Datadog Reviews

Our primary use of Datadog involves monitoring over 50 microservices deployed across three distinct environments. These services vary widely in their functions and resource requirements. 

We rely on Datadog to track usage metrics, gather logs, and provide insight into service performance and health. Its flexibility allows us to efficiently monitor both production and development environments, ensuring quick detection and response to any anomalies. 

We also have better insight into metrics like latency and memory usage.

Datadog has significantly improved our organization’s monitoring capabilities by centralizing all of our logs and making them easily searchable. This has streamlined our troubleshooting process, allowing for quicker root cause analysis. 

Additionally, its ease of implementation meant that we could cover all of our services comprehensively, ensuring that logs and metrics were thoroughly captured across our entire ecosystem. This has enhanced our ability to maintain system reliability and performance.

The intuitive user interface has been one of the most valuable features for us. Unlike other platforms like Grafana, as an example, where learning how to query either involves a lot of trial and error or memorization almost like learning a new language, Datadog’s UI makes finding logs, metrics, and performance data straightforward and efficient. This ease of use has saved us time and reduced the learning curve for new team members, allowing us to focus more on analysis and troubleshooting rather than on learning the tool itself.

While the UI and search functionality are excellent, further improvement could be made in the querying of logs by offering more advanced templates or suggestions based on common use cases. This would help users discover powerful queries they might not think to create themselves. 

Additionally, enhancing alerting capabilities with more customizable thresholds or automated recommendations could provide better insights, especially when dealing with complex environments like ours with numerous microservices.

I've used the solution for five years.

We have never experienced any downtime.

We previously used Sumo Logic.

Our primary use case for this solution is comprehensive cloud monitoring across our entire infrastructure and application stack. 

We operate in a multi-cloud environment, utilizing services from AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Platform. 

Our applications are predominantly containerized and run on Kubernetes clusters. We have a microservices architecture with dozens of services communicating via REST APIs and message queues. 

The solution helps us monitor the performance, availability, and resource utilization of our cloud resources, databases, application servers, and front-end applications. 

It's essential for maintaining high availability, optimizing costs, and ensuring a smooth user experience for our global customer base. We particularly rely on it for real-time monitoring, alerting, and troubleshooting of production issues.

Datadog has significantly improved our organization by providing us with great visibility across the entire application stack. This enhanced observability has allowed us to detect and resolve issues faster, often before they impact our end-users. 

The unified platform has streamlined our monitoring processes, replacing several disparate tools we previously used. This consolidation has improved team collaboration and reduced context-switching for our DevOps engineers. 

The customizable dashboards have made it easier to share relevant metrics with different stakeholders, from developers to C-level executives. We've seen a marked decrease in our mean time to resolution (MTTR) for incidents, and the historical data has been invaluable for capacity planning and performance optimization. 

Additionally, the AI-driven insights have helped us proactively identify potential issues and optimize our infrastructure costs.

We've found the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) feature to be the most valuable, as it provides great visibility on trace-level data. This granular insight allows us to pinpoint performance bottlenecks and optimize our code more effectively. 

The distributed tracing capability has been particularly useful in our microservices environment, helping us understand the flow of requests across different services and identify latency issues. 

Additionally, the log management and analytics features have greatly improved our ability to troubleshoot issues by correlating logs with metrics and traces. 

The infrastructure monitoring capabilities, especially for our Kubernetes clusters, have helped us optimize resource allocation and reduce costs.

While Datadog is an excellent monitoring solution, it could be improved by building more features to replace alerting apps like OpsGenie and PagerDuty. Specifically, we'd like to see more advanced incident management capabilities integrated directly into the platform. This could include features like sophisticated on-call scheduling, escalation policies, and incident response workflows. 

Additionally, we'd appreciate more customizable machine learning-driven anomaly detection to help us identify unusual patterns more accurately. Improved support for serverless architectures, particularly for monitoring and tracing AWS Lambda functions, would be beneficial. 

Enhanced security monitoring and threat detection capabilities would also be valuable, potentially reducing our reliance on separate security information and event management (SIEM) tools.

I've used the solution for two years.

My main use case for Datadog involves working on projects related to our sales reps in terms of registering new clients, and I've been using Datadog to pull up instances of them while they're beta testing our product that we're rolling out just to see where their errors are occurring and what their behavior was leading up to that.

I can't think of all of the specific details, but there was a sales rep who was running into a particular error message through their sales registration process, and they weren't giving us a lot of specific screenshots or other error information to help us troubleshoot. I went into Datadog and looked at the timestamp and was able to look at the actual steps they took in our platform during their registration and was able to determine what the cause of that error was. I believe if I remember correctly, it was user error; they were clicking something incorrectly.

One thing I've seen in my main use case for Datadog is an option that our team can add on, and it's the ability to track behavior based on the user ID. I'm not sure at this time if our team has turned that on, but I do think that's a really valuable feature to have, especially with the real-time user management where you can watch the replay. Because we have so many users that are using our platform, the ability to filter those replay videos based on the user ID would be so much more helpful. Especially in terms where we're testing a specific product that we're rolling out, we start with smaller beta tests, so being able to filter those users by the user IDs of those using the beta test would be much more helpful than just looking at every interaction in Datadog as a whole.

The best features Datadog offers are the replay videos, which I really find super helpful as someone who works in QA. So much of testing is looking at the UI, and being able to look back at the actual visual steps that a user is taking is really valuable.

Datadog has impacted our organization positively in a major way because not even just as a QA engineer having access to the real-time replay, but just as a team, all of us being able to access this data and see what parts of our system are causing the most errors or resulting in the most frustration with users. I can't speak for everybody else because I don't know how each other segment of the business is using it, but I can imagine just in terms of how it's been beneficial to me; I can imagine that it's being beneficial to everybody else and they're able to see those areas of the system that are causing more frustration versus less.

I think Datadog can be improved, but it's a question that I'm not totally sure what the answer is. Being that my use case for it is pretty specific, I'm not sure that I have used or even really explored all of the different features that Datadog offers. So I'm not sure that I know where there are gaps in terms of features that should be there or aren't there.

I will go back to just the ability to filter based on user ID as an option that has to be set up by an organization, but I would maybe recommend that being something part of an organization's onboarding to present that as a first step. I think as an organization gets bigger or even if the organization starts using Datadog and is large, it's going to be potentially more difficult to troubleshoot specific scenarios if you're sorting through such a large amount of data.

I have been working in this role for a little over a year now.

As far as I can tell, Datadog has been stable.

I believe we have about 500 or so employees in our organization using our platform, and Datadog seems to be able to handle that load sufficiently, as far as I can tell. So I think scalability is good.

I haven't had an instance where I've reached out to customer support for Datadog, so I do not know.

I do not believe we used a different solution previously for this.

I cannot answer if I have seen a return on investment; I'm not part of the leadership in terms of making that decision. Regarding time saved, in my specific use case as a QA engineer, I would say that Datadog probably didn't save me a ton of time because there are so many replay videos that I had to sort through in order to find the particular sales reps that I'm looking for for our beta test group. That's why I think the ability to filter videos by the user ID would be so much more helpful. I believe features that would provide a lot of time savings, just enabling you to really narrow down and filter the type of frustration or user interaction that you're looking for. But in regards to your specific question, I don't think that's an answer that I'm totally qualified to answer.

I was not part of the decision-making process before choosing Datadog, so I cannot speak to whether we evaluated other options.

Right now our users are in the middle of the beta test. At the beginning of rolling the test out, I probably used the replay videos more just as the users were getting more familiar with the tool. They were probably running into more errors than they would be at this point now that they're more used to the tool. So it kind of ebbs and flows; at the beginning of a test, I'm probably using it pretty frequently and then as it goes on, probably less often.

It does help resolve issues faster, especially because our sales reps are used to working really quickly in terms of the sales registration, as they're racing through it. They're more likely to accidentally click something or click something incorrectly and not fully pay attention to what they're doing because they're just used to their flow. Being able to go back and watch the replay and see that a person clicked this button when they intended to click another button, or identifying the action that caused an error versus going off of their memory.

I have not noticed any measurable outcomes in terms of reduction in support tickets or faster resolution times since I started using Datadog. For myself, looking at the users in our beta test group, none of those came as a result of any sort of support ticket. It came from messages in Microsoft Teams with all the people in the beta group. We have resulted in fewer messages in relation to the beta test because they are more familiar with the tool. Now that they know there might be differences in terms of what their usual flow is versus how their flow is during the beta test group, they are resulting in fewer messages because they are probably being more careful or they've figured out those inflection points that would result in an error.

My biggest piece of advice for others looking into using Datadog would be to use the filters based on user ID; it will save so much time in terms of troubleshooting specific error interactions or occurrences. I would also suggest having a UI that's more simple for people that are less technical. For example, logging into Datadog, the dashboard is pretty overwhelming in terms of all of the bar charts and options; I think having a more simplified toggle for people that are not looking for all of the options in terms of data, and then having a more technical toggle for people that are looking for more granular data, would be helpful.

I rate Datadog 10 out of 10.

We use the solution for logs, infrastructure metrics, and APM. We have many different teams using it across both product and data engineering.

The solution has improved our observability by giving us rapid log search, a correlation between hosts/logs/APM, and tons of features in one website.

I enjoy the rapid log search. It's such a pleasure to quickly find what you're looking for. The ease of graph building is also nice, and MUCH easier than Prometheus.

It is far too easy to run up huge unexpected costs. The billing model is not flexible enough to handle cases where you temporarily have thousands of nodes. It is not price effective for monitoring big data jobs. We had to switch to open-source Grafana plus Prometheus for those.

It would be cool to have an open telemetry agent that automatically APM instruments everything in the next release.

I've used the solution for three years.

I'd rate the stability ten out of ten.

I'd rate the scalability ten out of ten.

We did not previously use a different solution.

The setup is very straightforward. Users just install the helm chart, and boom, you're done.

We handled the setup in-house.

Be careful about pricing. Make sure you understand the billing model and that there are multiple billing models available. Set up alarms to alert you of cost overruns before they get too bad.

We've never evaluated other solutions.

It's a great product. However, you have to pay for quality.

Our primary use case is custom and vendor supplied web application log aggregation, performance tracing and alerting. We run a mix of AWS EC2, Azure serverless, and colocated VMWare servers to support higher education web applications. 

Managing a hybrid multi-cloud solution across hundreds of applications is always a challenge. Datadog agents on each web host, and native integrations with GitHub, AWS, and Azure gets all of our instrumentation and error data in one place for easy analysis and monitoring.

Through use of Datadog across all of our apps we were able to consolidate a number of alerting and error tracking apps and Datadog ties them all together in cohesive dashboards. 

Whether the app is vendor-supplied or we built it ourselves, the depth of tracing, profiling, and hooking into logs is all obtainable and tunable. Both legacy .NET Framework and Windows Event Viewer and cutting edge .NET Core with streaming logs all work. 

The breadth of coverage for any app type or situation is really incredible. It feels like there's nothing we can't monitor.

When it comes to Datadog, several features have proven particularly valuable. The centralized pipeline tracking and error logging provides a comprehensive view of our development and deployment processes, making it much easier to identify and resolve issues quickly. 

Synthetic testing has been a game-changer, allowing us to catch potential problems before they impact real users. Real user monitoring gives us invaluable insights into actual user experiences, helping us prioritize improvements where they matter most. And the ability to create custom dashboards has been incredibly useful, allowing us to visualize key metrics and KPIs in a way that makes sense for different teams and stakeholders. 

Together, these features form a powerful toolkit that helps us maintain high performance and reliability across our applications and infrastructure, ultimately leading to better user satisfaction and more efficient operations.

I'd like to see an expansion of the Android and IOS apps to have a simplified CI/CD pipeline history view. I like the idea of monitoring on the go yet it seems the options are still a bit limited out of the box. While the documentation is very good considering all the frameworks and technology Datadog covers, there are areas - specifically .NET Profiling and Tracing of IIS-hosted apps - that need a lot of focus to pick up on the key details needed. In some cases the screenshots don't match the text as updates are made. I spent longer than I should figuring out how to correlate logs to traces, mostly related to environmental variables.

I've used the solution for about three years.

We have been impressed with the uptime and clean and light resource usage of the agents.

The solution is very scalable, very customizable.

Service is always helpful in tuning our committed costs and alerting us when we start spending outside the on-demand budget.

We used a mix of a custom error email system, SolarWinds, UptimeRobot, and GitHub actions. We switched to find one platform that could give deep app visibility regardless of whether it is Linux or Windows or Container, cloud or on-prem hosted.

The setup was generally simple. However, .NET Profiling of IIS and aligning logs to traces and profiles was a challenge.

We implemented the solution in-house. 

I'd count our ROI as significant time saved by the development team assessing bugs and performance issues.

Set up live trials to asses cost scaling. Small decisions around how monitors are used can have big impacts on cost scaling. 

NewRelic was considered. LogicMonitor was chosen over Datadog for our network and campus server management use cases.

I'm excited to dig further into the new offerings around LLM and continue to grow our footprint in Datadog. 

We are using Datadog to improve our cloud monitoring and observability across our enterprise apps.  We have integrated a lot of different resources into Datadog, like Kubernetes, App Gateways, App Service Environments, App Service Plans, and other Web App resources. 

I will be using the monitoring and observability features of Datadog. Dashboards are used very heavily by teams and SREs. We really have seen that Datadog has already improved both our monitoring and our observability.

The ease and speed of which you can create a dashboard has been a huge improvement.  

The different types of monitors we can create have been huge, too. We can do so many different things with monitors that we couldn't do before with our alerts. 

Being able to click on a trace or log and drill down on it to see what happened has been great.  

Some have found the learning curve a bit steep. That said,they are coming around slowly. There is just a lot of information to learn how to navigate.

The different types of monitors have been very valuable. We have been able to make our alerts (monitors) more actionable than we were able to previously.  

Watchdog is a favorite feature among a lot of the devs. It catches things they didn't even know were an issue. 

RUM is another feature a lot of us are looking forward to seeing how it can help us improve our customer experience during tax season.  

We hope to enable the code review feature at some point to so we can see what code caused the issue.

I would like to see the integration between PagerDuty and Datadog improved.  The tags in Datadog don't match those in PagerDuty, and we have to make it work.  Also, I would like to see if the ability to replicate a KQL query in Datadog is made easier or better.  

I would like to see the alert communications to email or phones made better so we could hopefully move off PagerDuty and just use Datadog for that. 

There are also a lot of features that we haven't budgeted for yet and I would like for us to be able to use them in the future.

I've used the solution for about two years.

We use the solution for monitoring microservices in a complex AWS-based cloud service.  

The system is comprised of about a dozen services. This involves processing real-time data from tens of thousands of internet connected devices that are providing telemetry. Thousands of user interactions are processed along with real-time reporting of device date over transaction intervals that can last for hours or even days. The need to view and filter data over periods of several months is not uncommon.  

Datadog is used for daily monitoring and R&D research as well as during incident response.

The query filtering and improved search abilities offered by Datadog are by far superior to other solutions we were using, such as AWS CloudWatch. We find that we can simply get at the data we need quicker and easier than before. This has made responding to incidents or investigating issues a much more productive endeavour. We simply have less roadblocks in the way when we need to "get at the data". It is also used occasionally to extract data while researching requirements for new features.

Datadog dashboards are used to provide a holistic view of the system across many services. Customizable views as well as the ability to "dive in" when we see someting anomalous has improved the workflow for handling incidents.    

Log filtering, pattern detection and grouping, and extracting values from logs for plotting on graphs all help to improve our ability to visualize what is going on in the system. The custom facets allow us to tailor the solution to fit our specific needs.

There are some areas on log filtering screens where the user interface can take some getting used to. Perhaps having the option for a simple vs advanced user interface would be helpful in making new or less experienced users comfortable with making their own custom queries.

Maybe it is just how our system is configured, yet finding the valid values for a key/value pair is not always intuitively obvious to me. While there is a pop-up window with historical or previously used values and saved views from previous query runs, I don't see a simple list or enumeration of the set of valid values for keys that have such a restriction.

I've used the solution for one year.

The solution is very stable.

The product is reasonably scalable, although costs can get out of hand if you aren't careful.

I have not had the need to contact support.

Neutral

We did use AWS CloudWatch. It was to awkward to use effectively and simply didn't have the features.

We had someone experienced do the initial setup.  However, with a little training, it wasn't too bad for the rest of us.

We handled the setup in-house.

Take care of how you extract custom values from logs. You can do things without thought to make your life easier and not realize how expensive it can be from where you started.

I'm not aware of evaluating other solutions.

Overall I recommend the solution. Just be mindful of costs.

My main use case for Datadog is monitoring our servers.

A specific example of how I'm using Datadog to monitor my server is that we are maintaining request and latency and looking for errors.

I really enjoy the user interface of Datadog, and it makes it easy to find what I need. In my opinion, the best features Datadog offers are the customizable dashboards and the Watchdog.

The customizable dashboards and Watchdog help me in my daily work because they're easy to find and easy to look at to get the information I need. Datadog has positively impacted my organization by making finding and resolving issues a lot easier and efficient.

I think Datadog can be improved by continually finding errors and making things easy to see and customize.

I have been using Datadog for one month.

Datadog is stable.

Datadog's scalability has been easy to put on each server that we want to monitor.

I have not had to contact customer support yet, but I've heard they are great.

Neutral

We previously used our own custom solution, but Datadog is a lot easier.

I'm not sure if I've seen a return on investment.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it was easy to find and easy to purchase and easy to estimate.

I did not make the decision to evaluate other options before choosing Datadog.

I would rate Datadog a nine out of ten.

I give it this rating because I think just catching some of the data delays and latency live could be a little bit better, but overall, I think it's been great.

I would recommend Datadog and say that it's easy to customize and find what you're looking for.