Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Reviews

We're using Kaspersky on our server and some clients. It is the only security solution we have for these systems. We manage website categories through it, similar to how some website brands manage their categories. For example, we categorize websites like Facebook. Our approach to website management may differ slightly.

Kaspersky provides robust protection. It allows us to manage 30 clients from a single PC. We monitor and block data transfers via USB to prevent virus infections and other threats. 

Kaspersky includes web protection and user protection features. Web threat protection ensures that users are immediately protected whenever they browse the internet and encounter potentially harmful websites. This process helps safeguard users, and Kaspersky certifies websites to enhance the browsing experience.

It is not stable. It may not meet all our current requirements. Clients might face issues, which implies that our infrastructure might not be robust enough to handle additional components or tasks.

The admin console interface is difficult to navigate. If you don't use it for an extended period, you might encounter issues when looking for specific functions or events. Additionally, the UNC.exe file is still being utilized, which can affect system performance. It's important to periodically reinstall and update the software to ensure everything functions correctly. Managing a large infrastructure with this system may require additional effort and resources.

The admin console must be a little bit easier.

We have been working with Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for three years.

It is stable. I rate the solution's stability a seven out of ten.

We have 30 people working on this solution.

I rate the solution's scalability an eight out of ten.

The technical services helped a lot.

Positive

Deployment takes two days to complete. I am the only person doing it.

I rate the initial setup a seven out of ten.

I rate the pricing as five out of ten, whereas ten is expensive.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

We use the solution for protection against malware.

Kaspersky detects and moves issues to quarantine.

Kaspersky is an excellent choice for enterprise security. It supports Windows 10 and earlier versions like Windows 7, ensuring compatibility across various Windows operating systems used by our organization. Whether it's PCs or servers, Kaspersky provides robust protection and supports private communication. In case of security threats such as Java vulnerabilities or malicious links, Kaspersky effectively mitigates risks. It's important to note that while Kaspersky Endpoint Security can be installed on Windows 7, it integrates with Windows 10 without disrupting network connectivity.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for three years.

The solution is stable.

The solution is scalable.

If we pay more money for support, we got a convenient support, but we paid for minimum charges.

Neutral

The initial setup takes five business days. One person is enough for the deployment.

Pricing is very reasonable for a small companies. It cost around 64 dollars.

It works very fine and prevent any issues for operation. It is valued by estimated ten million.

I recommend the solution.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Kaspersky is a good product. It helps clients with adequate protection using the latest technologies, such as AI, Azure, and zero-day attack protection.

The number of incidents has been completely reduced. We haven't reported any incidents since we deployed the product. Additionally, on the dashboard, you can easily see all the attempts that have been detected. On the reporting side, it operates smoothly and effectively, ensuring security.

Kaspersky has EDR capabilities and extended EDR features, which help in mitigating legacy issues. Additionally, the robust management tools enable effective vulnerability patching and application deployment. 

It integrates well across different operating systems, including mobile devices like Android and Mac. It effectively manages firewalls, particularly with Fortinet, enhancing overall security posture.

The solution could provide more integration.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business since 2019.

We're looking for a comprehensive solution that integrates multiple services, such as malware protection and firewall capabilities, similar to what the Sophos platform offers. Our technicians have indicated that Sophos provides superior integration and functionality compared to Kaspersky.

The management console is user-friendly. We haven't encountered any problems with it. Our technicians can easily navigate the dashboard and perform any necessary tasks.

Administrators can easily monitor detections and remediations, saving considerable time on the administrator's side. Additionally, when threats are detected, the program promptly reports to the administrator, allowing for immediate action or manual intervention to mitigate potential risks.

Kaspersky does not exclusively focus on network security solutions. Instead, it primarily concentrates on securing endpoints. Adding additional components could enhance its effectiveness in protecting your environment.

Kaspersky primarily focuses on endpoint protection and includes features like application controls, unlike solutions such as Sophos, which integrate seamlessly with EDR and extend to network security. Kaspersky's offering remains focused on endpoint security without the same level of integration into broader network security frameworks.

The solution includes various components that can be tailored to meet specific needs. It provides comprehensive endpoint security, including email security, as a separate module. You can purchase and configure the necessary components without buying unnecessary add-ons like sandboxing separately.

Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

I used the solution for signature-based detection, machine learning, threat detection, behavior-based detection, and for the endpoint.

The solution's most helpful features for threat detection are machine learning analytics and behavior analytics. The solution's reporting capabilities are good. I can generate and schedule custom reports from it. It's helpful and gives us a high, medium, and low-risk-based approach.

Some threats were able to bypass the solution's detection.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for four years.

I haven’t faced any stability issues with this solution.

The solution’s technical support is okay.

Positive

I have worked with other tools, but I like Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business because it gives full endpoint control, including detection, vulnerability management, and file integrity.

The solution fulfilled our needs for the endpoints, including enhanced security and detection for the endpoints.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is not an expensive solution.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is a cost-effective solution. 

The product offers support only through mail and not on the phone. 

I have been working with the product for two years. 

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is stable. 

The tool's deployment is easy. It took five years to deploy the product. 

I rate the product a seven out of ten. 

We install Kaspersky to protect our endpoints for clients and servers. In the past, Kaspersky had different solutions for the clients and servers. We use the solution for protection from viruses, malware, etc., on the client's side.

I'm not sure if we'll increase usage of Kaspersky or try another solution. We are having discussions now with Trend Micro because we have new business requirements, and we want to see all the different capabilities that are there.

When we started with Kaspersky, it was an antivirus system, but now they've added endpoint protection, so it has more capabilities. Trend Micro has the same product and engine for clients and servers. We are using another product from Trend Micro that will integrate these products, which is better than having different solutions. For now, we're still using Kaspersky, but in the future, I think we'll move to Trend Micro.

With Kaspersky in place, we haven't faced any problems with viruses, ransomware, or anything like that. 

If something critical happens, Kaspersky will alert the admin or SOC team about it. I think Kaspersky's reporting, monitoring, and notifications should be more detailed.  

In my case, different admins are responsible because we have various departments. There is one admin per department. We don't need to receive all the notifications. We can receive only the critical alerts, but the other admins need to get all of them. That's one area where Kaspersky needs improvement.

I've been using Kaspersky for five or six years.

The performance is good. It doesn't use a lot of resources, which is crucial for us. However, the performance wasn't optimal out of the box. It needed some tuning on it to be sure that it is the best configuration. Kaspersky is reliable. I can't recall any time we had crashes or downtime.

Kaspersky is highly scalable. Right now, we have more than 500 users in various departments, including regular employees and managers.

Kaspersky support is fast and good.

Setting up Kaspersky isn't complex at all. It's straightforward. You install the server, and then you can install the agent remotely. It didn't take very long either. For post-installation maintenance, we have different sites, and each site has an engineer responsible for handling Kaspersky. The product doesn't necessarily require this many engineers. It's only because we have different locations. Right now, we have five or six engineers across the various sites.

We used a Kaspersky partner for implementation. They were very good.

I don't remember exactly what the licenses cost, but it's not too expensive. It's affordable,
especially when you are dealing with on-prem. However, I don't know about the new prices because we are in the process of buying support. We've owned the license for a long time, and we are now bringing in the support, so we are not paying much for this.

Kaspersky and most other security products have a lot of modules. They recently added several new ones. You find yourself buying and deploying so many things. There are some modules that everyone uses, like, for example, the orchestration module. Instead of selling them separately, it would be better to have bundles or an all-in-one license. That would save the customers from having to do lots of implementations. As far as I know, they do not have a bundled license. 

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security seven out of 10. I think Kaspersky is one of the best products for small and medium-sized businesses. It doesn't need that much experience for implementation and support. I would suggest that new users be patient when they're tuning in the first implementation. They might find that the system uses a lot of resources and the machines become slow. But after spending some time tuning, the product will work fine.

My primary use case is for threat protection. 

Endpoint Security is efficient and easy to use. It doesn't slow the performance of your personal computer. 

Kaspersky could be improved by better malware protection. They have to take advantage of Malwarebytes and integrate the same engine inside Kaspersky. I use Malwarebytes as well because Kaspersky doesn't always detect malware. 

I have been using this solution for five or six years. 

This solution is stable and the performance is good. There isn't much maintenance required, so you can manage by yourself, especially if you have experience in technical support, security, and Kaspersky. I think Kaspersky should have some type of free training to gain more traction in the market. 

There are around 500 people in my organization using Kaspersky. 

I have never contacted technical support. As an IT professional, I have handled everything myself. 

I use Malwarebytes because it's the best malware product. 

In the past, I have also used McAfee, Trend Micro, and Norton. We shifted to Kaspersky when it was introduced to the market. Both the companies I work for use Kaspersky. 

Kaspersky is very easy to install. It took about five minutes. Endpoint Security has an SaaS version for Windows, a software upgrade service. Installation is easy and the documentation Kaspersky provides is very good. 

I implemented this solution myself. 

I prefer paying for a yearly license because it has some discounts. One of the companies I work for pays for the Business Select license, for 100 users. 

I rate Kaspersky a nine out of ten. Many products tend to be a bit weak. For example, sometimes when you use the Windows operating system, it works for six months, then you have to reinstall it again or restore an image and then start working with it. It's not like Linux. Kaspersky is the best, one of the top three in the world, and I would definitely recommend it to others who are considering implementation. 

I use the solution in my company for endpoints and for anti-malware purposes. I use the solution for the endpoints in our infrastructure, so it allows me to block USBs or any other incoming connections from unknown sources.

The tool is easy to use for me, especially if it is the on-premises version. The product is easy to install. The best thing about the solution stems from the fact that it is available at a very low price with a lot of features that can be modified to meet the users' requirements. The policies of the product are easy to use.

The product is hard to use on a cloud server. From an improvement perspective, the use of the product on a cloud server should be made better. The GUI of the product is too basic, making it an area where improvements are required.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for five to six years. I don't remember the version of the solution. My company has a partnership with Kaspersky.

The major problem I have with the product stems from the fact that it needs more RAM space. My company has to make more RAM space.

Around 2,000 people in my company use the product.

I am very happy with the solution's technical support team.

The product's initial setup phase was easy.

Users must install MySQL first, after which they can install Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, after which they can use a package installer from another client that automatically connects the tool on the server, making it an easy process.

The solution is deployed on an on-premises model.

The solution can be deployed in an hour or two.

The product is available at a low price.

The integration of the tool with our company's existing IT infrastructure is good and helpful.

In my company, we have choices. If I want to use a cloud-based tool for endpoint security, we use Sophos. If I want an on-premises endpoint security product, I prefer Kaspersky.

If you want cheap endpoint security, especially on an on-premises server, I highly recommend Kaspersky since it is easy to use, install, and available at a low price.

I rate the overall tool a ten out of ten.