We use Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring to monitor our hybrid infrastructure.
We implemented Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring to help us monitor our infrastructure as we scale.
We use Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring to monitor our hybrid infrastructure.
We implemented Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring to help us monitor our infrastructure as we scale.
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is easy to use. It helps us quickly analyze how our infrastructure is performing across various services.
It helps with proper log management, allowing us to monitor our systems and analyze log data regularly. It also provides security operations capabilities for monitoring system health and ensuring uptime. We noticed these benefits immediately.
Our operational efficiency has been increased. It has improved our system health by monitoring the performance of data on servers, virtual machines, and containers, along with overall background processes.
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring provides end-to-end visibility into our cloud-native environment. This is crucial because any data corruption can impact all the information we've deployed. It also aids in log management, offering parameters that extend its functionality as a comprehensive monitoring tool for CPU, memory usage, and network traffic.
It has helped reduce our mean time to detect by four hours.Our mean time to resolution has been reduced by two hours. By providing access to all our network parameters, it simplifies log ingestion through streamlined calculations.
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring provides us with faster and more comprehensive insights into our infrastructure, allowing us to focus on critical business initiatives.
We saw the time to value immediately after deploying Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring.
The data collection from our VMs, containers, databases, and backend components is valuable.
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring's data analytics can be improved by including suggestions for various types of continuous monitoring.
I have been using Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring for three years.
The network uptime and monitoring are great.
The scalability of Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is excellent.
The technical support is good.
We previously used Datadog but it doesn't offer network monitoring features like CPU utilization or overall server performance, which Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring does, so we switched.
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring offers more functionality and visibility, making it a better choice for handling cloud architecture compared to Datadog.
The initial setup was straightforward. One person was required for the deployment.
I would rate Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring 9 out of 10.
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring offers automated, continuous monitoring and diagnostics, delivering real-time reports for all your data with enhanced functionality compared to other solutions.
We have 200 users of Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring.
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is the best solution for monitoring networks, parameters, CPU, memory usage, and network traffic cases.
I use it for monitoring and troubleshooting the performance of cloud-native applications.
Providing comprehensive visibility throughout the environment, it monitors my system, enhances career performance, and offers insights into the user experience.
Troubleshooting and visualizing a cloud-native environment is made easy with Splunk APM. It provides complete visibility into software tools, swiftly monitoring business performance and applications.
It possesses the capability to conduct distributed tracing within our environment. This includes monitoring the speed of tracked access, extending from end users to the Internet, system, and network services, and supporting my software application. Consequently, it offers an end-to-end overview of potential bottlenecks.
Splunk APM has significantly enhanced our organizational efficiency. Initially, my responsibilities included tracking website application performance, managing applications, and handling license releases. Now, it provides real-time user monitoring, transforming the way I handle these tasks.
It significantly impacts our organization's telemetry data, improving operational performance and user experience. The platform provides insights into application performance and effective log management. Ensuring accurate tracking of all performance-related logs contributes to building up the application performance percentage with comprehensive data.
It contributed to a daily reduction of six hours in our mean time to resolve.
The most valuable features are troubleshooting and optimizing application performance.
Another value lies in the resilience and quick recovery capabilities offered by the SIEM. It enables thorough monitoring across our landscape, providing insights into the number of running software applications. The tool furnishes comprehensive information across microservices, significantly enhancing our proficiency.
Enhancing system availability and optimizing service performance are crucial. It is essential for the monitoring tool to deliver quick response times when generating analytical reports, instead of prolonged delays.
I have been using it for two years.
It provides good stability capabilities.
It has the capacity to scale. There are approximately two hundred users and one administrator that use it.
I would rate its customer service and support eight out of ten.
Positive
The initial setup was straightforward.
The deployment process took six hours. During this time, a clear understanding was established regarding which technical applications—whether cloud-based, native, or others—needed monitoring and improved performance. These categories were identified in-house, with two individuals overseeing the process.
It allowed our IT staff to focus on other projects by freeing up their time. In total, it saved around four hours.
We evaluated Grafana.
It can serve as an analytical application for enhancing performance, ensuring all dependencies are effectively addressed. Overall, I would rate it eight out of ten.
Our primary use case for this solution is as a supplement to Dynatrace, so the log analytics is done in Splunk instead of Dynatrace.
We built a tool for firewall log monitoring and we powered all firewall logs to Splunk. In addition, we built a little dashboard that just specifies sources and the destination addresses and port numbers. It passes all the logs and tell us if there are any blocks or drops on the firewall level. This is a very useful tool for us.
The features I have found most valuable are log searching and log analytics, both of which are quick features.
There's a component in this solution that is particular and takes a lot of manual work and that is the automation. There is a lot of room for improvement with the automation. They should also improve the discovery and detection of all the infrastructure components so that it is more automated and takes less manual work.
I have been using this solution for about five years.
I would rate the stability of this solution an eight, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.
I would rate the scalability of this solution a nine, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.
I would rate the technical support of this solution a 10, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.
Positive
At first, we were deployed on-premises and then about one year ago we migrated to the cloud. So I would say they did most of the work around migration. There are around 1,000 users of this solution in our company.
We have seen the ROI.
I would rate the pricing of this solution a two, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the most expensive and 10 being the best price.
Our model of deployment is the cloud.
I would rate this solution as a whole a 10, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.
I would advise other people looking into this solution to do their due diligence and make sure they do their pre-work and post-work.
We have a lot of applications that we monitor. We have a lot of hardware that runs on VMware. We monitor all of that as well.
Dashboards have been helpful because people can go and look for themselves how their systems are running. The requests for us to go look at something have gone down because people can go and do it themselves.
It is important for us that Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring has end-to-end visibility. Developers and those types of teams can look at and troubleshoot any kind of issues quickly.
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring has helped reduce our mean time to resolve, but I do not know how much. We just help as needed, but for the most part, it is just the teams going in there and looking at things themselves.
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring has helped improve our organization’s business resilience.
Different teams can see a lot of different aspects of what is going on. They can see network traffic. They can see applications, and they can see hardware peaks and performances. They can see everything they need.
We could see the value of Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring within a couple of weeks of implementing it.
Dashboards help the application support teams to have a quick look at how their systems are running. It helps other teams as well.
They can get more integration with a few more products.
They can also update some of the dashboards that are in there now.
It is pretty good in terms of the ability to predict, identify, and solve problems in real-time, but there is always room for improvement.
I am in a new role. I have been there for two months. That is as long as I have been using it.
It is very stable. It is good.
Its scalability is great.
It is very good. I would rate them a nine out of ten. They are usually pretty helpful and knowledgeable.
Positive
We have it on-prem, and we also have a cloud instance. Our cloud provider is AWS. We do not monitor multiple cloud environments.
Deploying it was pretty straightforward. We just had to make sure that we were getting the logs right and setting the apps right. That was pretty much it.
We have seen an ROI in terms of manhours and less work for everyone.
I have always used Splunk.
I would rate Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring a ten out of ten. It is great. It is much better than a lot of other products, so it is definitely up there.
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring reduces our mean time to resolve. We are more proactive than reactive. I would be very confident to say that there is about a 25% reduction in time. We get things way quicker than when we were just doing it reactively.
It has the ability to identify and solve problems in real time. It saves time.
There is no one feature that stands out more than others. We use a little bit of everything. When we started using it, we did not exactly know it. It was new and fresh, so we just started gathering everything. We did not end up doing anything different. All of the features that we are using have had an effect on the monitoring that we are doing. Everything is very effective.
We never had any issues when it comes to the type of use cases we are using it for. We did not need more advancement on it, but I know that, in general, everything can be updated. There are tiny little tweaks that can be made regardless of whether it looks better or has a different flow to it than it does right now, but it works pretty well for what we use it for.
I have been using Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring for two to three years.
It is stable.
It is scalable. As we continue to grow and expand, the stability and the scalability are there.
They have been very helpful whenever we have had any issues. Only one or two times they did not know. That does happen. We are all humans, but that is the best that you can get.
Positive
I got onto the team when we started using it, so I am not sure what we were using before.
I would rate Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring a ten out of ten.
We mainly use it for different divisions and departments within our company to keep track of our systems' health. We also ingest log files to get data and alerts for different groups.
We used to use a number of different tools before we were introduced to Splunk. We used to have a very hard time getting this data in and being able to effectively use it because we had such a massive amount of data. We also could not find a way to organize it effectively. Splunk helped us to effectively use all the data that we collect in a valuable way for different customers and groups that we have in our company.
It has definitely helped reduce our meantime to resolve (MTTR). A lot of our customers have difficulty getting to root cause analysis of different problems and situations. They also do not have the data to perform analytical responses for different problems that there could be within our industry. They are now able to use this data effectively, not just for alerting, but also for preventative maintenance.
It has definitely improved our organization’s business resiliency by a lot. I do not have the actual data to share at this time, but there has been a marked improvement in the organization. We are now able to keep track of all the raw data that we pull in and then use it effectively. This helps our organization run more efficiently.
It has improved our organization's ability to predict, identify, and solve problems in real time. We are able to use data and search for it effectively. We have different analytical forms and data that we can use to improve in different ways.
The most valuable thing that we have seen within our group is the ability to ingest all this raw data and have it organized in a certain way so that different groups can get effective alerting from this massive amount of raw data that is out there.
A lot of customers had a hard time effectively searching within the data in Splunk. There is a learning curve from searches to indexes and using all the macros that we have created. It is a little difficult for somebody who has not used it quite a bit and does not have a lot of practice with it, but the AI features that we have been hearing about through Splunk will make it a lot easier for us to use human language to search this data. That is big. That is pretty powerful, and that will help a lot with our customers. At the Splunk conference, some of the talks have been about the AI platform and more effective and easier ways to search within Splunk through indexes and other things. These features will help correct some of the things with which we are having a hard time with some of our customers.
We have been using this solution for about four years.
We are not on the cloud. We are all on-prem. We have had certain issues with space on the servers and things like that, and while moving things up to what we need, we have not had any issues on the Splunk side.
It is great. We have not had any major issues with getting support from Splunk. With our monthly license, there are a certain amount of hours that we have with Splunk support. We are able to use it when we are getting close to the end of the month. In our meetings, we make a list of different topics that we would like to explore and discuss with Splunk. We create meetings for that, and they are always very helpful. We never had any issues in getting support from Splunk. I would rate their support a ten out of ten.
Positive
We used to use Tivoli. We also use AppDynamics in addition to Splunk for different parts, but we are starting to learn that Splunk does have a lot of similar toolsets. Splunk does the same as what AppDynamics does, and in some cases, there are more powerful tool sets that would help us. We are thinking of petering down our different tools to get into one tool, possibly Splunk. We already got rid of Tivoli, and we are using Splunk fully in place of Tivoli. We have seen a positive response to it.
We have seen cost efficiencies by switching to this solution. Because of the wider range of tools that Splunk offers, we were able to get rid of Tivoli and get rid of that licensing obligation on an annual basis. We are able to save a good amount of money on that and move that budget over to our Splunk budget to keep everything under one umbrella.
I was not involved in its deployment. I came on the year after.
We are currently on-prem, but we are working on developing and moving everything over to a Google Cloud platform. The announcement that Splunk is partnering with Google Cloud, in addition to AWS, is pretty good for us because we are working on moving over to the cloud in the next couple of years.
We have definitely seen an ROI. Our team is able to spend more time learning one tool as opposed to having to learn multiple different toolsets. Therefore, we are able to get more work done in a more efficient manner.
We have seen time to value using this solution. Our company has a very heavy push toward work-life management. Since we have been able to, especially in our group, switch to this tool, we could cut down on our on-call time and have our groups run on different patterns where people who are off are actually off. They do not have to be called in because essentially, everybody is able to access the tool and use it effectively because it is the one tool that we use as opposed to having different tool sets. Everybody knows how to use it, so it definitely has helped us in that way.
I know there was a panel and a team that was going through different tools. I was not a part of that process, but I know there were quite a bit of tools that they were looking at. Splunk must have worked out better than everything else.
I would rate Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring a ten out of ten.
We are monitoring our servers and their health. We are monitoring their functionality and supporting the Kubernetes platform.
Our team supports multiple different projects. They all have their own clusters and ways of operating, but we just use one Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring system.
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring has helped improve our organization’s business resilience.
I have primarily used it to go back into the past and understand why something happened. It provides enough information to do research and figure things out.
One thing I recently ran into was that the logs on the server most often get Gzipped after they have been rotated. We found that we were not monitoring some of the things, so we had to go back and pull them in. Right now, it pulls one at a time, untars it, or unzips it, so I cannot look at the entire history. There can be an improvement in that area.
I have been using Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring for four years.
It is stable.
About a year ago, we added another 600 servers and scaled up. We are getting more in the next year or later this year. It works smoothly.
They are good. I have a ticket open now. I told them to go ahead and close it because we thought it was a hardware issue, but they said that they would keep the case open till the hardware replacement to see if the issue goes away. That was pretty nice.
All of our hardware is HPE-based. We rely mostly on OneView, but it does not give us the service aggregation and other things that Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is giving us.
One of the gentlemen on other teams came to ours. He is very knowledgeable about Splunk, so he helped with the implementation.
All of our servers are RHEL-based.
A different organization group within our organization had Splunk, and they liked it, so we just went with Splunk.
I would rate Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring a ten out of ten.
We use Splunk APM for performance testing.
Splunk offers end-to-end visibility across our environment.
Splunk APM simplifies application performance monitoring. It also provides insights into data quality, including data security, integration, ingestion, and versioning of trace logs. We can directly inject data for monitoring purposes, trace the data flow, and monitor metric values.
Splunk can ingest data in any format, allowing us to easily monitor logs and identify blockages through timestamps, which saves us time.
The most valuable feature is dashboard creation. This allows us to easily monitor everything by setting the data we want to see. For example, imagine we're working on a project within the application. There might be different environments, such as development, testing, and production environments. In the production environment, we can use dashboards to monitor customer activity, like account creation or other user data. This gives us a clear view of how transactions are performing and user response times. This dashboard creation feature is one of the most beneficial aspects of Splunk that I've used in a long time. While Splunk offers many features, including integration with various DevOps tools, its core strength lies in data monitoring and collection.
Splunk's functionality could be improved by adding database connectors for other platforms like AWS and Azure.
I have been using Splunk APM for one year.
We previously used a legacy application for monitoring and when it was decommissioned we adopted Splunk APM.
Splunk offers a 14-day free trial and after that, we have to pay but the cost is reasonable.
I would rate Splunk APM eight out of ten.
Splunk APM requires minimal maintenance and can be monitored by a team of three.
