Check Point Remote Access VPN Reviews

We use it to connect our sites. We have a couple of sites that need to interconnect. They are in our cloud and our premise data center. 

The scalability needs improvement.

I have been using Check Point Remote Access VPN for five years. 

The solution is not very scalable. 

The initial setup is not very straightforward. I would rate the setup a four out of ten. The solution is easy to maintain. 

The solution is pretty expensive. I rate it an eight out of ten. 

Overall, I will rate the solution a seven out of ten. 

Check Point Remote Access VPN provides strong security features, including encryption, authentication, endpoint security, access control, and centralized management. These ensure data protection and access control for remote users, making it a reliable solution for maintaining security in remote access scenarios.

Improvements for Check Point Remote Access VPN could include enhancing mobile connectivity for a smoother user experience, bringing it closer to the level of Cisco AnyConnect, which is considered more user-friendly.

I have been working with Check Point Remote Access VPN for almost four years.

My experience with tech support for Check Point Remote Access VPN was okay, but I find Cisco's support to be better. Overall, I would rate Check Point's support around six out of ten.

Neutral

Installation of Check Point Remote Access VPN is straightforward and it involves agent deployment to user laptops, enabling easy connectivity. Maintenance is low-cost and manageable, even for small teams, as configurations are straightforward. Network security engineers need to specify network segments for traffic segregation, but overall, deployment is automated, minimizing manual intervention and complexity.

The pricing for Check Point Remote Access VPN is average. Firewalls, whether physical or cloud-based, tend to be expensive, and Check Point's offering is no exception. While cloud options may offer more flexibility, physical devices have significant licensing costs, often totaling thousands of dollars.

Remote Access VPN, like Check Point's solution, is user-friendly, requiring only client installation for connectivity. It is useful for employees accessing corporate networks remotely and for granting controlled access to contractors or vendors. Competitors like Cisco's AnyConnect exist but Check Point Remote Access VPN is highly regarded for its functionality and reliability.

Check Point's Remote Access VPN is user-friendly and efficient for connecting via laptops, offering a straightforward setup without complex configurations. It simplifies access to specific divisions within a corporate network, making it suitable for end-users without extensive security knowledge. Although challenges may arise with mobile connectivity, the overall experience is smooth and accessible.

MFA adds an extra layer of security to Remote Access VPN. For example, users might need to enter a code from an authenticator app on their phone in addition to their regular login credentials. This ensures enhanced verification of user identity and helps protect against unauthorized access.

Overall, I would rate Check Point Remote Access VPN as an eight out of ten.

Right now, my company connects with the vendors of Check Point whenever any maintenance is required, and not to our domain.

Check Point Remote Access VPN is a highly secured product with which, in our company, we can get end-to-end VPN connectivity so that the communication part is highly secured.

Check Point Remote Access VPN's connectivity and establishment takes time and needs to be faster.

In the future, Check Point Remote Access VPN should provide its users with URL filtering.

I have been using Check Point Remote Access VPN for ten years. My company is a customer and end-user of Check Point.

Though the solution is stable, sometimes the latest updates are not available, especially considering that it is something that has to be done very frequently to take care of URL filtering and the latest OWASP threats, which is only possible if the latest configuration is available to users.

It is a scalable solution.

Considering that access to the solution is given to specific people only in my company, I can say that around 100 to 150 people use the solution.

The technical support team of the solution is very good. My company hasn't faced any issues with the technical support team of the solution. My company has not had to wait for a response from the technical support team. I rate the technical support team of the solution a nine out of ten.

Positive

I have experience with Cisco. Though Cisco is one of the latest products that we deal with right now, my company has been more friendly with Check Point. My company prefers Check Point since it is easy and more user-friendly for us. Cisco is not that much of a user-friendly product since it requires highly skilled people and more engineers to operate it.

Check Point Remote Access VPN's installation process is easy.

Check Point Remote Access VPN's installation process can be done in two hours with the help of a person who takes care of the configuration part while also taking care of the respective routing configurations that are required.

The solution is deployed on an on-premises model.

Check Point Remote Access VPN's installation process is something that my company can manage with the help of our in-house members.

Compared to Cisco, Check Point Remote Access VPN is cheaper. My company makes yearly payments only towards the licensing costs attached to Check Point Remote Access VPN, as there are no extra costs attached to the product.

The maintenance part of the solution is easy and can be done remotely, because of which we face no issues in our company.

For 100 to 150 users, Check Point Remote Access VPN is a good option, but later on, if more people are going to get involved, causing one to invest in more frequent VPN connections while wanting secured connections, then Cisco is a better choice. For a limited set of people, Check Point is a better option.

I rate the overall tool a nine out of ten.

The main purpose of Check Point Remote Access VPN is to enable employees to securely connect to the corporate network when they work remotely, such as from home.

Check Point Remote Access VPN has some useful features, and configuring it is relatively straightforward. However, there are numerous issues, particularly with the SSL connection, including bugs and other problems. 

Check Point Remote Access VPN's current configuration has some limitations and issues. One major drawback is the inability to configure multiple gateways from the same management server for VPN access. While there is a feature called "Map multiple entry point," it is reported to be buggy and inadequate. This forces users to purchase additional licenses for separate central point management to achieve VPN access for different locations. Ideally, Check Point should enhance its system to allow for multiple VPN entries managed from a single server without additional licenses or workaround solutions.

I have been using Check Point Remote Access VPN for three to four years.

The product is stable.

I rate the solution’s stability a seven out of ten because we had some problems before, but we resolved them.

The solution is scalable. It is suitable for small and medium businesses.

I rate the solution’s scalability an eight out of ten.

The documentation and support available for Check Point Remote Access VPN are pretty good. A smaller or medium-sized company don't communicate directly with Check Point. They can't open tickets with them directly, which is frustrating. Currently, we have to go through partners who sell us the product to open tickets, and there should be an option to communicate directly with Check Point. Opening tickets directly with the vendor would streamline the process and potentially reduce response times.

Positive

Optimization can be a bit more involved with Check Point. Initially, you'll need to perform optimization steps during the configuration process to achieve your desired outcome. Cisco's solution tends to be more straightforward from the outset, providing a robust VPN solution without requiring as much post-configuration tweaking. While Check Point is relatively easy to configure initially, you may deduce more time to optimization tasks afterward. However, once correctly configured and optimized, it functions effectively.

It's easy to configure Check Point Remote Access VPN but It might not be suitable for certain configurations.

I rate the initial setup an eight out of ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy.

All the firewall solutions are expensive. Compared with the other vendors, Check Point's pricing is moderate.

Like many IT solutions, equipment such as firewalls can be expensive, but Check Point's pricing is competitive compared to other vendors. Currently, Check Point may even be slightly cheaper than Palo Alto.

I recommend Check Point as a firewall solution due to its effectiveness and reliability. For VPN, I might lean towards Cisco because it tends to have fewer optimization issues and other potential complications with VPN deployment. 

Overall, I rate the solution a six out of ten.

Our primary use case is to provide a remote access VPN to organization users so that they can access the organization servers or resources easily from anywhere.

With the help of Remote Access VPN, our organization's users can connect to our network easily and access servers. This has increased employee productivity.

The most valuable point is that it provides multi-factor authentication (MFA), which increases security by requiring an add-on verification method and ensures that only authorized users have access to the network.

The knowledge base can be improved for advanced troubleshooting. For new users, configurations might be complex. This can be also improved. 

We have been using this solution for the last year.

The stability is excellent.

The scalability is very good.

Our experience with customer service and support is excellent.

Positive

We are using the same solution.

The initial setup was very easy and straightforward.

We implemented it through an in-house team.

As per the market, everything looks good.

No, we haven't evaluated other option

We use Check Point Remote Access VPN for security features.

We encounter challenges for the product’s installation and troubleshooting processes compared to other VPN products. It is difficult to restore settings in cases of connection failure. This particular area needs improvement.

We have been using Check Point Remote Access VPN for five years.

The product is stable.

We have 3000 Check Point Remote Access VPNs in our organization. It is a scalable product. We can increase and downgrade the access as much as possible. The usage depends on the licensing model.

The technical support team only responds to the problems where the device stops working. Apart from that, they don’t reply to normal issues.

Neutral

We used ForcePoint before. In comparison, Check Point Remote Access VPN is stable and easy to connect.

The product is easy to maintain. It takes a few days to install and troubleshoot.

The product has average pricing. We purchase its yearly pricing.

I advise others to use the product instead of multiple SD solutions and hardware products. I rate Check Point Remote Access VPN a seven out of ten.

In the context of general user remote access, we utilize Check Point VPN concentrators that serve as both Internet firewalls and error ID locations. Our remote access system, constructed on a Check Point foundation, consists of four systems.

Currently, I'm part of the network team, and my primary concern revolves around maintaining a stable connectivity setup. It's important for this connectivity solution to have provisions, possibly within AWS, that enhance security measures and provide more security-related advantages. From my standpoint, our solution serves a general purpose. It operates effectively, particularly during challenges like adversities or infrastructure issues. Overall, it suits our needs well.

There were some issues with automation and instability. But overall, these self-integrated products offer exceptional support and prove highly beneficial from an administrative standpoint. It isn't overwhelming, as seen with instances like in other vendors. The platform is convenient to manage and scalable.

I have been working with Check Point Remote Access VPN for one year. 

The solution is scalable. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. 

Technical support is essential in our case. We encountered a few instances related to next-generation firewalls, though they might not be of direct interest.

In general, the response rate to our inquiries has been quick. Our cases are categorized as server-to-server or critical solutions, resulting in immediate internet connectivity for addressing the issue. The level of support we receive is of a very high standard.

Positive

We previously used Cisco AnyConnect. Both solutions are similar. However, the difference lies in the security features rather than the networking aspects.

Ultimately, the decision was made to expand and implement Check Point for the entire user base. This choice was reasonable based on the circumstances and the initial security in Check Point. We also had a phase where we utilized both solutions simultaneously. Eventually, due to our requirements, switching solely to Check Point proved to be the more precise decision, aligning with our corporate requirements.

The initial setup is not very easy and we are partnered with highly qualified engineers to deploy the solution. The process involves designing the overall network module, carrying out installations, configuring appropriately, and initiating the initial setup. The array agent is then deployed to individual personal computers. It takes almost one quarter.

We had a partnered team with highly qualified engineers to deploy the solution.

When working with remote access, the goal is to define the exact issue we aim to resolve. Identifying a suitable solution for discussions is crucial while focusing on establishing a high-level solution design. Following this, the implementation can proceed. Formulating a solid architecture utilizing Check Point isn't overly complex. The service switches provided within the system confer a sophisticated level of functionality.

Based on these, I would rate it a nine out of ten.

We primarily use the solution as a VPN for connection purposes. It helps us connect to corporate. 

It is easy to use and easy to set up. The setup is very fast.

The security is pretty good. 

It is stable most of the time.

It's becoming old-fashioned and slightly out of date. We're moving towards DNS.

We have noted some stability issues. 

I've used the solution for more than a year at this point. The company has maybe used it longer. 

The stability is very good. I'd rate it nine out of ten. It could be a bit better. It might now work with all programs. 

The solution is scalable. We have 80 or 90 users on the product.

It is not extensively used. 

We do not need to use technical support. We are technical ourselves and can handle issues. 

I've used Palo Alto and Sophos, among other solutions. I've used a few different solutions. 

The initial setup is very fast and straightforward. It only takes about five to ten minutes. 

You simply set up your firewall and handle settings and then send links to your IT team that can connect them.

We were able to manage the setup in-house. We did not use a consultant or integrator. 

I have not witnessed any ROI. 

The license is renewed yearly. I'm not sure of the exact price or if it is expensive. 

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. 

I would advise companies to make sure the configuration is correct on the firewall.