Celonis Reviews

Celonis is mainly used for process mining i.e. mining and analyzing business processes to create solutions.

Celonis' best feature is a new one called Action Flow, an enhanced version of earlier automation features with lots of integration options with other systems so you can access third-party systems and automate some actions there too.

The one thing that could be improved is the guides are not getting updated to cover new features and upgrades, which means we can't use them at their full potential. In addition, the development could be done more quickly, so we don't have to search online for solutions.

I've been using Celonis for three years.

Celonis has been quite stable since we migrated to the cloud version.

Celonis' scalability is completely customizable.

Celonis' technical support is quite professional, and they respond to tickets raised online quite well and quickly. However, sometimes it takes time to get a response, or they just send links to documentation that we've already seen and don't solve our problem.

I have also used SAP Signavio, but I found Celonis to be more mature with much more capability.

The initial setup is straightforward, and a standard deployment takes around three months.

Celonis is cost-effective.

Celonis is a very good tool that can improve your business process in a single package. It provides process analyzing power, automation, and real-time monitoring with a single license. I would give Celonis a rating of eight out of ten.

The most common use case for Celonis involves its ERP applications, notably for SAP and Oracle, particularly for procure-to-pay and order-to-cash processes. 

Clients use Celonis to process mined data created on SAP or Oracle and gain insights into process executions.

Celonis primarily helps with process discovery by understanding process variations and identifying opportunities for improvement. 

Although it is not utilized much for continuous monitoring, it has significantly enhanced our understanding of improvement opportunities.

The most effective feature of Celonis is its capacity to analyze processes and uncover optimization opportunities through its visualizations of process variances.

Celonis does not provide a detailed picture of user activities within processes because it relies on event logs from ERP systems. It offers only a process view without task mining capabilities. Expanding into task mining could offer greater insights.

I have approximately four years of experience working with Celonis.

The stability of Celonis is impressive. I would rate it as an eight on a scale from one to ten.

Celonis has high scalability, which I would rate as an eight on a scale from one to ten.

I find the technical support from Celonis to be of high quality, rating it a nine out of ten.

Positive

The initial setup of Celonis is relatively straightforward. The setup process is crucial, and with good quality data, Celonis is an easy product to use.

The return on investment from Celonis comes from identifying opportunities for process improvement which translate into time savings and cost savings.

Pricing varies depending on client needs and deployment scale. However, I find it competitively priced and offering good value for money in high-volume data analysis scenarios.

Celonis is recommended due to its proficient ease of use, rapid insight discovery, ability to execute on insights, and effective impact measurement.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

I am learning to use the solution for now.

I like that the product allows users to connect to different source systems like SAP, ServiceNow, and Salesforce. I like how the product deals with automation. I like the product’s UI, how the features work, and how they look.

Celonis provides machine learning or artificial intelligence analysis for the root cause of some process inefficiencies. We don't have to identify issues by ourselves. We can just rely on Celonis’ ML or AI features.

The tool must have better process graphs. It would be better to have some tool keys with customizable data. It would be better if detailed information about an activity is available when we hover the cursor on the activities. The solution must provide better side-by-side comparisons of different processes like target and current process or as-is and to-be models. I have faced issues on these points while using the product.

I have been using the solution for half a year.

I rate the solution’s stability a nine out of ten.

The tool’s scalability is great, and I like how it is done. I rate the scalability an eight out of ten. I have a small team of six people. We are learning and trying to do some test projects or pilots in the solution. We plan to increase the usage. Our clients want to look at our results. We are thinking about talking to Celonis to purchase some additional licenses. It depends on our projects and pilots. We like Celonis, and we would like to develop in this area.

I've used technical support a couple of times. The team’s response was fast and pretty clear.

Positive

I have used UiPath Process Mining. I have a bit more experience with it than Celonis. However, I like Celonis, and I am trying to learn and make Celonis our main tool for process mining in my team.

The initial setup was easy. I rate the ease of setup a nine out of ten. The deployment can be done very fast. I didn’t face any issues during the deployment. I used Celonis’ task mining tool. It's something different from process mining. Task mining deployment can take several minutes.

To deploy the tool, we should prepare our data, upload it, and do the analysis. Then, we can share the dashboard we make. We must assign roles to people we want to share the analysis with. It depends on how many people we want to see it.

I rate the pricing a five out of ten. The product is pretty expensive but reasonable.

People who want to use the solution should watch a lot of videos that Celonis provides in its academy. They must find some understandable project to understand process mining and how to work with it. They must try as many vendors as they can to compare and find the best solution.

We should find the tools that are best for our current task or our current project. We should not be rigid about using only Celonis or only UiPath. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

The product is used for the core business processes like accounts payable, accounts receivable, and order management.

Celonis Studio was introduced recently. Earlier, Celonis was case-centric. It worked on a case level. Now, it groups object-centric things. Action Flows are good. Most of the features in Studio are valuable to us. The solution has many features.

With every upgrade, the product is completely changed. When we work on technological tools, improvements will be made. However, the product should be similar to its previous version even after upgrades. With Celonis, the product and its features are completely changed after upgrades. The new features launched are unrelated to the previous version's features. A person experienced with last year's version cannot use the features introduced in the latest version.

I have been working with the solution for almost four to five years. I am working with the latest version of the solution.

The tool’s stability is good. There are no issues. I rate the stability a nine out of ten.

I rate the scalability of the tool an eight out of ten. Nearly 100 people in my organization are using the product. My clients are enterprise businesses.

Earlier, the technical support was the worst. Now, it has improved.

Positive

I rate the ease of setup an eight out of ten. The solution is deployed on the cloud mostly. The product can be deployed within eight to ten weeks if the process is less complex. A complex process with more use cases would take more time.

To deploy the solution, we need to understand the customer’s database environment and make a real-time connection. It is the most challenging part of the process. Customers don't allow us to connect to their databases. We must explain to them how we maintain their privacy and store their data. Once the connection is made, we just follow the normal procedures.

The solution’s pricing is high when compared to other process mining tools. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten.

People looking to use the solution should understand the basics and how Celonis works at the architecture level. Many users get trained and come to the job directly without understanding how the architecture works. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

I use the product for technical support.

The main feature of the product is process mining. We can use it to discover processes and mitigate the mistakes in the process. It also helps in optimizing the processes.

First-time users would need help from the support team to implement the solution. The support costs are very high. We must pay a very high price if we need to involve the support team.

I have one year of experience implementing the solution in the mining industry.

We get support from the web pages dedicated to support. If we face any specific server situation we don't have any experience with, we can resolve it with the technical support team’s help.

Positive

We use other enterprise solutions like Make. We use Make to integrate other solutions like Microsoft Excel and SAP.

The initial setup is not complex. We need to get trained and have some expertise in using the tools and the platform.

We implement the solution to gather information about the service providers. We do not need to maintain the product after that.

The tool has different pricing plans. We use a cloud solution focused on enterprise businesses new to process mining and Celonis. If we want to scale it up in the company or another process and another business unit, the cost will be high.

Once we try to scale it up, the product becomes expensive. The pricing is not an issue in a medium and large company because it's very low. It will cost $15,000 a year when we start using the solution. However, if we want to scale these solutions, the pricing can go up to $200,000 and more.

We do only one project or one process. I do not have experience with the tool’s scalability. We use it to mitigate the mistakes in this process. It is a very good product. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

We use the solution to collect the logs from a particular process, inject them into the tool, and analyze them to create a flow diagram. It helps visualize the entire process flow.

The solution works excellently for large-scale implementations of the applications. It performs well for connecting multiple processes.

We encounter challenges while analyzing logs. They should leverage the solution's machine learning algorithms for better log analysis.

I have been using the solution for two years.

It is a highly stable solution. I rate its stability an eight.

We can use the solution in multiple ways in terms of processes. I rate its scalability a seven.

The solution's community and technical support team are good. Although, the response time depends on the subscription.

Positive

The solution's initial setup has medium complexity. We need to check whether the services are running in a particular order. I rate the process a seven. It takes a few hours to complete.

The solution is expensive. I rate its pricing a six.

We have evaluated a few solutions for their licensing models.

I advise others to opt for the solution if they want a process mining product. I rate it a six out of ten.

Celonis helps to understand the processes within a company. For example, if you are an insurance company, you can use it to check how the end user or the person who's doing data entry of underwriting is performing their tasks. You can also analyze the flow of insurance and determine how it should be done. This can help you reduce your costs by 30 to 40 percent. 

Additionally, you can use Celonis to define and optimize your existing processes. By doing this, you can derive the perfect process mapping and customer claims processing can be streamlined. Celonis can be used for various processes, including underwriting, procurement, and end-customer claims.

We have around 110 to 120 developers under that, or multiple teams are there. They tend to do a lot of specific work for Celonis or process mining.

My two favorite features are execution management and process intelligence, which provide 360-degree data. These are my favorite features because they offer an implementation strategy for specific processes and provide recommendations. It's like having an expert provide a solution for a mining problem.

I would like to see additional features, such as starting up a kind of prototype based on the domain. For example, in the insurance domain, they could provide templates for top-tier processes. Currently, we are stating our own processes.

Additionally, it would be helpful if they could categorize processes into tier levels, such as tier one, two, and three, and provide guidance on aligning oneself accordingly. This could be useful in considering costs and other factors.

We are using version 2022.4.4 of Celonis.

The stability is great. I would rate it a nine out of ten.

It is a scalable solution. The number of users varies from 10 to 12 because that's set up for the mining team

The customer support is pretty good. They provide both on-call and email support, and they also have a good library of troubleshooting guides to refer to.

The initial setup is straightforward.

For the last two years, my team and I have been working on the deployment processes.

We have a yearly subscription model. They started with nice protection, but it is pretty high now.

For anyone doing process mining, this is the top tool available. It is the best one.

Overall, I would rate it an eight out of ten. The only drawback is the lack of domain-specific templates based on tier levels.

I've used Celonis for process mining, and it's the same as any process mining platform. I worked on the financial processes and the management side and did some benchmarking against KPIs.

What I found most valuable in Celonis is the ease of use.

I also like that users can compare and contrast and derive any KPIs, keep track and see what's happening within the process via Celonis. 

The solution also allows different user levels, not just the C-suite level, to look at some of the cost corrections that can be done to reach goals. I find this helpful, mainly because the leadership team doesn't usually have an idea of what exactly happens in the day-to-day process, and this gives leaders good insight into what is happening and how it affects the KPIs.

The task mining feature of Celonis needs improvement because it's more challenging than it looks. The solution still has a long way to go in that area.

I've been on a break, but I used Celonis within the last twelve months. My experience with it is one and a half years.

Celonis stability is an eight out of ten.

Celonis is a pretty scalable solution, but you must be more careful about the data you bring into the system. Do you think it's required? Otherwise, you'd have another data duplication on the cloud, where the cost could increase quickly.

I haven't used any other solution apart from Celonis.

The initial setup for Celonis is an eight out of ten, but it still depends on the data quality.

You need engineers and the development team to get the process started. Still, if you don't have the correct data, you'd spend a lot of time getting that in the proper format and extracting it from different systems.

Celonis can be fully deployed between three to six months, depending on the complexity.

A third party implements Celonis projects for my company. I come from consulting, and I have clients on Celonis.

Pricing-wise, Celonis is a five out of ten right now because my clients just started with the solution. When my clients start looking at scaling Celonis, the cost will grow. Every user has an additional charge, and every gig of data you bring in costs extra. That's where you have to be careful when scaling the solution.

The number of people involved in deploying Celonis depends on the scale of projects, but for one process, such as a financial end-to-end AP process, the initial development to deployment requires anywhere between three to four people, including engineers, processors, and consultants, at least.

My rating for Celonis is eight out of ten because it's coming up with many good features. Every day, there's something new about Celonis.

Celonis works with Camunda to identify any issues or loopholes in the process. 

It is used for loans and online credit, and it was more theoretical, based on data, and not real in other circumstances.

In my opinion, it's quite an advanced tool.

The pricing policy is not affordable in Ukraine. For example, in Kazakhstan, we have some negotiations with Azerbaijan country. Telecom is one of the biggest telecom companies in Kazakhstan, but this was a little bit expensive for them.

Now, I think they decided to postpone it because of the price policy.

We could start several projects, and we already have clients that are interested, but the only concern was pricing.

You only need processes to return the money. You need process, you already have the process, but say you need to return $50,000 or $100,000 every month.

However, in the areas where we work, meeting such a high standard is quite challenging.

For example, online loans. It's most likely an interesting case. However, with others, such as finances, some efficient method to make it efficient and return on money is rather challenging. Make it more than efficient.

I have been working with Celonis for one year.

We began communicating with our manager in Celonis. We were provided with presentations on how it works and practical experience with some processes.

Celonis is a stable solution.

Celonis is a scalable solution.

We tried using telecom data, but it didn't work very well. One of the biggest is undoubtedly telecom, but necessarily the biggest. 

They have the largest data warehouses and the largest amounts of customer information, data, or metadata. 

It works even though it doesn't map. Work it is. If telecom is involved in a large country, any issues might likely be resolved via other businesses.

We have three developers who are working with Celonis. 

We had expectations of of growing, but, we decided to postpone these projects or end our relationship with Celonis if the pricing and model are no longer affordable. 

It really changed three or four months ago. And it's no longer a low price.

I have not contacted technical support. My colleagues have, but I don't have any feedback from them.

I work for an integration company. It is an IT firm in Ukraine, and we are now considering becoming a partner with MaintainX. And we've worked with Bizagi previously, before the conflict. 

We are going public with Bizagi, but our clients have postponed these actions for various reasons.

Now we are thinking about Nintex or Nintex K2, whether it's an on-premises, off-premises, or cloud solution.

I don't have much experience as a project manager with One Bank working with Camunda, but I'm not sure if Camunda is a suitable choice for us to partner in Ukraine or another country, because we're currently concentrating on countries other than Ukraine, such as Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Moldova, and Romania. 

We have projects in the Benelux countries. And clients frequently inquire about BPM solutions, and we have a process with Nintex.

K2, as you are aware, is comparable to Nintex, however, it is an on-premise solution.

I have experience in Camunda yes, as the head of the project management office. I'm not responsible directly, but mainly about choosing a solution or choosing the partnership.

Before I was focusing on development. A solution for the bank in Ukraine. 

We are a partner with UiPath. 

Now, we have focused on more ERP. Process management is on pause now. 

Now, we start to think about VPN solutions to add to our portfolio, for the clients.

I am familiar with UiPath Process Mining. I don't have a lot of experience with it, just in a few projects. However, I have received feedback from developers.

When compared to Celonis, it has very basic functions.

The initial setup is not an issue. I am the head of the PMO. I am not personally responsible for it or using its use, but from what I know from my colleagues it was not difficult. 

It already has connections, and it could be integrated with various databases, or from Excel to SAP and others; it works well with this.

We completed the deployment ourselves. We have developers, and for us, it is part of our daily work.

We already have a Celonis account that we can use to demonstrate to clients. We could use it in some circumstances, but because we are partners and have a partnership with Celonis, we could use it for free.

We looked into the possibility of using UiPath Process Mining, but from my point of view, or from our discussion, which was around a year ago, it's not adequate for companies like telecom or banks.

It is a matter of connectivity. And while we are completely satisfied with UiPath as an ERP solution, I remember that process mining was not as advanced or as good as we thought. 

For complex users, such as our client, it was most important how easy it is to understand the process, how the graphs are clear for them, how they can adjust it, and how many have your products, such as EMC. 

For example, suppose you intend to optimize a process. Celonis is far better in this instance.

I would recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it.

It's also quite simple to use, which is a great benefit. It's also a no-code or low-code option. Some other solutions chose to be no code or minimal code, but they were not.

The downside is, of course, the pricing. It is only affordable for large or public companies.

For usability and how it works, I would rate it a nine, but because of the pricing, I would rate Celonis an eight out of ten.

I'm an artificial intelligence developer and a user of Celonis. 

The process chart is valuable as it gives you the flow of the entire process. It was quite helpful in identifying the bottlenecks and everything related to the process.

I'd like to see a couple of algorithms that can better identify the bottlenecks and provide a better view of those bottlenecks. That's a futuristic approach on this tool.

We carried out a POC on Celonis for four months.

The solution is stable. 

I was the only person in the company testing the solution and we didn't attempt to scale. 

I worked through the training sessions and didn't require assistance from customer support. 

The initial setup was fine. It was taken care of by the IT team and I'm not aware of any issues.

We were using a POC license so we did not get to the point of checking licensing costs.

I also tried using UiPath but I found Celonis was better because it provided greater accuracy. At the time UiPath did not have great handout documentation available. I found Celonis to be a good software.

I would recommend this product for companies that have connectors available in Celonis, because Celonis is more of a data application. On a POC scale, I rate this solution eight out of 10.