Tableau Reviews

The use is only academic, for the moment.

I've used it for six months.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

I've not needed to contact them.

I've not needed to contact them.

It was easy to setup.

We did it in-house.

• BIME
• QlikView
• SiSense

Data Preparation - This is a huge plus for Tableau as so many users have to spend time preparing the data before using Tableau

• Data Interpreter
• Splits -
• Really helps the average user

Drag and drop analytics:

Tableau 9.0 has a new Analytics pane that provides quick and easy access to common analytic features in Tableau.

You can drag reference lines, forecasts, trend lines, and other objects into your view from the Analytics panel. It is now easy to edit, format, and remove the analytic items that you have added, so you can experiment with different techniques as you explore the insights your data has to offer.

Ad--‐hoc calculations:

Ad--‐hoc calculations make it easy to add and edit calculated fields for your analysis. Double--‐click an existing field on the Rows, Columns, Marks, or Measure Values shelf to begin editing, or

double-click an empty area on a shelf to create a new calculation. As you type, a list of auto--‐complete options appears in a dropdown list, making it easier to find and pick the right elements.

Instant analytics:

Instant analytics provides an interactive experience for comparing summary information about a subset of marks to all the marks in your view. For example, you can compare the average for a few marks to the average for all the marks. After you’ve added trend lines, reference lines, reference bands, or distribution bands to your view, select one or more marks to see the new analytical indicators appear for the selection in addition to the analytical indicators for the whole view.

Level of Detail (LOD) Expressions:

New expression syntax in the Tableau calculation language lets you quickly create calculated fields that compute at the specified levels of detail. LOD calculations help you compute at multiple levels of aggregation and make it easier to create fields for analytical comparison (such as cohort analysis and totals or Average across segments), simplifying calculations that previously took several steps.

It's both intuitive and complex/deep. For our organization, it's given us opportunities to provide both on-sight and on-line training. We now have an online training product that more than offsets the expense associated with days of training. With Tableau, our customers more analytical.

It even has a connection to R and SAS for advanced users.

Also, it has given us the ability to collaborate with the Tableau servers, which is robust and can handle tens of thousands of users.

Tableau Server can now scale for unlimited users Enterprise scale brings with it the need for Governance. Data sources and workbooks must be vetted before they are "out there" to see except for the intended content consumers

The basic design of Tableau has some features that could be modified.

* There is no need to have five (5) ways to add a new worksheet. Brevity is rewarded - new users have so much to learn that 2 ways would do the job

* How to render time - When performing analysis, no single issue is more important than time series data. Tableau uses visual clues in many places - When one uses the pull down option for time that could be visualized better as a continuum. those selections should be presented in green to be visually consistent. Those above in blue.

If you're making a structured, strategic purchase, make sure that you have a plan for professional training.

• Go slow and methodically
• You must consider size of the company and types of users
• Desktop Plus server users - understand the constraints on the backend, and make sure you have enough CPU power
• There's lots of free stuff on their website that's great for the average user.

• Ease of data visualization
• Ease of dashboard creation
• Ease of dashboard sharing

The data was made clearer for us through visualization. In addition, it allowed us to automate result monitoring.

The integration and usage of multiple data sources is sometimes not that straightforward.

I've used it for six months.

All connections were to a SQL Database, and there were no issues with deployment.

No issues with stability.

No issues with scalability.

Did not need it.

Did not need it.

We already had OLAP Cubes in place, but we haven't switched and are currently using both.

It was straightforward.

It has given us faster reporting, resulting in better management of the information, and better usage of information in decision making.

Definitely understand your data structure before using Tableau. Tableau allows you to manipulate and depict data in various ways, as long as you have proper, well structured input.

It has ease-of-use features that make it a good data discovery tool for use with our clients. Additionally, the ability to rapidly mine data and visualize data issues for clients is valuable.

We can use this tool with our internal data as well as on client sites to rapidly evaluate data sets and gain understanding of patterns rapidly.

The integration of multiple data sources has sometimes been difficult and the size limitations are sometimes an issue.

We have been evaluating this product for approximately six months now.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

We are very early in our project but do not see any major limits yet.

Customer service has been excellent.

Technical support is very good.

No previous solution was in place.

The connections to the SQL data and flat files were straightforward.

Implementation was all done in-house.

Unknown at this time.

• Tableau
• PowerPivot/PowerBI
• Birst
• Sisense

1. Understand your business hierarchies intimately.

2. Create flattened data files for roll-ups.

3. Be prepared to clean and process data prior to use.

• It is very powerful
• Flexibility
  

Minor issues only. My biggest one is control over the order in which filters and sorts are applied. There is some control of this but not enough.

I've used it for seven months.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

It's very good.

Our parent company has its own internal Tableau support team so I have had no contact with Tableau’s own technical support

No previous solution was used in this company, but I do have experience of Domo.

It was complex. We have a complex situation with extensive data security set up at three and a half levels across over 100 active users with most of the users not only controlled by level but also having access to very specific sets of data only.

Inevitably the setup for this in Tableau was complex. This is not a criticism of Tableau however – just the opposite, the impressive thing is that it had the flexibility to achieve it at all

I implemented it myself.

Tableau is a very powerful and flexible product, it also demands some level of skill on the part of the user. When compared with Domo for example, the end result in its standard form is more flexible, is able to put more information in a single view, and offers more user interactivity. However the other side of this coin is that in its standard form, it is much less accessible to less skilled users. We have managed to develop an interface that is as accessible as Domo, but this has been quite a complex and time-consuming task.

All the features are valuable.

We plan to empower users with Enterprise BI and Self Service BI by Tableau.

It is still in our evaluation to replace our old BI tools.

We used Infobeacon and now we are using Cognos and Microsoft BI. We are currently looking for a better product.

Quality of data, flexibility and the performance of the tool(s) are the critical aspects of BI. Test the critical aspects by doing a proof of concept using a huge amount of data.

• Rich graphics
• Dashboard

• Trends
• Opportunities
• Automated reporting

• Faster implementation
• Processing speed

I've used it for six months.

Not really.

No issues encountered.

It felt a bit slow.

Very good.

I haven't needed to call them.

We used Cognos BI which was fast but a bit complex.

We implemented it in-house.

It's taken us six months to get an ROI.

It cost us US$3,000 for the initial setup.

We evaluated it alongside QlikSense, which we also use, and Cognos BI.

Try it alongside QlikSense as depending on user preferences and requirements, either product will do the job.

For both Tableau Public and Desktop, the ability to quickly pull together data sources into a meaningful (visual) display. Also, the intuitive design and ability to work with increasingly large and real-time data sets.

Mostly, I focus on the management and operational reporting aspects, enabling businesses to make better decisions at all levels through improved access to data.

It's hard to say right now but I can see challenges ahead as the market share and common standards become an issue - if the goal is to replace Excel, then it will be a winner-takes-all type of battle. For clients this may make them delay purchase and adoption.

I've used it for around eight months. My hands-on experience is mainly Tableau Public and Desktop trials. Project experience working with people who are expert in Tableau and Alteryx.

Tableau Public crashes on opening on my iMac. So far the web-based tools have worked very well.

Tableau Public crashes on opening on my iMac. So far the web-based tools have worked very well.

Not encountered any so far, but this appears to be one of their big selling points.

So far, very proactive. They have a lot of good training resources available online and very fast response from sales team.

It's been very good so far.

At my last company I tried to encourage the IT team to adopt these tools, but they were very focused on developing everything themselves. This turned out to be quite an expensive error and I would encourage companies - even those with their own in-house analyst teams - to consider using these tools as a way to quickly build models. They should only consider building models themselves if they know they have a product and solution that justifies it.

So far it's been very easy but I think a large enterprise would need to consider widespread adoption quite carefully so it aligns to the overall IT road-map.

We used a vendor team. What was useful about this in the examples I’ve seen is their ability to demonstrate "quick wins” to get support for wider deployment, and then to train key staff around the organisation to increase the pace of adoption.

I’d expect it to pay back within a year if the avoided costs of existing IT platform upgrades is included.

We are currently in the evaluation process.

Get some help to evaluate the options and identify the opportunities, find a test case to demonstrate the benefits, engage the IT team early.