the implementation ourselves.

I don't believe i would be able to accurately answer this question. I personally believe that we the benefits of having Workfront do equate to a monetary gain.

I was not around for the set up cost. Annually we spend $7,344.00 on the system. This includes a customer support package.

I was not part of the team when the evaluation process took place. I believe Workfront (at-task at the time) had a rep come in and do a presentation.

If your company or team decides to go with Workfront, it has all of the tools needed to run an excellent project management system.

Streamlined Project & Incident Management

Time Reporting

Customization

User friendly

Great for approval workflows

We were able to combine Project Management, Help Desk ticket handling, Time Reporting and now we have everything in one place. This saves a lot of time and since all work items have the option to post a comment and get other people involved, we are no longer sending emails about this.

Customizing and maintaining Workfront can be very time consuming. Also, once you get really familiar with it you will notice a few bugs.

2 years - Anaconda

As I mentioned, there are a few bugs in the system but nothing to worry about. Also, they have a website with information but it is not updated nor complete. Sometimes the only option is to use a consultant for basic things that could and should be listed in their help site.

We get a few errors every now and then. Most of them will go away without intervention of our Internal Support team or Workfront's help desk.

Some reports are beginning to take a lot of time but this is not affecting the general performance of the system. We have approximately 2000 active users and Workfront is working just fine for everyone.

They are really helpful. They are experts in their product and they will immediately identify when you go to them with a question, a bug or an enhancement request. Also, they will share their best practices or new ways to do things.

Their first level of support is really good when handling questions or minor incidents. When you report a bug it can take a long time for them to get it fixed. If you request a new functionality you may never get an answer.

Yes, we were using three different tools. The user experience and functionality was amazing, so we decided to switch

It is as complex as you need it to be. In our case we have lots of projects and we want to measure so many things that it took quite a while to configure, but in the end it was great.

We had some intense consulting sessions with Workfront, but we did it ourselves. We deployed in two phases, the first one was handled by the PMO and then they walked us through the second phase.

I was not involved with the financials of this so I wouldn't really be able to tell. Users in the company have been really happy with this system.

I was not involved with the financials of this so I wouldn't really be able to tell. Users in the company have been really happy with this system.

When I got here they had already decided to switch to Workfront and I am not really sure what the other options were. I believe they were considering Remedy.

Workfront is really good for Project Management. They have another section for "Requests" which is intended to be used for handling Help Desk tickets but this part lacks functionality. There are no categories, no SLA, no Priority based on Urgency and Impact.

The usability of the system has been great. It was by far the easiest product to use based on the products that we reviewed and the adoption with the use of the product has been great in terms of people understanding the system. People spend time learning our process and methods, and not the tool which is the way it is supposed to be.

The communication enhancements with the tool have been wonderful. In some cases, Workfront has replaced email communication and everything is done in the system. People have left the dashboards up on their computer screens all day and really use that to manage their work, communication, time, and really all aspects of their day.

We have two separate departments that use Workfront for various reasons, but they also collaborate on many projects together. Having that unified tool that both departments work on has helped greatly with their work together, approvals, communication, and keeping up with tasks.

Some of the specific functions in the system can get a little quirky and could use some help with, but those are really for unique cases and not general system functionality. The mobile app or table use of Workfront could also be better (from a project manager's prospective using the Gantt Chart). The legacy gantt chart that was built in Flash and Java was great in terms of its usability but it wasn't sustainable with newer technologies. Worfront is still working on a better solution for the Gantt and in my opinion haven't developed an acceptable replacement for the legacy gantt so we continue to use it.

Since 2009

We did not. Its been a long time since we first deployed it, and things have changed in terms of our process and set up if the program. When we've deployed the program out to other offices, not a start from scratch deployment, more like an extension of what is already in the system, everything went smooth and easy.

There occasionally is errors where you need to reload the browser, or what you did didn't get save but those are the types of errors that aren't easily replicated so they were more of exceptions then the rule. There really hasn't been any issue with stability.

We've successfully expanded the use of Workfront from one department to about 5. The biggest issue with scalability is the use of custom terms and statuses in the system. The permissions in the system are pretty good so if there are things that people shouldn't see, they won't see but when it comes to the custom statuses and terms, everyone sees those. We had to use workarounds and put the department's name in front of those custom areas, but it would be nice to be able to hide and show those based on permissions.

Excellent. We've always had good response time, and the representatives have been knowledgeable.

The support has been good. As an administrator, I feel that I know the system very well and I'll only use technical support when there is something that I can't figure out, which in some cases means that the tool just doesn't do want I want it to or what I think it should. That sometimes is frustrating but that is on me and not on the technical support.

MS Project and Excel. Nothing was enterprise for the department, people used what they wanted so we switched to get more uniform.

Straightforward, although the word of advice given to me and what I give to others is that what you go live with isn't necessarily what you'll have live up in a few months. Once you start using the system more and fully realize the capabilities of the system, how you've set things up will change.

Vendor came in for a week with us and worked with us on requirements gathering and set up of the tool. It went well. Adoption was slow on our end so we could have used more work on that but the actual set up of the system was good.

We don't use the system for ROI tracking so unsure.

Only cost that I am aware of is the license per user cost.

Yes, we evaluated other solutions. Innotas, MS Project Server, Team Dynamix.

This is a great tool and can really help an organization. It is a solution to manage your process, not define your process. It is important that you develop your process and methods and then configure the system to use the system. You can use the system to help develop some of your processes, but you'll be better off doing the opposite.

Building reports and dashboards is simple. Building custom workflows and input forms is fast and provides better control over our business.

Some workflows that were heavy in tasks are now centralized in one project. This provides optics on our current workload, what is late, and who is the primary owner. Reports used to take weeks to build. Our users can build them on their own in a 30 minutes or less.

It would be nice to have a different price plan for users that are not using the system except for a few times each month.

Almost 1 year.

The deployment was very impressive. A two week engagement is a big time commitment, however, you have actually a working system and reporting by the time you are done. Well worth the investment.

None

It does require a full time resource for the first 2 - 4 months if you want a enterprise wide fast adoption. Other than that it requires buy-in from all levels to make the transition smooth.

The customer service is great once you get the right person on the phone. Sometimes the person can't resolve the challenge because it's more about custom workflow. It's sometimes best to use their professional services to solve complex workflow challenges.

We haven't had too many challenges. The only issue we had was around enterprise Outlook and Active Directory set up issues. They didn't get fixed as fast as we wanted but they were resolved.

We used Central Desktop, SharePoint, and MSProject. All of them have some strengths, but Workfront is the system that has the most comprehensive solution and the best support. They have a higher price point but you end up getting better user adoption and a better solution. Workforce is also much more innovative and faster at putting our releases because of their SaaS model. Their client base is much more creative which in turn helps everyone.

Setup was great. The person that came on sight listened and delivered solutions. We are starting to use some of Workfront's best practices for our client set ups.

We used Workfront's resources to implement. They were great.

We had a 6 month ROI. We continue to add licenses. It must be worth it if we are buying more.

The costs are a bit expensive in terms of licenses and adding an internal FTE to administer the system. We get our money back in better service levels and improved moral for employees to track wins in their department.

Central Desktop, MS Project, and Sharepoint.

Invest in an business administrator. It's worth it.

Project Tracking

Timesheets

Reporting

Previous to Workfront, all projects were tracked in Excel Spreadsheets. Updates were only received when a projects became critical. This lead to daily fire alarms and those who screamed the loudest god the work done. Now, all projects are tracked and prioritized based on several criteria. Resources know their schedule over a month out and are not having to shift focus several times throughout the day.

Agile methodology- When a task is assigned to an agile team the date associated with the task becomes null and void because is is scheduled in an iteration. The PM then does not have the ability to update the date and often will throw off the project schedule and show as behind.

I have used Workfront (AtTask) for two years now

None

None

With the new security levels the Administrative overhead increased.

Excellent, very timely attention to urgent issues.

Excellent, always had the answer I needed even though sometimes it required escalation to level 2.

Excel and project

The setup was very straight forward and it was simple enough to get my PMO team trained and efficient using it within only a couple of weeks.

Less than 6 months

This has been a great solution for us. We are integrating with TFS and ZenDesk so that each department can work within their own application. Work happens much more efficiently and the transparency throughout the organization is immeasurable as the majority of all executive reporting is happening within the tool.