Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Reviews

We primarily use Kaspersky Endpoint Security for antivirus access control and virus control. 

This solution is deployed on-prem. 

I think that all the features are valuable for our environment. 

It would be great if, as an additional feature, you could download updates without deploying updates to end users. 

I have been working with Kaspersky for three years. 

This solution is stable. 

We use this product extensively and there is no need for maintenance. 

Kaspersky Endpoint Security is scalable. 

There are approximately 7,000 users of this solution in my organization. We don't have plans to increase our usage yet. 

If I need assistance from technical support, I can use the texting system from the customer support website. 

Before using Kaspersky, I used Symantec, though I don't remember why I switched. 

The initial setup was straightforward. I deployed this solution by myself. 

We implemented this solution through an in-house team. 

Our company has seen a ROI. 

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security a 10 out of 10. 

Kaspersky is straightforward. If you go to their website, you can install it easily. 

We primarily implement the solution for our clients. It's primarily for securing endpoints.

This solution has a good history. We began with Kaspersky. It had a lot of market share and people were very aware of this product. 

The solution can scale.

The stability has been good.

The price is a bit expensive. Since 2018, we were moved from Kaspersky South Africa to Kaspersky France. They began increasing the price. In the beginning, they gave us rebates. We began with 25% and now we're down to 12%.

It's more and more difficult for our customers. It's grown more expensive and customers are not happy about it.  

The solution has been stable. Sometimes clients might have configuration issues, however, we have been able to deal with that and help them through. It doesn't crash or freeze. there aren't bugs. It's reliable. 

The solution is scalable and has an add-on EDR as an option. If a company wants to expand its offering, it can. It's not an issue.

We have many solutions that we deal with. The best is Kaspersky for sure. However, we are expanding our business on Symantec, also, for the last three years. With Acronis, we are just beginning. We have no more than one year with this product.

The deployment isn't bad. We can help clients with it and walk them through it to make everything easy. 

We are able to assist clients if they need help with the initial setup

The solution is growing more expensive and it's becoming an issue.

We are using the latest version of the solution, the Cloud Free Plus with add-on EDR. The last version.

I'd advise potential new users to be confident in the product.

I'm satisfied with the product, however, I'm not really going any deeper with it than I already am. If you don't have protection, ransomware might get you, and then things will be a mess. It's good to have some protection.

I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten. We've been happy with the product's capabilities. 

We use Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business to protect against threats.

I have found the most useful features to be protected against viruses, mail threats, encryption of the devices, and MDM. There are a lot of features.

The encryption feature could improve.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for approximately eight years.

The Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business solution is stable.

We have approximately 700 users using this solution.

The support is very helpful, they are good.

I have previously used Bitdefender eight years ago and it was not stable.

The installation is simple. It can be deployed on Windows, Mac, and servers.

I am able to do the implementation of the solution, it is easy to do.

We have approximately 700 licenses for this solution and we pay annually.

I would recommend this solution to others and I rate it the best solution.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business a nine out of ten.

My primary use case is on server workload, where this solution works really well.

Areas for improvement include signature update management and selecting the respective features on the endpoint side. There are so many features available that it can be difficult to know which to choose, and if you have very low-level endpoint devices, the user experience is slower, especially when updates are running.

I've been using this solution for about three years.

This product is stable, though that can depend on business structure and the kinds of devices used.

This solution is scalable.

I'm satisfied with the performance of Kaspersky's technical support.

The initial setup was fairly simple, taking only a few minutes.

Yearly licenses are available.

I would recommend this solution for other people looking into implementing it and rate it as seven out of ten.

My primary use case of this solution is for protection from malware and viruses. 

This solution is deployed on-prem. We are using the latest version. 

One of the most valuable features is that it's quite secure. I'm satisfied with this solution. 

As far as improvements, maybe the licensing could be cheaper, but I think this solution is pretty okay. 

I have been using this solution for about 12 years. 

The stability and performance are good. 

This solution is scalable. There are about 300 people in my organization using Kaspersky. 

I haven't contacted Kaspersky's technical support. 

The installation is easy and straightforward. It took roughly 10 minutes, and I did it myself. For deployment, you need one admin. 

We implemented this solution through an in-house team. 

We pay for licensing yearly. 

I rate Kaspersky a 10 out of 10, and I would recommend this solution to others. 

I like the security that this solution provides. It not only protects against the outside world, but it also protects against careless users. We do have users who make careless mistakes in the operation, but the system protects them from their attacks, and we can easily identify and follow up on the problem.

The performance could be better.

We would like to see improved performance and faster deployment in the next release.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for ten years.

It's a server-based application.

We are using the latest version. We update it daily.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is reliable, but it can be resource-intensive at times.

We have approximately 130 users in our organization.

We used technical support about once a year on average.

There are some issues with the configuration, but it is still very good, and the impact on general use operations is minimal.

The installation is a little complicated and can take a long time, and it requires a policy for our internal control.

The installation requires an experienced user.

We have two mechanical team members to maintain this solution.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I would rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business a nine out of ten.

We use Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for protecting our information.

The solution is secure.

There are times when Microsoft Windows's antivirus called Defender interferes with the functionality of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business. There should be better integration with Windows.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for approximately six years.

We are having some stability issues but we have been using the solution for a long time and we have not had any issues until now. Once this issue is fixed we expect it to work well in the future.

We have approximately 90 people using the solution in my organization.

We have had some issues with the solution and we have contacted support and they have resolved them.

The installation takes half an hour to complete.

I did the implementation of the solution and we have five engineers that handle the maintenance.

There is an annual license required to use Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business a six out of ten.

We use Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for many purposes. We mainly use it for protection against malware. Additionally, we perform a lot of administration for users using the application, device, and web controls.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is a very powerful tool for us. We use a lot of third-party software that integrates well with the solution.

The solution could improve by providing a cloud service that synchronizes with the on-premise console which would give better connectivity in remote areas.

In a future release, there should be DLP features added.

I have used Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business within the last 12 months.

The solution is stable. However, sometimes when we complete a Windows automatic update we receive the Windows blue screen error prompt. The majority of the time it was because the equipment has updated and the update was not the best one.

The solution has been scalable, we have a lot of different servers.

The technical support is good. We had some difficult problems that were new that took the support some additional time to find a solution. For minor problems, they have been very responsive with their support.

We use many network protection solutions, such as McAfee.

The installation is easy, it can be done with a few clicks of the mouse to install the administration, and from the administrator, you can deploy the solution to the users.

The solution requires a license and there are different license packages depending on the number of users you need.

I would advise others before implementing this solution to have an organized network. It makes the process a lot easier.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business a nine out of ten.