TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security Reviews

It's used as antivirus protection on the endpoints.

The initial setup is straightforward. 

It's stable and reliable. 

The solution can scale. 

I can't think of any specific areas that need improvement. 

I've been using the solution for a couple of years. 

The solution has been stable and reliable. The performance is good. there are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

It is a scalable solution. If you need to expand it, you can.

We have around 10,000 users on the solution at this time. 

I'm not sure if our team has ever used technical support. I've never contacted them directly.

Trend Micro's been in our company for quite some time. Apex, under the new name, is the latest. Before that, it was OfficeScan, which was Trend Micro as well. We've likely used Trend Micro for a decade.

It's an easy product to set up, from my understanding. I don't recall discussing any complexities during implementation. The deployment likely took less than a month. It doesn't take too long. 

At this point in time, just a couple of engineers are needed to manage the solution.

Our team handled the setup process. We did not use an integrator or reseller. 

We've likely experienced an ROI while using the solution.

I'm not familiar with the licensing costs. They are a part of our enterprise agreement.

I'm not sure which version I'm using at the moment. I don't directly manage the solution at the moment. 

Potential new users need to evaluate their licensing cost and the solution, whether it checks all the boxes and has all the features they need.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.

We use Apex One for security purposes. We have installed Apex One agents on 1,900 laptops and desktops. We use all the modules that are available in Apex One.

We have seen a reduction in viruses and malware since moving to Apex One.

Apex One is very good for threat detection and removal and scanning purposes. It has advanced protection capabilities that adapt to protect against unknown and stealthy new threats. These capabilities are definitely important for us.

It can detect ransomware with runtime machine-learning capabilities. It has the capability to detect ransomware-related threats as well.

Apex One can be integrated with other security products.

They provide virtual patching to protect against vulnerabilities even before a patch is available for the source of the issue.

Its threat-hunting capabilities and the information about the known threats are the most available features. It can easily catch any threat in our environment. If you have applied policies and rules, it quarantines or mitigates a threat. It is a very good feature in Apex One. 

Apex One is easy to learn. It is not complex.

We sometimes face issues with policies and rules while working with Apex One. They sometimes do not work.

When we implement an application policy for application control, sometimes, users are not able to access other applications. We apply the policy to a specific application, but it gets applied to all applications. We have found such issues, so the application module or application rules need to be improved in Apex One.

I have been using Apex One for five years. I have been using it in my current company for four years, and I also used it in my previous company.

There is downtime, but it is minimal.

Their support is very good. Whenever we need their help, we raise a ticket, and we get a response within one or two hours. We get a very good response from Trend Micro support. I would rate them an eight out of ten.

Positive

I have previously used McAfee. 

It is on-prem as well as on the cloud. I was involved in its initial deployment, but it was four years ago. It was simple. It was not too complex.

In terms of maintenance, it does require maintenance. 

We got help from Trend Micro. There were two people in total. I and one person from Trend Micro were involved in its deployment.

You need certain skills and a certain amount of knowledge to work with this solution because a lot of things are there. I have been working with Apex One for about five years, and it has been good so far. It is very easy to use, and it gives good protection from threats. I would recommend it to others.

Overall, I would rate Apex One a nine out of ten.

We use Apex One to identify and resolve malicious activity.

Apex One is effective at catching malicious activity. It has multiple modules that improve threat prevention across hundreds of networks. It's successful against malware and ransomware attacks. The solution has advanced capabilities like behavior modeling that help it deal with unknown threats. It's easy to use and learn.  

We can integrate Apex One with our ITSM solution, and it integrates seamlessly with other Trend Micro products. Apex One detects malicious activity and can feed information into the Apex Central console or any product. The detectors, data analyzers, and other email gateways are integrated. 

Apex One uses a lot of RAM and other physical resources, and I also don't like the web interface. 

I have used Apex One for about three years.

Apex One is generally stable, but it consumes too many resources. 

We haven't used other vendors for our EDR console, but we have used traditional endpoint protection solutions like McAfee and Symantec. 

Apex One was deployed before I joined the company. It requires some maintenance. Trend Micro's support providers contact me monthly about our problems. For example, when we upgrade the Apex One web version, we need to upgrade the Microsoft version. That's the problem for me in our business network. 

Apex One is inexpensive compared to other solutions that are available in our country.  

I rate Trend Micro Apex One seven out of 10. 

We use Trend Vision One Endpoint Security for device control and behavior monitoring. I investigate scenarios by the number of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security logs and show the root cause of the issues.

I use Trend Vision One Endpoint Security for work control, application control, firewall, whitelist and blocklist filtration, analysis, monitoring, deep security for the servers, major monitoring, and IPS modules. Although I use Alteryx for encryption, Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is stronger than Alteryx when it comes to communication.

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security should have a DLP module.

I have been working with Trend Vision One Endpoint Security for three years.

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is a very stable solution, and I haven't faced any issues.

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is a scalable solution, and we can increase its license for a lot of users.

The pricing is good.

I would recommend Trend Vision One Endpoint Security to other users for stronger security, documentation, and support.

I'm working for a company that is a partner for Trend Vision. We act as an intermediary between the vendor and the customer.

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security is more comfortable for administration, and its customer support is good.

If I want to make a ticket for Trend Vision, I can make it via Trend Vision support or contact its partner.

The capability to defend endpoints against threats is very strong because it uses a signature-based outlet. I can investigate threats using vendors like Trellix and Carbon Black, but Trend Vision is the first to detect malware, ransomware, and malicious scripts.

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has advanced protection capabilities that adapt to protect against unknown and stealthy new threats. It's very important as the algorithms of Trend Vision communicate with the One Endpoint Security appliance and provide feedback with all of the updated signatures.

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security detects ransomware with runtime machine learning capabilities because it has a malware protection module, and it's very important to us.

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security can integrate with Trend Vision Ericsson solution and take logs from it. We can integrate Trend Vision One Endpoint Security and Trend Vision DDAN.

It is very easy to learn Trend Vision One Endpoint Security.

It is easy to administer Trend Vision One Endpoint Security.

It took just one day for us to realize the benefits of Trend Vision One Endpoint Security from the time of deployment.

Since moving to Trend Vision One Endpoint Security, we have seen an 80% reduction in viruses and malware.

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has reduced administrative overhead for us by 100%.

Overall, I rate Trend Vision One End point Securityten out of ten.

We use it for endpoint protection. We are using its latest version.

I did not get too much bad feedback from the employees and the users in the company. That is the main benefit for me. 

It reduces administrative overhead. Along with our mail security solution, there is a 40% or 50% reduction.

Based on the feedback from the consumers or the parties that are working in the company, I did not get much bad feedback. Nobody said that it is not working or they are not able to work. They can run their programs as usual while Apex One is retrieving data or scanning their computers or laptops. It also catches any malicious activities or spyware easily. Apex One provides good defense against threats such as malware, ransomware, and malicious scripts. I would rate it a four out of five for its protection capabilities. 

It is easy to learn. In just two or three hours, our system administrator could learn how to use it. It is easy to integrate and easy to manage.

One of our firewalls once detected a threat, but Apex One did not detect it. 

We escalated some thing to our consultant, and it is still not resolved. I asked my administrator about it, and he said that they are working on it. I did not follow up too much because it was not a very complex issue. Only one of two users had this problem, but it did not disturb their operations. There was an error message on their systems, and when they clicked okay, it got closed. They did not face this problem all the time. It happened only in some cases, but we could not find the reason.

I have been using this solution for two years.

It is stable. I would rate it a nine out of ten in terms of stability.

It is scalable. We have about 100 users using the solution. I would rate it a ten out of ten in terms of scalability.

We were using another solution for endpoint protection. I do not remember its name, but we switched to Trend Micro within two or three months of my joining this organization.

The most important reason for switching was that the other solution did not have an EDR solution. The price was also more than the Apex One and EDR altogether. We also saw some malware problems, and some of the users also had issues with using their computers. They could not even move the mouse, whereas Apex One does not impact their work. It works in the background.

We had a consultant for the installation. He logged into our system and installed it. It took two days, which also included training.

It does not require much maintenance. It just works, and our system administrator does not have to work much on it. He uses it only if there is any issue. Otherwise, he does not touch it.

Its price is reasonable compared to other solutions.

We considered other solutions. We did not do a PoC, but I asked the IT managers at my previous company for their opinion. In the end, we went for Trend Micro Apex One.

I would recommend Trend Micro Apex One to others. It works well. You can just install it and then forget it.

We have not yet integrated it with other products. I have a cloud EDR solution, but it is still not in production. I have the license, but I have not used it yet.

I would rate Trend Micro Apex One a nine out of ten.

We use it for many use cases, such as servers, clients, laptops, end-users, servers, and endpoints.

It's easy to use and used to be a very good solution a few months ago. However, we recently did an intrusion test, which didn't work as expected. So now we're very disappointed with it.

There is room for improvement in the behavior filtering and control of Trend Micro. Currently, this feature is not functioning correctly, which is evident in the behavioral backset basset on signatures like visors, but the behavior filtering is not working properly and needs to be improved.

I have been using this solution for five years now.

There are no issues in performance. It is a stable solution, and I would rate the stability a seven out of ten.

It is a scalable solution, and I would rate it a seven out of ten.

The customer service team is very good. It is very responsive and knowledgeable.

Positive

The initial setup is very easy. The deployment was very fast.

You do not need an expert to set up the solution, and you can deploy it yourself.

We use a yearly subscription, and it is expensive.

Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten. There are some issues with the behavior filtering functionality.

For me, the use cases for Micro Apex apply to some agents only.

It is a great product capability-wise.

One of the features I like in Micro ApexOne is the configuration for device management; it is very precise and allows more permission for different use cases. For example, some job titles require specific and granular integrations for device management since the check is different from USB.

It has good signature-based capabilities. It's good for its capabilities but should offer a module with integrated machine learning where you can detect behaviour and knowledge.

Another significant issue is the deployment process; it is a little longer process and takes around five to six months.

I have been using it for a year and a half. Although, I only log in a third of the time.

I have not faced any significant problems with stability on my computer. Therefore, I would rate it a seven as well, the same as scalability.

I would rate the scalability a seven out of ten.

Tech support could be better for a local company. I would give the tech support an overall rating of six and a half. We have to notify them that people are also using their product here.

Neutral

The initial setup is difficult because the process is long, and it took us about five to six months because CORETech is about that size.

We deployed it on-premise.

As a whole, I would rate Micro ApexOne a seven out of ten.

The primary use case of the solution is for endpoint protection.

I genuinely enjoy the script and I find Trend Micro to be more user-friendly, as it requires only two administrators.

The big issue that I have is the edge agent, of course, Trend Micro has a larger database making it easier to find information.

I believe that optimization is a really good feature on the front side.

The customization has room for improvement.

I would like to have the ability to see what files are being scanned live.

I have been using the solution for almost three years.

I give the stability a nine out of ten.

I give the scalability a nine out of ten.

We previously used Microsoft Defender and Broadcom Symantec. Trend Micro Apex One is more complete and has a better layout.

The initial setup is straightforward. It is easy to deploy the code. I give the initial setup an eight out of ten.

The deployment is quick.

The implementation was completed by a third party.

The license is expensive but it is a complete solution.

I give the solution a nine out of ten.

I recommend the solution to others because Trend Micro Apex One provides good protection.

Our consultants provide solutions to our customers for SOC 2 use cases. We have more than 50 small to mid-sized customers and about ten enterprise customers. 

For one use case, we compared features and pricing for possible options. The solution was the best fit and we completed the project in twenty days. 

The solution is lightweight and easy to deploy.

The end-user perspective is very good because the solution isn't complex to learn and support is readily available. 

The solution could be more proactive by using AI to assess the production landscape and compete with other products that fully support Linux. 

For example, the old version of Apex did not support some kernels in the Linux environment. But their new version called Vision is supporting Linux and you're going to want all that compatibility. It is important that the solution stay on top of the latest trends. 

I have been using the solution for two years. 

The solution is cloud-based and scalable. 

The setup and implementation are not complex. It does take some time for many users or machines. Typical installations take about two days. 

We implement the solution for customers. 

The pricing is reasonable and depends on user count. 

We recommend the solution for tighter budgets or use cases that are not too feature heavy. 

If a customer has a bigger budget or is looking for a more futuristic product, then we recommend CrowdStrike or SentinelOne. 

Customers needing full Linux support should look at Apex' new product called Vision. 

I rate the solution a seven out of ten in comparison to SentinelOne and CrowdStrike. 

We primarily use the solution for our endpoint protection. It is integrated for endpoint protection. It's a good product. Some of our clients also use the solution. 

Trend Micro Apex One is good for endpoint protection. They're a Gartner leader for it, so that's why customers like it. 

Their patch management is unique compared to other endpoint protection solutions. It is a good feature. 

The nano protection and device control are great. We were monitoring predictive machine learning. All features are available in the Apex One feature.

It's scalable.

It is stable.

Technical support is helpful.

It is not user-friendly. If they improve this side and make it more user-friendly, then it'll be helpful for IT admins in terms of operating the solution. It's just a bit complex to learn and use at this point, compared to other endpoints. 

Sometimes the solution cannot support legacy PCs.

The product can be a bit heavy.

I've been dealing with the solution for one year.

The platform is good. The product offer is good and the customer experience is good. The only limitation is it's not easy to operate. That said, it is reliable.

It is scalable. That's not a problem.

Technical support isn't too bad. I've been satisfied with the level of support I can get. They are pretty responsive. Their level of knowledge is good.

Positive

I've also used Symantec, which is easier to set up. It's also lighter. However, Symantec's support is not good at all. 

The solution has a moderate level of difficulty. It's not too easy and also not overly complex. For example, compared to Symantec, Trend Micro is more complex.

I'd rate the setup process a two out of five in terms of the ease of setup. You need to have prior knowledge. 

We use the solution in-house. We also resell it and are integrators. 

We're using the latest version of the solution.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.