Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Director at KNC
Reseller
Top 20
Helps clients with adequate protection using the latest technologies but have lesser integrations
Pros and Cons
  • "It integrates well across different operating systems, including mobile devices like Android and Mac. It effectively manages firewalls, particularly with Fortinet, enhancing overall security posture."
  • "The solution could provide more integration."

What is our primary use case?

Kaspersky is a good product. It helps clients with adequate protection using the latest technologies, such as AI, Azure, and zero-day attack protection.

How has it helped my organization?

The number of incidents has been completely reduced. We haven't reported any incidents since we deployed the product. Additionally, on the dashboard, you can easily see all the attempts that have been detected. On the reporting side, it operates smoothly and effectively, ensuring security.

What is most valuable?

Kaspersky has EDR capabilities and extended EDR features, which help in mitigating legacy issues. Additionally, the robust management tools enable effective vulnerability patching and application deployment. 

It integrates well across different operating systems, including mobile devices like Android and Mac. It effectively manages firewalls, particularly with Fortinet, enhancing overall security posture.

What needs improvement?

The solution could provide more integration.

Buyer's Guide
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
April 2025
Learn what your peers think about Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business since 2019.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We're looking for a comprehensive solution that integrates multiple services, such as malware protection and firewall capabilities, similar to what the Sophos platform offers. Our technicians have indicated that Sophos provides superior integration and functionality compared to Kaspersky.

What other advice do I have?

The management console is user-friendly. We haven't encountered any problems with it. Our technicians can easily navigate the dashboard and perform any necessary tasks.

Administrators can easily monitor detections and remediations, saving considerable time on the administrator's side. Additionally, when threats are detected, the program promptly reports to the administrator, allowing for immediate action or manual intervention to mitigate potential risks.

Kaspersky does not exclusively focus on network security solutions. Instead, it primarily concentrates on securing endpoints. Adding additional components could enhance its effectiveness in protecting your environment.

Kaspersky primarily focuses on endpoint protection and includes features like application controls, unlike solutions such as Sophos, which integrate seamlessly with EDR and extend to network security. Kaspersky's offering remains focused on endpoint security without the same level of integration into broader network security frameworks.

The solution includes various components that can be tailored to meet specific needs. It provides comprehensive endpoint security, including email security, as a separate module. You can purchase and configure the necessary components without buying unnecessary add-ons like sandboxing separately.

Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller
PeerSpot user
Rehan Rauf  - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager Nayatel Business Solutions at Nayatel Pvt. Ltd
Real User
Top 20
A scalable and easy-to-deploy product that provides excellent security and vulnerability assessment features
Pros and Cons
  • "The security and vulnerability assessment features are valuable."
  • "The product must improve its price to suit small and mid-size enterprises."

What is our primary use case?

We use the solution for endpoint protection, device control, site management, and centralized manageability.

How has it helped my organization?

The product provides complete visibility of users and their access control. The solution has some impact on our system performance, but it does not interfere with my day-to-day jobs. It is not heavy to run on the system server. It does its job silently.

What is most valuable?

The security and vulnerability assessment features are valuable. It's a good and effective product. It does the job.

What needs improvement?

The product must improve its price to suit small and mid-size enterprises. The cloud is free for large enterprises with a large number of users. However, for small deployments, the cloud is costly.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the solution for two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I rate the tool’s stability an eight out of ten. We had some minor bugs. The support team took care of it.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I rate the tool’s scalability a nine out of ten. We have approximately 600 to 700 users.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is easy. We do not need a technical person to deploy the tool. It is easy to manage. It is a cloud-based solution. The deployment and testing take around 15 to 20 days. We need six to seven months to onboard customers, though.

What other advice do I have?

We are partners. We propose the solution to our customers. We also use the tool on-site. It’s a good product. It is easy to deploy and scalable. It provides all kinds of functions and controls. We must use the tool. Overall, I rate the solution an eight and a half out of ten.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner/Customer
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
April 2025
Learn what your peers think about Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
CTO | CIO | Group Head Technology at Thal Industries Corporation Ltd
Real User
Top 5
Used for endpoint computing and protection from virus attacks
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable features of the solution are the daily updates and protection from virus attacks."
  • "Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business doesn't have a built-in DLP (data loss prevention) solution."

What is our primary use case?

We use the solution for our endpoint computing. We install the solution on the laptops and desktops of the employees within the organization.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features of the solution are the daily updates and protection from virus attacks.

What needs improvement?

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business doesn't have a built-in DLP (data loss prevention) solution.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for the last 13 months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is a stable solution. We are always connected with Kaspersky and updating our server.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is a scalable solution. The solution has covered 100 endpoints, and it is deployed across five locations.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have previously used McAfee and Apex One.

How was the initial setup?

The solution's initial setup is very simple and has no complexity.

What about the implementation team?

To deploy the solution, we get the demo, get quotations, and get it approved by the management. There was only one distributor of premium security in Pakistan, and their team deployed the solution on our premises. The solution was deployed within one week in our organization.

What was our ROI?

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business provides value for money.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The solution's pricing is reasonable.

What other advice do I have?

We have Kaspersky-certified professionals within my team. There are two certified professionals, one is Sophos certified, two are VMware certified, and one is Veeam certified. We have multiple team members. We have certified employees in the IT team under my supervision.

We are planning to implement SIEMS, SOC, and threat intelligence and outsource these three services to manage service providers. We currently have a 100 Kaspersky license, and we are satisfied with the performance of the solution. We update the pattern twice daily, and we have found no issues.

We have already blocked the major USPs. We are using licensed Microsoft software, and we have implemented anti-spammer firewalls. It's a controlled environment. It is quite difficult, and we are conducting assessment, penetration testing, and IT risk assessment on a yearly basis. So, our environment is a very controlled environment.

Our in-house team members and support staff are trained to maintain the solution and take care of issues. I would recommend the solution to other users.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Roymell Santos - PeerSpot reviewer
ICT Officer at Intelligent Skincareinc Inc.
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Comprehensive protection with user-friendly features and efficient resource utilization
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable features for us include data security, as well as web browsing and password management security measures."
  • "It would be beneficial to have more robust cloud management capabilities for Endpoint."

What is our primary use case?

The reliability of Kaspersky Security is evident in its effectiveness in various use cases, including endpoint protection and antivirus functionalities.

How has it helped my organization?

Kaspersky supports the security needs of remote workforces by providing solutions tailored for remote usage. These solutions are particularly beneficial for employees outside traditional office environments, as they rely on VPNs to ensure security.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business has the potential to enhance our clients' security stance significantly. I believe its comprehensive set of features is highly beneficial and sufficient for our customers' needs.

Deploying global policies is smooth, with no issues encountered in managing security policies.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features for us include data security, as well as web browsing and password management security measures.

What needs improvement?

It would be beneficial if the price could be reduced, and improved management of the license allocation for adding additional Endpoint users would be advantageous. This would enhance the management capabilities for partitioning additional licenses.

It would be beneficial to have more robust cloud management capabilities for Endpoint. This would allow us to easily monitor threats originating from client devices and potentially establish remote connections to address issues. Such enhanced cloud functionality would greatly assist in IT management tasks.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with it for approximately seven years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I would rate its stability abilities eight out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I would rate its scalability capabilities nine out of ten. We have around sixty users withing our client base.

How are customer service and support?

Technical support is rated as five out of ten because it lacks local support for immediate assistance. This may lead to longer wait times for responses. However, given the stability of our current Endpoint, this shouldn't pose a significant issue. Improvement in technical support would be beneficial, especially in regions where direct support is unavailable.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Prior to adopting Kaspersky, we utilized Sophos antivirus. However, I favor Kaspersky due to its user-friendly interface and minimal resource requirements.

How was the initial setup?

I find the initial setup process for Kaspersky to be quite satisfactory compared to other products. Unlike some other solutions, I didn't encounter any issues with installation or needing to guide the customer through the process.

What about the implementation team?

It can typically be implemented within an hour.

What other advice do I have?

Overall, I would rate it nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Muhammad_Irfan - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Network Administrator at ACMC
Real User
Top 5
Has good analytics and reporting capabilities for tracking threats and security compliance
Pros and Cons
  • "The product's most valuable features are automation and central administration."
  • "I rate the pricing five out of ten."

What is our primary use case?

We use the product as a firewall to provide antivirus and email security. It helps us protect against threats and malware.

What is most valuable?

The product's most valuable features are automation and central administration. It efficiently identifies and manages vulnerabilities and protects data. Additionally, we can deploy it immediately.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for six years. At present, we use the latest version.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is a stable platform. It has fulfilled all the requirements, including email and data protection, web traffic management, add-on filters, web browsing, and ransomware protection. It is working perfectly. I rate the stability an eight out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have 50 Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business users in our organization. It is a scalable platform.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support team works well 99.9% of the time. They guided the upgrading and updating of the solution. It addressed a crashing issue with the central console by recommending an upgrade to a specific version. Additionally, when a computer encountered problems after moving to another group, the support team suggested installing updates to resolve the issue.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used several products before. We switched to Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for affordable pricing and better functionality.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup takes five to ten minutes to complete. If the solution is installed for the first time, it might take a bit longer, i.e., around five minutes, and subsequent installations on existing systems might take around ten minutes.

What about the implementation team?

We can implement the product ourselves.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We purchase the product's yearly license. I rate the pricing five out of ten.

What other advice do I have?

The platform provides a centralized administration system for managing endpoint protection. The business security management features include boosting productivity, anti-spam protection, encryption, etc. It has good analytics and reporting capabilities for tracking threats and security compliance. I rate the product a ten out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Nickolay Tolstopyatov - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of IT Department at Tengri Partners Investment Banking
Real User
Top 5
Stable product with a wide range of security features
Pros and Cons
  • "It is an effective solution. It provides a wide range of security and defense features."
  • "Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business’s interface could be easier to understand when displaying the activities during configuration processes."

What is our primary use case?

We use the software to secure and defend the network from malicious attacks for endpoints.

What is most valuable?

It is an effective solution. It provides a wide range of security and defense features.

What needs improvement?

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business’s interface could be easier to understand when displaying the activities during configuration processes.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for eight or nine years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is a stable product.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have 50 Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business users in our organization. It is challenging to scale while working with a large number of users.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support team takes time to respond to the queries. However, their documentation on the website is helpful.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

How was the initial setup?

We encounter issues while deploying the product if it is not installed properly and requires one executive to work on the process. However, it is easy to maintain.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We purchase the software’s yearly license. It includes support and maintenance updates. The pricing is a bit more expensive than other products.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated a few similar products. We decided to use Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business as it is more stable, has different defense models, and helps in efficient network supervision.

What other advice do I have?

The product uses a lot of resources for hardware. It is necessary to install and configure the product correctly. I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business a nine out of ten.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
AhmedSemary - PeerSpot reviewer
It security engineer at Raya Contact Center
Real User
Top 20
Provides good threat detection and reporting capabilities
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution's most helpful features for threat detection are machine learning analytics and behavior analytics."
  • "Some threats were able to bypass the solution's detection."

What is our primary use case?

I used the solution for signature-based detection, machine learning, threat detection, behavior-based detection, and for the endpoint.

What is most valuable?

The solution's most helpful features for threat detection are machine learning analytics and behavior analytics. The solution's reporting capabilities are good. I can generate and schedule custom reports from it. It's helpful and gives us a high, medium, and low-risk-based approach.

What needs improvement?

Some threats were able to bypass the solution's detection.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for four years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I haven’t faced any stability issues with this solution.

How are customer service and support?

The solution’s technical support is okay.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have worked with other tools, but I like Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business because it gives full endpoint control, including detection, vulnerability management, and file integrity.

What was our ROI?

The solution fulfilled our needs for the endpoints, including enhanced security and detection for the endpoints.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is not an expensive solution.

What other advice do I have?

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Juan Solano - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Director at Atlantic Quantum Innovations
Real User
Top 5
Bad technical support, but used for endpoint protection, virus detection, and centralized administration
Pros and Cons
  • "We use the solution for endpoint protection, virus detection, and centralized administration."
  • "We are having some troubles because some American companies we work with don't want to work with Kaspersky."

What is most valuable?

We use the solution for endpoint protection, virus detection, and centralized administration.

What needs improvement?

We are having some troubles because some American companies we work with don't want to work with Kaspersky.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for four years.

How are customer service and support?

I have heard from my people that the technical support for the solution is not that good.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

How was the initial setup?

The solution's initial setup for the endpoints is pretty easy, but it's pretty complicated for the central solution. Deploying all the agents is pretty complicated. I rate the solution’s initial setup a five out of ten.

What about the implementation team?

The solution's deployment took a long time. It took three months for the solution's complete deployment. A security engineer, an infrastructure engineer, and five to six technicians were involved in the solution's deployment.

What other advice do I have?

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business helps protect our remote workforce. Some of our users connect to the central office via VPN, and all of them are using Kaspersky. We are currently deploying some rules via Kaspersky on the console. It is getting a little harder for me to perform IT security management tasks. Nowadays, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is not that good for malware protection.

The solution's application control feature was pretty good at managing software on our network. We were using it constantly, but it's becoming a little challenging. It's pretty difficult to do because you need a very specific engineer and a lot of tweaking of the firewall rules.

Because of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, we are PCI and ISO 27001 compliant. We are having some troubles because some American companies we work with don't want to work with Kaspersky. Five security engineers and technicians were involved in the solution's maintenance.

I would not recommend the solution to other users because some American and European companies don't work with to work with it.

Overall, I rate the solution a four out of ten.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: April 2025
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.