Amazon AWS Reviews

We have been using AWS for our own product. We are not direct users. Rather, our customers are using our product, which is hosted on AWS.

The cost should be reduced.

They should have a better big data stack.

We have been dealing with Amazon AWS for the last six years.

This product is stable and we plan to continue selling it in the future. All of our products are tightly integrated with AWS.

AWS is a scalable platform.

The technical support is good.

There is no installation for AWS, as it is a cloud product.

AWS is expensive and the cost should be reduced.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

The primary use case of this solution is for hosting your infrastructure.

It's very easy to use.

The activation process can be improved. Sometimes, the activation takes a lot of time. There are many components of the infrastructure.

Integration with in-house applications could be simplified.

We have been dealing with Amazon AWS for one year.

We are using the latest version.

It's a stable solution.

It is a scalable product. We have 30 users in our organization.

We plan to continue to use Amazon AWS.

We have never had a problem with technical support.

There is no installation for this solution. It's a cloud solution.

There is a cost for any components you get.

AWS is not an expensive product.

I absolutely recommend this product.

I would rate Amazon AWS an eight out of ten.

We use this solution to deploy our products.

Within our company, there are at least five people using this solution. Usually, they are technical people — some software developers and a couple of infrastructure managers.

Whether we decide to increase our usage with this solution depends on our business development.

It allows us to deploy a production environment using Oracle Database, an API integrator, or by using our development tools. 

It's easy to manage. We can use a wide range of technologies with AWS.

It's very easy to configure and to use the platform, but we would like to be notified about our consumption. The consumption is a critical point for us because we are not always using the platform, but sometimes we receive high charges — high amounts of money for services that we didn't even use during that month, for instance.

I would like to receive some alerts when my consumption is getting out of the normal range.

I have been using Amazon AWS for roughly two years.

It's pretty stable. We haven't had any problems with the platform. Overall, I think it's quite optimized.

Scalability-wise, haven't had any issues. We work with small to medium-sized solutions so we haven't really needed to test the limits.

We haven't really had to contact technical support. The documentation is very complete and easy to understand. 

We tried using a Google cloud platform, but we had some configuration problems with some programs like WordPress. 

The initial setup is very straightforward. I wasn't involved in the deployment, but I believe it took less than four hours.

The price could be lower. Currently, we spend between $300 to $1,000 dollars a month to use this solution. We try to avoid using a license if we can.

I would recommend AWS to other interested companies. It's a very stable platform. It's easy to use and you don't have to be an expert to deploy your first project. Obviously, you'll need to make use of some advanced features, but in that case, support is always available. 

On a scale from one to ten, I would give this solution a rating of eight. 

Our primary use case is for cloud storage.

There is less work for the DBAs. Everything is handled in AWS itself.

We don't have issues with stability or scalability.

We manage support issues, we don't depend on others for technical support.

I would rate it a seven out of ten. 

In an RDS environment, we only get the CPU utilization and this thing. The growth rate and free space increases. Getting the CPU utilization is 99% or 90% sometimes.

We don't know whether to increase server capacity or alert notifications. We don't know which hard disc to purchase or what the next recommended CPU is. There should be an indicator. We would like to have more guidance. 

We are a solution provider and we use this solution to host applications for our customers. Their use cases are related to legal and advisory matters.

The most valuable features are load balancers, databases, and S3 buckets.

I have found some problems related to the database.

The price of this solution could be reduced to make it more competitive.

There are some limitations for certain applications that happen regionally and it is an issue for us. If we work with an application that is set up in New York, for example, then it has to be able to work in Pakistan.

I have been using Amazon AWS for between six and eight months.

We have not experienced any issues in terms of stability.

Scalability is not a problem. We are currently extending our use of Amazon AWS and have acquired a partnership with them. With this, we are creating a cloud department for which we will offer Amazon Web Services.

I did not have to call technical support.

Our deployment took between five and ten months.

I find that Amazon AWS is expensive.

I recently evaluated the Oracle Cloud Platform, and I find that Amazon is more expensive.

My advice to anybody who is researching AWS is to consider their budget. If the budget is available then it is a good choice, whereas, for those who want to spend less, I would suggest using Oracle instead.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

Our primary use case is an end-to-end cloud solution and design.

As a service vendor, we have helped clients to achieve faster "go to market" on their products, and have provided highly flexible cost-effective system management solutions.

The most valuable features of this solution are Compute, Security, Database, Media, Management, and Governance.

This solution would be improved with the inclusion of hybrid Kubernetes management.

Our primary use case for this solution is commercial cloud computing, analytics, and storage.

We have seen an improvement in our infrastructure, as the code makes it very easy to deploy quickly to AWS.

The features that we have found most valuable are IAM, KMS, and Security Groups for customizable security. Cloud formation for well-defined blueprints is also useful.

An easier way to determine estimated costs quickly would be helpful.

I use this product for hosting business applications like SAP on the AWS infrastructure. We have some new customers in Egypt and out of Egypt. This solution is magnificent. 

In our company, Amazon provides us with a lot of help like training for our staff. They always support us with any service or any solution. The security updates is perfect. and also supports for customers.

There are many benefits to AWS. For our customers, it optimizes their TCO. In terms of  computing, they can scale up and out. 

There's not specific things for improvement but that being said, they can improve the overall process and features of the product and to enhancement the stability.

It's stable enough. In terms of actual numbers, it's 99.99% stable.

Scalability is really perfect. I can make any scale anytime, whether I scale out or scale up.

Their technical support is really good. I am very satisfied.

Amazon is the leader in the public cloud categories, it has the largest market shares. I ask our customers why they're not using it. 

I would rate this solution a 9.5 out of ten. It's the leader in the public cloud and a leader in the market. 

I would recommend it to any customer using another solution. I would offer it as an alternative to another similar solution like IBM, Google and Azure.