Director of QA at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Valuable features such as reporting capabilities and the ability to execute tests. Initial setup was complex.
What is most valuable?
The features I feel were most valuable were the reporting capabilities, the scheduling, and the ability to execute tests from anywhere.
How has it helped my organization?
Before upgrading to Performance Center the team was required to be at the controller location, and reporting needed to be extracted then presented.
What needs improvement?
I’d like to see the scheduling feature extended to more of an infrastructure management tool.
For how long have I used the solution?
5 Years
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)
May 2025

Learn what your peers think about OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
None
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Yes, though I believe these were caused by our infrastructure implementation and not the product.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
None
How are customer service and support?
Customer Service: Excellent!Technical Support: Proficient
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We were previously using HP’s LoadRunner product. We switched because we were centralizing the function and needed a more robust product.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was complex, but we were helped every step of the way by our NRCE (Named Response Center Engineer).
What about the implementation team?
We used HP resources NRCE. They performed expertly.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
No
What other advice do I have?
Use professional services to assist you with the install.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.

Engineer 2 at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Is stable and scalable
Pros and Cons
- "The initial setup was straightforward. I was able to download everything myself without any IT support."
- "Currently, when we try open LRE we encounter cookie banner issues. However, I'm not sure if it is within the enterprise solution or with the vendors."
What is our primary use case?
This solution is used for performance testing.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable features are the multiple schedule and load setup preferences in a test scenario. It is also flexible in scalability.
What needs improvement?
We encountered cookie banner issues when opening LRE.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for six years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability is good.
What other advice do I have?
I would definitely recommend LoadRunner for performance testing of any application/system with a wide variety of protocols. It's a great tool for capturing performance bottlenecks and its commendable analysis and reporting.
I would rate it nine out of ten
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise)
May 2025

Learn what your peers think about OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Team Leader at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Great for load simulation and creating correlations
Pros and Cons
- "LoadRunner Enterprise's most valuable features are load simulation and creating correlation for parameters."
- "LoadRunner Enterprise's reporting should be quicker, easier, and more flexible."
What is most valuable?
LoadRunner Enterprise's most valuable features are load simulation and creating correlation for parameters.
What needs improvement?
LoadRunner Enterprise's reporting should be quicker, easier, and more flexible.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using LoadRunner Enterprise for five to six years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
LoadRunner Enterprise is very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
LoadRunner Enterprise is scalable.
How are customer service and support?
Micro Focus' technical support is fast and efficient.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is very straightforward.
What other advice do I have?
I would give LoadRunner Enterprise a rating of nine out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner

Buyer's Guide
Download our free OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: May 2025
Popular Comparisons
OpenText LoadRunner Professional
OpenText LoadRunner Cloud
IBM Engineering Test Management
Buyer's Guide
Download our free OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- When evaluating Load Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- SOAtest vs. SoapUI NG Pro?
- Does Compuware have a manual testing solution? Which manual testing solutions should we be considering?
- What are the top performance tools available to load test web applications?
- What is the best tool for mobile native performance testing on real devices?
- When evaluating Performance Testing Tools, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Cost of TOSCA Testsuite?
- Do you have an RFP template for Testing Tools which you can share?
- Specflow vs Selenium
- What are the best performance testing tools?