Zabbix is very flexible and scalable.
Project Manager at a non-tech company with 10,001+ employees
Highly recommended open source monitoring software for servers and network monitoring
Zabbix provides flexible functionality over Nagios and other open source monitoring softwares like opennms, zenoss etc. It is widely used in market these days due to its easy administration and configuration.
Pros:- 1. Zabbix provides a user friendly GUI interface for administration and configuration for monitoring servers and network.
2. Zabbix is open source software, so no licenses needs to be purchased.
3. Zabbix clients can be configued easily by installing Zabbix client software on client machines on the network. Zabbix client machines can be of either windows, linux or any unix machine.
4. User parameters can be configured for customized scripts.
5. Configuration/administration documentations are available on official web site of Zabbix and videos/additional documentations are also available on other popular websites like youtube etc.
Cons:- 1. Installation is little complex, tedious, time consuming and prone to user errors. However, once installed, it provides user friendly interface for all administrative tasks.
2. Some scripting knowledge is required in order to make changes to configuration files.
3. Adding custom services requires reloading the config or restarting the service.
Alternate Vendors:- Nagios, Zenoss, Cacti !!
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
IT Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor
I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want using these, but they require quite some expertise before you can use them. Then there are the ones that are not open source, the enterprise softwares and cost you some money, but on the other hand, they are extremely easy to set-up and learn. You can have them up and running in a matter of minutes. And then there are those which are completely cloud based. They can be free of cost or charge some money depending on the software. The good thing about these is that you don’t have to install any extra software, and it can be managed completely online but then again these have limited features and you cannot exploit them to the full extent as you can do with the open-source and to some extent the enterprise software, so I won’t suggest you to use these, because these are generally not the complete solutions and require other support software to achieve the same. Below I have listed the outstanding pros and cons of the various Network analyzers that you can look into.
Nagios
Pros:
- Nagios offers an extensive set of collector plug-ins that allows users to gather performance and availability data from a broad range of operating systems, including Windows and Netware
- Nagios has a web interface that helps users check network health from anywhere
- Creates reports on trends, availability, alerts, notifications — via the web interface
- Monitors network redundancies and failure rates
Cons:
- Web GUI is not good
- Steep learning curve is required for managing config files to run devices and tests
Zabbix
Pros:
- Zabbix is fully configurable from its web front end and so it is easier to use Zabbix
than the popular Nagios — whose configuration requires several text files - Further, Zabbix combines both monitoring and trending functionality, while Nagios
focuses exclusively on monitoring - The Web monitoring function of Zabbix allows users to monitor the availability and
performance of web-based services over time. Moreover, this functionality allows
Zabbix to log into a web application periodically and run through a series of typical
steps being performed by a customer - It’s open-source and has a well-designed Web GUI and overall concept
- Zabbix offers good alerts, dedicated agents and an active user community
Cons:
- Zabbix is not suitable for large networks with 1,000+ nodes, due to PHP performance
and Web GUI limitations - A lack of real-time tests, as well as complicated templates and alerting rules
Solarwinds
Pros:
- SolarWinds’s ConnectNow Topology Mapping allows users’ environment to be mapped
in real time automatically. This provides graphical visibility into users’ networks,
requiring no additional work or tools - SolarWinds’s Integrated Wireless Poller monitors wireless devices for security and other issues and reduces the difficulty in managing these items, allowing more widespread use of wireless technologies
- Excellent UI design
- Customizable, automated network mapping
- Great community support provided by Thwack
- Mobile access
- Native VMware support
Cons:
- Unable to configure alerts from the web-console
- Clumsy “Group Dependency” configuration
- Reporting module needs better ad-hoc reports
- No native support for Microsoft Hyper-V. Features SNMP only
PRTG Network Monitor
Paessler has completely redesigned its Web interface to make it simpler to use. In addition, the company has added support for a mini-HTML interface for mobile devices, including iPhones, BlackBerrys, Androids and Windows Mobile devices. What’s more, with the iPhone app — available through the iTunes App Store — IT managers can not only receive alerts about network status, they can also take action.
Pros:
- Google Maps integrated with the Web interface, allowing monitoring software to display
geographical maps - Functions of advanced maps for creating custom network views
- Real-time availability of up to a year of actual historic data, not aggregated data
- Integrated native Linux monitoring functions
- Monitoring of virtual environments, including VMware, HyperV, Xen and Amazon Cloud Watch
- Installation of reliable alarm system enabling alerts via e-mail, SMS, instant
messenger, pager message, HTTP request, syslog, etc. - A variety of new sensors and remote probes to monitor distributed systems, including
xFlow sensors for monitoring via NetFlow or sFlow. - Very easy setup,
- broad range of sensors,
- self-contained design
**I did not find any cons!
Spiceworks
Spiceworks is a network management and monitoring, Help Desk, PC inventory and software reporting solution for handling IT in small and medium-sized businesses.
Pros
● Fast installation
● Main dashboard completely configurable
● Easy to use monitoring console
● Active user community, with forums, ratings and reviews, how-tos and whitepapers
● Free
● Easy to install and configure for Windows environments
● “All in one” solution for Inventory, Monitoring, and Help Desk
● Great starting point for IT management
Cons
● On larger networks, performance can be slow
● Limited scalability
● Does not facilitate managing control of monitored devices
● Some initial device configuration is required to be recognized by Spiceworks
● VMWare and Unix systems not discovered nearly as easily as Windows
● Does not provide the same depth of monitoring and control as enterprise-level
products
Software | Faster Config Process | Good web interface | Compatible to leading OS | Better Graphics and Navigation | Cost Effective | Free? | Mobile Access | Integrated Maps |
Nagios | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Zabbix | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Solarwinds Orion Network Performance Monitor | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
Yes |
Paessler NetworkMonitor | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes |
Spiceworks | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
No
|
Inputs
If you want to try out an open-source software, which is absolutely free, you should opt for Zabbix. You can also try out the PRTG Network monitor as it is free for up to 30 sensors. Considering the fact that currently we do not have a lot of servers, you can opt for the PRTG monitor as it is much simpler than Zabbix with almost all the same features and actually much better GUI. Like Zabbix it also has excellent community support and once you feel that you need to add more sensors you can opt to pay for those using the PRTG Network monitor or go for Zabbix. The problem with softwares like Zabbix and Nagios is that they require a very steep learning curve and unless you devote a person for that purpose it would be really time (that implies money) consuming. So basically its just the same. I would suggest to give the PRTG Network Monitoring System a try.
Important links
PRTG Network Monitor download link :
http://www.paessler.com/prtg/download
Zabbix Download link :
http://www.zabbix.com/download.php
PRTG System Requirements :
http://www.paessler.com/prtg/detailedrequirements
Zabbix Systems Requirements :
http://www.zabbix.com/requirements.php
PRTG Support :
http://www.paessler.com/support/manuals
Zabbix Support :
http://www.zabbix.com/documentation.php
PRTG Community and Blog :
http://www.paessler.com/blog
Zabbix Community and Blog :
http://www.zabbix.com/community.php
Extended Feature Comparison of the Network Analyzer tools
Name | IP SLA Reports |
Logical Groupings |
Trending | Trend Prediction | Auto-Discovery | Agentless | SNMP | SysLog | Plug-Ins |
Zabbix | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Supported | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Solarwinds | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Supported | Yes | Yes | Yes |
PRTG Network Monitor | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Supported | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Nagios | via Pliug-in | Yes | Yes | No | via Pliug-in | Supported | via Pliug-in | via Pliug-in | Yes |
Name | Triggers/ Alerts | WebApp | Distributed Monitoring | Inventory | Platform | Data Storage Method | License | Maps |
Zabbix | Yes | Full Control | Yes | Yes | C, PHP | Oracle, MySQL, PostgreSQL, IBM DB2, SQLite | GPL | Yes |
Solarwinds | Yes | Full Control | Yes | Yes | .NET | SQL | Commercial | Yes |
PRTG Network Monitor | Yes | Full Control | Yes | Yes | Unknown | Proprietary | Freeware and Commercial | Yes |
Nagios | Yes | Yes | Yes | via Pliug-in | C, PHP | Flat file,SQL | GPL | Yes |
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Meanwhile Zabbix offers trend prediction as well:
www.zabbix.com
Buyer's Guide
Zabbix
May 2025

Learn what your peers think about Zabbix. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2025.
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Flexible but the UI is hard to get used to.
Valuable Features:
Room for Improvement:
The UI is hard to get used to.
Use of Solution:
2 years
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
IT Manager at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
Zabbix sends alerts which are useful to prevent server outages.
What is most valuable?
The e-mail and SMS alerts are two features I have found valuable.
How has it helped my organization?
Zabbix sends alerts e.g space on drives etc... which is useful as a prevention of server outage.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for 3 years.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
No issues with deployment.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
No issues with stability.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
No issues with scalability.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We previously used Spiceworks.
How was the initial setup?
The setup was straightforward, monitoring simple environment.
What about the implementation team?
We implemented in-house.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
1 virtual server equals 1000 USD.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Spiceworks.
What other advice do I have?
I recommend this solution.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Owner at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
ZABBIX is a 'all-in-on' and 'true opensource' monitoring solution but needs needs improved reporting functions
What is most valuable?
This software is the most powerfull monitoring tool that I know. Actually since 2005, when I started to work with ZABBIX, this software keeps growing and growing. Each new version ZABBIX SIA company (who maintain this software) delivers improvements and new features that help IT professionals to take care of their infrastructure. Some of the main features:
- Automated network discover (ICs, servers, switches, routers, etc)
- Automated item/metric discovery (partitions, network interfaces, users, databases, virtualhosts, etc)
- Flexibility to 'learn' things (is trivial to extend ZABBIX features)
- All things (historical data, configuration, etc) are in database
- Automated inventory hosts (hardware and software)
- Web monitoring (a robot to check websites)
ZABBIX is a 'all-in-on' monitoring solution. We don't need any other monitoring tool since we use ZABBIX.
How has it helped my organization?
Actually we are ZABBIX partners (premium and training) to Brazil and LatAm and our goal is to help other companies using ZABBIX.
What needs improvement?
I think ZABBIX needs improved report functions. Since ZABBIX version 1.8 we are using the ZABBIX API to integrate ZABBIX data with others tools (Pentaho, QlikView, etc.) when ZABBIX built-in reports are not enough.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using ZABBIX since 2005.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
None.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
None.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
In some scenarios/projects we need to adjust ZABBIX components (agents, proxies, nodes, GUI, database, etc) in line with each one. What I mean is that we need to know ZABBIX and also know the customer's environment to have a successful deployment without stability and scalability issues.
How are customer service and technical support?
Customer Service: ZABBIX SIA has almost 70 partners around the world and services are delivered in local customer languages :)Technical Support: ZABBIX SIA partners has levels (Reseller, Certified and Premium) and Premium partners are the best ones :)
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Yes, we used a lot of other monitoring tools (6 at the same time with distinct functions). We switched to ZABBIX because:
- ZABBIX is a 'all-in-on' monitoring solution
- ZABBIX is 'true open source'
- ZABBIX is 'Commercial/Professional' supported
- ZABBIX has a 'centralized' approach. All things are done using the ZABBIX GUI
How was the initial setup?
Its depends, if the customer environment is complex, the initial setup will be same. Here (at Unirede) the initial setups are always straightforward because we already have good expertise with ZABBIX and infrastructure areas.
What about the implementation team?
In-house team.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Our setup was done with a in-house team and the costs are a 'ZABBIX Certified Specialist' to take care. But we are a ZABBIX Premium Partner and our customers choose ZABBIX (instead other commercial softwares) mainly because a ZABBIX deployment is not too expensive ;)
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Of course. We need to check other oprions all the time. Some software we evaluated: Nagios, Zenoos, HypericHQ, PandoraFMS, BigBrother/Quest.
What other advice do I have?
People need do a POC (Prove of Concept) to check if ZABBIX will fit in their needs. We also have a lot of blogs talking about 'Monitoring Solutions' and a lot of 'comparisons', but I think the best way to start is to choose to work with a ZABBIX Partner around the world and talk about your needs.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Consultant at a tech consulting company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Easy product with all the features you need but it would be nice if it had predictive trending.
What is most valuable?
Low Level Discovery is imho the best feature in Zabbix. It will do some auto discovery of network devices, filesystems and snmp oid's.
How has it helped my organization?
If you are serious about your infrastructure then you have to know what is going on. With Zabbix we know when servers are using to much cpu, memory, disk IO, etc. Besides getting notified when something goes wrong, we are also now aware of how good our infrastructure scales, something that can save us money and frustrations.
What needs improvement?
Zabbix has it all except for predictive trending. This would be a nice extra feature. Also the SLA (it services) part can use some improvement.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the product for about 2 years now, the company I work for was using it already before I joined. About a year ago I passed the Zabbix training course.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
Deployment of Zabbix is easy and very straightforward. The only thing to do is install clients on your devices that you want to monitor. And even that is not always needed. It is also possible to do some checking from the server side. Also, it runs on almost every platform available on the market today.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Zabbix is written in C, developers have high standards before accepting code from the community. Zabbix itself uses little resources and is very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
If it scales then it is Zabbix. The only thing that can be in your way is the database and the hardware it runs on. As Zabbix uses a database you need descent hardware and a good DB if you have alot of machines to monitor with lots of items to check.
How are customer service and technical support?
Customer Service: For us, as partner the support we get from Zabbix is great. We get answers quick and they always take our issues seriously.Technical Support: There is professional support from Zabbix SIA that can be bought. They even offer to develop custom features in Zabbix if you like. Of course there are also the Zabbix partners like the company I work for that can provide support.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Before I knew about Zabbix I was working at another company where we where using Nagios (opsview). Glad I had a chance to learn Zabbix, there is just no way to compare Zabbix. This is real time monitoring :)
How was the initial setup?
Setup of Zabbix is easy. There is a great manual how to install and use it on most of the systems be it with rpm or deb or from source. It's probably the easiest open source monitoring platform to install. Also there are almost no dependencies needed that are not in the os already.
What about the implementation team?
As a Zabbix partner and official trainer we of course did the setup on our own.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The product self is free there is no hidden cost or no cost for a enterprise version or some features that get disabled later. The product comes 100% free and it stays that way.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
In our company we are always following the latest trends on the market so we try to follow them all as much as needed. Our preference goes mostly out to Zabbix of course.
What other advice do I have?
Tweak the standard templates and make sure you don't run the DB on a virtual platform.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Since Zabbix 3.0 there is now predictive trending and much more. In fact Zabbix is now the only open-source solution that delivers a complete set of features.
Engineer at a tech company with 51-200 employees
Chose Zabbix over Nagios but wouldn’t suggest an in-house Zabbix implementation without a technical staff
What is most valuable?
Open Source: All the sources for all the products are Open Source, so you can use a complete product from the start. There are no "premium" features with additional cost.
How has it helped my organization?
It gives you visibility over your infrastructure, so you are able to know the health of your services and it's dependencies every moment (and even to react automatically to problems). For example, in one organization I worked for, before Zabbix the problems were normally reported by the clients using the call center, so the Operations team was always working against the clock and with high levels of stress; after a successful implementation of Zabbix, putting the right monitors in place and a period of stabilization, the Operations team had the information to prevent the problems before the clients were affected. This resulted in a Operations team with lower levels of stress, more time to work on important projects and client satisfaction by lowering the number of problems visible by the client.
What needs improvement?
The low discovery functionality is still very young so this feature has a lot of room for improvement. The graphics generated by the system can be improved and also the web interface. At this point in time it's possible to archive a good level of security by using external tools, but it would be nice if this level of security could be archived out of the box.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution since version 1.4 which was around 2008, so I've been using the product for six years now.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
Having the right knowledge, the installation and implementation of Zabbix it's very simple, even the principal Linux distributions already have a Zabbix version in their repositories. A successful implementations requires the knowledge of what it's necessary to monitor and the way to do it, but this is true for all monitoring products.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
No, the software is very stable as well as the the components it depends on (in my case Linux, Apache, MySQL).
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
No, Zabbix is very scalable and well programmed, also gives you elements to identify when the performance could be a problem and can be configured in a very granulated way. Also, the principal components can be separated and gives you options to distribute the monitoring (archiving horizontal scaling).
How are customer service and technical support?
Customer Service:
I don't have first hand experience with the Zabbix SIA support, but the support the community provides it's great.
Technical Support:Based on the information I can see in the Zabbix forums and social networks I would say Zabbix SIA have engineers with an excellent technical level.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Yes, the principal reasons to switch to Zabbix were: Flexibility (Zabbix allowed the monitoring of something the other product does not), cost (no license costs, it was possible to monitor something with no extra costs, the hardware necessary for Zabbix was much lower) and in the tests Zabbix outperformed the other products evaluated.
How was the initial setup?
The first time I installed the product (back in 2008) my initial impression was the software was complex to install, basically because at that time the repositories of my Linux distribution had an old version of the software and I wanted the most recent so I installed the software by compiling the sources; but once you understand, document and become familiar with the process it's pretty easy. Also, at the beginning understand the philosophy behind Zabbix was a little complicated but equally once you have the knowledge it all become easy and natural. Another aspect you can consider complex in Zabbix it's the lack of detail in some templates, so if you only use the out of the box templates (without changes) you ended up with a basic monitoring, most of the time you will need to extend the template to adjust it to your specific needs and obviously this will require knowledge of several aspects (this can be seen as an advantage or a disadvantage).
What about the implementation team?
I've been responsible for about 4 Zabbix implementations and always was in-house job.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
In this case, again, I don't have numbers. In the last implementation, the original cost was only the cost of the hardware plus the salary of the sysadmin responsible of the system, the day to day cost it's only the salary of the sysadmin. No fees for licenses and no fees for support at this time.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Yes. Nagios: This product it's the de-facto for open source network monitoring. System Center Operations Manager: The monitoring solution of Microsoft.
What other advice do I have?
My advice is that its good to have a clear understanding of the goals you are looking to fulfill with the monitoring system, the objectives must be clear, also the environment in which the system will be implemented and the capacities (hardware, people, time, etc). There are a lot of aspects to take into consideration when choosing and implementing a monitoring system so invest as much time as possible in planning carefully. Zabbix is a great product, with great flexibility and I'm sure can be adequate to most of the situations, but maybe it's not the best choice in some scenarios, so plan carefully before choosing and implementing any product. For example, I would not suggest an in-house Zabbix implementation to a company without technical staff.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Manager of Development at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees
No comparison between Nagios and Zabbix. Zabbix wins hands down.
IMO
there is no comparison between Nagios and Zabbix. Zabbix wins hands
down. Having worked with Zabbix since 1.4 it has evolved into a great
product and the features coming into 2.x are amazing.
Some features that Zabbix has that Nagios is lacking:
- Auto Registration
- Auto Discovery (agent devices, snmp, etc..)
- Aggregate Graphs (this is very useful when looking at the overall picture)
- Distributed Monitoring
- Windows Service Discovery (coming in 2.x)
- Native JMX Support (coming in 2.x)
There are many other features that Nagios just doesn't have, not to mention the ease of use.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free Zabbix Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: May 2025
Product Categories
Network Monitoring Software Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Server Monitoring IT Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Monitoring SoftwarePopular Comparisons
Veeam Data Platform
Dynatrace
Datadog
New Relic
Azure Monitor
Splunk AppDynamics
Microsoft Configuration Manager
Grafana
Elastic Observability
Tanium
SolarWinds NPM
PRTG Network Monitor
Cisco DNA Center
ThousandEyes
Cisco Secure Network Analytics
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Zabbix Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Zabbix vs. Groundwork vs. other IT Infrastructure Monitoring tools
- Which is the best network monitoring tool: Zabbix or Solarwinds? Pros and Cons?
- New Relic or Zabbix?
- Which network monitoring tool is more customizable: Nagios or Zabbix?
- Is Zabbix or SolarWinds NPM better for infrastructure monitoring?
- Which application integration do you expect to have with Zabbix?
- When evaluating Network Performance Monitoring, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
- What Questions Should I Ask Before Buying a Network Monitoring Tool?
- UIM OnPrem - SaaS
I have not used Anturis, but I have heard that this is very good monitoring tool for cloud servers.