Commvault Cloud Reviews

I'm using it in my company and using it with customers. 

The product offers many very valuable features that we use often.

It is straightforward to set up. 

It's stable.

Technical support is great. 

The solution is scalable. 

There are some features that need general improvement. 

With respect to the cloud, they need to offer more integrations.

We'd like to see the administration be a bit easier with respect to the command center in the future.

I've used the solution for 12 years. 

The solution is stable and reliable. there are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. The performance is good. I'd rate the reliability nine out of ten. 

It is scalable. It is able to expand as needed. I'd rate the ability to scale at an eight or nine out of ten. 

In our company, we have about 100 people using the solution. 

They offer very good technical support. 

I do work with a variety of other products as well. Commvault offers easy administration and access and also is less complex. It has a lot of upsides. 

The solution is very simple to set up. 

The maintenance and how many people need to maintain the solution varies according to the product that is used. 

The pricing is mid-range. It's not too high, not too low.

We are Commvault partners. 

I'm using the latest version of the solution. 

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. 

We use Commvault Complete Data Protection as an enterprise data backup solution. Previously, we used it for databases, but nowadays, we primarily use it for our servers and user data.

The functionality of Commvault Complete Data Protection is similar to that of other enterprise backup solutions, so there's not much benefit from it when you compare it with its competitors, except for the cost. Commvault Complete Data Protection is more affordable than my company's previous solution, Veritas NetBackup.

What I found most valuable in Commvault Complete Data Protection is its deduplication technique, mainly because the solution has the highest deduplication ratio, giving you higher storage capacity.

Commvault Complete Data Protection meets market standards, but an area for improvement is its licensing model because everyone else offers the subscription-based model nowadays. At the same time, Commvault still has the traditional license model, where you must buy a set of licenses.

For example, you must purchase one hundred licenses if you're backing up one hundred virtual machines. At the same time, other players offer a pay-as-you-go subscription model, which means if you use one hundred this month, you'll pay for one hundred, and if you use thirty next month, you'll pay for thirty. With Commvault Complete Data Protection, on the other hand, you pay for one hundred licenses even if you only use fifty virtual machines, so the licensing model needs improvement.

I've been working with Commvault Complete Data Protection for a few years.

Commvault Complete Data Protection is a stable solution. Still, there was one case when the media server was rebooted because of a hardware problem, and then Commvault Complete Data Protection also ran into issues with the internal database. Otherwise, it is good in terms of stability. There was no major problem with the solution.

Commvault Complete Data Protection is scalable. My company was able to scale it when it had a media server problem, particularly storage issues.

The company quickly added disk libraries to the server, particularly disk expansion units. You can add additional media servers. It can be physical or virtual, or you can add a virtual machine from the cloud as a media server. Commvault Complete Data Protection is easy to scale.

My company receives good Commvault Complete Data Protection support from the reseller, which provides first-level support when my company experiences any issues. If the reseller cannot solve the problems, that's when Commvault support steps in. Commvault support is pretty good and responds very quickly.

We used Veritas NetBackup before but switched to Commvault Complete Data Protection because the costs associated with Veritas NetBackup were higher than the cost of Commvault Complete Data Protection. Veritas NetBackup had similar functionalities but had a higher price.

The initial setup for Commvault Complete Data Protection was straightforward.

Commvault Complete Data Protection has master and media server models, so my company prepared two on-premise machines, one for the master server and one for the media server, according to Commvault specifications.

You had to click, click, and click to install Commvault Complete Data Protection, then install the master and media servers. The company's environment is mainly on a virtual infrastructure, so it just had to add the vCenter into Commvault Complete Data Protection to explore every offshore machine under that vCenter. The installation process was pretty easy.

The reseller implemented Commvault Complete Data Protection for my company because the company's purchase from that specific reseller includes installation services.

We do have a great ROI from Commvault Complete Data Protection.

I cannot give the exact pricing for Commvault Complete Data Protection because I was not involved in the purchasing process. Still, my company purchased through a reseller, so the pricing may differ.

I'm using the latest version of Commvault Complete Data Protection.

The vendor provides maintenance for Commvault Complete Data Protection, and support-wise, it's good, and the maintenance is easy.

My company has a small IT team, so it's mostly people from the IT team who have access to the solution. The IT team manages it. Regarding backup, every employee's data goes into Commvault Complete Data Protection, but four to five people access and use the solution.

Suppose anybody asks me about wanting to start using Commvault Complete Data Protection. In that case, I will say go for it because the solution is good and functions like any other backup tool, such as Veritas NetBackup.

My rating for Commvault Complete Data Protection is eight out of ten. It's a good solution.

Complete Data Protection is a multi-platform solution that covers almost everything — Linux, Windows, SQL Server, Oracle, MYSQL Postgres — in a single platform. You can schedule backups and restore databases locally or remotely.

Complete Data Protection is convenient because you can manage various types of databases, and it's pretty easy to set it up.

When you deploy Complete Data Protection for past services, it's more complicated because you cannot directly back up from the previous service host. We have to build a proxy server, like a middleware, to directly access the past database server. It's complex and hard for beginners to figure out.

I have been using Complete Data Protection for about three years.

Complete Data Protection is pretty stable.

We have hundreds of database backups, and Commvault has handled that well. If anything fails, they will send an email notification to notify you of what has failed.

I rate Commvault support eight out of 10. Commvault support is typically good, but they're not all equal. Some of their technicians are more knowledgeable than others.

Positive

The initial setup is complex, and the step-by-step process isn't laid out in the documentation. It isn't very detailed. They don't show you how to set up a proxy server, so I spent a few weeks to figure it out. Once you set it up, it's easy to add another database and schedule a backup.

I think only large enterprises are willing to pay for it because they charge by data volume. And I think some other companies won't use this, maybe it costs more money.

I rate Commvault Complete Data Protection eight out of 10. It's easy to use once you set it up.

The rate of duplication is great because when you do the first full backup, it duplicates 20%, but when you do more increments, depending on the mode, the duplication is 99%. It is also great at detecting ransomware. It's not an antivirus, but when you copy files, the system can send you a message such as, "Mr. Albert, have you downloaded 10,000 files in two minutes? Why are you doing this?" Again, it's not an antivirus, but it notifies you if something is wrong with your system.

The interface could be improved because it has two different consoles. The first console is Java, and it is a little complex, but you can do 100% of the operation. But now, there is an alternative console of HTML 5. It is trendy and simple, but you can only do 70% of your operation. The HTML console is perfect for a client or a partner.

You have all the information centralized with the Java console, and I believe they plan to transition to the HTML console fully.

We have been using it for three months, deploying both on-premises and cloud. The choice of on-premises or cloud depends on what the client wants.

I rate the stability an 8.5 out of ten, and there is a small room for improvement.

It is easily scalable. We have about 300 users of Commvault Complete Data Protection in our company.

We have used technical support, and you can contact them by opening a ticker and in a few minutes, they will action it. For example, we opened a ticket last week, and the issue was solved in 30 minutes.

Veeam, Veritas and Rubrik are three software comparable to Commvault Complete Data Protection. Veeam is competitive in price and demand. Their solution is not very good, but many people use it because it is not expensive. Commvault Complete Data Protection, however, is the best out of all of them.

The initial setup is simple.

I rate the pricing an eight out of ten, with ten being a good price and one a high price. Depending on the client, they have different types of licensing.

I rate the solution a nine out of ten. We would like to see a single console for everything in the future.

We have the solution deployed on-premise and private cloud.

There are many valuable features of Commvault HyperScale X giving many possibilities to complete jobs, particularly with the backup and restore.

HyperScale X is not user-friendly. There are many settings that have to be done on your own. It would benefit from a better interface. 

Commvault has a command center that is easy to use, but it does not have the functionality you need, so you have to switch to the Java GUI.

I have been using Commvault HyperScale X for five years.

The product is stable if it is set up correctly. HyperScale X is sophisticated software that requires you to configure it on your own. This can be difficult to handle.

This solution is scalable. In our company, we have two users of the product.

The support offered by Commvault HyperScale X depends on the country you connect with. U.S. support is better than the support offered in India. With the language barrier, different lingo, and how quickly they speak, I often cannot understand what they are saying.

Prior to using Commvault HyperScale X, we were using Commvault with Windows Server. We switched due to the complexity and software updates with Windows. HyperScale provided a good offer that would improve our space requirements.

The initial setup of Commvault HyperScale X was not complex, however, it was not easy either. It took two days to set up the appliances, which we completed with the assistance of a consultant.

HyperScale X is expensive. 

Anyone considering to implement Commvault HyperScale X should do so based on their own needs. There are many tools you can use, but it is complex even if you are running the command center. VM is an easier tool, but it has reduced functionality. 

I would rate the product a seven out of 10 overall.

We need to take a log backup every fifteen minutes, and HyperScale X sends the data fast (even over a terabyte) and runs on time, so we're able to do the backup and discovery for customer and audit procurement.

HyperScale X's best features are Deep Look and Archiving, which really reduce the backup time, and DR solution, which allows us to replicate data from the primary data center to the backup data center and immediately activate the backup set if the primary set goes down.

I really struggled to configure HyperScale X as there was a lack of detailed documentation. In the next release, I would like to see increased capacity and automated solutions for backup.

I've been using HyperScale X for three years.

HyperScale X is really stable.

HyperScale X's scalability is okay.

Commvault's technical support is responsive and helpful. Sometimes it takes a longer period to get a solution due to the complex environment, but we're always able to get one in the end.

I would rate the ease of setting up HyperScale X as four out of five. It took around fifteen minutes to deploy.

We used an internal approximate services team.

We've seen a good ROI from HyperScaleX as it's a really useful endeavor environment. I would rate our ROI as five out of five.

We did a POC for Azure backup, but Commvault had more services available at our level.

HyperScale X is really user-friendly and has a lot of features. It's also cheaper, faster, and more stable than its competitors. I would rate HyperScale X as eight out of ten.

We can go from one page to another page, from office backups to VM backups, or applications like secret backups. So everything can be configured or restored from a single pin.

Commvault is easy to deploy and easy to understand for any end-user or any new system. If it's just a basic VM, or like any Hyper-V backup, it's good to understand and then implement. 

Commvault is easy to architect compared to other products.

We can manage everything from a finger pin instead of going into everything else. Commvault has everything in a finger pin. It's a single console. That's really good.

Commvault tries to integrate with every new product that's coming out on the market. Sometimes it makes everyone's life easier if it works well. If not, we don't know where the error is coming from, and it has a lot of bugs.

Another issue is with the eDiscovery platform, Activate, where they profile data. It has a lot of issues with the indexing.

Commvault also has something called a file-level on detection. On the production server, if it finds any anomalies on the files, it sends an alert. It runs every five minutes, so admins can get an email alert. That's very good, but it's a reactive alert, we only get it when there's a backup happening. If they can improve that and make it a proactive alert, to identify and send anomalies to admins, that would really help any companies out there go against malware.

I've been using Commvault for the last five years. 

I give it a seven on a scale of one to ten, because many times, whenever there is some issue, they provide a hotfix. In large enterprises, we won't be able to update the hotfixes because there is a change in management. There are also hotfixes once every two weeks.

Scalability is really good. We can scale out as much as we want.

Commvault support is great in most of aspects. We support Commvault customers for most of the part. Whenever we open support cases, most of the cases ends up with Commvault dev team. On most of the clients, or on most of the servers, we don't see any network issues, but they say that it's a network issue, even though there is no network issues. So that's one issue. We always have issues because we don't see any network issues in the environment, but the support says that it's a network issue.

We do provide services for Veeam and Rubrik. When comparing Commvault and Veeam, Commvault has a single pin, but Veeam does not. Also, Commvault is great for any type of workload, but Veeam is great with workload platforms.

It does reduce storage costs in the cloud. At the same time, if you're trying to back up a Cloud application, it adds more cost. If we run data verification drops like an extra or Cloud data, the data that's available in three containers, it adds a lot of cost. However, when we just do a backup to the Cloud, it sells a lot, but it doesn't run a verification.

At the same time, Commvault came out with MTSS Cloud that they partner with Azure, and that really saves money for any customers. Like a 20 to 30% savings when they use MTSS. Commvault licensing changed a lot in the last five years. I saw four times they change their licensing model.

If the customer is completely virtualized and if they don't have any workloads apart from the virtual environment, then they should go with Veeam. But if the customer wants to protect the application level, let's say maybe Mongo DB within those virtual environments, then Commvault is better compared to other products.

They are up to mark whatever we see an enterprise from hypervisors, that is virtual involvement. They cover everything and they also cover most of the databases that come out. They're up to date on all the workloads. They can protect most of the workloads out there. It's very important for any organization to protect all its data sets.

If anyone wants to protect multiple workloads, different kinds of workloads, Commvault is best for that.

I would rate this product an eight out of ten.

We use Commvault to backup our cloud environment.

Commvault is a disaster and recovery software and since it is automated it does not require much attention.

Commvault is very simple to use and it is automated.

I have been using Commvault for approximately nine months.

Commvault has been stable in our usage.

Commvault has tremendous scalability.

We do not have plans to increase the usage of the solution.

We have not needed to use the support.

We have not used a previous solution.

The initial installation is straightforward and took approximately two days. However, the process could be more simple.

We have four people in my organization using the solution. 

We did the implementation in-house.

We have two staff for maintenance and support for the solution.

The license is paid on an annual basis and the price is reasonable.

We evaluated Veeam but we choose Commvault because they catered to us as a very small company.

I rate Commvault an eight out of ten.