Tricentis NeoLoad Reviews

We primarily use the solution for load testing. Our focus is not so much performance testing. We focus more on load testing, which does inadvertently include performance testing, however. 

The test cases are quite easy to build and to maintain. This is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us. It's the reason why they changed from JMeter to NeoLoad.

Overall, we're quite satisfied with the product.

Sometimes it's complicated to maintain the test cases. It's much easier than in JMeter, however. I'm not sure if this depends so much on NeoLoad, or is more based on the environment that we are testing.

I've been using the solution for about a year now.

The stability of the solution has been good, or at least good enough for our purposes. We haven't experienced any bugs or glitches so far. We also haven't had any crashes that would lead us to believe the solution isn't sound.

The scalability has so far fit our needs. We haven't had any issues expanding as required.

We currently have three people actively working on the solution. They are all testers.

The technical support is very good. Whenever we have needed something, they've provided support without us having to worry or wonder about if we'd get a response. Either they would send someone or help us remotely or the partner that they recommended to us (during the implementation process) helped us very quickly. The support has met our expectations so far and we're satisfied with their level of support.

We previously used Apache JMeter. We switched because test cases were easier to build on this solution.

The initial setup was straightforward for us. However, we did have assistance with the process, and that made it easier.

We got someone from Neotys to help us find someone to help assist us. They recommended a partner to help us to set it up right very quickly. We ordered the assistance suggested and we signed the contract on a Friday evening. We got the first report from NeoLoad the following Tuesday evening. We were quite satisfied with the assistance we received. It made the setup process quite easy.

We have pretty close to the latest version of the solution but are currently trying to make an upgrade.

I can recommend that product. I'd also recommend that new or potential users do some training. It's a good idea to use experienced partners or consultants to assist with the initial setup.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

We use NetLoad for two different types of testing. We use it for load testing and automation testing. We use it test out the user experience. 

NeoLoad can be integrated with Selenium for testing the user interface and user experience.

The scripting is really user-friendly and the reporting is very good. It supports regular expressions that help us to correlate things.

NeoLoad integrates well with other solutions.

I would like to see support for auto-correlations.

I have been using Neotys NeoLoad for three years.

This is a stable solution from what I know. The frequency in which it is used depends on the project and the client.

We have 50 people who are licensed and using this solution.

The technical support is good.

I also have experience with Apache JMeter.

The implementation is easy. It is just about downloading the application and there are three modules to install and configure, including the monitoring, the agents, and the controller.

This is definitely a solution that I recommend. 

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

We use this solution because we want to know the difference between two different tools to suggest for our clients.

As we are a services company, we have used NeoLoad also as part of our exercise.

I like the scripting and parameterization features.

While importing the scripts from backup it should not create the new variables because it has created some issues for us.

Used for performance testing of applications on QA environments as well as production environments. NeoLoad is best tool for testing in production without making many changes to the script or solution.

It helped in achieving the testing of on-premise applications, as well as cloud-based applications, without much difficulty.

• Integration of all components in one place.
• GUI-based requests
• Ease of use compared with other performance tools.

NeoLoad does not support Citrix-based applications. Neotys should take a look into this protocol.

No issues.

No issues. As far as Neotys NeoLoad, it is excellent in scalability.

The support is good. 

We started with NeoLoad.

The initial setup is easy.

The implementation was done in-house.

Our ROI is 100%.

The licensing cost is less compared to other licensing performance testing tools.

We tried JMeter, but due to its support (which we found subpar), we had to switch to NeoLoad.

You will love NeoLoad moving from open source and code-based performance tools.

It is primarily used for load testing, stress testing and performance testing. It is a very good product.

It is a bit easier compared to our LoadRunner, and it is cheaper. It can select to upload and it is based on cloud services. It is really easy to learn and to use. 

It needs improvement with post-production. 

It has good support. 

It is cheaper than other solutions.

There are several key features, including Jenkins integration, infrastructure monitoring, and results analysis.

Implementing this product has allowed us to increase the number of projects that get load testing, and the frequency by which we re-test our performance.

It needs improvements in the UI. It's currently not as friendly as it should be.

We've used it for seven years.

We haven't had any issues with deployment.

We have never experienced any isuses with stability.

The product has scaled very well up until this point.

The support from Neotys is very good. Responses are timely and come from experienced, knowledgeable load testing professionals.

We previously, and still use JMeter for some projects, in addition to Neoload.

The initial setup is straightforward for basic usage. The setup for higher volume load testing is more involved, but I wouldn't say complex, as should be expected for an enterprise class load testing tool.

We implemented it with our in-house team.

It's priced based on the numbers of VUs, virtual users, that your needs require. The free edition gives you 50 VUs. The pricing is fair for high-volume licensing. Cloud VUs can be rented on-demand for bursts of higher capacity testing needs without permanent purchase.

We looked at JMeter and Webload.

I highly recommend understanding load testing concepts before using any automation tool.

Less manual scripting and ease of setting up monitoring are very valuable features of the tool.

Loadrunner has extensive list of analysis features available whereas NeoLoad had limited when I worked.

It helped us deliver the solution for various customers within budget and efficiently.

Analysis can be further improved. I have been using LoadRunner analysis and it has been a very powerful tool.

I have used it for six months.

I have not encountered any deployment issues.

I have not encountered any stability issues.

I have not encountered any scalability issues.

Technical support's turnaround time for issue response is too good.

I have worked on various different performance testing tools, and I found NeoLoad very much within budget without compromising the quality of the product.

Initial setup was straightforward.

A vendor team implemented it.

More protocols can be added, and I would love to see if any profiler is included in it.

In my opinion, correlation of dynamic data is the most important advantage of this tool. Normally, it is difficult to record performance scripts, but with this tool it is much easier.

Since this tool is lowering the risk of monthly releases to live environment, it reduces the stress on people. In addition, performance problems that we could not solve for a long time have been solved by the tool with Dynatrace integration.

It would be good to make some updates on the reporting side. For example, correlating the performance of server, throughput and hit count in a specific time interval would be a nice functionality.

We use the tool full-time on our test environment and we have been releasing it to our live environment for 2 years.

Support side of the tool is very strong. We have seen fast feedback and answers to other questions we faced in the past about licensing and other general problems.

I have used many performance testing tools. This tool goes one step further with easy integration with code analysis tools, server monitoring, the success of correlation studio and the advantages on the mobile side.

Licence cost is very attractive compared to other vendor tools and also there are many license alternatives. Licence costs are good enough compared to the benefit of the tool to the company.

The ease of recording scripts and the correlation process, the force-on monitoring, success on the mobile side, and easy integration with code analysis tools are the reasons I have rated this product so high.