Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) Reviews

We use Splunk ITSI to collect the infrastructure metrics and visualize them.

Splunk ITSI provides end-to-end visibility into your IT environment. It displays key performance indicators for various services. If a KPI is red, indicating an issue, clicking on the corresponding service will take you to the server for further investigation. Splunk ITSI can also automatically trigger incidents for critical issues, allowing your support team to resolve them quickly.

It has significantly improved our incident management process. Previously, we relied solely on a service indicator that simply displayed the service status. If the indicator turned red, we would then manually create an incident report. Now, we've implemented static thresholds that automatically trigger incidents to be added to our queue. This is a major advantage.

Splunk ITSI has reduced our alert noise by 30 percent.

Since implementing Splunk ITSI, we've significantly reduced our mean time to detection. Previously, we relied on receiving incident reports, which caused delays.

Splunk ITSI has reduced our mean time to resolve.

We collect infrastructure metrics from various servers, including Windows Services. One particularly useful feature of Splunk ITSI is the ability to create custom services. This functionality makes it easy to identify specific functions that are malfunctioning or experiencing problems. With this information, we can quickly troubleshoot and fix the issues.

In Splunk ITSI, thresholds automatically trigger incidents when a service value falls below the threshold. This prevents us from automatically triggering alerts for situations where the service value is within the acceptable range. We've identified this as an issue with the ITSI product and are working with Splunk for guidance on how to implement the desired behavior.

While the overall Splunk documentation is detailed, the documentation for specific premium apps, like Splunk ITSI, is more brief.

The technical support has room for improvement.

I have been using Splunk ITSI for one year.

I would rate the stability of Splunk ITSI nine out of ten.

Splunk ITSI is a scalable solution, meaning it can handle increasing amounts of data and users as our needs grow.

We experience occasional delays in receiving solutions from Splunk technical support. Splunk's support for P3 cases seems inadequate, as they frequently switch support personnel. For instance, in a single P3 case, we had three different technical support representatives assigned. We were ultimately forced to escalate the issue to our account manager to get it resolved. In essence, we never receive complete support from a single point of contact; instead, the support team keeps changing, necessitating us to explain the problem from scratch each time.

Neutral

The initial deployment is a straightforward process. However, the time it takes can vary depending on whether we're installing for the first time or performing an upgrade. For a first-time installation, Splunk ITSI typically takes around 30 minutes. Upgrading an existing installation requires additional time to clean up previous configurations; this process usually takes about 40 minutes to complete.

Two people were involved in the deployment.

We are using Splunk Enterprise software. We contacted Splunk to demo ITSI, and we were impressed with its functionality and the included options. Therefore, we decided to try ITSI exclusively and did not evaluate any other vendors.

I would rate Splunk ITSI eight out of ten.

We're currently working on implementing adaptive thresholds. This functionality would analyze service trends over the past seven days automatically set thresholds and generate incidents based on that data. Successfully implementing this would be a significant achievement, but we're encountering some technical challenges. We've opened a support case with Splunk to address these issues, and we're hopeful for a resolution within the next few weeks.

We have around 150 people using Splunk ITSI.

Two people are responsible for the maintenance of Splunk ITSI in our organization.

I would rate the resilience of Splunk ITSI nine out of ten.

In my experience starting my career with Splunk, I haven't encountered any marketing tools that can quite compare. Splunk offers a comprehensive set of features and well-organized documentation. The detailed and clear documentation that Splunk provides is something I particularly appreciate.

I recommend Splunk ITSI.

We utilize Splunk ITSI to enhance our IT operations within our infrastructure. Our goal is to monitor only the most critical KPIs. Additionally, we have access to a detailed overview of the KPI services and entities, allowing us to identify issues in real time. 

We deploy Splunk ITSI both on-premises and in the Splunk cloud. 

We implemented infrastructure monitoring using ITSI to track various aspects such as latencies and specific components like CPU and memory. I can now provide detailed information about the specific cause of CPU-related issues. The problem lies in determining the process through which we can obtain a high-level overview of our services. When we delve deeper, we have access to numerous details to identify the KPI responsible for disrupting the service application. I can now explore ways to monitor its performance and locate the service in question. With ITSI, we can receive alerts and easily navigate to the precise location to resolve the problem.

The end-to-end visibility of Splunk ITSI in our network environment depends on the individual utilizing it. While it may be present, it is crucial to possess a solid understanding of ITSI. In order to illustrate this aspect, we require a well-defined use case that demonstrates our intention to employ ITSI. Overall, I would describe the end-to-end view as highly effective. It facilitates seamless data acquisition and enables us to easily analyze the data afterward.

Splunk ITSI can be utilized for predictive analytics to prevent incidents before they happen. It is regarded as the superior option for observability. While observability is commendable, we also make efforts to view data from SignalFX and leverage ITSI's capabilities to analyze and access large volumes of data. ITSI serves as a tool for analytics, but we can also employ it for observability, albeit SignalFX remains our primary choice for that purpose.

Splunk ITSI has helped us streamline our incident management, particularly through its correlation searches and event policies. With these features, we can efficiently handle multiple tasks by grouping them together under correlations. We can easily search for and identify these tasks and then review them in-network, allowing us to determine the specific episode and identify any high alerts. This enables us to drill down and investigate further, depending on our proficiency with ITSI. Additionally, we have the ability to create a dashboard for editing reviews. This way, we can access our episodes, drill down into our dashboard, and examine the detailed information about the issues we are facing.

ITSI has helped reduce our alert noise by thirty percent. We don't need to extract a large amount of information from our correlation strategies. We can simply refine them and obtain the essential details, thus avoiding unnecessary noise in our environment. We just need to grasp the main idea.

Splunk ITSI has helped us reduce our mean time to detect by approximately fifteen percent. I have been collaborating with individuals who also utilize ITSI for the past five years, and we have observed its continuous improvement each year. The mean time to detect is contingent upon our level of dedication to ITSI in that aspect.

Splunk ITSI has helped us reduce our mean time to resolve by approximately fifteen percent. If we also have a good dashboard alongside it, we can drill down and go straight to the issue.

One of the excellent features is the service analyzer, which is truly impressive. Additionally, we have the infrastructure review, which allows us to assess our infrastructure comprehensively. That is fantastic! Furthermore, the latest ITSI connects the new tenant we have for tenant management. This feature enables us to retire an entity instead of merely deleting it, and if needed, we can easily reactivate it. There are numerous exciting new additions. Splunk ITSI itself is highly interactive, making the overall service experience truly remarkable.

Splunk ITSI could function even better, particularly when it comes to refreshing the service infrastructure. If we could have the option to go back not just sixty minutes, but also one or five minutes, it would enhance our capabilities.

The service analyzer component is excellent, particularly the default analyzer. However, I believe the refresh time should be faster. If it also takes five minutes to complete, as suggested by the KPI requirements, then the refresh time should be significantly reduced. If the data doesn't load within five minutes, our service and KPI will not function properly. Therefore, it is crucial to make it faster.

I would appreciate having more customizable dashboards to assist with in-depth analyses.

I have been using Splunk ITSI for two years.

Since I started using Splunk ITSI, it has remained stable.

Splunk ITSI is scalable.

The documentation for Splunk Doctors is excellent, particularly when it comes to addressing installation issues. However, when it comes to Splunk Processing Language, Splunk itself is unable to assist us. I would recommend relying on the documentation as a valuable resource.

Positive

The initial setup is complex. Even if we have installed ITSI, we still need to install the other apps that accompany ITSI. Perhaps we want to work on this matter, so it depends on whether I am deploying it in a large environment or just a single environment with minimal activity. Therefore, we need to include all of these in the architecture. The ITSI app is one component, but the other apps that derive from it must also be taken into consideration.

We have a tool that we use in our team to expedite the deployment process. However, we are unable to disclose the details as it is a proprietary system. On an average day, if we have access to ITSI, I can personally complete the task within a few hours due to my prior experience. However, for someone without technical expertise, it may take up to a day. Although one knowledgeable person can complete the deployment, it is easier with two people.

I have witnessed a significant return on investment in that aspect. However, it ultimately depends on the customer's use case. Everyone desires to acquire Splunk, but not everyone understands its functionality in that aspect. So, if we have a customer and a strong use case, and we know what they want, we will definitely be able to achieve it. But if we don't have a customer and lack knowledge about it, it will just remain as is.

Splunk ITSI is expensive; however, with the appropriate use case, it justifies the cost.

I rate Splunk ITSI an eight out of ten.

Anyone who is considering a point monitoring system instead of Splunk ITSI should know that with ITSI, we gain access to several other features. Even just with the service analyzer, we can observe our KPIs and identify their affected components. We can determine which settings are causing the issues and make informed decisions, such as trying alternative options. We can also evaluate if a particular KPI has significant importance, as it has a substantial impact on the overall order of operations. This provides us with a detailed perspective in terms of data and other relevant aspects. While it may not offer a purely granular view, having everything consolidated into a single interface is extremely convenient. Working with ITSI requires a considerable level of willingness and experience. However, as we are transitioning towards various new tools, including the ability to easily integrate plug-and-play devices, the only issue with ITSI might be the initial setup. Once we have it implemented, we will have the capability to accomplish all our desired tasks.

The way Splunk sells ITSI is not the way we use it. We can make much better use of ITSI. The most important aspect, in my opinion, of ITSI is the episode review. For instance, when we encounter an issue that is not immediately visible, how can we evaluate that aspect? Therefore, ITSI is beneficial. From my perspective, we need individuals to sit down and explain how it works, as it can be confusing initially. However, once we have a clear understanding, it works well.

In my organization, my team is the only one working with ITSI. We handle all deployments, and typically, we deploy on public cloud infrastructure such as Azure, AWS, and GCP. Nowadays, most deployments are cloud-based. Additionally, with the rapid growth of Splunk Cloud, installation is not a concern as it is taken care of. Our focus is on the implementation if we choose to go the Splunk Cloud route. However, we still handle the installation process ourselves, so we need to ensure our preparedness in that regard.

We have roughly 20 people in our organization that use Splunk ITSI.

In the beginning, we need to ensure that the data we receive is valid. Once we have confirmed its validity, we can rest assured that the system will generate alerts, eliminating the need to worry about maintenance.

I recommend Splunk ITSI for organizations that are interested in IT operations, monitoring, or analytics. By ensuring optimal utilization of Splunk ITSI, organizations can achieve a good return on investment that justifies the purchase.

Splunk ITSI is our platform for data ingestion from various sources. We leverage it to manage Kubernetes configurations, licenses, reports, dashboards, and user permissions. Additionally, we utilize ITSI for field extraction and data model retrieval.

We successfully integrated Splunk ITSI with ServiceNow. The integration process was straightforward. We downloaded the Splunk Integration application from the ServiceNow app store and configured the ServiceNow account using the provided URL, username, password, and authentication method.

Splunk ITSI offers end-to-end visibility through a centralized admin console. This console allows us to monitor all aspects of our system, including indexing performance, daily resource usage, CPU utilization, and insights.

Splunk ITSI has helped our organization save time. We saw the benefits within the first three minutes of use.

We saw time to value within minutes of using Splunk ITSI.

The KPS used to automate the integration policy is the most valuable feature of Splunk ITSI.

After upgrading Splunk ITSI from version 4.11 to 4.13, the analyzer stopped finding values for KPS and services. We had to manually deploy a script to resolve this issue.

I have been using Splunk ITSI for three years.

Splunk ITSI is stable.

Splunk ITSI is a resilient solution able to recover quickly.

Splunk ITSI is scalable.

The technical support team is great. They've helped troubleshoot our issues. Once we raise a ticket, we can continue the process using a DLL file.

Positive

The initial deployment is straightforward. The setup is automated.

Five people were required for the deployment.

The implementation was completed in-house.

The licensing is based on data usage.

I would rate Splunk ITSI eight out of ten.

I recommend Splunk ITSI over other APMs because we can monitor everything from a single console.

Splunk ITSI is deployed across multiple locations.

No maintenance is required for Splunk ITSI.

We have some business-oriented monitoring. The technical components are aggregated to business services up to a certain level. We could do a lot more, but this is what we are doing currently.

Splunk ITSI has improved our mean time to resolution. We can essentially notice things before somebody calls. We have better customer satisfaction. It is hard to say how much time it has saved, but if we do not use it, it will take quite a while until we notice something is down or until we find out what exactly is the issue.

We monitor multiple cloud environments with it. It is no more difficult than anything else.

Splunk ITSI has end-to-end visibility into our cloud-native environment. We also have SignalFx. We are an early adopter of SignalFx in Switzerland. It is integrated, and we have been beta-testing the integration. It is quite easy and workable. It is quite nice.

It provides business resilience by empowering staff. That is the core feature. You can tailor the solution and give the exact information in a certain context. This correlation and this presentation help the business, the users, or the person responsible for the application or the stack. That is the interesting part.

Splunk Episodes are valuable because it correlates and aggregates all the information, and you do not have one million events to look at and triage, so it is quite convenient.

The solution is okay. I am not sure whether the current release has already moved to the new framework where instead of the glass tables, we can directly use the Dashboard Studio. It would be nice to have that integrated into the same framework.

We have been using Splunk ITSI for more than four years.

Its stability is excellent.

Its scalability is excellent.

They used different tools for different parts. For the service aggregation part, they used Netuitive. They still use Dynatrace for some of the things, but they have mostly moved to SignalFx. Dashboarding was one area for which they never had anything.

The guys with the container-based workload absolutely demanded SignalFx. That had the repercussions of finally moving to Splunk ITSI.

I was not involved in its deployment.

I am not sure about the ROI of Splunk ITSI, but we have definitely got an ROI from Splunk. We have been using Splunk since version 3 and doing lots of things. We have hundreds of use cases. If you ask anybody in the business, they would say that it is essential and critical.

Splunk has improved our business resilience in combination with Splunk Enterprise. It is widely adopted by our developers, and we also have a fairly large number of dashboards where core services, such as managed file transfer, are transparent for the users that own a system that is connected as a sending or receiving device so that they can self-service and check if everything is working. There is also alerting on that. So, there are multitudes of use cases. It is more of a framework; it is more of a platform. There is wide adoption of it. 100% of the users in the company have access to it. Not everybody uses it, but everybody has access to it.

It is interesting. I am not involved that much lately, but if I recall correctly, you license primarily on the volume of data that you are using in Splunk ITSI, but there is no way Splunk can ever check if that is true, so that is interesting. We are not doing it, but someone can pretend to just use 10%, and it would be super cheap. It is tricky, but it is more tricky for Splunk than for us.

There were quite a few solutions that we looked at. We were beta testing Splunk ITSI, but unfortunately, the adoption was not possible back then. They had a few market-leading products in the procurement. Due to SignalFx, we finally chose Splunk ITSI.

I would rate Splunk ITSI an eight out of ten.

We use the solution to monitor throughout the enterprise. We get alerts and create incidents and use it in our ticketing tool. 

We have set up alerts so we can effectively monitor our infrastructure. Even small alerts the users face we can monitor. 

We started small with a few users and once we saw the visibility we could achieve and the performance of the solution, we rolled it out on a larger scale. 

The analysis and KPIs it provides are very useful. We can create episode monitoring. 

The service analyzer is quite useful. 

Its end-to-end visibility is very good. We can get to the root cause of troubleshooting. It makes the process easier. Troubleshooting happens very quickly - and that means we have less downtime. 

We use the predictive analysis capabilities. It plays a major role as it allows us to act faster. 

Our response time is almost instant. We can create alerts and check reports. It checks everything in real-time so that we can jump into action much faster.

It's helped with incident management. It's helped us reduce incidents while improving performance and visibility. It reduces the amount of work we need to do as well. We've likely reduced work by 30% or so. 

Since it's reduced alerts, it's reduced alert noise. We do have triggers for alerts, and we can shortlist them and troubleshoot the ones that create the most noise. 

Our performance metrics have improved. Alert noise has dropped by 60%. We've been able to maintain everything much easier. Handling the infra is simpler. 

Our mean time to detect is down to 5 minutes. That's down from 15 to 20 minutes in the past.

We're getting alerts with delays of maybe five minutes, however, we'd like to see real-time alerting in the future. 

From a predictive analysis point of view, we'd like to see emails corresponding to the alerts we get. That would be an added benefit. 

I've been using the solution at least 2 years. 

Every time we upgrade, we do find some issue, however, it does get resolved. Overall, I'd rate stability 9 out of 10. Most of the time, it's stable. 

We have two to three people using the solution. We have the solution across multiple locations. 

The solution is very scalable. 

Technical support is very good. I'm satisfied with the level of knowledge the techs have and the response time. 

Positive

We did not use any other solutions. 

The initial setup is not complex. I'm not sure exactly how long it takes to implement as it was already in place when I began.

There is some maintenance required. You may have to run regular upgrades. 

We've seen an ROI in the lack of downtime, which has improved by 80%.

I don't have any visibility on the cost of the product.

I'm a Splunk customer. 

We don't have Splunk integrated with any other solutions. 

For someone who already has an APM solution, but is considering switching to Splunk ITSI, I'd advise them to take a look at it against other solutions. However, Splunk is very, very good. It's likely to help any organization. I'd recommend it over a different monitoring solution. It eliminates much broader downtime and allows teams to act on alerts faster. 

resilience is very important to us and Splunk helps us maintain that. It's very reliable. 

I'd recommend the solution to others. 

It's a good idea to go through the documentation so that everyone is on the same page with the setup.

I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.

There are multiple use cases, which include heat maps, glass tables, and predictive analysis.

The first one is mainly related to heat maps. For example, if you want to monitor the health of a server, you can prepare heat maps for that. When you set up any kind of alerts, they can get missed because people are too busy to check their emails. With these heat maps, the color changes automatically. The Cron job runs behind the scenes, and you don't need to run them manually. 

You can also set up a glass table in ITSI for the architecture. For example, a setup like Amazon would have web services, databases, queues, and other things. For the purchase and other things, it has to connect to the external world, so you need to place the complete architecture over there, and you can assign the threshold value. If there is an issue with any of the points, for example, there is an issue with the connectivity of the database, the heat maps would change in color, which helps you to easily identify that there is an issue.

It also has a concept called predictive analysis. For example, your WhatsApp chat backup happens every 24 hours or 7 hours, but you cannot predict how much bandwidth it's going to use during the backup. It might even use 100% of the bandwidth. You cannot set a proper threshold. In such cases, you can use predictive analysis. It'll analyze the data patterns, and based on the data pattern, it predicts if everything is good or if something is bad. It can predict if something is going to fail.

You can have an integration with the ticketing tools. For example, if something happens on any server or PC and you've directly integrated the tickets from Splunk to ServiceNow, it's automatically going to create a ticket in ServiceNow.

There's also a concept of episode review wherein it groups the alerts so that there's no ticket spam in ServiceNow. For example, if you are monitoring a server and it's down, there might be 10 to 20 alerts, which would create 10 or 20 separate tickets and spam your ticketing system. In such cases, you can use the episode review feature. It will merge all those tickets into one and include all the details in that.

Splunk ITSI allowed us to monitor the health of servers. We can also completely monitor an application and identify data patterns. Automation of ticketing tools can also be done with this. We can also do log monitoring with Splunk ITSI.

It's also helpful for developers. When they create an application, if there is an issue in their code, based on the output data, a request is automatically triggered to the engineering team stating that there is an issue with the code.

The visibility into an application is very good if you configure everything properly. You first have to analyze the application by using any of the monitoring tools such as Elastic, Splunk, etc. You have to analyze the application in and out, and afterward, you have to place the monitors in particular places for end-to-end visibility. For example, in the case of a home security system, to completely secure the home, you have to place the devices in a proper place. Until and unless you place the devices in a proper place, you cannot say that it's completely secured. If you are not keeping the cameras at the main entrance and the windows, or you haven't placed them properly, you can't say that the home is properly secured.

Splunk ITSI is very good for predictive analytics for preventing incidents before they occur. For everything, there are patterns, and based on the algorithm, you are allowing the machine to analyze the data and predict whether the data patterns are coming in a proper way or not. Splunk analyzes the data patterns based on the historical information that we give it. After analyzing the historical information, it creates triggers. If the data that we are feeding into the machine is incorrect, it's not going to work the same way.

There's the accuracy of alerts. In Splunk, the data is almost in real-time, so we get tickets in real-time. If there's a failure, we can roll over to the backup applications immediately. It saved about a million euros for one of our clients. They were having an issue with the Symantec antivirus that blocked the complete Citrix environment, so the workers were not able to sign in and access the application, which led to an outage. Within a matter of minutes, Splunk triggered a ticket, and they identified that they were having an issue with this particular antivirus, and they blocked it.

Splunk ITSI has helped streamline our incident management. There is efficiency in terms of clubbing the tickets and sending tickets with meaningful information, so mainly with the alerting system, you can configure as much information as you want using the Splunk monitoring tools. You can send some links in the ticket, or you can send a separate set of guidelines for the engineers on what has to be done. The clubbing of tickets has also helped a lot to avoid spamming.

Splunk ITSI has reduced our mean time to detect. Based on my experience and the feedback from others who are using it, it has saved a lot of time. The time reduction is significant when compared to other tools in the market.

It has reduced our mean time to resolve. Glass tables have been very helpful. With the help of Splunk ITSI, you can place the heat maps and services in place based on the application architecture to easily identify where the issue is coming from.

I find the episode review, glass tables, and correlation search features very useful.

Microservices is the only area where Splunk ITSI can be improved. When things come from one EC2 instance to another, there's a lack of exposure to microservices, so we can't know what's happening. Apart from that, it's doing pretty well.

I've been using Splunk ITSI for five or six years.

I'd rate it a nine out of ten in terms of stability.

I'd rate it a nine out of ten in terms of scalability.

It isn't 100% satisfactory for all the cases. About 80% of the time, they are good, and about 20% of the time, they aren't as good. They can be very slow. We also had an incident where we asked them to upgrade to a version, but in that latest update, Splunk had removed some concepts because of price issues. As a result of removing a particular module, our complete environment failed. It took us a day to roll back the version and go back to normal. Overall, I'd rate them a seven out of ten.

Neutral

I used VMware vSphere and a CA Technologies tool. We switched to ITSI because the optimization was very less in them. There is also a significant difference in data parsing. We also have real-time data. 

At the beginning of my career, I found it to be complex because you need to know a lot of areas, such as network and firewall rules, routing methodologies, and the cluster concept. I kept on learning along with my teammates, and it's pretty good now.

In the beginning, my teammates helped me, but now I don't need any help. Depending on the load and the environment, I can build things.

One of our clients was paying two hundred thousand to three hundred thousand dollars for a report based on the complete data, whereas they could also get the data by running a couple of queries from the database. After the implementation of Splunk, we used something called DB Connect. It was a small tweak, and after that, the price was reduced to a hundred dollars or eighty dollars per annum. All they are doing now is creating or running SQL queries, getting the data back in Splunk, and based on that, triggering and sending a report. That's it. It was all about preparing proper monitoring. The data was already available. We prepared the alerts. Along with the alerts, we also prepared dashboards for the users to visually review the historical information for the past one or two years. They can even see the report month-wise. Two hundred thousand dollars to less than a hundred dollars is incomparable.

Its pricing has been changed as per the market. You get a good support service with it as well. They have 24/7 customer support. There is a portal, and if you are having issues, they are available in order to resolve them. So, its pricing isn't too much.

I'd advise learning the tool properly, understanding its capabilities, and utilizing it efficiently. One of our clients was paying hundreds of dollars towards the license, but they were utilizing it only for server monitoring. 

To someone who already has an APM solution but is considering switching to Splunk ITSI, I'd say that switching to ITSI is going to help them a little bit more. The grouping of the ticket to the users can be easily planned. It's not rocket science. It's easier compared to the other tools where you need to create a lot of configuration for that. The configuration has been segregated, which makes it easy for the applications team to set up their own monitoring and group them to avoid the number of tickets generated. You also have predictive analysis along with heat maps and glass tables, which aren't available in other APM tools in the market right now.

Overall, I'd rate Splunk ITSI an eight out of ten.

We are trying to take regular dashboards that we have for monitoring and pull them all together for a high-level view of what is going on.

We have not got very far with it yet. We have done a service decomposition. We had some KPIs set up, and we have got just a couple of health scores, but we have not really pulled it all together. We have not gotten value out of it yet, but we are getting there. We have not seen any improvements yet, but we have high hopes. 

Splunk has helped improve our company's business resilience, but with ITSI, we are not there yet. Splunk has been great so far in terms of the ability to predict, identify, and solve problems in real-time. I have not played around with any other IT ops platforms, but it has been fantastic for us for monitoring systems with dashboards, etc.

We have not yet experienced any cost efficiencies by switching to this solution, but Splunk has certainly saved time for our system maintainers because our dashboards now roll up alerts. We just need ITSI to pull all those alerts together so that we get one alert for one problem.

We have not had any time saving with ITSI yet. We are just not that far. It has also not yet helped to reduce our mean time to resolve, but hopefully, it will.

The solution has been stable. It seems like a great solution. We have not gotten far enough with our application to see its benefits yet, but we are getting there.

It has been a large learning curve. We used Splunk Enterprise. The dashboards are pretty simplistic for the developer at first, but when they went into ITSI, it was a different world. We lacked training. We played with it a little bit, and then we brought the Splunk team in, and they did a service decomposition and whiteboarding, and it made more sense, but it was an intimidating tool for us to jump into at the beginning.

We have been using this solution for just about a year.

We have not had any issues related to stability.

We are just starting. I have got a couple of services in there. We have not scaled anything yet.

The support has been hit or miss. We are on a classified program, so we had clear points of contact assigned to us. There was a transition, and we have got some new ones. Everyone is busy and overwhelmed, and their hands are full, but the last couple of times that we reached out, we did not get much of a response.

In the past, their support was a nine out of ten, but recently, it has been a seven out of ten.

Neutral

We had a homegrown user interface that had alerts, logs, and things like that, but it was painful to manage ourselves.

We do not have any cloud. It is just on-prem. I was involved a little bit in its deployment. I was involved more as a lead but not hands-on.

We had deployed to bare metal servers at the beginning, and then we migrated to a cloud-like environment. It is not a cloud, but it is a service provider for us. At the same time, we moved to Kubernetes and containerized all of our systems. We thought we would use Splunk containers, but that did not work out for us, so we ended up pulling Splunk containers back out and installing Splunk back on VMs. That is where we are now. I do not remember the specifics, but we had trouble with deploying Splunk containers.

We implemented it ourselves.

We did not evaluate other solutions because we were already using Splunk Enterprise, so it made sense.

At this stage, I would rate it an eight out of ten because we do not have proof yet that we will get where we want to be.

Attending Splunk conferences gets me out of the office and lets me focus on Splunk for a week. They are super helpful.

Our customer is an internal department. We have about 150 teams that use Splunk and we provide Splunk for all of them. Our IT is currently setting it up for one of them. This customer is really impressed by the Glass Tables, possibilities for management, and the Showcase.

The department that uses ITSI runs the public buses for Switzerland. They use it to collect data about the cars. We will build Glass Tables for them. It's a management summary for tickets. They use it to collect data about the solution flow regarding the response time and ticketing flow. 

It helps optimize the business by speeding up trouble ticket resolutions.

We have a lot of teams using Splunk and they would be blind without it.

We have problems doing upgrades and operating alternate new versions.

The migration of the existing glass tables needs improvement. There were at least two upgrades where we had to heavily update the existing glass tables to get them to work with the new version. 

That's something that Splunk could improve on. They should simplify the upgrade process. 

I have never used their support. We solve our problems by ourselves. 

I would rate Splunk's ability to predict, identify, and solve problems in real-time a five out of ten.

I would rate Splunk an eight out of ten. It has great potential but it is a little complex to set up.