Amazon AWS Reviews

We use AWS for product development, testing, and storage management.

AWS has improved our organization by driving efficiency in our product development cycles.

I like that it's easy to use.

They could lower the cost. The setup could also be easier.

I've been using Amazon AWS for about five years.

AWS is fairly stable. There are always some issues, but not much.

AWS scales fine most of the time. It's just expensive.

We've used Azure, we've used Google Cloud, we've used DigitalOcean, and we used SoftLayer. We're primarily using AWS because 75% or 80% of people use AWS, and we want our product to run optimized on AWS.

The initial setup is relative. It's easier than others, but it could always be easier.

It's expensive. It costs you an arm and a leg. It's just about your expertise to do it on-prem versus in the cloud. I think it's more cost-effective to do it on-prem, but not everybody has a lab or the capital equipment budget to staff a lab. So, they are defaulting to using a service.

That's the trade-off. If you're going to scale, most of the time, people are going to build it in-house. To get development started and to get things moving quickly, the cloud providers offer a valuable service. The biggest charge is for storage, moving data back and forth, and the ingress and egress charges.

I would tell potential users that there's a learning curve, but it definitely works.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Amazon AWS a solid seven.

Public Cloud

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

We are a solution provider and we use this solution to host applications for our customers. Their use cases are related to legal and advisory matters.

The most valuable features are load balancers, databases, and S3 buckets.

I have found some problems related to the database.

The price of this solution could be reduced to make it more competitive.

There are some limitations for certain applications that happen regionally and it is an issue for us. If we work with an application that is set up in New York, for example, then it has to be able to work in Pakistan.

I have been using Amazon AWS for between six and eight months.

We have not experienced any issues in terms of stability.

Scalability is not a problem. We are currently extending our use of Amazon AWS and have acquired a partnership with them. With this, we are creating a cloud department for which we will offer Amazon Web Services.

I did not have to call technical support.

Our deployment took between five and ten months.

I find that Amazon AWS is expensive.

I recently evaluated the Oracle Cloud Platform, and I find that Amazon is more expensive.

My advice to anybody who is researching AWS is to consider their budget. If the budget is available then it is a good choice, whereas, for those who want to spend less, I would suggest using Oracle instead.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

Private Cloud

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

This tool is indispensable, and must be taken into account when designing. It is the best platform on the market today.

Our organization has benefited tremendously with Amazon AWS since its implementation as we race to find new digital marketing strategies.

• Cutting-edge design
  
• Ease of use
• Market adaptability
  
• Accessibility
• Creator guarantee
  

In the next editions, the use of this tool should be extended to Google and Apple operating systems.

One to three years.

Trends are stable in Amazon AWS.

No specifics relating to scalability can be given.

I have never used a tool like this, and since its implementation I have seen great results. 

The return on investment is positive in terms of short-term results. 

Before choosing you can read other opinions and opt for the best tool that has aesthetic value and focus that is on par with Amazon AWS.

I was evaluating other avant-garde options but none were better than Amazon AWS.

It is a platform of high quality and commercial versatility. It is of the best that exist in the market.

• EC2 Container Service
• RDS
• SQS
• SNS
• SWF
• DynamoDB
• Elastic Beanstalk
• S3
• Cloudwatch

• Management of code and assets has become extremely simple.
• Faster development time.
• Applications are extremely scalable.
• Round-the-clock monitoring ability.

• Latency: EC2 Container Service is not quite zero downtime as claimed.
• Not enough or in-clear documentation for some products.

I have used it for two years.

Deployment was fairly simple.

Stability was never an issue.

We have not encountered any scalability issues.

Cloud is the way to go and it had more features than the competitors.

Before choosing this product, we also evaluated Microsoft Azure.

All of them in different scenarios, hard to tell.

Yes. It allows us to cheaply experiment with lots of different setups, evaluate prices and business ROI, and rollout solutions effectively.

Monitoring could be better IMHO. We currently hack together an extra monitoring piece into the puzzle for each project.

Since 2008

When the service started it had a few issues, it kept improving drastically.

Not in the past couple of years.

Not in the past couple of years.

Customer Service: Excellent.Technical Support: Excellent.

We used sporadic in-house machines, hosted services with different vendors. Reliability and ease of use were key.

There was a learning curve, starting to work with the service, too many 3 letters in the lingo. Courses and training and books and a podcast really help.

Different cost analysis of hosted services and co-locations.

Take it slow, there is a learning curve, but you get a return on your time for every hour you invest in learning to use this service.

Comprehensive Cloud platform offering, with a huge ecosystem of ISV partners, great selection of pre-built images, and much more!! Pricing cannot be beat, and new features and reduction in price are always in the works.

It is a highly complex product, and requires training and familiarization before use.

To optimally use this product, invest in training and development projects initially.

I use AWS for web services and platforms as well as a digital channel to buy my programs.

AWS is constantly growing in features with every new version. It's a good cloud provider with excellent availability. The integration is good, and their security products are interesting. Amazon is always innovating and delivering new products to customers.

I'd love to see an Amazon data center here in Peru.

We started using AWS nearly six years ago. 

Amazon is expanding its presence in Latin America, including Chile, Brazil, and Peru. The latency and communication will be fast with all these new data centers in South America.

I rate AWS nine out of 10. 

Public Cloud

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

My primary use case of Amazon AWS is doing my Mac backup. 

The most valuable features are how stable and easy to use Amazon AWS is. 

Amazon AWS could be improved by lowering the general storage price. 

I have been using Amazon AWS for a couple of years. 

This solution is stable. 

I didn't previously use a different solution. 

This solution is easy to install. It's quite straightforward since it's cloud-based. It took half an hour at most. 

I implemented this solution myself. 

I pay for a yearly license to use this product. 

I rate this solution a 10 out of 10. I would recommend it to others who are considering implementation. 

Public Cloud

Amazon Web Services (AWS)