Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Reviews

My primary use case is on server workload, where this solution works really well.

Areas for improvement include signature update management and selecting the respective features on the endpoint side. There are so many features available that it can be difficult to know which to choose, and if you have very low-level endpoint devices, the user experience is slower, especially when updates are running.

I've been using this solution for about three years.

This product is stable, though that can depend on business structure and the kinds of devices used.

This solution is scalable.

I'm satisfied with the performance of Kaspersky's technical support.

The initial setup was fairly simple, taking only a few minutes.

Yearly licenses are available.

I would recommend this solution for other people looking into implementing it and rate it as seven out of ten.

My primary use case of this solution is for protection from malware and viruses. 

This solution is deployed on-prem. We are using the latest version. 

One of the most valuable features is that it's quite secure. I'm satisfied with this solution. 

As far as improvements, maybe the licensing could be cheaper, but I think this solution is pretty okay. 

I have been using this solution for about 12 years. 

The stability and performance are good. 

This solution is scalable. There are about 300 people in my organization using Kaspersky. 

I haven't contacted Kaspersky's technical support. 

The installation is easy and straightforward. It took roughly 10 minutes, and I did it myself. For deployment, you need one admin. 

We implemented this solution through an in-house team. 

We pay for licensing yearly. 

I rate Kaspersky a 10 out of 10, and I would recommend this solution to others. 

We primarily use the solution for version and device control. That's why we have moved to Kaspersky. It's meant to be assisting us with device and control issues.

The solution is light. It's is easy on the client-side, and even on the server. It doesn't take much processing power. There's no bottleneck of the applications.

We have the ability to restrict users and third-party VPNs. We have control over the user and application access and have put in place policy-based safeguards also.

The solution has been quite stable.

The scalability is good. 

We have found the initial setup to be rather straightforward. 

We found that, for some reason, some site URLs were being blocked in Kaspersky. However, we have since found a solution. As it stands now, the URL opening issue has been resolved on our end.

The solution could be more secure. 

We have been using Kaspersky for almost two years.

The stability is good. The performance is reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

The scalability of the product has been good overall. If you need to expand it, you can.

In head office, we are using the product on the client end for about 100 plus people. On the server end, we use it as well for about 60.

We've never contacted technical support as we have not found any complexity regarding the product. It's a product that is easy to deploy and control. 

We are also using Symantec. While we have been using Kaspersky for about two years, we've used Symantec for around eight to ten years.

We also leverage a Cisco-based firewall to increase security.

The installation is very straightforward and simple. It's not difficult. A company shouldn't have any issues with the process. 

We have two personnel that handle deployment and maintenance. One is currently managing it, and the other is managing the client end.

We have a yearly license with Kaspersky currently. It has already gotten renewed after its first expiry. We will renew it. When we renew it, we tend to make sure it's also as up-to-date as possible. 

We have the latest version of the solution installed currently.

I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten overall. We are quite happy with its capabilities so far. 

I would recommend the solution to other users and organizations. 

I like the security that this solution provides. It not only protects against the outside world, but it also protects against careless users. We do have users who make careless mistakes in the operation, but the system protects them from their attacks, and we can easily identify and follow up on the problem.

The performance could be better.

We would like to see improved performance and faster deployment in the next release.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for ten years.

It's a server-based application.

We are using the latest version. We update it daily.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is reliable, but it can be resource-intensive at times.

We have approximately 130 users in our organization.

We used technical support about once a year on average.

There are some issues with the configuration, but it is still very good, and the impact on general use operations is minimal.

The installation is a little complicated and can take a long time, and it requires a policy for our internal control.

The installation requires an experienced user.

We have two mechanical team members to maintain this solution.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I would rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business a nine out of ten.

We use Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for protecting our information.

The solution is secure.

There are times when Microsoft Windows's antivirus called Defender interferes with the functionality of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business. There should be better integration with Windows.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for approximately six years.

We are having some stability issues but we have been using the solution for a long time and we have not had any issues until now. Once this issue is fixed we expect it to work well in the future.

We have approximately 90 people using the solution in my organization.

We have had some issues with the solution and we have contacted support and they have resolved them.

The installation takes half an hour to complete.

I did the implementation of the solution and we have five engineers that handle the maintenance.

There is an annual license required to use Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business.

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business a six out of ten.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is used for network protection. It does monitoring and can detect intrusions and viruses. Additionally, we use it for log management.

There is plenty of features that make the solution work very well.

When I do a malware scan on my computer it takes a long while. This process could improve in the future. Additionally, the security could improve.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for approximately three years.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is a stable solution.

We have approximately 24,000 users are using this solution.

We have not needed to contact the support because we have not had any issues.

We have a department that handles all the implementation and maintenance of the solution.

There is an annual license required.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security a seven out of ten.

We use Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for many purposes. We mainly use it for protection against malware. Additionally, we perform a lot of administration for users using the application, device, and web controls.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is a very powerful tool for us. We use a lot of third-party software that integrates well with the solution.

The solution could improve by providing a cloud service that synchronizes with the on-premise console which would give better connectivity in remote areas.

In a future release, there should be DLP features added.

I have used Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business within the last 12 months.

The solution is stable. However, sometimes when we complete a Windows automatic update we receive the Windows blue screen error prompt. The majority of the time it was because the equipment has updated and the update was not the best one.

The solution has been scalable, we have a lot of different servers.

The technical support is good. We had some difficult problems that were new that took the support some additional time to find a solution. For minor problems, they have been very responsive with their support.

We use many network protection solutions, such as McAfee.

The installation is easy, it can be done with a few clicks of the mouse to install the administration, and from the administrator, you can deploy the solution to the users.

The solution requires a license and there are different license packages depending on the number of users you need.

I would advise others before implementing this solution to have an organized network. It makes the process a lot easier.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business a nine out of ten.

The Kaspersky Endpoint Security is used for all the workstations in the company.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security protects us against viruses and dangerous software, and it's also great because it has a component that is useful for the deployment of software versions to the end user's computer.

In terms of improvement, we do not use the solution for the servers in most cases because the solution protects us against some software. Hence we have problems installing such software on the server; however, we do some fine-tuning to use this type of software.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security is stable.

We are satisfied with the support.

The initial setup of this solution was straightforward.

The licensing is yearly based.

 It is expensive, it could be cheaper, so I think the solution's pricing could be better.

Yes, I would definitely recommend Kaspersky Endpoint Security to other users.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.