Pega Platform Reviews

The primary use case for this solution is business process management within a local bank. The environment involves handling various banking operations and customer interactions, where the solution aids in streamlining and automating processes.

The platform has significantly improved organizational efficiency by automating complex processes and enhancing operational flexibility. It has facilitated smoother workflow management and integration with existing systems, improving overall productivity.

The product's most valuable features include its adaptability and flexibility, attributed to its Java-based architecture. It allows for easy updates and incorporation of new features, ensuring the solution remains relevant and effective in meeting changing business needs.

The product's artificial intelligence capabilities could be improved. More advanced AI features could further optimize process automation and decision-making.

I have been using Pega BPM for approximately three years.

The solution generally maintains good stability. It is designed with dual balances to ensure continuous operation even if one server fails.

The platform is highly scalable, accommodating the growth of organizations and adapting to increased demands effectively.

We previously used a different business process management tool but switched to Pega BPM due to its superior flexibility and adaptability to our specific needs.

The initial setup was straightforward and self-explanatory, taking approximately one day to complete.

The implementation was conducted in-house, and no vendor team was involved. Our internal team handled the process efficiently.

The return on investment is substantial, ranging from 3o% to 80%, with visible improvements and benefits typically realized within a short period.

The product pricing is considered reasonable compared to other solutions in the market.

We evaluated several options, including IBM BPM and Oracle BPM. 

Overall, the solution is highly effective for business process management. However, to fully leverage its capabilities, you must stay updated with the latest features and improvements.

I rate it an eight out of ten. 

Our company is the service provider for Pega BPM; we act as the IACs for three products from Pega. We recommend a product to our company's customers based on the requirement and their budget. 

If a customer is looking for a platform at the enterprise level, which comprises customer service, case management, BPM, and mobile features, our company recommends Pega BPM to them. 

When customers look for standalone applications, not at the enterprise level but a quick local platform they want to build some applications with, such as a leave management system or an attendance system, then we recommend other solutions than Pega. 

When an enterprise-level platform is required, which is Pro Code, our company recommends Comodo. If someone is looking for a case management platform to perform the BPM and native operations using native mobile apps but not the front-end processes, this is where our company will always recommend Comodo.  

The UI cannot be customized in the solution. 

I have been using Pega BPM for ten years. 

Our company is an Elite partner of Pega; there are only six to seven Elite partners of the vendor, which include TCS, Infosys, and Accenture. Thus, our company has a strong relationship with Pega, and we receive a response within an hour from the tech support team when an issue occurs. Our company's CEO was the technical director of Pega for fourteen years. 

For small and medium-scale requirements, the solution can be deployed within a week. But for large organizations the deployment time would vary depending on the requirement volume. The largest systems in Saudi Arabia are running on Pega. The solutions from the vendor handle the process of commercial registration, compliance metrics, investment management, citi management and integrations with IoT solutions. 

Pega is usually not recommended for developing small-scale applications; rather, Comodo or OutSystems can be used. Pega CRM is one of the most robust applications in the market, offering a private cloud, unlike Salesforce.

Some customers in the Middle Eastern countries, India, and other APAC countries don't want the cloud to be hosted outside their native countries. Vendors like Salesforce don't have a cloud server available in the Middle Eastern countries. Pega now offers integrated customer service, 360° customer view, and additional services as per customer needs. 

For one of our customers for Pega, their revenue escalated from 300 million a year to 600 million Saudi riyal in a quarter. There are multiple Pega licensing models, including outcome- and revenue-based licensing models. Financial institutions usually prefer Pega's revenue licensing model. 

For instance, a loan-based financial institute will have to pay X amount as the cost once they can cater one billion loans. As a thumb rule for price calculation, if you are availing a limited number of licenses for a small entity, it's going to cost you a dollar for each case or end-to-end workflow. 

From creating a Pega account to purchasing the solution, all the processes in between, including the KYC and customer role management process, are considered a single case. If there is a huge volume requirement of ten million cases in India, the same price will come down to 50 cents per case; with negotiation, it might also come down to 33 cents a case. 

Pega BPM and other solutions from the vendor are all low-code solutions. Especially in the Middle East and African markets, our company has noticed that they are more focused on front-end development; therefore, often, a customized UI is required, which cannot be implemented with Pega due to low code functionality and standard principles defined in the platform. But Pega BPM offers an integrated case flow and customer service, which contributes to the vendor becoming a world leader. 

There are AI-driven business process management features being incorporated in the solution. For instance, if you mention the vendor about your plan to develop a loan application, they build the entire case flow for you and make the application available within an extremely short span, after which the connectors and APIs need to be set up and integrated. Pega BPM is a highly advanced solution. 

At our company, we also evaluate if a customer actually needs Pega solutions before recommending it. For instance, if Pega is considered the Ferrari of the industry and the customer is willing to drive at a speed of 10 to 20 Km/h, then it's not worth the cost. For basic requirements, a customer can choose Comodo when only the BPM layer and custom UI are needed to build native mobile apps, while the workflow remains on Comodo. 

Pega is the leader in business process management solutions. Pega creates market trends across the globe. If you check Forrester or Gartner reports, Pega has always been rated as the top BPM solution provider. Other competitor companies learn from Pega and implement improvements in their products. Pega is not considered a front-end portal platform. The limitations of Pega are quite logical. The product owner of Pega mentioned that to build a low-code rapid development platform, it is mandatory to provide templates.

For example, in MS Word, you can use the numerous templates or start from a blank template. The templates in Pega are pre-defined; they cannot be customized; when starting from scratch in a solution, it won't be considered as a low-code solution. Pega needs to find a way to implement low code even with a blank template. Pega is working on a new product line called Constellation in which the aforementioned issue will probably get resolved. 

I would overall rate Pega BPM an eight out of ten. There are still some challenges with the front-end aspect of the solution, but the product is best when it comes to business processes and customer service management. 

The European and American customers of our company are more keen on the process flow rather than the application appearance at the front-end. But for customers who are focused on the front-end more than what's underneath the Pega product, it becomes very difficult to make them understand the value of Pega. I expect the vendor to implement improvements on the front-end. 

PegaRULES is utilized to streamline the progression of a case or business process, guiding users through various stages and steps required to accomplish a specific task. PegaRULES offers built-in functionality for reporting and provides a basic user interface. It is currently implemented on an older version of the Pega platform, specifically Pega 7.1.7 or 7.2, which may employ technologies, such as Cosmos.

One of the key advantages of PegaRULES is its out-of-the-box capabilities, which eliminate the need to build certain functionalities from scratch. For instance, features like "get next" in process flows allow for the seamless continuation of a flow without the requirement of additional activity creation. This serves as an illustration of how existing components can be leveraged rather than starting from scratch. It provides a solid foundation, to begin with, and allows for enhancements at a higher level, making it a beneficial starting point.

There is room for potential improvement in the performance of PegaRULES, as well as the need to address any existing security concerns. It should be noted that working with an older version of Pega, rather than the latest 8.x versions, may limit certain capabilities and leave room for vulnerabilities that could benefit from increased attention. Furthermore, the user interface (UI) could be a candidate for enhancements. It is worth mentioning that newer versions of Pega may have introduced improvements in these areas. 

I have been using PegaRULES for approximately five years.

At times, I find PegaRULES to be a bit convoluted, although I don't rely heavily on their technical support. Instead, I usually turn to their Pega Product Network (PPN) to seek assistance when I encounter challenges. It proves helpful to see what others are writing and sharing on the platform.

One aspect I am not fond of when it comes to PegaRules is their training. The training methodology often feels disjointed and lacks clarity, making it difficult to grasp the concepts they are trying to convey. Personally, I have struggled to understand their training materials based on my own experience.

I rate the support from PegaRULES a seven out of ten.

Neutral

PegaRULES is generally straightforward to work with, at least in my experience. While there may be some learning involved, it is not overly complex. Having some familiarity with Java can also be beneficial. Personally, I did not encounter any significant difficulties when working with PegaRULES.

The price of PegaRULES is more expensive than other solutions on the market.

I rate the price of PegaRULES an eight out of ten.

This is one of the best solutions in its category.

I rate PegaRULES a nine out of ten.

This solution is useful for business process management if you have any banking solutions or need to manage a process. Maybe a very simple example could be a loan approval process where you need to upload your documents and have them be verified by users. In other words, you have a methodical process in place that encompasses reviews. It can be anything, it might be an order that you have placed on Amazon which needs to go through another. Anything that involves a methodical process is a good fit for Pega as a product.

What I found the most valuable is the case management and the UI design capabilities. We have the ability to do any kind of integration on Pega, which is really beneficial. 

I think there is room for improvement in the low code/ no code environment that they're promoting now. That needs to be aligned a little bit more. I still feel that it is not that friendly for a person who has no experience with Pega to just go in and try to create something. It is a little bit difficult to comprehend, which can be a challenge for the developers who manage the solution because they will have a hard time getting people to use it. For example, if several business users start developing an application at the same time, bottlenecks can happen and the developer will have to go in and kill the conflict in the rules that they have created. That could be better streamlined, which means there is room for improvement there.

I have been using this solution since 2010.

I would rate the stability of this solution a nine, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.

I would rate the scalability of this solution a seven, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.

I would rate their support a five, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best. There are lags in their responses.

Neutral

My impression is that the initial setup process has to be followed via documentation. It's becoming a little bit less complicated, but it is still not easy for an inexperienced user to kickstart and deploy. The deployment an hour and a half at most. It can be deployed by one person. 

I would rate this process a six, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.

The pricing is a bit costly. Although it is a little bit costlier than all other tools on the market, it is more consistent. It also shortens the time to go live by quite a bit.

As far as maintaining this solution goes, how extensive it is will depend on whether or not you will be maintaining just Pega. It allows you to delegate many of the business rules to business users where they themselves can actually go and configure their rules and modify them. A user can have their own dedicated set of rules that they can go and configure. 

Overall, I would rate this solution an eight, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.

The primary use case includes working with Pega Platform, but the organization is planning to switch to another solution soon.

While there may be stability issues, they are minimal.

The technical support is very low, rated at a one or two out of ten. There is a lack of support and community presence in the country, leading to challenges in finding developers.

There have been some stability issues, however, they are not significant.

The technical support from Pega is very low, rating a one or two out of ten.

Negative

The pricing is expensive, and this is an issue.

The organization is in the process of selecting a new solution.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.

I work in the automobile industry, and I generally use Pega for automating regulations and warranty applications.

Currently, we are in a project where the return on investment is less than six months, which is quite noticeable. Time savings are about three hundred percent when building an application in Pega compared to building in Java.

It's an end-to-end solution and a digital transformation tool. It has a range of modern technologies and proven designs built into it, making it a one-stop solution for many industries, including banking, insurance, automobile, and government. It includes AI, has decision-making capability, and is a rich case management tool.

The UI layer is a concern since it is native to them and embedded into the code. I cannot have my own UI layer at the moment. Also, finding a person with the right knowledge for Pega, since it has fewer resources available, is a challenge.

I have been using it for 18 years now.

When you say stable, it all depends on how you have approached the application or the design. If you choose it and design it correctly, it is 100% sustainable.

There is no need to be concerned about scalability. It is scalable across regions and divisions.

The support is okay. I would rate it as six or seven. They have a process-driven approach that can delay problem-solving.

Neutral

I have used WorkFusion and Kofax in one of the solutions. However, Pega clearly outperforms them in all aspects.

As a cloud-based solution, it's a click away. If you are talking about on-premises, it hardly takes an hour, and one person is enough for installation.

Currently, we are working on a project where our return on investment is less than six months.

Pega is at the higher side of medium pricing, but with the cloud, it should be manageable.

I have used WorkFusion and Kofax before. However, Pega clearly outperforms them.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

We use Pega BPM for backups, consumers, markets, payments, loans, etc.

The most valuable features of the solution are case management, routing, and low-code environment.

The solution's pricing model or licensing model could be a little better.

I have been using Pega BPM for 12 years.

I rate the solution’s stability an eight out of ten.

I rate the solution an eight out of ten for scalability.

The solution's technical support is good, but there are some things it needs to improve. Sometimes, the support takes longer because of the customer queries and the analysis it has to do.

Neutral

The solution’s initial setup could be made a bit easier.

We are using the solution's case management, many finance-related modules, and some frameworks. The solution's case management function has improved our daily operations. It was easy to customize Pega BPM for our industry. The solution handles some industry-leading tasks, like legal compliance.

Pega BPM has a huge offering, which includes CLM (Contract Lifecycle Management) and many frameworks built into their packages to comply with industry standards. Pega BPM is deployed mostly on-premises in banks for data security. Other BPM services, such as Oracle BPM, IBM BPM, Appian BPM, and Camunda BPM, are available in the market.

Small and medium enterprises have different needs and different costs. Pega BPM simplifies the modeling of a typical low-code workflow and data. There are other use cases where some other tool works better. Recommending Pega BPM depends on the business needs and journeys. Using the solution varies from case to case and depends on cost, complexity, infrastructure, and all other associated things that come with it.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

We primarily utilize it for automating a multitude of business operations, including finance, accounting, manufacturing, and product development. These processes play a crucial role in managing our day-to-day operations and we find that the automation provided by our use of this technology streamlines and simplifies these processes greatly.

The most valuable feature of Pega BPMI would be the academy courses, specifically the Product Development Network (PDN). Additionally, our organization has a dedicated Customer Engagement Team that we work closely with to achieve our goals.

The training aspect of Pega BPM requires significant enhancement. There should be more opportunities for third-party training and engaging events, such as hackathons where individuals can share their expertise. Additionally, the training structure itself should be more organized, as I have received feedback from my colleagues in the COE that the current training approach is overwhelming and requires excessive referencing to obtain accurate information. Another area for improvement would be the user experience with regard to RPA. Simplifying the IDA for citizen developers would make it easier for them to adopt the RPA tool.

I have been using Pega BPM for approximately five years.

I rate the stability of Pega BPM an eight out of ten.

I rate the scalability of Pega BPM a nine out of ten.

The setup of Pega BPM is not complex.

I rate the initial setup of Pega BPM a six out of ten.

I rate Pega BPM a seven out of ten.

In conducting our evaluations and comparisons between UiPath and Pega BPM, we found that both systems hold a comparable standing. Although, it is evident that UiPath outperforms in certain aspects such as user experience and ease of use in the development process. On the other hand, Pega BPM excels in addressing complex customization needs and offers more cost-effective solutions. Ultimately, our assessment concluded that both systems score equally in terms of their capabilities and effectiveness.

UiPath is best suited for smaller-sized companies. Pega BPM is better suited for large-sized businesses. 

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Pega BPM a seven out of ten.