Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Reviews

The most valuable feature is the central view. With this view, I can see all of the data.

I find it to be slow on my end and would like to see that improve. I think the e-learning portal can be updated because it's been disabled due to an upgrade. The data could be updated as well. I also think that pricing could be improved.

I've been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security since 2018.

We currently have 150 users but have not tried to expand yet.

Customer service/technical support staff have been responsive. They look for documentation and listen to you as you describe what happened.

The initial setup was straightforward.

We implemented it in-house, and the deployment took several days.

We have been using a yearly subscription and feel that pricing could be better. Perhaps, discounts could be given, during the renewal process, to those who have been customers for some time.

Our primary use case is for monitoring. 

Before Kaspersky, I had to control each PC one by one but now it's just one update and it can detect a virus on all of the systems. 

The blocking feature is the most valuable feature. 

It needs more computer resources. They should have more anti-spam features. 

It's a little more expensive compared to other anti-virus competitors like Symantec. 

I would rate it an eight out of ten. Not a ten because it needs more computer resources. 

Kaspersky is fairly good with endpoint management. Though, we do not use Kaspersky at our mail security levels because our mail security is done by another product that we use.

So far, performance has been okay. We just updated to the latest version.

It has improved our performance and deployment.

• The main thing for us is that we get our reporting.
• Deployment and centralized management are essential for us because of the number of loads that we have along with the number of geographic locations where we are based.
• If any policy has been breached, it will send you a report.
  

• I would like to see machine learning and AI as added features.
• It would be nice if they had a separate email security solution (instead of only their cloud edition), similar to what Forcepoint and Trend Micro have. 
• I would rate their encryption as a one out of 10. It needs a lot of improvement.
• There are some features built into Kaspersky that do not work at all, so we have to use other products instead.

It is a fairly stable product. 

There have been some disturbances going on in the market due to potential leaking of information, but I don't think we are very much concerned about what's happening in the global space. We know our data is secure at our level. We backing up our data and it is doing its job

It is a scalable product. We have been able to create a number of groups where we were to allow policies and deny policies. Another solution did allow us to do this, but we found it was not user-friendly.

The technical support is not very good. I think my mind fixes things before they get it together. I would rate the technical support as a three or four out of 10.

In the past, we went with Trend Micro. It was okay, but we needed a change, and we opted for Kaspersky. It had a lot more features from an endpoint management standpoint. We found it better in terms of deployment. Normally, with the other solutions, we would face issues with deployment.

The initial setup was not a problem for my team.

The vendor came in to help initially, but in the end, we set it up ourselves. 

I don't think it is a good product from a support standpoint.

Most important criteria when selecting a vendor:

1. The product should work and do what it promises.
2. The vendor and product should have a roadmap.
3. Support.

Securing our network is now easier since we have divided the task between the antivirus and the overall network firewall. This means different people can focus on the different lines of defense, hence enhancing security.

• Network Agent
• Over the network deployment
• Monitoring
• Reporting
• Manipulation

I can easily manage over 300 computers antivirus from my desk. I am able to see detected viruses, run disinfection, and scans remotely. I am able to troubleshoot Kaspersky Antivirus installed on workstations from my desk by uninstalling, starting tasks, communicating with computer users (Network Message), and viewing and deploying to those who are not installed. Updates are also run on a schedule and this saves on bandwidth usage since some updates from the KSC dbase.

From time to time, some users loose connection via the Network Agent. This gives us a tough time, since they are in different localities, so we have to run tasks and sometimes manually re-establish the NetAgent connection.

At first, the whole centre concept was new to me, but the documentation really helped as I had a smooth time catching up. I also once lost a KSC server as it crashed and I had to redo all the setup since I had learnt about the backup method. However, the KSC team was and continues to be of great help via their assistance from the company account.

Yes, but it was largely our network settings. Setting up the slave servers is a headache if the network is not well-configured.

The support is very good. A 10 out of 10.

This is the solution I found when I joined the organization, so it is hard to tell if it was a switch.

Straightforward, since I used the provided manual/documentation guide.

It is quite standard, because we use the volume licensing.

Not applicable.

It is very reliable, user-friendly endpoint security software. I recommend it to any administrator.

We primarily use the solution for endpoint security. It's just used to protect our equipment for the most part.

The security of the solution is very good. It helps us avoid viruses very effectively. We're quite concerned about this, and we take pains to ensure everything is protected.

The solution is very user-friendly and easy to use. 

The initial setup is very simple.

The solution is stable.

We haven't had any issues so far, and therefore don't have any complaints.

It would be preferable if the product were more proactive and more modern in its approach to security and protection.

We've been using this solution for about five years. It's been a while.

The solution is very reliable and scalable. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's not buggy or glitchy. We've been pleased with its level of stability.

We have about seven people using the solution. We're a very small company. We don't have much cause for large-scale expansion. What we are getting is what we need at this point.

We haven't actually used technical support just yet. We haven't had a need to as we haven't faced any issues with the technology. The solution itself is very reliable.

The solution is not complex to set up. It's very easy to implement. We didn't run into any problems with the process.

The deployment is fast. It only really takes about 15 minutes or so.

We deploy the solution annually.

We've been looking at similar solutions, such as CrowdStrike, as a next-generation antivirus or anti-malware.

We're dealers of Kaspersky. We're resellers. However, we're also customers. We mainly work with small companies.

I'm not sure of which version of the solution we're using currently. 

This solution is a good tool for small companies, at this point I can say that. For bigger companies, it may be better to look at cloud solutions, such as CrowdStrike, for instance.

Overall, I would rate the solution at an eight out of ten. It's easy to use and offers good protection.

We mostly use the product as an antivirus solution. With Kaspersky Security Network (KSN), we are protected against most new threats.

Beside being an antivirus solution, it is an endpoint solution. Therefore, it has many features, like deploying a package to many clients, an MDM solution, etc.

They can improve the zero-day exploit to be more effective.

For five years, we have not had any stability issues.

For five years, we have not had any scalability issues.

Support is actually quick. They try to find the solution fast and comfort you when a problem arises.

No, we did not use another solution before.

The setup was simple. After the setup, you also need to configure rules based on your company needs.

The licensing is based per agent. You can get discounts if you have more agents.

We evaluate NOD32, Symantec, and McAfee along with this product.

If they need more than an antivirus solution (like MDM and package deployment), they can still consider the product.

• Antivirus engine
• Center Management
• Security Center

It is very stable, and effective in combating spam, viruses, Trojans, etc.

Data loss prevention (DLP) in email security.

Nine years.

No issues.

No issues.

An eight out of 10 for technical support.

Yes, we used a different solution. We changed it because it went down in support and providing up-to-date information.

It is a mixture of both. You must know some information about installing a client server application in a WAN environment. You can use the guide as well to deploy the product.

Pricing is very competitive and licensing is very much ethical.

Trend Micro, McAfee, and Sophos.

Must have an up-to-date system and should have minimum a mid-size range server.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is used for security.

The most valuable features in Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business are protection and encryption. Additionally, the interface is good and it can be integrated with Windows, Linux, and Mac.  

The solution could improve by having some integration with other vendors.

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business for approximately two years.

I have found the support to be good.

The implementation is very simple.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business a ten out of ten.