Check Point Remote Access VPN Reviews

The typical scenario for remote access to organizational resources is that employees connect from home or from a branch if maybe we have internal resources in our organizations. So most times, employees will need to connect to their resources of the organization remotely.The types of internal resources they're connecting to through Check Point Remote Access VPN include file servers, servers from file storage, and business applications, with about 30 resources connecting through VPN at the same time.I don't have anything really unique to add about my main use case for Check Point Remote Access VPN; it's just a good tool for remote access, providing remote access.

The best features Check Point Remote Access VPN offers include encrypted connections, which are brief, centralized management, multiple flexible connection options, and end-to-end point security.Centralized management with Check Point Remote Access VPN mainly helps our team with policy administration and user connectivity.The end-to-end endpoint security provided by Check Point Remote Access VPN impacts our organization by ensuring compliance and enhancing security.Check Point Remote Access VPN positively impacts our organization by improving productivity, as employees are able to work even when they're not in the facilities, which is a plus for us.In terms of how much productivity has improved with Check Point Remote Access VPN, our company typically operates in an office work mode; however, under circumstances when we are not able to go to the office, the VPN really helps keep things moving.

One challenge I notice with Check Point Remote Access VPN is that it sometimes requires rebooting.

I have been using Check Point Remote Access VPN for about two years now, and we are using this for remote access to organizational and organization internal resources.

I estimate that Check Point Remote Access VPN has kept things on track for about 25 to 30 days a year.

Right now, my company connects with the vendors of Check Point whenever any maintenance is required, and not to our domain.

Check Point Remote Access VPN is a highly secured product with which, in our company, we can get end-to-end VPN connectivity so that the communication part is highly secured.

Check Point Remote Access VPN's connectivity and establishment takes time and needs to be faster.

In the future, Check Point Remote Access VPN should provide its users with URL filtering.

I have been using Check Point Remote Access VPN for ten years. My company is a customer and end-user of Check Point.

Though the solution is stable, sometimes the latest updates are not available, especially considering that it is something that has to be done very frequently to take care of URL filtering and the latest OWASP threats, which is only possible if the latest configuration is available to users.

It is a scalable solution.

Considering that access to the solution is given to specific people only in my company, I can say that around 100 to 150 people use the solution.

The technical support team of the solution is very good. My company hasn't faced any issues with the technical support team of the solution. My company has not had to wait for a response from the technical support team. I rate the technical support team of the solution a nine out of ten.

Positive

I have experience with Cisco. Though Cisco is one of the latest products that we deal with right now, my company has been more friendly with Check Point. My company prefers Check Point since it is easy and more user-friendly for us. Cisco is not that much of a user-friendly product since it requires highly skilled people and more engineers to operate it.

Check Point Remote Access VPN's installation process is easy.

Check Point Remote Access VPN's installation process can be done in two hours with the help of a person who takes care of the configuration part while also taking care of the respective routing configurations that are required.

The solution is deployed on an on-premises model.

Check Point Remote Access VPN's installation process is something that my company can manage with the help of our in-house members.

Compared to Cisco, Check Point Remote Access VPN is cheaper. My company makes yearly payments only towards the licensing costs attached to Check Point Remote Access VPN, as there are no extra costs attached to the product.

The maintenance part of the solution is easy and can be done remotely, because of which we face no issues in our company.

For 100 to 150 users, Check Point Remote Access VPN is a good option, but later on, if more people are going to get involved, causing one to invest in more frequent VPN connections while wanting secured connections, then Cisco is a better choice. For a limited set of people, Check Point is a better option.

I rate the overall tool a nine out of ten.

On-premises

When it comes to Check Point Remote Access VPN, my company is still in the testing phase and will be due for a rollout with our client, who has wanted a VPN connection since last summer.

If I compare the solution with some of the other products my company has used in the past, I can definitely see that it has some valuable features that allow me to see the traffic and what a client does. With the tool, I cannot only see a session but also the resources our company's clients are connected to since I can do so with the help of firewall logs. I like the overall visibility of the product.

The thing I like about Check Point Remote Access VPN stems from the fact that it terminates at the firewall wherever the client is going, and it works in an unencrypted manner, which allows me to see where the traffic is going. I can gain access to the clients' networks with NetScaler and with the aid of a packet sniffer.

Check Point Remote Access VPN handles up to a hundred megabytes for clients, but I want it to be able to handle up to one gigabyte.

For improvements in the product, I can create a wishlist since it is a VPN technology. I would love to see what is available on the VPN connections, but it is important for our company to check the encryption part of it.

I have been using Check Point Remote Access VPN for a couple of years.

The firewall part of the tool has been running for a while now without the need for any reboot. I don't have any stability-related issues with the product.

When it comes to VPN products, our company talks about putting them on another internet gateway, which seems to be an easy process. Using the scalability feature of the product seems to be a painless process, in my opinion.

I have contacted the technical support for the solution. The solution's technical support responds immediately. The quality of the solution's technical support is good. If a member of the technical support team doesn't have the answer to my queries, then they ensure that someone else who has the knowledge responds to my issues.

I rate the support team a ten out of ten.

Positive

I have experience with Citrix NetScaler since it is the only product that I have used as a remote access VPN tool.

I feel Check Point Remote Access VPN is better than Citrix NetScaler.

The product's initial setup phase was easy. I haven't had any formal training, but I have learned everything related to the tool.

The solution is deployed on an on-premises model.

A team in my company takes care of the deployment phase.

The reason I started to use Check Point Remote Access VPN is because it is preferred by the organization where I currently work.

The solution needs maintenance. There is a need to update the policy rules and ensure that the firmware is kept up-to-date.

I request the potential users of the product to invest time in going through the knowledge-based articles since they have a plethora of information.

I rate the overall tool a nine out of ten.

On-premises

In the context of general user remote access, we utilize Check Point VPN concentrators that serve as both Internet firewalls and error ID locations. Our remote access system, constructed on a Check Point foundation, consists of four systems.

Currently, I'm part of the network team, and my primary concern revolves around maintaining a stable connectivity setup. It's important for this connectivity solution to have provisions, possibly within AWS, that enhance security measures and provide more security-related advantages. From my standpoint, our solution serves a general purpose. It operates effectively, particularly during challenges like adversities or infrastructure issues. Overall, it suits our needs well.

There were some issues with automation and instability. But overall, these self-integrated products offer exceptional support and prove highly beneficial from an administrative standpoint. It isn't overwhelming, as seen with instances like in other vendors. The platform is convenient to manage and scalable.

I have been working with Check Point Remote Access VPN for one year. 

The solution is scalable. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. 

Technical support is essential in our case. We encountered a few instances related to next-generation firewalls, though they might not be of direct interest.

In general, the response rate to our inquiries has been quick. Our cases are categorized as server-to-server or critical solutions, resulting in immediate internet connectivity for addressing the issue. The level of support we receive is of a very high standard.

Positive

We previously used Cisco AnyConnect. Both solutions are similar. However, the difference lies in the security features rather than the networking aspects.

Ultimately, the decision was made to expand and implement Check Point for the entire user base. This choice was reasonable based on the circumstances and the initial security in Check Point. We also had a phase where we utilized both solutions simultaneously. Eventually, due to our requirements, switching solely to Check Point proved to be the more precise decision, aligning with our corporate requirements.

The initial setup is not very easy and we are partnered with highly qualified engineers to deploy the solution. The process involves designing the overall network module, carrying out installations, configuring appropriately, and initiating the initial setup. The array agent is then deployed to individual personal computers. It takes almost one quarter.

We had a partnered team with highly qualified engineers to deploy the solution.

When working with remote access, the goal is to define the exact issue we aim to resolve. Identifying a suitable solution for discussions is crucial while focusing on establishing a high-level solution design. Following this, the implementation can proceed. Formulating a solid architecture utilizing Check Point isn't overly complex. The service switches provided within the system confer a sophisticated level of functionality.

Based on these, I would rate it a nine out of ten.

Hybrid Cloud

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

The primary use case is to remotely connect to various sites and various apps and use some technological apps that are cloud-based. Check Point Remote Access was the essential platform for us to connect remotely through a secure network with an encryption key. It's also an encryption service for all information shared and obtained from this remote connection. Today, we still use it to remotely connect to computers, apps, websites, and cloud-based apps while traveling or out of the office.

Check Point Remote Access has been the perfect solution for us for a couple of years now. It helped us to remotely connect to various cloud-based apps and software when we were out of the office during the pandemic. 

After the end of the pandemic, we continue to use this platform so that all our employees in our real estate sector can connect to specific apps and not neglect their workdays when they are traveling in other states of the country. 

Check Point has been perfect for protecting us from any type of attack or data theft during remote management; it prevents and blocks all types of data leaks and has an authentication for each connection.

The most valuable aspects of the solution include: 

- VPN auto-connect feature. It is essential. It activates the VPN every time I make a remote connection and since I don't have to activate it manually to make the remote connection, it saves me time.

- Compliance scanning. It allows me to detect any existing irregularities in the network that is being used for the remote connection.

- The VPN Client. It allows me to fully configure all remote access, configure the firewall used, and gives me full access to network settings.

The main feature that would be improved within Check Point Remote Access is its operation within Linux OS, as it currently does not have many features for that OS. You cannot access the detection of threats that can steal your data. 

In addition, it does not have an incident analysis that can detect failures in time in the network or VPN connectivity. 

Also, the IPsec settings on Linux are quite limited, which makes it a bit difficult to configure the settings you can make for remote connection to Linux.

I have used this solution for a period of more than three years. The main reason why I decided to start using it is due to the fact that we needed a solution that would allow us to work remotely when the COVID-19 pandemic happened; this was a perfect solution for working remotely securely.

I was impressed by the scalability of this platform throughout our company, mainly since this solution emerged as the main use within the C-Level area of our company. It does not neglect some cloud-based apps when out of the office. The scalability of this platform made it possible for us to implement it in most areas of the company in order to strengthen remote work.

The Check Point support team was always attentive to any requirement when we first purchased this system. We had about three questions when we purchased Check Point Remote Access and the Check Point team answered all of our questions within minutes.

Positive

The main implementation was quite simple. Implementing it correctly in our corporate area took us a few days. However, it took us one month to fully implement it in all areas of our company. 

I found the initial setup to be fairly quick and provided a pretty useful system for protecting data leaks during remote connections.

We handled the initial setup in-house.

We got a return on investment from this platform in about four months. We managed to enhance remote work greatly. This allowed our sales and our customers' solutions to benefit by 40%. In addition, we managed to enable our employees to provide direct customer service, which strengthened our sales by more than 40%.

The Check Point Remote Access pricing is one of the most affordable solutions in terms of cost. This solution will power remote work for any company, and this solution comes at a very low cost. It provides a complete control panel, an SSL Portal, and client access for operating systems. I consider it very helpful for any company - at a very affordable price.

On-premises

Check Point Remote Access VPN enables us to access on-premise applications while working from remote locations.

The feature that I found most valuable is how conveniently Check Point Remote Access VPN allows us to access our HR system. We use it for the process of logging in and logging out.

I think Check Point Remote Access VPN is good enough to suffice our needs. At present, I don't have any complaints about the tool.

I have been using Check Point Remote Access VPN since the COVID-19 pandemic started.

In our organization, approximately 3,000 users work on Check Point Remote Access VPN. The number may go up if we hire more employees.

I think that the tech support provided by Check Point Remote Access VPN is good. Also, I would add that I have no complaints.

I would say that the initial setup was straightforward. The deployment process took place on weekends and during non-banking hours. In our organization, we only need around 10 to 15 employees, who include network administrators, developers, and project managers, for the deployment and maintenance of Check Point Remote Access VPN.

The deployment was conducted with the help of our in-house team.

I won't be in a position to answer this question. But, I can say that the licensing costs are charged annually.

We evaluated alternative options by using Forcepoint as a benchmark.

I would like the support to be faster. I rate this solution a nine out of ten.

Hybrid Cloud

Other

We use it to connect our sites. We have a couple of sites that need to interconnect. They are in our cloud and our premise data center. 

The scalability needs improvement.

I have been using Check Point Remote Access VPN for five years. 

The solution is not very scalable. 

The initial setup is not very straightforward. I would rate the setup a four out of ten. The solution is easy to maintain. 

The solution is pretty expensive. I rate it an eight out of ten. 

Overall, I will rate the solution a seven out of ten. 

Check Point Remote Access VPN provides strong security features, including encryption, authentication, endpoint security, access control, and centralized management. These ensure data protection and access control for remote users, making it a reliable solution for maintaining security in remote access scenarios.

Improvements for Check Point Remote Access VPN could include enhancing mobile connectivity for a smoother user experience, bringing it closer to the level of Cisco AnyConnect, which is considered more user-friendly.

I have been working with Check Point Remote Access VPN for almost four years.

My experience with tech support for Check Point Remote Access VPN was okay, but I find Cisco's support to be better. Overall, I would rate Check Point's support around six out of ten.

Neutral

Installation of Check Point Remote Access VPN is straightforward and it involves agent deployment to user laptops, enabling easy connectivity. Maintenance is low-cost and manageable, even for small teams, as configurations are straightforward. Network security engineers need to specify network segments for traffic segregation, but overall, deployment is automated, minimizing manual intervention and complexity.

The pricing for Check Point Remote Access VPN is average. Firewalls, whether physical or cloud-based, tend to be expensive, and Check Point's offering is no exception. While cloud options may offer more flexibility, physical devices have significant licensing costs, often totaling thousands of dollars.

Remote Access VPN, like Check Point's solution, is user-friendly, requiring only client installation for connectivity. It is useful for employees accessing corporate networks remotely and for granting controlled access to contractors or vendors. Competitors like Cisco's AnyConnect exist but Check Point Remote Access VPN is highly regarded for its functionality and reliability.

Check Point's Remote Access VPN is user-friendly and efficient for connecting via laptops, offering a straightforward setup without complex configurations. It simplifies access to specific divisions within a corporate network, making it suitable for end-users without extensive security knowledge. Although challenges may arise with mobile connectivity, the overall experience is smooth and accessible.

MFA adds an extra layer of security to Remote Access VPN. For example, users might need to enter a code from an authenticator app on their phone in addition to their regular login credentials. This ensures enhanced verification of user identity and helps protect against unauthorized access.

Overall, I would rate Check Point Remote Access VPN as an eight out of ten.