Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Reviews

Securing our network is now easier since we have divided the task between the antivirus and the overall network firewall. This means different people can focus on the different lines of defense, hence enhancing security.

• Network Agent
• Over the network deployment
• Monitoring
• Reporting
• Manipulation

I can easily manage over 300 computers antivirus from my desk. I am able to see detected viruses, run disinfection, and scans remotely. I am able to troubleshoot Kaspersky Antivirus installed on workstations from my desk by uninstalling, starting tasks, communicating with computer users (Network Message), and viewing and deploying to those who are not installed. Updates are also run on a schedule and this saves on bandwidth usage since some updates from the KSC dbase.

From time to time, some users loose connection via the Network Agent. This gives us a tough time, since they are in different localities, so we have to run tasks and sometimes manually re-establish the NetAgent connection.

At first, the whole centre concept was new to me, but the documentation really helped as I had a smooth time catching up. I also once lost a KSC server as it crashed and I had to redo all the setup since I had learnt about the backup method. However, the KSC team was and continues to be of great help via their assistance from the company account.

Yes, but it was largely our network settings. Setting up the slave servers is a headache if the network is not well-configured.

The support is very good. A 10 out of 10.

This is the solution I found when I joined the organization, so it is hard to tell if it was a switch.

Straightforward, since I used the provided manual/documentation guide.

It is quite standard, because we use the volume licensing.

Not applicable.

It is very reliable, user-friendly endpoint security software. I recommend it to any administrator.

We mostly use the product as an antivirus solution. With Kaspersky Security Network (KSN), we are protected against most new threats.

Beside being an antivirus solution, it is an endpoint solution. Therefore, it has many features, like deploying a package to many clients, an MDM solution, etc.

They can improve the zero-day exploit to be more effective.

For five years, we have not had any stability issues.

For five years, we have not had any scalability issues.

Support is actually quick. They try to find the solution fast and comfort you when a problem arises.

No, we did not use another solution before.

The setup was simple. After the setup, you also need to configure rules based on your company needs.

The licensing is based per agent. You can get discounts if you have more agents.

We evaluate NOD32, Symantec, and McAfee along with this product.

If they need more than an antivirus solution (like MDM and package deployment), they can still consider the product.

• Antivirus engine
• Center Management
• Security Center

It is very stable, and effective in combating spam, viruses, Trojans, etc.

Data loss prevention (DLP) in email security.

Nine years.

No issues.

No issues.

An eight out of 10 for technical support.

Yes, we used a different solution. We changed it because it went down in support and providing up-to-date information.

It is a mixture of both. You must know some information about installing a client server application in a WAN environment. You can use the guide as well to deploy the product.

Pricing is very competitive and licensing is very much ethical.

Trend Micro, McAfee, and Sophos.

Must have an up-to-date system and should have minimum a mid-size range server.

The solution is used as an antivirus for protection.

The setup and implementation are easy.

The threat intelligence features are not up to date.

I have been using the solution for two years.

The product is stable.

The product is scalable. We have five customers.

The setup depends on the solutions. If we use it with normal solutions, it takes ten minutes. If we use it with VMware or other infrastructure like Hyper-V, it will require additional effort.

We are partners. The tool must update its signature, threat intelligence features, and IoC. The signature is not sufficient. It is not authentic. Overall, I rate the tool a seven out of ten.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is used for security.

The most valuable features in Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business are protection and encryption. Additionally, the interface is good and it can be integrated with Windows, Linux, and Mac.  

The solution could improve by having some integration with other vendors.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for approximately two years.

I have found the support to be good.

The implementation is very simple.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business a ten out of ten.

It's on-premise. There are three Kaspersky appliances — EPP, EDR, and the sandbox — that all work together. If someone wants to secure their internal endpoints, they can use the EBB and the EDR tools. You can use these to investigate traffic on the endpoint. The sandboxing feature is used to check the files. 

I'd like Kaspersky to be more stable and secure.

We've been providing Kaspersky for many years. Before I joined this company, my company worked for several years with various endpoint protection solutions by Kaspersky, Trend Micro, Carbon Black, and others.

Yeah, yeah. Stable and scalable.

Kaspersky support has cooperated with us. They were very helpful.

Setting up Kaspersky is easy, but it requires two or three core members from our team, including admins and managers if necessary. And that is because of the administration that I mentioned. And we set up an SQL Server to manage Kaspersky. With help from the customer team, it takes only six to seven days to get it working. 

Kaspersky requires a license. I don't remember how much it costs exactly, but it's charged per appliance. 

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security eight out of 10. I recommend it.

The solution is primarily used in order to protect computers. It also helps you avoid issues online.

The solution has been very stable. The performance is good.

The product is quite scalable.

We use it at our enterprise, and it's been extremely beneficial.

We've found the product to be easy to use.

The solution could be more secure. It's an aspect the company needs to be mindful of.

I've been using the solution for around two years at this point.

The solution is stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It's reliable. We don't deal with any types of crashing or freezing.

The solution can scale if you need it to. That's not a problem.

Right now, in our organization, about 25 people use it.

We've never used technical support before. We've never had to call them. Therefore, I can't speak to how helpful or responsive they are. 

For an antivirus product, I used to use McAfee. However, I had some information stolen from my computer and therefore I had to change products. It didn't protect me very well. 

I did not handle the installation process. There's another team that manages that aspect of the solution. Therefore, I can't comment directly on how easy or difficult it was to implement.

There is a systems manager that handles any maintenance that may be required.

We had a team that handled it internally.

You do have to pay for a license. We pay a yearly licensing fee. I can't speak to the exact cost, however. 

I'm a customer and an end-user. I do not have a business relationship with Kaspersky.

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. We've mostly been quite please with its performance. 

I'd recommend it to other users and organizations.

We use this solution for the antivirus to secure our PCs and server rooms.

As far as it functions, it works fine. 

From a technical standpoint, they are good and it's functional, but improvements are needed.

It's very heavy and it affects the computer's performance. 

We need better performance. A lightweight solution without affecting the performance of the computer would be better.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for 14 years.

I don't have any issues with the stability of Kaspersky Endpoint Security.

This is a scalable solution. We have approximately 200 users in our organization.

We have plans to increase our usage.

Technical support is okay. I don't have any issues with them.

I was not involved in the installation but seems to be straightforward.

We have three people to manage this solution for our organization. The team is made up of two engineers and one manager.

Licensing fees are paid annually.

I would recommend this solution but the performance needs to be improved.

I would rate this solution a four out of ten.