CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR Reviews

CrowdStrike side, Falcon is the Endpoint Detection, Overwatch is the service that sits behind it. From a human point of view,it looks at the anomalies that normal AI and machine learning couldn't catch. So it is the combination of the two that really works well.

At this stage, I don't really see room for improvement. I do think because the IP security market and the threat landscape is moving along so quickly, there's always room for improvement and there are always new elements one has to look at and look at in-depth, but at this stage, OverWatch is much better than the competitors. And I've seen a lot of their competitors.

I have been using this solution for around a year and three months.

It is very stable at this stage. 

It's very scalable. It's scalable to the extent where it will out-scale anything we've got in South Africa. It definitely would fulfill every single need we've got in South Africa in terms of scalability.

Our clients are mostly enterprise, but they vary. They are clients that take security very seriously. I focus just on the security side and obviously even smaller customers have big security profiles sometimes.

The technical support so far has been good. It would be better if they had people in the country, in South Africa. But other than that, it's been very good. I haven't had complaints.

I did use other solutions before CrowdStrike. CrowdStrike is the most expensive, so not always the best solution to everybody's problem because of the price tag. From a security efficacy point of view, I have not seen anything that's been as good as CrowdStrike and I've seen a lot them.

The initial setup was straightforward. I've seen rollouts where a thousand could be rolled out in an hour. So it really is quite straightforward. It is simple. It doesn't need the back end that a lot of your other endpoint security products need where you need to install a lot of servers on-site before you can get the solution in and working. From prerequisites and so forth there's very little that you need. It really is simple and quick.

My advice to anybody considering this is: Do it. If somebody really wants to implement and they've already seen that they've got a need, I believe everybody's got a need, and that they've got budget and total for it, my advice would be to do it. Get it implemented. Any of the traditional antivirus solutions or endpoint protection solutions see about 50% of what goes on, on the internet. People who don't have CrowdStrike or a decent competitor, they are blind to 50% of the problem. You cannot manage what you cannot see. My advice is to do it.

I'd rate it an eight out of ten. Not a ten because the price point is not good. It really is an expensive product in the South African market. And they need people in our country. Their partner program isn't yet where it should be. They need a lot of work and there's a lot of improvement needed. But in terms of the technical and the security behind the product, it's a kick-ass product.

We use virtually every module within the solution, including identity protection. It boasts its own robust EDR capabilities, essentially positioning it as the top EDR solution in the market.

The prevention capabilities hold the utmost value.

The only aspect where we've offered feedback for potential enhancement is essentially the user experience.

I have been working with it for two years now.

It exhibits exceptional stability, with no instances of downtime experienced since its implementation.

In terms of scalability, we haven't encountered any issues. We have intentions to expand our usage in the future. Continuously striving for improvement, we aim to broaden the scope of what we utilize within the platform.

The customer service is quite satisfactory, with a reliable response time adhering to the service level agreement. I would rate it nine out of ten.

Positive

It's deployed across all aspects of our infrastructure, providing comprehensive coverage for our entire environment. It requires no maintenance.

The return on investment has been significant, aiding us in various simulated assessments and playing a crucial role in both detecting and preventing incidents early on. Moreover, it has proven beneficial for overall asset management.

While the cost is relatively high, it is justified by the value it brings.

We evaluated nearly fifteen solutions, including some of the top ones in the market. However, we opted for CrowdStrike because it aligns perfectly with our requirements and fits within our budget. Upon testing it out, we found that it effectively fulfills its intended purpose.

Overall, I would rate it nine out of ten.

We commonly use it for mitigating phishing, virus, and malware attacks, making it an essential tool for such security incidents.

The system is valuable as it is a fully managed endpoint protection service designed to stop breaches, detect threats, and respond to incidents effectively.

The technical support is satisfactory, but there is room for improvement to enhance it.

I have been working with it for approximately four years.

Stability is excellent, and our clients are satisfied with it. Even minor bugs are promptly addressed and fixed.

Technical support response times are contingent upon the severity level of the issue. However, we ensure prompt attention by assigning a dedicated person or engineer to address critical issues immediately. I would rate it seven out of ten.

Neutral

The initial setup is quite simple.

Managing and implementing it is straightforward for us because we have specialists in our company who are skilled at implementing this tool. The deployment time varies depending on the client's needs, but typically it takes no longer than one week.

Our clients choose CrowdStrike, particularly Falcon Complete, due to a variety of factors such as pricing and a wide range of features.

Overall, I would rate it eight out of ten.