We primarily use the solution for process mining.
I've installed various Celonis agents. We are disconnected from the Celonis cloud and doing real-time replication of the tables.
We primarily use the solution for process mining.
I've installed various Celonis agents. We are disconnected from the Celonis cloud and doing real-time replication of the tables.
There is good business process intelligence to be explored.
It is easy to use. The product offers easy configurations.
The real-time replication was just implemented and is quite useful.
There are business process reports that can be leveraged.
It's a good product. It extracts the customer business process, and it identifies all the issues in the current business processes. Issues are visible in the dashboard, and they can start working on improving those business processes based on what they see there.
It's scalable.
The solution is now stable.
The solution can be a bit expensive.
The company has been using the solution for more than two years.
We use a small agent on our landscape. When I initially install this agent, I didn't dedicate or allocate a separate server. I already have some other server that has small agents. I tried to use the same agent and the same server to install this agent. However, when we started doing real-time replication, that's when we saw some hiccups in ICPO usage, and we ended up installing it on a separate dedicated server.
This likely was not due to the Celonis. We already had some other processes and agents running on the same server and Celonis reported there are latency issues. That's when we made a decision to write code and allocate a separate server for Celonis and it has worked fine.
I cannot reuse the same Celonis agent for all kinds of Celonis features. It has to be a separate agent. There are Celonis automation and Celonis data extraction - two different agents. We cannot have one agent accommodating both of them. Initially, we started with Celonis automation, and later we end up installing Celonisdata extraction for real-time replication. It can scale well.
The initial setup is simple, and it is easy to configure. It takes less than one hour to configure to Celonis cloud and hand over the system to business process experts, and they can start extracting the data.
I'm not sure of the exact licensing cost.
I've also looked into SAP.
We are Celonis partners.
I've seen Celonis actively used by many other customers. I'd rate it eight out of ten.
If we deal with finance and accounts, we can do process mining for our customers' accounts payable processes. Within the accounts payable, we can observe the flow and invoices. We can see how many days it takes and which invoices are processed right the first time. We can also generate the process flow using Process Explorer.
In addition, some dashboards display the day's outstanding payables and show how many invoices are pending. It helps us know how much money is lost and how to get discounts or pay the full amount.
Celonis has machine learning and root cost analysis capabilities. It also has capabilities with process deviations and Process Explorer. In addition, we can do filtration based on activity and timestamp, and several features are available in Celonis to prioritize certain use cases.
They need to improve the root cause analysis because they label symptoms as root causes. In addition, they need to provide readymade value stream mapping. There are several models in value stream mapping, like first pass yield and rolled throughput yield, and these concepts are brought in as a measure in the Process Explorer. It will be beneficial to anybody who wants to complete a workshop.
We have been using this solution for two and a half years. Deployment depends on the customer's requirements, and some customers prefer having this solution on cloud, while others prefer it on their servers. We help customize Celonis for our clients so that data can be mined and different views of the process can be realized. We can identify deviations in the process, the root causes for those deviations and the financial impact.
It is a very stable product, and there are no issues.
It is a scalable solution.
The technical support is a commercial model, so they have readymade demos. There are also customized use cases that can be lifted and implemented. We haven't directly used technical support, so I can't provide details on their direct support.
There are two types of facilities available in Celonis. First, the setup is straightforward because they have a very good financial and account ecosystem. They have a good amount of connectors available, but certain kinds of customizations must be done in the non-finance area. Celonis has an industry wheel feature that mentions the use cases across different industries and within different departments.
The deployment depends on the number of use cases and their complexity. For example, a typical finance deployment won't take more than eight to 12 weeks. However, it may take four to five months to complete in some cases. In addition, if it's a customizable non-finance process, it takes a bit more time.
I cannot provide any details on licensing because it is confidential information, but the licensing cost differs from organization to organization and partner to partner. A gold partner has more benefits and provides a discounted license.
I rate this solution a nine out of ten. Regarding advice, it is good to always complete the modules in Celonis. This will help to understand where to focus transformation efforts. In addition, if a third-party consultancy is thinking of using Celonis, the modules will help with an approach to a customer's pitch. I believe the certification is costly, but the training model will provide a way to get sales for Celonis customization and implementation. Customers should go through the modules first and decide.
Celonis is mainly used for process mining i.e. mining and analyzing business processes to create solutions.
Celonis' best feature is a new one called Action Flow, an enhanced version of earlier automation features with lots of integration options with other systems so you can access third-party systems and automate some actions there too.
The one thing that could be improved is the guides are not getting updated to cover new features and upgrades, which means we can't use them at their full potential. In addition, the development could be done more quickly, so we don't have to search online for solutions.
I've been using Celonis for three years.
Celonis has been quite stable since we migrated to the cloud version.
Celonis' scalability is completely customizable.
Celonis' technical support is quite professional, and they respond to tickets raised online quite well and quickly. However, sometimes it takes time to get a response, or they just send links to documentation that we've already seen and don't solve our problem.
Positive
I have also used SAP Signavio, but I found Celonis to be more mature with much more capability.
The initial setup is straightforward, and a standard deployment takes around three months.
Celonis is cost-effective.
Celonis is a very good tool that can improve your business process in a single package. It provides process analyzing power, automation, and real-time monitoring with a single license. I would give Celonis a rating of eight out of ten.
We're using this solution for process mapping, analysis, and data mining. Right now, we're mapping customer journeys in retail space and product onboarding journeys.
We are focused on the merchandising space. For example, in merchandising, there will be a lot of processes. There's product onboarding and pricing promotions, etc. We map the journey and then try to understand what are the hiccups in the current processes and then identify them and then automate those strategies.
Celonis gives us our consulting licenses separately. We use those licenses for a quick study for the customer place and then recommend it. If the customer is willing to go ahead and implement Celonis, then we'll go for the corporate license model.
I'm a consultant and we primarily work with retailers.
The cost could be improved.
I've been using Celonis for about two years.
The stability is good.
The scalability is good as long as you have the cloud space.
Technical support is really good. For me, the sales support matters more. When I'm in a sales cycle, the Celonis sales teams are very helpful. They reach out to me from day zero.
Installation is straightforward.
The cost would be a concern for a certain category of customers. Flexible cost models would help smaller players be able to adapt Celonis into their business operations.
I would rate this solution 9 out of 10.
It's definitely a wonderful tool for clients to understand their operations in real time. Rather than reacting to a problem, you practically know the problems and then fix those problems.
Most of our use cases are for finance and accounting because that's what we focus on. These processes include, for example, accounts payable, procurement, and order to cash.
From a features perspective, the discovery and analytics parts of Celonis have been valuable, especially the analytics and all of the out-of-the-box process connectors.
Celonis has a simulation module that can only simulate based on the data it was mining from the systems. We would like to have the option to add other activities that are not happening in the systems and be able to simulate that impact as well. In other words, we want to be able to extend the simulation module with these additional features.
For example, we would like to see improvement of the simulation capabilities to include a BPMN-compliant modeler. That is, we would like to be able to connect the simulation to the BPMN modeler. I think it's one of the features that is missing in Celonis.
I've been dealing with Celonis since 2020.
It is on the cloud and is scalable because it doesn't depend on any infrastructure that we use.
We have dealt with Celonis' support, and we try to leverage more of the less informal support needs through implementation teams because going through the help desk sometimes takes time. There is room for improvement with regard to response time.
The initial setup is straightforward.
Typically, we have a couple of people, up to five, involved in the implementation. However, it depends on the scope and the size. If the project is small or medium, typically, up to five people are enough.
It is an expensive solution.
Our clients have annual licenses.
If you're looking for a process mining tool that comes with a lot of out-of-the-box process connectors and out-of-the-box analysis, then Celonis is definitely a good option. Celonis allows you to deploy it and get the value faster because it already has out-of-the-box connectors for major ERP systems like SAP and others.
If you're looking for something more simple and you want to invest more time in configuration, then you should probably look for another tool.
Also, it's not an inexpensive solution, and there are other solutions on the market that probably are less pricey.
Overall, I would rate Celonis at nine on a scale from one to ten.
I'm employed as a process mining expert.
I had prepared a proof of concept regarding segregation of duty. We used to have a lot of problems with the segregation of duties of SAP. The solutions that we use are ServiceNow, SAP, and one other. SAP has three systems, the first one is the main enterprise system, the second is the AP one, which is used for planning, and the third is the CRM system.
We also have something called DW, which is a data warehousing system. I was mostly in the security sphere, such as segregation of duties. There's no automatic role provisioning for the users who have joined the company or who are supposed to use SAP. We need to provide the accesses manually. We have to analyze the risk for each of the roles by using the GRC tool in SAP. It's an intensive manual process. There used to be a lot of problems while giving the rules, and while giving the rules, there are different markets. This company operates in 64 different countries, such as Uganda, Budapest, India, and Sri Lanka. These countries have different rules to define into it. For example, a user in the UK shouldn't have access to India. There is no possibility that we can trace it because there is no standard flow. There is no way you can pass through the data or event logs through this because there is no foolproof way of preparing a workflow.
In Celonis, you have something called a Petri net. Petri net is a token-based entry system, which helps you to find out the way how the event logs work. You have something called concurrence, which means if a PO or an invoice creation can happen at the same time, a process mining tool will not pick these two activities in their chronological order, because they might have happened at the same time. However, a token-based approach would have been better and more accurate. You would know that this particular event was passed, but this event is supposed to pass on the fourth or fifth phase of the tokenization. This was not the situation we had. The Petri net is complicated compared to a Google DMN flow. Google DMN flow is easier.
Celonis is one of the best solutions on the market. It offers you a lot of training materials and exposure to its ecosystem. Celonis is trying its best to prepare an ecosystem for it because, without an ecosystem, you will not be able to scale up.
I have noticed Celonis and Azure, as Infrastructure-as-a-service do not communicate well with each other. Since Celonis has recently acquired PAF they would try to synergize their operations with Microsoft tools. In the next couple of years, they should be more connected to the Microsoft ecosystems. In the long term, they should integrate more with SAP which is a partner of Microsoft. This would result in cost efficiencies.
I have been using Celonis for approximately two years.
Celonis was a stable solution. My company was trying to understand the power of Celonis. They wanted to create a second line of defense when audits fail because the segregation of duty team needs to ensure that the audits had never failed. Working in an alcoholic beverage company, they always wanted to make sure the solution never fails, or at least we're able to show them mitigation steps if one audit fails. This is the reason why they started the Celonis process mining as a proof of concept.
The scalability of Celonis is good. They have a lot of use cases and a lot of experience they have gained over a period of time. They have multiple models and ecosystems. Additionally, they have a lot of prebuilt apps or extractors, because they have done a lot of implementation of process mining. I have worked with Alteryx Designer, but Alteryx Designer's problem is it's not as simple as Celonis. Alteryx designer uses a complicated methodology that you have to do from the scratch. With Celonis, you don't need to do that. There are a lot of prebuilt extractors, and you can use those extractors if you know where to get the data from. For example, your data table in SAP gives you these PO header items.
I have not contacted support. However, I attended one of the technical seminars of Celonis. One of the academic counselors was there and I found them extremely knowledgeable.
I have used Camunda, Alteryx Designer, and Google DMN previously. The Camunda forms were cloud-based which was a benefit.
This is a cloud-based tool and it does not require an installation. You need to have a data extraction which could be a continuous process.
The implementation process time or difficulty depends on the complexity of the infrastructure. I haven't tested the integration on different scenarios.
Whenever I learn something, until I see any return on that investment, I would not invest in it. I have a serious plan of investing more time and resources in Celonis. I have found Celonis has a lot of new additions and it would be able to capture the markets very soon. The way the process improvements or process excellence is being looked at and the next progressive step for automation, I believe Celonis would play a vital role.
Celonis offers free learning possibilities. I am using the free version of Celonis.
I have evaluated many other tools.
I would recommend this solution to others.
I rate Celonis a nine out of ten.
The most common use case for Celonis involves its ERP applications, notably for SAP and Oracle, particularly for procure-to-pay and order-to-cash processes.
Clients use Celonis to process mined data created on SAP or Oracle and gain insights into process executions.
Celonis primarily helps with process discovery by understanding process variations and identifying opportunities for improvement.
Although it is not utilized much for continuous monitoring, it has significantly enhanced our understanding of improvement opportunities.
The most effective feature of Celonis is its capacity to analyze processes and uncover optimization opportunities through its visualizations of process variances.
Celonis does not provide a detailed picture of user activities within processes because it relies on event logs from ERP systems. It offers only a process view without task mining capabilities. Expanding into task mining could offer greater insights.
I have approximately four years of experience working with Celonis.
The stability of Celonis is impressive. I would rate it as an eight on a scale from one to ten.
Celonis has high scalability, which I would rate as an eight on a scale from one to ten.
I find the technical support from Celonis to be of high quality, rating it a nine out of ten.
Positive
The initial setup of Celonis is relatively straightforward. The setup process is crucial, and with good quality data, Celonis is an easy product to use.
The return on investment from Celonis comes from identifying opportunities for process improvement which translate into time savings and cost savings.
Pricing varies depending on client needs and deployment scale. However, I find it competitively priced and offering good value for money in high-volume data analysis scenarios.
Celonis is recommended due to its proficient ease of use, rapid insight discovery, ability to execute on insights, and effective impact measurement.
I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
I use the solution to deal with API processes, to understand business flows, and end-to-end processes.
The most valuable features of the solution are Celonis Process Explorer and Variant Explorer, which allow users to see all the digital footprints related to processes.
With Celonis, the way to use the product is one of the main difficulties users face in our company. In our company, we use Celonis for analysis, KPIs, and dashboards, and though the creation of new views is not too difficult for me, I cannot use all the luxurious things that we use in Celonis in our company while dealing with the analysis part. In general, the tool is easy to use, but our company doesn't get the luxury of using all the components in the analysis area of the product.
I have been using Celonis for a year. My company has a partnership with Celonis.
In terms of scalability, Celonis has more potential than Tableau and Power BI. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten. Celonis is a wonderful tool, so you cannot find any drawbacks at the right moment.
My company connects daily with Celonis' technical support team. Celonis' technical support team is very supportive, and our company can reach out directly to the support team if we have any queries.
Within a day or two, the technical support team of Celonis solves our company's issues.
I rate Celonis' technical support team a seven out of ten.
Neutral
In Celonis, when our company has all the configuration permissions, then the initial setup phase becomes easy, especially when we want to connect to their source system. Otherwise, users can use Slack to deal with the product's initial setup phase, which is an easy process. The source system makes documentation available in Celonis, so it is not difficult for anybody to deal with the product's setup phase.
The solution is deployed on the cloud, and if you don't want to connect to the systems, then it can always provide the data in a flash file.
Celonis doesn't need users to follow a deployment process since one has to just give users access to Celonis EMS to users so that they can see the process flow. There are no deployment issues in Celonis, and once any model is built with the product, our company has to provide training to the client on how to use all the dashboards and KPIs with Celonis Process Explorer and Variant Explorer.
Though Celonis is a bit pricey, it is worth it.
I suggest that others who plan to use the solution first use Celonis Academy Training.
With Celonis, my company builds apps and publishes them in marketplaces, and if anybody wants to use a particular app, then our company builds it for them, after which they can download it or purchase it from us.
I rate the overall tool a nine out of ten.
