No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Deputy Head of IT department at UkrGasBank
Real User
Aug 22, 2023
Provides users with secure, seamless remote access to corporate networks
Pros and Cons
  • "It operates effectively, particularly during challenges like adversities or infrastructure issues."
  • "There were some issues with automation and instability."

What is our primary use case?

In the context of general user remote access, we utilize Check Point VPN concentrators that serve as both Internet firewalls and error ID locations. Our remote access system, constructed on a Check Point foundation, consists of four systems.

What is most valuable?

Currently, I'm part of the network team, and my primary concern revolves around maintaining a stable connectivity setup. It's important for this connectivity solution to have provisions, possibly within AWS, that enhance security measures and provide more security-related advantages. From my standpoint, our solution serves a general purpose. It operates effectively, particularly during challenges like adversities or infrastructure issues. Overall, it suits our needs well.

What needs improvement?

There were some issues with automation and instability. But overall, these self-integrated products offer exceptional support and prove highly beneficial from an administrative standpoint. It isn't overwhelming, as seen with instances like in other vendors. The platform is convenient to manage and scalable.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with Check Point Remote Access VPN for one year. 

Buyer's Guide
Check Point Remote Access VPN
July 2026
Learn what your peers think about Check Point Remote Access VPN. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2026.
904,680 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is scalable. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. 

How are customer service and support?

Technical support is essential in our case. We encountered a few instances related to next-generation firewalls, though they might not be of direct interest.

In general, the response rate to our inquiries has been quick. Our cases are categorized as server-to-server or critical solutions, resulting in immediate internet connectivity for addressing the issue. The level of support we receive is of a very high standard.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We previously used Cisco AnyConnect. Both solutions are similar. However, the difference lies in the security features rather than the networking aspects.

Ultimately, the decision was made to expand and implement Check Point for the entire user base. This choice was reasonable based on the circumstances and the initial security in Check Point. We also had a phase where we utilized both solutions simultaneously. Eventually, due to our requirements, switching solely to Check Point proved to be the more precise decision, aligning with our corporate requirements.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is not very easy and we are partnered with highly qualified engineers to deploy the solution. The process involves designing the overall network module, carrying out installations, configuring appropriately, and initiating the initial setup. The array agent is then deployed to individual personal computers. It takes almost one quarter.

What about the implementation team?

We had a partnered team with highly qualified engineers to deploy the solution.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?


What other advice do I have?

When working with remote access, the goal is to define the exact issue we aim to resolve. Identifying a suitable solution for discussions is crucial while focusing on establishing a high-level solution design. Following this, the implementation can proceed. Formulating a solid architecture utilizing Check Point isn't overly complex. The service switches provided within the system confer a sophisticated level of functionality.

Based on these, I would rate it a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
josephtampient3 - PeerSpot reviewer
CEO at T3 Real Estate Group
User
Feb 27, 2023
Low cost with good compliance scanning and a VPN auto-connect feature
Pros and Cons
  • "Check Point has been perfect for protecting us from any type of attack or data theft during remote management."
  • "The main feature that would be improved within Check Point Remote Access is its operation within Linux OS, as it currently does not have many features for that OS."

What is our primary use case?

The primary use case is to remotely connect to various sites and various apps and use some technological apps that are cloud-based. Check Point Remote Access was the essential platform for us to connect remotely through a secure network with an encryption key. It's also an encryption service for all information shared and obtained from this remote connection. Today, we still use it to remotely connect to computers, apps, websites, and cloud-based apps while traveling or out of the office.

How has it helped my organization?

Check Point Remote Access has been the perfect solution for us for a couple of years now. It helped us to remotely connect to various cloud-based apps and software when we were out of the office during the pandemic. 

After the end of the pandemic, we continue to use this platform so that all our employees in our real estate sector can connect to specific apps and not neglect their workdays when they are traveling in other states of the country. 

Check Point has been perfect for protecting us from any type of attack or data theft during remote management; it prevents and blocks all types of data leaks and has an authentication for each connection.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable aspects of the solution include: 

- VPN auto-connect feature. It is essential. It activates the VPN every time I make a remote connection and since I don't have to activate it manually to make the remote connection, it saves me time.

- Compliance scanning. It allows me to detect any existing irregularities in the network that is being used for the remote connection.

- The VPN Client. It allows me to fully configure all remote access, configure the firewall used, and gives me full access to network settings.

What needs improvement?

The main feature that would be improved within Check Point Remote Access is its operation within Linux OS, as it currently does not have many features for that OS. You cannot access the detection of threats that can steal your data. 

In addition, it does not have an incident analysis that can detect failures in time in the network or VPN connectivity. 

Also, the IPsec settings on Linux are quite limited, which makes it a bit difficult to configure the settings you can make for remote connection to Linux.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have used this solution for a period of more than three years. The main reason why I decided to start using it is due to the fact that we needed a solution that would allow us to work remotely when the COVID-19 pandemic happened; this was a perfect solution for working remotely securely.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I was impressed by the scalability of this platform throughout our company, mainly since this solution emerged as the main use within the C-Level area of our company. It does not neglect some cloud-based apps when out of the office. The scalability of this platform made it possible for us to implement it in most areas of the company in order to strengthen remote work.

How are customer service and support?

The Check Point support team was always attentive to any requirement when we first purchased this system. We had about three questions when we purchased Check Point Remote Access and the Check Point team answered all of our questions within minutes.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

The main implementation was quite simple. Implementing it correctly in our corporate area took us a few days. However, it took us one month to fully implement it in all areas of our company. 

I found the initial setup to be fairly quick and provided a pretty useful system for protecting data leaks during remote connections.

What about the implementation team?

We handled the initial setup in-house.

What was our ROI?

We got a return on investment from this platform in about four months. We managed to enhance remote work greatly. This allowed our sales and our customers' solutions to benefit by 40%. In addition, we managed to enable our employees to provide direct customer service, which strengthened our sales by more than 40%.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The Check Point Remote Access pricing is one of the most affordable solutions in terms of cost. This solution will power remote work for any company, and this solution comes at a very low cost. It provides a complete control panel, an SSL Portal, and client access for operating systems. I consider it very helpful for any company - at a very affordable price.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Check Point Remote Access VPN
July 2026
Learn what your peers think about Check Point Remote Access VPN. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2026.
904,680 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Richard Hermogeno - PeerSpot reviewer
Channels Management Head at Philippine National Bank
Real User
Feb 12, 2023
A Great Solution That Offers Seamless Remote Access To Our Organization’s On-Premise Applications
Pros and Cons
  • "Check Point Remote Access VPN enables us to access on-premise applications while working from remote locations."
  • "I would like the support to be faster."

What is our primary use case?

Check Point Remote Access VPN enables us to access on-premise applications while working from remote locations.

What is most valuable?

The feature that I found most valuable is how conveniently Check Point Remote Access VPN allows us to access our HR system. We use it for the process of logging in and logging out.

What needs improvement?

I think Check Point Remote Access VPN is good enough to suffice our needs. At present, I don't have any complaints about the tool.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Check Point Remote Access VPN since the COVID-19 pandemic started.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

In our organization, approximately 3,000 users work on Check Point Remote Access VPN. The number may go up if we hire more employees.

How are customer service and support?

I think that the tech support provided by Check Point Remote Access VPN is good. Also, I would add that I have no complaints.

How was the initial setup?

I would say that the initial setup was straightforward. The deployment process took place on weekends and during non-banking hours. In our organization, we only need around 10 to 15 employees, who include network administrators, developers, and project managers, for the deployment and maintenance of Check Point Remote Access VPN.

What about the implementation team?

The deployment was conducted with the help of our in-house team.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I won't be in a position to answer this question. But, I can say that the licensing costs are charged annually.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated alternative options by using Forcepoint as a benchmark.

What other advice do I have?

I would like the support to be faster. I rate this solution a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer2396205 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Network Administrator at a transportation company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
May 21, 2024
Enable employees to securely connect but has configuration limitations
Pros and Cons
  • "Check Point Remote Access VPN has some useful features, and configuring it is relatively straightforward."
  • "Check Point Remote Access VPN's current configuration has some limitations and issues. One major drawback is the inability to configure multiple gateways from the same management server for VPN access."

What is our primary use case?

The main purpose of Check Point Remote Access VPN is to enable employees to securely connect to the corporate network when they work remotely, such as from home.

What is most valuable?

Check Point Remote Access VPN has some useful features, and configuring it is relatively straightforward. However, there are numerous issues, particularly with the SSL connection, including bugs and other problems. 

What needs improvement?

Check Point Remote Access VPN's current configuration has some limitations and issues. One major drawback is the inability to configure multiple gateways from the same management server for VPN access. While there is a feature called "Map multiple entry point," it is reported to be buggy and inadequate. This forces users to purchase additional licenses for separate central point management to achieve VPN access for different locations. Ideally, Check Point should enhance its system to allow for multiple VPN entries managed from a single server without additional licenses or workaround solutions.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Check Point Remote Access VPN for three to four years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The product is stable.

I rate the solution’s stability a seven out of ten because we had some problems before, but we resolved them.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is scalable. It is suitable for small and medium businesses.

I rate the solution’s scalability an eight out of ten.

How are customer service and support?

The documentation and support available for Check Point Remote Access VPN are pretty good. A smaller or medium-sized company don't communicate directly with Check Point. They can't open tickets with them directly, which is frustrating. Currently, we have to go through partners who sell us the product to open tickets, and there should be an option to communicate directly with Check Point. Opening tickets directly with the vendor would streamline the process and potentially reduce response times.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Optimization can be a bit more involved with Check Point. Initially, you'll need to perform optimization steps during the configuration process to achieve your desired outcome. Cisco's solution tends to be more straightforward from the outset, providing a robust VPN solution without requiring as much post-configuration tweaking. While Check Point is relatively easy to configure initially, you may deduce more time to optimization tasks afterward. However, once correctly configured and optimized, it functions effectively.

How was the initial setup?

It's easy to configure Check Point Remote Access VPN but It might not be suitable for certain configurations.

I rate the initial setup an eight out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

All the firewall solutions are expensive. Compared with the other vendors, Check Point's pricing is moderate.

What other advice do I have?

Like many IT solutions, equipment such as firewalls can be expensive, but Check Point's pricing is competitive compared to other vendors. Currently, Check Point may even be slightly cheaper than Palo Alto.

I recommend Check Point as a firewall solution due to its effectiveness and reliability. For VPN, I might lean towards Cisco because it tends to have fewer optimization issues and other potential complications with VPN deployment. 

Overall, I rate the solution a six out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer2244411 - PeerSpot reviewer
Security Architect/Staff Engineer at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Apr 17, 2024
Provides strong security features and offers a straightforward setup
Pros and Cons
  • "Check Point Remote Access VPN provides strong security features, including encryption, authentication, endpoint security, access control, and centralized management."
  • "Improvements for Check Point Remote Access VPN could include enhancing mobile connectivity for a smoother user experience."

What is most valuable?

Check Point Remote Access VPN provides strong security features, including encryption, authentication, endpoint security, access control, and centralized management. These ensure data protection and access control for remote users, making it a reliable solution for maintaining security in remote access scenarios.

What needs improvement?

Improvements for Check Point Remote Access VPN could include enhancing mobile connectivity for a smoother user experience, bringing it closer to the level of Cisco AnyConnect, which is considered more user-friendly.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with Check Point Remote Access VPN for almost four years.

How are customer service and support?

My experience with tech support for Check Point Remote Access VPN was okay, but I find Cisco's support to be better. Overall, I would rate Check Point's support around six out of ten.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Neutral

How was the initial setup?

Installation of Check Point Remote Access VPN is straightforward and it involves agent deployment to user laptops, enabling easy connectivity. Maintenance is low-cost and manageable, even for small teams, as configurations are straightforward. Network security engineers need to specify network segments for traffic segregation, but overall, deployment is automated, minimizing manual intervention and complexity.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing for Check Point Remote Access VPN is average. Firewalls, whether physical or cloud-based, tend to be expensive, and Check Point's offering is no exception. While cloud options may offer more flexibility, physical devices have significant licensing costs, often totaling thousands of dollars.

What other advice do I have?

Remote Access VPN, like Check Point's solution, is user-friendly, requiring only client installation for connectivity. It is useful for employees accessing corporate networks remotely and for granting controlled access to contractors or vendors. Competitors like Cisco's AnyConnect exist but Check Point Remote Access VPN is highly regarded for its functionality and reliability.

Check Point's Remote Access VPN is user-friendly and efficient for connecting via laptops, offering a straightforward setup without complex configurations. It simplifies access to specific divisions within a corporate network, making it suitable for end-users without extensive security knowledge. Although challenges may arise with mobile connectivity, the overall experience is smooth and accessible.

MFA adds an extra layer of security to Remote Access VPN. For example, users might need to enter a code from an authenticator app on their phone in addition to their regular login credentials. This ensures enhanced verification of user identity and helps protect against unauthorized access.

Overall, I would rate Check Point Remote Access VPN as an eight out of ten.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1961277 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Ts Systems Integration Specialist at NTT Security
Real User
Nov 1, 2023
Highly secure with good support and multiple factor authentication layers
Pros and Cons
  • "It is easy to install the Endpoint Remote Access VPN client on different platforms."
  • "Bug Fixes and enhancement requests should be remediated earlier."

What is our primary use case?

Check Point Remote Access VPN is a highly secure and seamless software that provides end-to-end security solutions.

We can connect anywhere in the world over possible ways to secure the infrastructure.

Check Point Remote Access VPN is the best available solution in the market for providing endpoint management solutions by ensuring adherence to strict compliance and multiple scanning of the data to ensure no data theft or leakage and security and compliance are maintained at the highest level possible.

Also, we have multi-authentication so there is no chance of leakage.

How has it helped my organization?

Check Point Remote Access VPN provides multi-factor authentication layers.

We can make Data transfer more strict with Data Integrity, Encapsulation, DES,3DES, and Hashing Algorithm so that the level of security will be higher.

Also, they provided a multi-level authentication support system for continuous scanning and compliance management throughout the IT system.

Multiple VPN connections can be established and share the data in a secure possible way.

What is most valuable?

It is easy to install the Endpoint Remote Access VPN client on different platforms. Within the company, we use it for Windows and macOS.

Built-in, centrally managed Compliance blade. We check the client OS for the presence of the latest security updates and that the corporate antivirus software is up and running, and do not allow the client to connect to the office site in the case where these rules are not satisfied. That prevents the infected computers from connecting to the company's location and spreading the threats.

The stable VPN connection and uptime are also very good.

We have a centrally managed Firewall blade, which allows filtering traffic on the rule base to protect the requirement.

What needs improvement?

Bug Fixes and enhancement requests should be remediated earlier, as we have multiple dependencies and Auditors are forced to have the latest patches in place.

Checkpoint Major version should have an extended time than the default time mentioned in the end-of-life policy document with additional prices.

Tools must be introduced and supportive in analyzing the data, flow, and threats.

We have to introduce the scripting part to work seamlessly.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for more than four years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is scalable. 

How are customer service and support?

The company offers the best support overall and we can trust their advice.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

This is the first time we are using this type of solution.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is straightforward, simple, and centralized. 

What about the implementation team?

We handled the setup in-house.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The product is better than any other product in the marketplace. Technically sounded techies all over the place. It is cost-effective and most importantly stable and secure.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We trust the Check Point Software technology.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer2037513 - PeerSpot reviewer
Project Manager at Digitas APAC
User
Feb 12, 2023
Easy to set up with good remote access and a flexible to configure VPN
Pros and Cons
  • "This platform has developed a reliable communication infrastructure that employees can use to communicate with remote workers."
  • "Connection of devices from various locations is efficient though there are a few challenges when there is a network failure."

What is our primary use case?

Remote Access VPN helps my team to connect our devices remotely without any limitations. It is easy to establish a secure connection among teams and connect efficiently with maximum security. 

Teams can share files effectively under secure networking infrastructure. When implementing projects and tasks, it conveniently troubleshoots technical issues that can affect information traffic. 

I can now share large size of documents with my colleagues from a remote location without any interference. It is easy to facilitate remote workers and engage them.

How has it helped my organization?

This platform has developed a reliable communication infrastructure that employees can use to communicate with remote workers. The organization has benefited from a secure network that cyber attacks cannot compromise. We can safely access our servers from anywhere, anytime, without fear of losing confidential information. 

It gives the IT team an opportunity to monitor the performance of devices and control their operations. We can freely connect with our clients from remote areas and give them guidelines without physical appearance under a secure connection.

What is most valuable?

Secure remote access has enabled teams to focus on productive meetings without fear of being attacked by external ransomware attacks. Device access from remote networks has enhanced the efficient connection of teams from various areas. 

The setup process is simple, and new users can set it without any challenges. The cost and maintenance charges are relatively low as compared to most products in the market. 

Configuration of the VPN with other applications is flexible with productive performance. Identity and access management enables the IT team to categorize devices and channel them to effective network infrastructure.

What needs improvement?

My experience with the set features has always been excellent. The secure connection networking system has enabled each team to connect effectively with colleagues from anywhere. 

Connection of devices from various locations is efficient though there are a few challenges when there is a network failure. Disconnection due to internet failure may affect the entire connection and slow down the workflow. 

The setup process requires skilled manpower and dedicated teams to get the best results from the entire connection system. 

Integration of more powerful kill switch tools will enhance secure connection. 

Additional server locations can boost service delivery and cut the cost of connecting computing devices from different areas.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for 11 months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The secure connection is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I am impressed by the performance of this tool.

How are customer service and support?

The customer support operations have been excellent throughout.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have not worked with another VPN.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was successful.

What about the implementation team?

Implementation was through the vendor.

What was our ROI?

The ROI has been positive since we deployed this tool.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The setup and licensing terms are effective.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

This is the best solution that I have come across.

What other advice do I have?

For secure device connection and team collaboration, this is the best solution.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Google
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Edwin Solano Salmeron - PeerSpot reviewer
Soporte técnico superior at Acobo
Real User
Feb 5, 2023
Good encryption, secure login capabilities and easy to install
Pros and Cons
  • "A single login based on a second authentication factor is giving us the possibility of integrating third-party services for authentication based on a security scheme."
  • "A characteristic to improve is the communication service under the SMTP scheme."

What is our primary use case?

We wanted to give employees the possibility to work from anywhere outside of the organization, being a house or another remote location of offices. We wanted this capability with the possibility and ease to grant them access to our perimeter network so that they could access the data or internal applications for the use of each of its functions. We wanted faster, safer, and more efficient transactions that are going to be shared within our organization based on the business.

How has it helped my organization?

This tool gave us the possibility and the benefit of being able to establish that all users, according to their geographical location, need to transfer, manage, execute, validate, and maintain data. We are always in contact with all users within and outside. It is strong, fast, easy to install, and extremely secure for each of the functions that it is designed for. Important to note is that one of the features uses a single sign-on approach.

What is most valuable?

Among other features, advantages, and services that the solution provides us, it is important to understand that it gives us the possibility, capacity, and management for establishing that each of the resources is accessed through encrypted communication tunnels. A single login based on a second authentication factor is giving us the possibility of integrating third-party services for authentication based on a security scheme. This goes beyond a simple password, giving us the possibility of integrating more than one service. 

What needs improvement?

A characteristic to improve is the communication service under the SMTP scheme. In some cases, it is quite complex when it comes to managing, configuring, forwarding, and integrating mail services. It consumes a lot of processing and RAM memory. We want a solution that allows us to use current resources so that high processing peaks demanded by the virtual or physical equipment do not occur. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for four years.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Hugo Alexis Espinoza Naranjo - PeerSpot reviewer
Perimeter Security Administrator at a security firm with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 20
Jan 22, 2023
Great encryption and MFA with helps improve a company's security posture
Pros and Cons
  • "It can improve an organization by providing secure access to resources for traveling employees, which can help to reduce the risk of data breaches or other security incidents."
  • "Improved scalability would allow the solution to handle larger numbers of users and devices without a significant impact on performance."

What is our primary use case?

Check Point Remote Access VPN is a VPN solution that allows users to securely connect to corporate networks from remote locations. It enables users to access corporate resources such as files, applications, and network devices as if they were on the corporate network.

The primary use case of Check Point Remote Access VPN is to provide secure remote access for employees, contractors, and partners who need to access corporate resources while working remotely. This can include employees working from home, traveling, or working in a remote office location. 

How has it helped my organization?

It can improve an organization by providing secure access to resources for traveling employees, which can help to reduce the risk of data breaches or other security incidents. 

It also can improve the organization's security posture by providing secure remote access with multi-factor authentication, encryption, and other security features.

It is important to note that the results of the solution will depend on the organization's specific environment and configuration as well as how well it is implemented and managed.

What is most valuable?

Some of the features that are considered most valuable in Check Point Remote Access VPN include: 

Multi-factor authentication. This feature allows organizations to use a combination of authentication methods such as certificates, tokens, biometric authentication, and user credentials to secure remote access connections.

Encryption. This feature provides end-to-end encryption for remote access connections, which helps to protect against eavesdropping and other forms of man-in-the-middle attacks. 

What needs improvement?

The solution needs:

Advanced monitoring and reporting capabilities in order to have a more detailed visibility into security incidents and events. It's important to note that the areas of improvement and additional features will vary depending on the specific use case and the organization's security needs, so it is recommended to contact the vendor to know more details about their roadmap and the next releases of the product. 

Improved scalability to allow the solution to handle larger numbers of users and devices without a significant impact on performance. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for one year.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Erick Chinchilla Mena - PeerSpot reviewer
Profesional Gestión Informática 2 - Especialista en Sistemas de Información at CompuGuana
Real User
Nov 17, 2022
Good integration, great for remote access, and centralizes users effectively
Pros and Cons
  • "We can integrate remote access to our branches through Check Point services."
  • "Currently, Check Point is an ally that we have used within our organization to protect the perimeter area, the equipment, and other technologies."
  • "We'd like to integrate Check Point into the Remote Access VPN solution and have the ability to integrate multiple devices as access points through the solution."

What is our primary use case?

We needed to grow a little more at a cloud level, which means that we have had more places in which we host information, and needed to protect it. We needed to allow users to have access from the different branches in the cloud to our main branch and to access remotely. As a result of these needs, we have been looking for solutions that allow us to have quick and efficient access no matter which branch we are going to access, and to have access allowed quickly and easily as if users were inside the perimeter area of ​​our organization.

How has it helped my organization?

Currently, Check Point is an ally that we have used within our organization to protect the perimeter area, the equipment, and other technologies. We have complete protection in one technology that we are using so that our users with greater frequency can access the data of our organization regardless of where they are. With this, they can have quick, simple access as if they were within the perimeter area. This has given us greater protection when it comes to having protected and verified access under user identity.

What is most valuable?

We can integrate remote access to our branches through Check Point services; however, those services come with a centralized identity, a domain identity, which does not work for the different logins. It only works for the login through the remote connection application. The user profile is centralized, verified, and filtered by the tool, thus being one of the characteristics that are very important to me since it shows any activity that the user is going to carry out.

What needs improvement?

We'd like to integrate Check Point into the Remote Access VPN solution and have the ability to integrate multiple devices as access points through the solution. This would allow us to have a tool that it is not only remote access for mobile devices but a remote access solution for virtual teams, including mobile devices such as cell phones, tablets, and other types of devices in IoT areas such as doors, houses, and medical equipment.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for one year.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Check Point Remote Access VPN Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: July 2026
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Check Point Remote Access VPN Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.