Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Reviews

We use this solution to secure our endpoint devices.

With Kaspersky, we are licensed for 300 users. Eight technical engineers handle all maintenance-related issues. 

The reporting feature is good. Also, the device control is good. 

This solution used a lot of memory and GPU; it would be nice if this could be reduced. 

I have been using Kaspersky Endpoint Security for roughly five years.

The initial setup is easy. 

We installed this solution ourselves. 

Licensing is on a yearly basis. We have a three-year license.

Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give Kaspersky Endpoint Security a rating of eight.

I would absolutely recommend this solution to others.

We are using this solution for endpoint protection against intrusions, such as viruses.

One of the main features of this solution is the fast scanning capabilities.

I would like to see better-enhanced features, such as protection against ransomware and different types of malicious malware.

In an upcoming release, I would like to see DLP, encryption, and a VPN feature. There are a lot of other solutions coming out which claim they have all these features together.

I have been using this solution for two years.

I have found the solution to be stable.

We have over 3,000 users using the solution in my organization and the solution is scalable.

The technical support has been great. When we log a ticket we receive a solution shortly after.

We were previously using Symantec.

The setup was easy and not challenging.

The price of the solution is reasonable. It is less costly compared to competitors.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security a seven out of ten.

We are using this solution for endpoint protection.

The main feature of this solution is it is easy to use.

I would like to see integration to many different systems easier.

I have been using the solution for approximately one year.

The solution has been stable the past year we have been using it.

I have found the solution stable. We have 1,800 users using this solution in my organization.

We have not had any issue with the solution that we would need to contact the technical support.

There is a license required for this solution and we have 1,800 licenses. The cost is a bit high and we are looking for an alternative.

We are currently looking for an alternative solution and have evaluated Microsoft Defender.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security a seven out of ten.

I use the solution for security protection.

The solution sometimes slows down the computers of our clients, the performance needs to improve.

I have been using the solution for approximately five years.

We have over 1,000 users using the solution in our organization and the solution has been able to handle it.

Our technical team did the installation of the solution.

We have been evaluating other solutions to change in the near future.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security a six out of ten.

We use the solution for protection against viruses, spyware, and malware.

The solution is user-friendly and the dashboard is good.

When we connect to the solutions' website they block out our VPN connection. This causes us some difficulties. Additionally, when we use the solution on the laptop it uses more memory resources and becomes slower.

I have been using the solution for approximately six months.

The solution and its platform are reliable and stable.

The solution is very scalable. We have approximately 79 employees using the solution in my organization.

The setup of the solution is easy.

When comparing this solution to others, such as Alpha Security & Antivirus, it is more compact and the firewall is better.

I would recommend this solution to others. However, make sure you have the appropriate amount of resources to handle it. If you do not have adequate resources this will impact the performance of the computer.

I rate Kaspersky Endpoint Security an eight out of ten.

We're using the solution primarily for protection and security. We use it for malware protection. 

The antivirus feature is very, very good. It offers us good protection.

The solution is quite stable. It's reliable.

The scalability of the solution is excellent.

We have found the installation to be very quick and very straightforward.

The price of the solution is a bit high. It would be nice if it was less expensive. We're using a lot of devices, and therefore the costs add up.

I've been using the solution for the last two years or so. It's been a while.

The solution offers very good stability. It's reliable. The performance is good. It doesn't crash or freeze. There are no bugs or glitches. We haven't had any problems with it.

We have more than 1,000 users on the solution currently.

We've found the scalability to be quite good so far.

We likely will increase usage in the future.

We've reached out to technical support in the past. We've found them to be quite good. They are helpful and responsive. We're satisfied with the level of service they provide to us.

The initial setup is not too difficult or overly complex. The implementation, for the most part, is straightforward, and the deployment is quick. It doesn't take much more than five minutes. 

We handled the implementation ourselves, in-house. We did not need the assistance of any integrator or consultant.

The solution can be a bit pricy. Especially if you have to cover many devices, it can get expensive. The price compounds.

We are using the latest version of the solution. I cannot recall the version number off-hand.

We use multiple deployment versions, including on-premises and cloud versions.

I would recommend the solution to other companies. 

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. We've been pretty happy with its capabilities in general.

We primarily use the solution for endpoint security and protection.

We haven't had any major issues with the solution overall. It's quite a reliable product so far.

The stability has been reliable so far.

The pricing has been quite good and very reasonable.

We found the installation to be very straightforward and the deployment process to be very fast.

We've found that sometimes the solution is not doing its job in detecting some malware. They need to make sure that they are advancing their technology to catch more malicious events. There needs to be more security in place specifically on the malware side of things.

I've used the solution for two years. It has been a while.

The solution is quite stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. the performance has been reliable so far. 

The scalability hasn't really been tested by our organization. We've never tried to expand it, and therefore I can't speak to how successful expanding it may be for other companies. 

We only have two users of the solution in our company.

At this time, we likely won't keep using the solution.

I've never opened any tickets with technical support. I can't speak to how helpful or responsive they are. I've never dealt with them directly.

The installation was not complex at all. It was very straightforward. A company shouldn't have any issues with the process.

The deployment was also quite quick. It only takes a few minutes, if I recall the process correctly. It's not long and drawn out. It's easy.

I handled the implementation myself. It's not difficult. I did not need the assistance of an integrator or consultant at all. 

At the time, when we purchased the solution, the company was giving us the best deal on the market. It's the reason why we ended up choosing it. I don't recall the licensing aspects or if we had to pay for it, and if so, how much.

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. 

I haven't suffered from a malicious attack, and therefore I'm treating it quite high, as it is doing what we need it to do. The protection levels so far have been sufficient.

It's a good solution that companies should consider if other options are not available to them.

We primarily use the solution for security and protection. We use the product to scan our machines and arrest any viruses it comes across in its search. We also use it for notifications. It will alert us to any issues with the system.

The solution is very easy to use. It's an extremely user-friendly product.

I've found the product to be scalable.

The solution is very, very stable. I haven't had any reliability issues so far.

The solution is fairly easy to install and update online.

When it comes to handling the expiration of licenses, the solution should give a company more time to set up a renewal. It happens too abruptly right now.

I've been using the solution for a couple of years at this point. it's been a while. It's not new to me.

I can confirm that the solution is quite stable. There are no bugs or glitches. it doesn't crash or freeze. The performance is reliable.

The solution is scalable. If a company needs to expand the product, it can do so quite easily.

We have more than 4,000 users across our entire organization that utilize the solution.

We have a lot of Kaspersky licenses and therefore will likely continue to use them going forward.

I've never been in touch with technical support. Therefore, I can't speak to how knowledgeable or supportive they actually are if there are issues that arise.

We have not used another solution. We've used Kaspersky for over ten years and we've never switched solutions at this company.

When I got the machine it was very easy to install the product. It was not complex. Our IT didn't have any issues. Going forward, it's been updated online. This is also a simple and automatic process.

I'm not sure the exact amount of time it took for our IT admin to deploy the product.

We have 11 engineers on hand to deal with installation and any maintenance requirements. 

Our IT admins handle the installation. Individual employees do not do that. Therefore, I didn't handle the installation myself. However, it was handled in-house, and not by an integrator or consultant.

As an end-user, I am not aware of the costs of the licensing policies. I'm not on the commercial negotiation side of the licenses. There is someone else in the company that handles those details.

We are customers and end-users.

I'm not sure of the version. This is handled centrally by the organization. I don't deal with that aspect of the product.

I'd recommend the solution to other companies.

I'd give it a rate of nine out of ten.