Pega Platform Reviews

I use the product for process orchestration purposes.

There are a lot of frameworks in the product. I use Pega PRPC the most.

There are no job opportunities for users who have expertise in Pega. They are learning the certification program but need work. Pega should work on redefining their model and creating a demand for their skills. They need to reach a large number of business organizations.

I have been using Pega BPM for five years.

I rate the platform's stability a seven out of ten.

We have more than 500 Pega BPM users in our organization. We plan to increase the usage.

The initial setup process is straightforward.

We do not have to purchase any licenses for the product.

I recommend Pega BPM to others and rate it an eight out of ten.

We use the solution as a low-code development tool. The tool has pre-built rules. Hence, they can be reused and configured as per client requirements.

We can use the rules as per the class.

PegaRULES need to improve its JVM. It needs to enhance the operation speed and memory size.

I have been working with the solution for four years.

I would rate the tool's stability a nine out of ten.

I would rate PegaRULES' scalability a nine out of ten.

The tool's support will take time to resolve issues if it's a product enhancement issue. Application-related issues will be resolved immediately.

Positive

PegaRULES' setup is easy.

I would rate the product's pricing a six out of ten.

PegaRULES is mainly for enterprise companies and I would rate it a nine out of ten.

I am currently using it in my current organization. I have recently joined a new organization that also uses Pega, but in my previous organization, we used Pega for a couple of use cases where we set up automated workflows and other things.

We were doing straight-through processing and had everything set up. And we had RPA, and BluePrism bots there that we wanted to decommission, we set up Pega to do so.

We had issues with RP as a technology, as well as numerous challenges with some critical processes. Now, what used to always fail, too many bots and too many handoffs, both human and automated, is where we thought we would build APIs and integrate Pega.

When we were implementing in 2012, we also used Pega phones. It was a complete front office to back office interaction that was created, followed by case management. But I'm not sure, if you say case management as a feature, there's also knowledge management, which is present, but case management is what I've used extensively. 

Overall, the ability to integrate with multiple applications and effective case management is the most valuable.

If it could also be integrated with robotics, it could help with a lot of things, even if we don't have APIs, we could still talk to other applications. If it could invoke a bot, for example.

It currently has OpenSpan, but OpenSpan is a different thing entirely, as you call it in robotics order. 

If the BPM and robotics could be integrated more easily, then I believe both could be used.

It is not at all integrated. OpenSpan operates in a completely different manner, and Pega operates in a completely different manner. Part of it is called Pega robotics, but it has nothing in common, in my opinion.

I have used Pega BPM for quite some time. I started using Pega BPM in 2012, it has been for 10 years.

However, because I was leading at the time, I didn't have much experience with the tool. There was one client at the time, where my role was to lead a 60-person team. 

We actually did massive implementations. We used that finance framework to create a lot of workflows, at least three to four workflow applications that were quite large, as well as a lot of integrations and such. 

We did use it extensively from 2012 to 2015. We are still using it.

Pega BPM is definitely a stable product.

Pega BPM is scalable.

I am not sure how well it will work because we have a lot of requirements that I see today, we have a lot of emails, that we want to set up, all of these as workflow. I am still trying to understand and see how all of these emails will be converted to case management and email listeners, how much it can be scaled, and whether it'll work properly or not when the volumes increase because we have a huge demand right now. We also have to see how Pega will support us.

We haven't reached the point where we can scale to maximum capacity to see how the product performs. However, we can currently see that the product is scaling based on our requirements.

Because I am new to the organization I don't know how many users it has. But, in the previous organization, I believe there were many business units that used it, including the front of house and back of house. I wouldn't have a figure in mind.

At my previous company, I was one of the business units that used it. I wouldn't know, but from my business unit's perspective, the front of house was probably 200 people.

It is used daily, and we get through our smart forms, we get the inputs, and then the back office creates the interaction, and the back office works on it.

They have a very good support system.  You must have your contacts in place, and they must respond to you based on the escalated level. It's fairly consistent.

I would rate the technical support a four out of five.

Positive

So far, I have primarily used Blue Prism and Automation Anywhere for RPA.

The initial setup was difficult because, as previously stated, there were numerous integrations. However, we had excellent support from the ECS team, the Pega team, and the platform setup. 

Once we got it set up, I would say we were pretty stable. Once done correctly and set up properly, it should be more stable than an RPA solution, in my opinion.

I would rate the initial setup a four out of five.

The initial setup was done in-house.

It was in-house when I did my setup. It was not a cloud setup, but rather an in-house setup. We did an upgrade, and everything was done in-house.

I would rate Pega BPM an eight out of ten.

Pega BPM is used by us for customer onboarding, support, and care.

Case Management, as well as Workflow Automation, are Pega's most powerful capabilities. 

By creating a visual layout of the business process, designers can easily go and implement the business process. And from there, you can pretty much do it in concur. You can concentrate on each area of the business process and create user input tasks with defined role-based access controls on each of those user input tasks.

Pega's low code development is entirely based on object-oriented and application development. However, I believe it can be used in a low code application, such as development platform features such as tracking and dropping some user components. It has that support, but not to the extent that other platforms do, such as the app in or out system. They make it very simple to create UIs without the need to use HTML, CSS, and JavaScript together to create pixel-perfect UIs. I believe Pega could improve in this area.

I have been working with Pega BPM for more than five years.

It's fairly stable and in performance as well.

We didn't have to put much effort into upgrading our platform and adding more resources. I would say that the platform is obviously very robust and capable of scaling to large enterprise-scale recommendations.

In our company, we have more than 300 people who use this solution.

Technical support is very good. They usually respond quickly to inquiries, whether they are about infrastructure or products.

The initial setup is straightforward. You can now create your business processes and begin designing forms for end users. On Cloud, it is pretty straightforward.

Maintenance is dependent on the size of the program or application. You would need at least two people. However, the number of people would vary depending on the size of the application and the program.

Some of the key pain points were addressed by the applications that were developed, primarily in terms of user satisfaction and implementing them in the business process. 

The return on investment was not a consumer web application where the product would be rolled out to the general public and revenue would be generated. 

It was designed primarily for internal business users, With the main goal of the application being to improve business processes and bring all offline processes online to have a digital footprint of those business processes, making tracking easier.

I am not aware of the cost. But, considering the licenses, user licenses, and infrastructure, I'd guess around a million USD.

I would rate Pega BPM an eight out of ten.

I believe they simplify the application development. It is still complex. The learning is not easy, it takes time compared to other products on the market. For the learning curve, I would reduce two points.

When our clients automate the KYC and onboarding processes, they can reduce their manual force and then deploy them in much better tasks rather than the mundane activities of selecting forms and gathering information.

There is definitely an advantage to digitization, so we recommend Pega to our clients for the KYC digitization. Pega's strength is in KYC onboarding.

The workflow automation can be slow, so there is room for improvement there.

Personally, I have been using the solution for the past three years, but my company has been using it for about seven or eight years. 

The solution is stable.

The solution is quite scalable. 

The customer service team is very responsive and helpful. We haven't had any complaints or issues with them. I would rate the customer service as a nine out of ten.

Positive

The initial setup was easy. On a scale of one to five, I would give it a four. 

The deployment was handled by Pega and was quite easy, not very complex, and the customer was satisfied. 

The pricing is a bit on the high side, but you're paying for a quality product.

I would recommend that you work with one or two Pega developers in the initial stage. After that, it's quite straightforward.

I would rate this solution as a nine out of ten. The Pega product is definitely good. 

I use Pega BPM to automate business use cases and integrate third-party application data into applications designed on Pega Platform.

Previously, our HR onboarding application ran in silos, so everything was happening separately. Pega BPM allowed us to consolidate all the data in one place, from which we could define our business workflow. This means that we have the entire flow running in one application from start to end with the help of third-party application data.

Pega BPM's most valuable features are case management, integration, the convenience of using REST APIs, and the ease of changing things at the UI level.

Pega BPM could be improved by including token-based authentication and extending its integration options. In the next release, Pega should live up to their claim to be low-code/no-code and make their platform more simple and UI-based.

I've been using Pega BPM for almost two years.

Pega BPM is stable.

Pega BPM is scalable.

The initial setup wasn't complex, but you have to define your class structure and architecture properly. Deployment took around a month. Also, Pega says BPM is low-code/no-code, but that's not true - you need intervention as you can't design the application without some knowledge about it.

We used an in-house team.

Pega is expensive. If your company has a good amount of money to spend, go for Pega as it has many things readily available out of the box. But if you're looking to save money, you may be better going for an open-source platform.

I also evaluated WaveMaker, but Pega has features that aren't available on WaveMaker.

Pega BPM is a very good tool if you have the budget to spend on it and you need to automate any business process wherein you get the data from multiple sources. I would rate Pega BPM as six out of ten.

We support clients who use this solution. We have had a client who used Pega in London at their headquarters and in their data center operations in India. They installed Pega in the UK, but they wanted to run the applications from the data center in India. They wanted to give access to all the business users across the world in more than 12 different countries. 

The client used SAP for their business system, Pega for the business process management and UiPath for automation.

The robotic process automation has increased the confidence of business users. 

The cost of licensing could be improved.

I have been using this solution for 5 years. 

There are multiple components within support. This first component is the functional support from an BPM perspective that is module related. The second component is technical support for when clients want any customization of their BPM product along with any workflows.

The initial setup is straightforward. For an implementation project, we usually have a team of 10 BPM developers along with the BPM technical architect and the BPM technical lead. The implementation projects runs over 18 to 20 weeks, while an upgrade project, requires eight to 10 people over 12 to 16 weeks. If it is a support project, we use a team of six people over a period of one year.

Normally, we don't own the licenses. Customers have their own licenses and we work on their environment.

As an IT services company, we provide different solution options to customers. We offer SAP BPM, Pega, IBM BPM and Oracle BPM. The first and foremost consideration is that the customer needs to be comfortable with the solution that we offer. 

There is a feature to accelerate the development so that business analysts can directly create their user stories and assign the task to the developers. It's called DCO.

Pega is claiming they're into low code but as per Gartner Magic Quadrant, Pega is not there now. Appian, OutSystems, Mendix, Salesforce, and Microsoft Power Platform are the major leaders in the market as low-code platforms as per Gartner Magic Quadrant. Pega has to improve if they would like to gain their position in the low-code space. They would have to improve major functionalities that these low-code vendors and low-code platforms have like their mobile compatibility. A citizen developer can easily make B2C mobile apps.

Pega has to come up with a lot of improvements in these low-code areas for the citizen developers who can easily create mobile apps with minimal coding or no coding. With other competitors like Appian, OutSystems, and Mendix, you can do it using visual modeling.

The price could also be improved.

I have been working with Pega for about six years as a solution architect.

Pega is a stable product. If you're solving a business problem for case management, Pega is the best for case management solution, but the product architecture is entirely different. It's rule based. It's not popular for UI or UX management.

Pega's technical support is not as friendly as Appian. 

I would rate Appian higher than Pega. The price of Pega is a bit higher than Appian and the software isn't as friendly.

The price could be lower.

I would rate this solution 8 out of 10.