SAP HCM Reviews

We're implementing SAP SuccessFactors to streamline our HR operations. Before, we only did payroll in SAP HCM. Now, we're bringing in personal and recruiter information to make the workflow easier and less time-consuming.

The payroll function in SAP HCM has been most beneficial for managing global workforces. We plan to use goal management and KPI features to link to payroll through the SAP SuccessFactors module.

The payroll functionalities have greatly enhanced our efficiency. Previously, we did payroll manually in Excel, which was time-consuming and error-prone. Now, there's a single source of truth in the system, drastically reducing human errors - I'd say by about 60-65%.

There's still room for improvement. We need end-to-end systems. Only the HR team uses HCM, but employees don't have access to their data. With Employee Central, employees can see their ratings, increment cycles, and other details, making things more transparent.

SAP's technical support is okay. In my last job, when we had a P1 issue, just raising a ticket wasn't enough. You need to follow up every ten minutes and call them for updates. It depends on the person handling it. I don't just rely on SAP's support system. Even though it's automated, it's about the people who want to solve the problem quickly. I don't think the support team understands how serious production downtime is.

I want SAP HCM to adopt new changes faster, like AI and analytics, for future releases. SAP HCM is slow compared to Tableau or Power BI. In Fiori, we faced challenges creating dashboards. It should work fast to compete with startups in areas like AI-powered queries and instant dashboards.

I have been using the product for five years. 

Before the tool, our processes were entirely manual. We didn't use any similar system. Many competitors like Workday, Darwinbox, and others prefer SAP HCM because we're primarily an SAP shop, using many of their modules across our organization.

Regarding compliance, we haven't fully utilized the tool's capabilities. We mainly use it for payroll and attendance. Leave management and other compliance-related functions are still handled outside of it. We upload this external data for payroll processing. Full integration of these features would allow us to leverage the tool to its maximum extent.

We're not currently using AI in our HR management with SAP HCM. Humans still make all decisions. We have plans to implement analytics after SAP SuccessFactors implementation, but that's part of our future roadmap.

Most industries have been using SAP HCM for decades. In my industry, feed manufacturing, we have many versions. But I believe the pharmaceutical industry has even more versions. I'm not totally sure, but I feel this system might not handle pharma's needs well. This is just my guess based on the problems I face with version control. When R&D changes two or three versions, they don't get updated regularly, messing up the whole value chain.

I rate the overall product an eight out of ten. 

We use the product for analytics, employee experience, and talent management.

The platform is beneficial in terms of managing data points. Additionally, it gives a lot of insights, helping us with people analytics. The employee experience features allowed us to derive new inputs for management.

SAP HCM has valuable features for analytics data management. The employee experience feature is another good functionality that allows us to note down feedback. It provides ease of utilization and efficient integration with stand-alone products and works well in delivering reports. It has a better mobile application compared to others.

The product's learning and development features could be better, including new exclusive LMS tools. Additionally, the data analytics feature could have more depth, similar to Workday.

I have been using SAP HCM for about eight to ten years.

Stability-wise, the platform works well.

It is a scalable product. The number of users varies for different organizations. I have been a part of a company with over 20,000 users. On the other hand, there was a company with only 200 users. I have worked with a different range of employees.

We are using Workday. It works better regarding certain analytics features in integral databases than SAP HCM.

We took assistance from consultants to implement the product in a few companies. At the same time, we implemented it ourselves in one of the companies.

In my earlier organization, we comprehensively analyzed the ROI after implementing SAP HCM. The results showcased substantial progress and benefits over the years. We were able to bring a lot of insights to business leaders through efficient reports and dashboard functionalities.

We purchase the product's yearly license.

SAP HCM's personal administration feature greatly impacts the organization's record-keeping process. It eliminated a lot of unnecessary manual work effectively. It is a good product; advise others to go for it if they have an essential budget.

I rate it an eight out of ten.

We use SAP HCM for recruitment and payment modeling features.

It is a valuable product that helps our company organize payment structure, recruitment, and talent management.

The platform is simple to use and has a user-friendly dashboard and integration features.

The product's license is very expensive.

I have been working with SAP HCM for seven years.

It is a stable platform. I rate the stability an eight.

Our organization has 300 SAP HCM users working from the finance, administration, HR, and engineering departments. I rate the scalability a seven or eight. It is a scalable product.

The technical support team is responsive.

Neutral

We also use SAP S/4HANA, a business suite product from SAP. It enables financial, controlling, and material management.

I am a technical expert, and thus, it is very simple to install for me. They have documentation to refer to. However, configuring HR processes, including reporting and workflow features, can be challenging. The deployment depends on the number of employees. It takes around three to six months to complete the process. We have a team of three technical executives. One resource can maintain the product. SAP also provides support to each customer for maintaining the application. They release updates every year.

The product generates a return on investment with the capability to develop and manage the talent in the company. It helps with detecting talent, employee rotation, and managing resources. We can make a decision on employee retention using SAP HCM.

It is an expensive platform. The pricing depends upon the specific model and number of user accounts included in a bundle. The licenses for 1000 users might be less expensive than licenses for 100 users. We have to pay around 20% of the license cost for maintenance and support services for two years.

I recommend SAP HCM to others. It is a very useful application that can centralize the management system. We can integrate it with S/4HANA for financial features.

I rate it an eight out of ten. I would not rate it a nine as it requires specific change management and deployment training. It is a new application, and users need to familiarize themselves with the functionality.

With SAP HCM, decision-making is very helpful. Every data that's related to our employees is stored in the solution. We are an organization of over 2,000 employees, and the solution has helped to maintain a database for everyone.

All our employee data, like performance and payroll, is managed through SAP HCM.

SAP HCM's long and tedious transactions can be improved.

We have been working with SAP HCM since 2004.

We have never faced any stability issues with SAP HCM. We have an on-premises system and never faced any server issues or technical glitches.

SAP HCM is a scalable solution.

SAP HCM's technical support was on point. I appreciate that every data we wanted, every help, reconfiguration, or customization we wanted in the system, happened as soon as the request was made.

Positive

The system is now becoming outdated because it involves all the transactions and is very detail-oriented. We want to move towards the cloud solution they're offering.

The solution's maintenance happens weekly for us because we have a lot of customizations done in the system. We're directly in contact with the SAP facilitation team, and they do it for us, the local partners in Pakistan.

Before choosing SAP HCM, users should consider the transaction time, how the data is being configured, and how the data or report generation comes out for them.

Overall, I rate SAP HCM an eight out of ten.

Payroll is always the central area the tool focuses on. It needs to ensure things are flowing, employees are paid on time, and there are no issues related to location, pay, or hiring. SAP HCM helps observe all the work, from hiring to paying paychecks every month. It's a system that depends on the data you input. You don't want to work with bad data and expect miracles. If the data isn't clean, it's more work.

What can be improved in SAP HCM depends on the industry it serves. The system's navigation could be simplified for users. The flow and integration between parts, like core HR, payroll, and recruiting, must be communicated properly. Users should focus on how doing things correctly from the start will improve things in the long run rather than feeling overwhelmed by tasks.

About stability, if companies think about the things I mentioned from the start, it'll be better. It's much better to have SAP help than to manipulate the data themselves. You can't put bad data in and expect the vendor to fix it. They might say it's too bad and you'll need more steps to fix it. Some organizations don't take these decisions seriously because they think vendors want to sell products. They might use one or two modules and expect others to work fine, too, depending on the correct data in the modules they already use.

I think this solution's scalability is good, but it depends on the organization. Scalability depends on what the company wants and what it's working with.

The tool's deployment depends on the type of data, where the source data is, how accurate it is, and whether there are any duplications to eliminate. This process requires data mapping and cleanup ahead of time.

The setup process usually takes about six weeks to six months, sometimes up to nine months, depending on the size of the project. It might take four months for one or two modules. However, you should plan for nine months because of potential resource constraints, budget issues, hiring consultants, and considering how many on-site resources the company has to support the project while doing their daily work.

Maintenance can be complicated. It depends on whether the company wants to do it themselves or have the vendor (like SAP) handle it. If SAP handles it, they support working with clients to ensure everything flows properly. If the company does it themselves, they might make manipulations that aren't right and make things worse. This often happens because they don't understand the delivered functionality within the system.

It all depends on how stable and standardized the company's processes are. If they make the workflow work properly, things can be easier. But if they manipulate data and expect things to work out on their own, they'll see a lot of issues. It's even more complicated when two people are doing one job, and security issues can occur.

If you do things the right way, you'll see results in six to seven months. If not, it could take a year or two, and things still won't be right.

The cost depends on the size of the organization. Compared to others, I'd say Oracle is number one, followed by Workday and SAP HCM.

I've only done one or two projects lately with SAP HCM. The use cases depend on the company, what it's implementing, and what issues it deals with daily. They also vary based on the modules it's working with. There's no generic situation.

How SAP HCM supports an organization's HR needs depends on where they want to go with the information, how they want to grow, and their budget requirements. I usually use a specific version within the core HR space. The impact depends on the project and the organization's size. The impact isn't big for small companies with few employees because they can use the standard functionality. However, the impact is huge for organizations with over 5,000 employees.

People often worry about the learning curve when switching from a system they're used to. They get curious about how much improvement they'll see rather than focusing on learning and seeing the results.

You need to be prepared to use the solution. You don't need to be a professional, but you shouldn't overthink it or worry that you won't be able to do it just because it's new. Many people get carried away in that process and lose track.

People often hesitate to learn and worry about different tasks. Instead of going from A to Z, they look for shortcuts, which don't work in all environments. You must go through the learning process to understand the system properly and get the necessary information. People often look for shortcuts, which isn't the right way.

I rate the overall solution a seven out of ten. 

My primary use case for the solution was managing employee data and handling all payroll-related operations. It included managing employees from their entry into the company until their exit and resolving any errors within the system.

The product significantly improved our organization by automating many processes, which reduced paperwork and provided clearer, more accurate goals and competencies. 

The most valuable feature of the SAP HCM solution was its integration with SuccessFactors, particularly the Performance Management feature. This integration allowed for effective employee performance and payroll data management.

The product could be improved in terms of cost. Additionally, having a reliable support partner who thoroughly understands our needs and can promptly address issues would enhance the overall user experience.

I have worked with the SAP HCM solution for five years.

The product is stable. 

The solution is scalable. 

Our experience with customer service and support was moderate. While the support provided by the vendor was helpful to some extent, some areas required improvement in terms of understanding our specific needs and providing timely solutions.

Neutral

We are planning to switch to a local program due to financial constraints.

The initial setup was straightforward. We followed the guide and translated our company's needs into the system, making the process smooth and manageable.

We implemented the solution with the assistance of a vendor team.

The product is expensive. 

SAP HCM is a powerful program that can greatly benefit organizations with its comprehensive features and integrations. However, companies should be mindful of the costs and ensure they have the necessary support infrastructure.

I rate it a nine. 

We use it for accounting, billing, purchase requisitions, and raising purchase orders. It manages accounts, tracks attendance, and handles auditing and reconciliation. It also generates reports, manages pricing, creates invoices, and processes POs. I am assigned to the accounts division and use SAP HCM for my tasks. SAP HCM also has modules for HR tasks, such as documentation and onboarding.

The feature I like most in SAP HCM is its effectiveness for talent management. I'm comfortable with the complete accounting module, using transaction codes and generating invoices. The process is easy, and using entry sheets is flexible. I find the accounts module very good.     

When performing reconciliation, manual entry is sometimes required, and barcode scanning isn't always available. Integration with barcodes would make reconciliation smoother and track every product. If I enter data for many products and need to go back, I want the process saved so I can resume without starting over. Integration would help.

For HR processes, SAP HCM is very effective. It handles large employee data sets, making onboarding, paperwork, and document storage easy. It also manages tickets and other HR tasks efficiently. Overall, I find it excellent for HR.

I have been using SAP HCM for the past year and will continue to use it. 

SAP HCM is stable. If there is a technical glitch, raising a ticket can resolve it.

In our organization, more than thirty users use the HR module, and over four hundred use the accounting module.

The technical support is excellent. Any escalations are usually resolved within one or two days. Escalations are usually resolved within one or two days.

For installation, the technical team is always available. Since we purchased SAP HCM, the SAP technical team handles all installations and support. They are available 24/7, so there are no issues with installation. It's good.

The benefits of using SAP HCM are significant. It saves a lot of time by automating processes and centralizing tasks in one system. This eliminates the need to connect multiple people via phone or manually track orders and attendance. With SAP HCM, even hundreds of branches can be coordinated efficiently. It provides ease of access, quick response times, and overall time savings. 

I would rate SAP HCM ten out of ten because I haven't experienced any issues. It's a good product. For those starting to use SAP HCM, I recommend it if the company has the budget and strong employees. SAP HCM requires substantial resources, so it's ideal for large organizations, especially those with multiple branches, supply chains, logistics, and active accounting departments. For smaller organizations, ranging from one to fifty employees, it may not be as suitable. For larger organizations, I highly recommend it.

With SAP HCM, I can handle HR administration and management tasks for both employees and HR. Additionally, SAP offers a specific module for human resource planning and management.

The valuable features of SAP HCM include managing employee data from hiring to retirement. It handles settings for new hires and stores employee information. 

HCM could improve compatibility, making it more accessible via web applications and graphical interfaces. Additionally, pricing could be more competitive compared to SuccessFactors.

I have been using SAP HCM for a couple of years.

The number of end users of HCM varies based on the size of the company. Companies with thousands of employees, like some big names, use HCM. Over the past few years, there has been a trend of companies transitioning from the SCM module to also using the HCM module.

SAP support for answering questions is generally fast, knowledgeable, and customer-friendly. They cover all modules and aspects of businesses, providing end-to-end solutions and addressing basic organizational needs effectively. I would rate the support as an eight out of ten.

Positive

Licensing with SAP involves negotiation to determine costs and benefits. Return on investment depends on how effectively the company negotiates with SAP for reasonable pricing.

People often face challenges when starting with SAP due to a lack of understanding of how it works. However, with time, they realize its benefits and find it to be a good fit for their business needs.

SAP supports organizations in complying with global chart regulations, but some users find their support lacking in reliability. When encountering issues, users may experience delays and difficulty finding solutions through the SAP support portal.

SAP HCM brings value through new innovations like SuccessFactors. Consultants emphasize transitioning from on-premises to cloud-based applications.

Overall, I would rate SAP HCM as an eight out of ten.

We use the product for benefits and payroll. 

The tool's most valuable features for our HR operations include easy reporting capabilities, which allow us to generate reports for management meetings and auditing purposes. Additionally, it supports appointment preparation and processing benefits. 

SAP HCM cannot integrate with other third-party applications. One of the drawbacks we encounter with SAP HCM, specifically in payroll management, is the limitation regarding changing payroll areas within the same month. For instance, if an employee transitions from staff to non-staff status during the month, we face difficulties because the system doesn't allow us to change the payroll. 

We encounter issues related to employee repatriation, especially when individuals return within a two-year timeframe. The system sometimes picks up previously processed data, complicating the repatriation process. As a result, we often have to find workarounds to address these issues. These challenges may stem from our system configuration, but we're still investigating to determine the exact cause.

I have been using the product since 2014. 

I don't always find SAP HCM to be stable. Sometimes we encounter issues that we thought were resolved, but they resurface. It may be due to our configuration, but we do experience these issues from time to time.

We use SAP SuccessFactors for recruitment and performance marketing. 

The tool's deployment and installation can be complex because numerous adjustments are required to tailor it to our needs. For instance, when processing education grants, it takes considerable time to customize SAP to suit our purposes due to our various requirements.

Maintaining SAP is generally manageable, but we sometimes need assistance from external contractors to handle tasks that we cannot manage internally.

I find the reporting satisfactory. The quality of reports depends on the data input, particularly the master data. However, I am optimistic about transitioning to newer tools like SuccessFactors, which can integrate with other systems outside SAP. I rate the tool a seven out of ten. 

It didn't go live with it.

Sap HCM is not a flexible solution to meet our requirements.

There are several issues with GuI, and it's not easy to use. Additionally, it requires a significant amount of configuration, and we haven't been able to find anyone who can meet our specific data configuration needs. But the major issue it's a really old fashion app. We are in 2023, there is no need to use an app that looks like this.

It's been around two years now. We already had SAP in our company, and we already were working with a partner to finalize all the configurations, but it didn't succeed. So it's not working yet.

It is a pretty stable solution.

It is a scalable solution. For other modules, it's around 100 to 200 users in my company. We had 12 administrators.

The customer service and support team is okay for all modules. But for HCM, we couldn't find a dedicated consultant to assist us.

Negative

It was difficult to deploy. However, it has already been deployed, but there were challenges regarding configurations and implementation. So, we had a lot of issues.

The setup took around one year. Because configuration included our requirements and making the rules, ensuring compliance with insurance rules and governance tools. It's like insurance policies in Egypt or something similar that may affect the SAP HCM system.

The pricing is really high. Compared to Odoo, it's very high. However, if you already have the other modules, it's okay. But SAP will cost you a lot of money.

We are looking to switch to Odoo. It seems easy to use. It is very, very easy to use and configure according to our requirements.

I don't recommend implementing SAP HCM. It's not good at all. Overall, I would rate the solution a three out of ten. It is primarily due to complexity, configuration, and pricing.