The extensive availability of ready-made gadgets in Pega BPM is a double-edged sword. While it offers convenience, it also leads to a steeper learning curve. Our developers and business analysts need to invest significant time and effort to fully understand and utilize the platform's capabilities.

In essence, it's a complex product that demands a deep understanding to be used effectively. So, it cuts both ways. This complexity can be both an advantage and a disadvantage, depending on the user's expertise. So, the learning curve is pretty high! 

So, it's very good if you are a professional user, but you need to be a really good professional user to use this solution effectively.

View full review »

I have limited knowledge to suggest improvements, but I believe robotics could improve, as my learning curve in robotics has been challenging.

View full review »

There is room for improvement in the user interface area. Pega has addressed this with the Constellation architecture, allowing flexibility in UI customization. 

Pega should continue enhancing their AI capabilities to potentially eliminate the need for integration with external AI tools.

View full review »

In the Middle East and Africa region, Pega was not very strong from the user experience standpoint. To address this, Pega introduced Constellation, which allows a user to build a more engaging visual experience.

View full review »

The product's artificial intelligence capabilities could be improved. More advanced AI features could further optimize process automation and decision-making.

View full review »

The technical support is very low, rated at a one or two out of ten. There is a lack of support and community presence in the country, leading to challenges in finding developers.

View full review »

The UI layer is a concern since it is native to them and embedded into the code. I cannot have my own UI layer at the moment. Also, finding a person with the right knowledge for Pega, since it has fewer resources available, is a challenge.

View full review »

The licensing cost is very high.

View full review »

What PegaRULES should work on is the integration aspect. I can integrate it with other platforms, but that can take time. It would be good if integration could be automated or if the tool had more out-of-the-box integration features.

Apart from that, I can do most of the integrations with other platforms in  PegaRULES. Still, from a development perspective, as a software developer, I would like to see an easier way to implement integrations where I can click a few screens or do less coding for integration. Still, if I have to do any integration, it would be possible in PegaRULES, but it would take two to three hours to complete.

I want a more straightforward integration process in the tool because compared to Microsoft Power Platform, another low-code, no-code tool, Microsoft Power Platform is relatively straightforward to integrate with Twitter. You can quickly get the feeds from Twitter. Microsoft Power Platform has an out-of-the-box integration setup with Twitter.

Based on this example, PegaRULES could have a more straightforward integration piece. If the tool had more default integration pieces or out-of-the-box integrations with other platforms by default, that would help a lot. For example, Twitter integration, ChatGPT integration, etc., especially because ChatGPT is becoming popular.

Otherwise, I'll have to write some custom code and then create the connectors and the HTTP connectors and connect the connectors to the system manually, which takes time. I want default integrations that I can plug and play to make integrations in PegaRULES easier.

Integration with the latest AI is a feature I want to see in PegaRULES. For example, an out-of-the-box integration with ChatGPT because I'm working on an integration piece for one of my own POCs, but I need custom coding to build that feature. I need a feature that lets you click a button to integrate PegaRULES with multiple platforms to make the integration process very easy.

Less custom coding when it comes to integration is also what I want to see in the tool, though that impacts developers like me rather than the customer experience because it's more the backend.

View full review »

The UI has always been the weakest part. These days, the competition with Salesforce is with respect to the outreach of handling the process. That has been one of the challenging factors. So, mostly, it's about the UI, which I believe is because Pega is dependent upon a third-party application, be it React or Angular, to have a UI.

At times, the performance can be a major issue, which is something they're working on. So, performance can be a concern sometimes.

Their support could also be better.

In terms of additional features, I have no requirements.

View full review »

An area for improvement in Pega BPM is security. It's secure, but it still has a lot of vulnerabilities, though Pega takes care of security through upgrades and different patch versions released from time to time.

Pega BPM is robust, but it still needs some improvement performance-wise.

View full review »

The UI cannot be customized in the solution. 

View full review »

There is room for potential improvement in the performance of PegaRULES, as well as the need to address any existing security concerns. It should be noted that working with an older version of Pega, rather than the latest 8.x versions, may limit certain capabilities and leave room for vulnerabilities that could benefit from increased attention. Furthermore, the user interface (UI) could be a candidate for enhancements. It is worth mentioning that newer versions of Pega may have introduced improvements in these areas. 

View full review »

I think there is room for improvement in the low code/ no code environment that they're promoting now. That needs to be aligned a little bit more. I still feel that it is not that friendly for a person who has no experience with Pega to just go in and try to create something. It is a little bit difficult to comprehend, which can be a challenge for the developers who manage the solution because they will have a hard time getting people to use it. For example, if several business users start developing an application at the same time, bottlenecks can happen and the developer will have to go in and kill the conflict in the rules that they have created. That could be better streamlined, which means there is room for improvement there.

View full review »

Currently, there isn't any feature I want to be added in the next release of Pega BPM because Pega always adds new features that my team welcomes and looks forward to learning.

One area for improvement in the solution is the long learning curve, but after that, you'll find Pega BPM easy to use.

View full review »

The pricing could be flexible and have multiple options. It is mainly suitable for large enterprises. They could have subscription plans to cater SMEs.

View full review »

The solution's pricing model or licensing model could be a little better.

View full review »

Pega BPM's documentation should be improved, especially for freshers or new trainees.

Pega BPM's pricing could be improved because it is expensive. People are not choosing Pega BPM because of its price and are moving to open-source or cost-effective solutions like Camunda.

View full review »

The training aspect of Pega BPM requires significant enhancement. There should be more opportunities for third-party training and engaging events, such as hackathons where individuals can share their expertise. Additionally, the training structure itself should be more organized, as I have received feedback from my colleagues in the COE that the current training approach is overwhelming and requires excessive referencing to obtain accurate information. Another area for improvement would be the user experience with regard to RPA. Simplifying the IDA for citizen developers would make it easier for them to adopt the RPA tool.

View full review »

The UI part needs improvement. 

Some integrations can make it unstable. They need to strengthen the integration aspect and make the process more seamless. 

It would be nice if Pega provided suggestions while users were on it. It already gives you some warnings, however, in relation to specific rules, it would be ideal if Pega could provide suggestions to help users make improvements here or there.

View full review »

The UI needs improvement. 

Some integrations can be a bit complex during implementation. 

Other than that, we have not come across any missing features. It's been very good across the board. 

View full review »

Customers expect more out-of-the-box solutions. Right now, Pega is a platform on which you can build anything; as a platform, it's very powerful. However, what customers also expect is a quick turnaround. That is one area where they can improve. If they could create more business-friendly, customer-friendly solutions in the areas where customers traditionally use Pega, that would be helpful. That way, the same solution can solve similar problems for other customers, and it is more plug-and-play.

They are building in process mining. They acquired a technology company in Brazil, so they're bringing process mining over into the product. Process mining will help the customers to do continuous business implementations since they will find challenges to help adjust processes. That is one thing that we're looking forward to. 

View full review »

In theory, business rules tend to be something that business users can use. What I mean by that is that I don't know whether it always works out that well because the problem in banking specifically is that you need auditing and you need some kind of control. So, even if you're doing rules, there has to be an approval process. You can do all that in Pega, but it is not exactly everything that the vendor says it is. I've spent some hands-on time with the platform, and you can do those things, and it is all low code, but is it as easy as they make it sound? No. That's my two cents. For example, if I want to do something, there is no way to switch from low code. I just want to do a simple If-Then-Else rule, but I have to go through their low-code tool and do dragging and dropping. I'm a development person, and in my opinion, even some business users could do this easier. There is no way to go back and forth to an editor where I can just type in an If-Then-Else rule, which would be much faster than drawing in their low-code editor. They don't support that. They lead you too much. It depends on your level of expertise, but in some cases, it is just not that easy to use.

I don't like their whole deployment pipeline. It is very closed in nature. You have to use their pipeline to push things out to production. It is a turnkey solution, and I'm not a big fan of that. That was one of the things that we liked better about Salesforce. With Salesforce, we could use our own deployment tools or we could use a third-party deployment tool. Pega is a pretty closed system. It is closed in the sense that the deployment pipeline and some of the things that you do go through their tool. They don't integrate with GitHub, Azure DevOps, and so forth, which are really effective for versioning. I just don't like that.

View full review »

The usability of the solution for developers is sometimes difficult to work with because instead of fixing the existing bugs in the previous version, there is always a rush to push out a new version leaving the bugs in the old versions unresolved. I would like the bugs to be fixed before moving on to a new version.

Upgrading versions is a challenge and expensive. PegaRULES should try to spend more time on developing the newest versions in such a way the upgrade could be easier, or in a way that clients don't need to upgrade every year to a new version or every couple of years in order to plan expenses and complicated upgrades.

The UI needs reworking. PegaRULES has added new features to the UI, but I'm not sure it's the right direction.

View full review »

Pega BPM can improve product management, case management, omnichannel, CDH, and the customer data hub. All the major domains can improve. Additionally, more AI functionality and proper integrations with Pega RPA would be helpful.

View full review »

I would like to see Pega BPM improve the user experience. The platform has a lot of restrictions. 

View full review »

If it could also be integrated with robotics, it could help with a lot of things, even if we don't have APIs, we could still talk to other applications. If it could invoke a bot, for example.

It currently has OpenSpan, but OpenSpan is a different thing entirely, as you call it in robotics order. 

If the BPM and robotics could be integrated more easily, then I believe both could be used.

It is not at all integrated. OpenSpan operates in a completely different manner, and Pega operates in a completely different manner. Part of it is called Pega robotics, but it has nothing in common, in my opinion.

View full review »

Its implementation in the public sector was a bit complex. 

In terms of features, I have not come across any limitations in the last four or five years. I'm on the sales side. I work with customers, and my role involves reading a customer's mind and providing the best solution so that all pain areas are addressed. Pega has got very good features and tools. I didn't come across any limitation where a customer wanted something, and we were not able to provide that. Generally, whatever a customer demands, we are able to meet that demand. 

View full review »

I believe that Pega's strategy when it comes to the UX part is not that great currently as compared to the other emerging BPM tools in the market. I look forward to seeing the UX part of the solution improved in a much better manner.

View full review »

Pega's low code development is entirely based on object-oriented and application development. However, I believe it can be used in a low code application, such as development platform features such as tracking and dropping some user components. It has that support, but not to the extent that other platforms do, such as the app in or out system. They make it very simple to create UIs without the need to use HTML, CSS, and JavaScript together to create pixel-perfect UIs. I believe Pega could improve in this area.

View full review »

The workflow automation can be slow, so there is room for improvement there.

View full review »

Pega BPM could be improved by including token-based authentication and extending its integration options. In the next release, Pega should live up to their claim to be low-code/no-code and make their platform more simple and UI-based.

View full review »

The solution could be more scalable. 

It has some DevOps limitations.

The product could be more robust and faster compared to what they have right now.

View full review »

A few things I would like them to improve include, first of all, that they don't have any open-source learning platform. To learn Pega, you need to be a partner. If someone just wants to learn Pega for the sake of learning, they won't be able to do so as they don't give access to that.

I would like to have an integrated process mining capability inside Pega. It will be like an entire digital transformation thing then. You don't need two or three sources. Similar to Signavio. Signavio runs BPM, it does modeling, and it is having process mining as well. In Pega, we have modeling, we have RPA, and we have BPM, however, we don't have process mining right now.

View full review »

Containerization should be improved in relation to Pega because Camunda is deployable in the containerization deployment process. Pega is trying to move in that direction, but that will have to improve slightly.

View full review »

There are no job opportunities for users who have expertise in Pega. They are learning the certification program but need work. Pega should work on redefining their model and creating a demand for their skills. They need to reach a large number of business organizations.

View full review »

PegaRULES need to improve its JVM. It needs to enhance the operation speed and memory size.

View full review »

The cost of licensing could be improved.

View full review »

Pega is claiming they're into low code but as per Gartner Magic Quadrant, Pega is not there now. Appian, OutSystems, Mendix, Salesforce, and Microsoft Power Platform are the major leaders in the market as low-code platforms as per Gartner Magic Quadrant. Pega has to improve if they would like to gain their position in the low-code space. They would have to improve major functionalities that these low-code vendors and low-code platforms have like their mobile compatibility. A citizen developer can easily make B2C mobile apps.

Pega has to come up with a lot of improvements in these low-code areas for the citizen developers who can easily create mobile apps with minimal coding or no coding. With other competitors like Appian, OutSystems, and Mendix, you can do it using visual modeling.

The price could also be improved.

View full review »

This is a very expensive product and there is a lack of availability of the Pega skill sets, the resources. 

View full review »

The main problem with Pega is that it is quite complex, so it is very difficult for the developer to learn. Sometimes it is like a black box where you can't develop other things. When you try to modify something on the product it is quite difficult. Also, when new people try to learn how to develop in Pega, it is quite difficult to learn, and it's a big product. I think that is the problem.

Maybe they could try to make an easier implementation. I don't know how. Maybe with more information on the Pega platform, in the Pega academy, or modifying the application to make it easier to implement. 

View full review »

The local development approach is good in Pega, however, cost-wise, it's getting expensive. That needs to be addressed.  

With Camunda, containerization is the most helpful feature. It can containerize and it can have its own deployment process. Pega may be adding that feature in a future release, however, right now, that's lacking and needs to be addressed.

I'd like to see Pega support microservices architecture, which it doesn't do right now.

View full review »

They use something called a unique model-based architecture. During development, where the database and the UI, everything comes from one single piece of architecture. Due to that sometimes the enterprise architecture teams do not like it due to the fact that it forces them to use just one piece of architecture. If these could be more modularized, then it can be easily deployable in different kinds of scenarios in organizations, it would be much better.

However, they are kind of tightly coupled and it's difficult to separate everything out. Still, I would say it is an improvement to consider for the future. Id they could decouple the various components so that it gives flexibility to enterprise architects to deploy what is most needed as part of their enterprise architecture strategy, rather than getting kind of, looking at the only way the product handles, it would be a stronger product.

They are currently spending some time on improving the product with respect to machine learning, especially related to robotic automation. They probably could be a little more adept on that area would help.

It's very difficult to change many things unless somebody puts in the time to figure everything out. However, Pega could learn from all the customer service calls they get and categorize them in order to do an automatic form-based or customer service based response. If they could set it up to everything automatically, then that would save a lot of time and headaches for companies and help them troubleshoot and work through issues faster.

View full review »

PegaRULES should provide a more drag-and-drop interface to make it a low-code, no-code product.

View full review »

The solution is expensive and it put many of our customers off. After a while, the company was no longer prepared to work directly with customers which created problems. 

View full review »

The initial setup can take a while. You need to have the right people in place to handle it effectively. 

It can be pretty expensive and is better for larger enterprises. 

View full review »

In the next release, Pega should include process mining.

View full review »

One of the areas of this solution that could be improved would be to improve the low code features of the application itself. We would also like to use the same platform to build any application, even if it is not necessarily defined as a functionality needed by a BPM.

The RPA tool within this solution needs further enhancement to compete with other RPA tools in the market. They are focusing more on the overall platform rather than working on the RPA. Document AI tools could be an added functionality, for example. Alternatively, customers will need to purchase another RPA tool to complement the whole solution if they have very advanced RPA needs across their business.

View full review »

There was a lot of room for improvement on the RPA front because the product was still in its journey for more than one year. The product was still in its early stages of development. We spoke with the Pega team and provided our feedback.

On the BPM front, I believe it is pretty standard and an industry leader. 

We have experienced a few technical challenges, particularly triggering the workflow through file drops and accessing files. Those difficulties are more of a cloud versus on-premises issue because everything was on the cloud, and they were unable to retrieve files from on-premises folders. As a result, we had to resort to workarounds.

I believe they could work on more integration of their RPA and BPM so that it becomes seamless for anyone, and then it becomes easier for a human versus machine interaction using the same BPM. They said at the time that it's on their roadmap and should be coming soon if it hasn't already. But those are the things that, in my opinion, would make a better BPM, where it would function as an enterprise orchestration layer, collaborating with humans and bots in the same way and delivering the business process.

View full review »

There are several areas for improvement with this product. The performance of the application is very slow, the UI needs improvement, and the architecture needs to be simplified. In addition, it's impossible to know what's going on behind the scenes of this solution, and there's no tech support or useful documentation, so I have been forced to do my own troubleshooting.

View full review »

The way the IDE works with the chatbox and the taxonomy imports could be a little smoother.

There should be quicker approvals for CDH. It is a bureaucratic approval process to be able to get those particular licenses.

View full review »

It should have integration with non-relational databases. A lot of databases are non-relational, and as a company, we are planning to move to NoSQL or open-source databases. It would be good if we are able to install and use Pega on a NoSQL database. 

They can also try to tailor or organize the company a bit differently and go more towards the microservice concept.

I would like Pega to develop machine learning and intelligent AI algorithms. They have a good foundation in terms of the model and the stuff that we are using for some customers, and it will be good to onboard as many machine learning algorithms as possible.

View full review »

The previous versions had good training documents but the updated versions need to improve the documentation.

View full review »

Reporting is not so clear and not so great. We really struggle to get the right reporting. When we need reporting based on the content of the tickets, we are not able to get it. The MIS reporting is not great. That's one of the reasons why we are switching to ServiceNow.

Its compatibility with the higher versions of Internet Explorer should be improved. It really works well in Mozilla Firefox or any other browser, but when it comes to Microsoft Edge or Internet Explorer, sometimes, the layout gets disturbed. The positioning of the buttons changes, and there is some distortion in the layout. I am not sure whether it is our configuration problem or Pega's, but when it is working in Mozilla Firefox, it should also work in Microsoft Edge or Internet Explorer.

View full review »

The reporting does not work well for us. If we have somebody working on a ticket or request, we are not able to track the end-to-end time. Also, the assignment is not happening correctly. Ideally, they should have panel management reporting.

The end-user notifications need to be improved because there is a delay.

It is not fully compatible with all versions of Internet Explorer, so sometimes, it does not work. There are technical glitches because of this.

View full review »

From a room for improvement point of view, what I've seen is that many customers want solutions that directly meet their requirements so while Pega has somewhat vertical solutions on Pega customer service and sales automation, industry and customer experts expect more out-of-box solutions to be readily available on Pega.

It is the same for additional features - the customer expects more business solutions to be directly available on Pega. For example, when I say business solutions, Pega could have a business solution on customer service, a business solution on sales automation. Pega may not have a proper business solution for LOS, or Loan Origination System. These are common business solutions which could be made available in the solution, it would be very good if they could focus on the direct business solutions which customers expect over here.

View full review »

In terms of areas that need to be improved, I would say the timeout. This is because sometimes when we are patching some data from the database, we are getting added as a timeout. I would like to build a solution for that or to improve that feature, because by doing so the process will be trimmed. Sometimes it gets stuck just due to taking so much time for the user in the back-end data from the database. I think all the other features are very good.

Additionally, I'd like to select the availabilities. I'm using the earlier version now because it is on-premise implementation. If I go on the newer PGi for a couple of days, the latest version, then I will able to see what other additional features we need to have in the BPM tool.

View full review »

Pega BPM could improve the UI, it is poorly designed to have a good UX experience.

View full review »

There is a scarcity of resources who have worked with this solution before.

View full review »

Pega BPM could improve the artificial intelligence capabilities because they are always valuable and case management for all types of industries is important. Additionally, the reporting performance management capabilities could be better because you want to have insights into how your processes are working, such as Cloud protection. The whole range can be better. However, the platforms are improving every year, they are on the right track.

In the next release of Pega BPM, they should add more ways to do the customer interaction fields in the portals.

View full review »

The licensing model of Pega BPM is tricky, especially for first-time customers, so it's something that they could improve.

The technical support team for this solution could be faster in resolving tickets.

View full review »

We would like to have a better ability to customize PegaRULES.

In Pega, it is very important to have good overall system performance. As such, the performance should be improved.

Better automation would be helpful because I would like to see all of the manual intervention removed.

View full review »

In regards to the integration, more APIs may be required.

It needs more integration with other platforms.

View full review »

It's called a local platform but on the other hand, it needs a lot of experience. It's not all that easy to click and plug and play. If you really want to use all the features out of this platform, you definitely need a lot of experience and a lot of training to get there.

Because the platform offers a lot of different features, it's rather complex and makes it very valuable for many different use cases, but what I would improve is that you can't tell all the people that it's a local platform, which suggests that it's for everybody, even for those people that do not have any clue about IT. They are using a lot of functionalities that try to help those developers and usually they make good jobs, but there are some situations where this automation will cause a lot of stress and trouble. This is something that creates more work at the end than if you just started from scratch. 

View full review »

PEGA claims that they provide a LOW-CODE-PLATFORM which is easy to use - even for "citizen developers" (i.e. business employees).  bla bla. If you really want to use all the features out of this platform, you definitely need a lot of experience and a lot of training. In all of my projects there were many obstacles to solve which weren't simple and which could not be solved by "citizen developers" but only by Lead System Architects with 5+ years of PEGA experience. You can compare PEGA with SAP - if you really know how to use both of them, it can make the difference. If you are only interested in developing automated micro services / processes, than there are far better options.  

I would like to have a lightweight version of the solution, something like Appian or Outsystems that is much more focussed on process core features. If you set up your first projects and you see that you need more functionalities, than it would be great to upgrade to the PEGA platform.  

For me PEGA is sometimes like the MS Office package. In the past you had the core functionalities like Word and Excel, and you were fine with that. Now you have a complete suite starting from SharePoint and Teams and whatever, but in most cases you don't need all the features because you just have a certain purpose where you need the best software. 

CONCLUSION: The PEGA platform is an outstanding product for those companies that are really willing to use it as a BPM PLATFORM throughout the whole company. The many features and OOTB functionalities makes it very valuable for many different use cases. Those companies that are willing to setup a BPM program for a couple of years will definitely benefit from PEGA.

View full review »

There are some UX shortcomings within the solution. However, it's my understanding that they have addressed them and in the next three months they will come out with a new updated version. They will be moving away from HTML5.

View full review »

From a technical point of view, it would be helpful to have some advanced analytics to help with configuration. We have a lot of unwanted features and it would be good to configure it more appropriately so that we are using just exactly what we need.

View full review »

I haven't been using the solution for that long, so I don't know if there are any features that are lacking.

We need more light retail BPM tools within the Pega system. However, Pega is mostly for big companies.

As our group is pretty small, we may need to look for a different solution that's more geared to smaller sized organizations.

View full review »

Compared to other BPM products, the interface is somewhat complex, so the usability could be improved.

View full review »

The solution would benefit from more integration capabilities.

There are some tools within the solution that are difficult to use.

View full review »

The solution needs to invest more in its technology. For public and private clouds, for example, the development environment is slow. Saving events should take one to two seconds, max, and because you are making changes often, the slowness cuts down on productivity because we have to wait for things to save before continuing. 

The UI could be slightly improved.

View full review »

Pega currently is trying to add chatbots to their systems, and it's still quite immature. This part definitely needs to be improved. The RPA also needs improvement. Pega has its own RPA, via an acquisition a couple of years ago. They bought OpenSpan and tried to rewrite it to Pega's platform. It still has some gaps. For example, they have no machine learning. If they want to be more mature in the market, they probably need to consider working on improving that.

View full review »

The solution could use more plugins.

The pricing model needs to be improved. Right now, it's too expensive.

View full review »

In terms of improvement, we would see a benefit in Pega having better availability on the cloud side. Their presence on the cloud is not as strong as their competitors. Pega and the partners both have needs to enhance their cloud footprint compared to what it is now.

There is room for improvement with RPA as well (Robotic Process Automation) to automatically take action for users. 

View full review »

What should be included is some UI features and maybe some integrations. This includes documentation on how the UI works. For example, some way for the Pega out of the box tools to support UGS. That would be very wise.

My issue is that the UI is hard to see in some small details. You can't do fast work with it all the time. Sometimes a customer has some requirements that you go outside of this box. It gives you the Pegs UI tool which has some limitations about styling and customizing the UI.

For some customers, it meets their requirements and for some, it doesn't. That's my view for organizational use. Maybe they could provide better technical support. 

When you are trying to do some minor attachments, you shouldn't be required to use the UI. However, you can just use the solutions that are already in there.

View full review »

The unit testing needs to improve, as well as the user interface.

In coming releases, I would like to see something in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML).

View full review »

The UI needs improvement. The product itself does not have too many issues, but implementing Pega solutions is a bit of a challenge due to the way code is handled, and in general the quality of partners available with Pega specialisation could be improved.

View full review »

The biggest thing I have seen is when going from one version to another and upgrading to the latest version, it takes a pretty long time for an organization to go through an upgrade process. I think that's an area where they can make it a little smoother.

Also they need to come up with licensing options. Right now they do have a cloud-based option, but the cloud prices I've seen are much more expensive compared to competing products.

View full review »

Pega Cloud early adoption and use for cross enterprise capability was new to many. The early adoption meant version 2.0 of their cloud service may require refactoring and redesign of some services.

View full review »

• UX
• Business specific functionality

View full review »

No Cons as such, but if it's not implemented by knowledgeable resources it's going to be a disaster. View full review »