Microsoft Intune Reviews

I am using Microsoft Intune for supporting clients with mobile devices.

The most valuable feature is the policy CSPs.

The closest Microsoft Intune can be to GPOs, the better. There needs to be more granularity on application deployments. However, they have done better recently with the application deployments.

I have been using Microsoft Intune for approximately seven years.

Microsoft Intune is scalable. You can add Defender ATP and other inbuilt features.

The technical support from Microsoft is not good, they take a long time to respond to a case and they do not update you on what is happening on a case.

I've been on multiple deployments. The range from the pilot can take from a couple of weeks to a full-scale deployment, which can be a couple of months to a year. The longest I have been involved in was eight months.

The clients pay for a license and each can have a different type of license, such as an E3 or E5.

I have found sometimes Microsoft Intune does not work and it can be very unresponsive.

The honest truth is that Microsoft Intune is the future. Even though it's not the finished article, because it changes every week, the earlier you adopt it, the fewer hassles you will have down the line. The more you wait, the bigger the problem you might end up having trying to migrate.

I rate Microsoft Intune an eight out of ten.

The solution is deployed on cloud.

Autopilot is a great feature. Most users are looking for zero-touch deployment. 

There are many things that could be improved in Microsoft. Reporting and troubleshooting for the application deployment could be better. It's very difficult to understand. 

It's also very difficult to monitor where exactly the error is and the kind of scripting we're trying to deploy. PowerShell scripting is even getting a delay compared to other applications or policies. Usually if we deploy the configuration profile, there is an immediate sync and it will be applied to the devices, but it's not happening on PowerShell. This is an apparent option for PowerShell that is not working properly, so that again needs to be rectified. The reporting is a major drawback in Microsoft in Intune. They're not properly reported on the console.

I have about seven years of experience with Microsoft. I have been working with Intune for the past four years.

The solution is stable, but the reporting steps could be improved. The product has been released for more than six years, but some complete information is required.

The solution is scalable.

Technical support is very active. We used to interact mostly with Microsoft, so we had a lot of issues from the Intune side, so we were often troubleshooting steps. The technical side is pretty good. Whenever it's required, they will immediately schedule a call. I would give them a 9 out of 10.

Initial setup is of average difficulty. It requires a lot of people. We need to have an Azure AD license, so some AD integration is required. A kind of firewall is included.

In Jamf, it's not like that, so we have a single console and we can implement it. But here, we have multiple because it can be integrated and co-managed. I can't say it is very easy to deploy. For very small-scale industries, then it's definitely easy if you have minimal user devices or user IDs. If you're looking to deploy the solution on a corporate-level, and if they have multiple tenants, in that case, it is definitely complex.

If you are looking for it to be co-managed, there'll be an SCCM and an AD team. Otherwise, one or two engineers is fine for Itune.

I would rate this solution 7 out of 10. 

If you are working as a SME, anybody can do the major part of troubleshooting and configuration. Even someone who isn't certified will be able to do the configuration and implementation part. Logs are required to troubleshoot.

Intune is the best tool going forward because everyone is moving to the cloud. If you have a cloud environment, it will be easy for a service provider to provide support. The solution can also be easily integrated to other tools.

There are so many additional features included in Intune that it's very easy for the users, corporate, and for companies to manage the devices. Even if the device is out of office, even if it is not domain-joined, it will be easy for us to manage for the client, or for the companies to manage it.

We use this for management of all mobile devices.

We would like to see support for Chrome and/or devices for Chromebooks.

I have been using this solution for about three years.

The solution is stable.

The solution is scalable. We currently have tens of thousands of users within our organization using the solution.

I think customer support is quite good, we have enterprise support and premier support agreements.

Initial setup was straightforward.

Potential users should run a proof of concept. This can be done easily because Microsoft is offering a free trial period of one month.

I would rate this an eight out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for mobile device management and security controls.

The most valuable aspect of the product is data loss prevention. That's really a benefit of the platform in general.

The solution appears to be stable and scalable. 

The biggest improvement could be in the implementation, the ease of the implementation of it. They should make it easier to order it, however, that's generally true for everything from Microsoft.

I'd love to be licensed in Microsoft. I'm trying to do that, however, I can't find a training program that will fit with my schedule. Everything requires you to be on-site for a week, as opposed to on-demand training. A big improvement would be having some on-demand training that is quality and not just a sales pitch.

I'd like to see mobile device wiping to be better. That feature is a critical feature. If that could be enhanced, I would be grateful.

We've been dealing with the solution for a year and a half to two years. 

My understanding is the solution is stable, however, I can't say if that is the case for enterprise-level deployments. 

The solution is scalable to a point. I don't have a good insight on enterprise-level deployments and therefore cannot speak to how much it can scale.

I've never reached out to technical support. I wouldn't be qualified to comment on their level of service. 

The initial setup can be a bit difficult. I'm not certified in any way for Microsoft. 

I cannot speak to how many people are required for deployment or maintenance tasks. 

I'm a managed service provider. We work with a distributor who's a reseller. We have clients that use this product regularly.

I'd advise new users to do their research on Microsoft products and understand what's included and what's not included in the packages they already have.

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten.

Our main use cases with Microsoft Intune are about how we automate the deployment. Auto-pilot is a feature that we normally recommend. Another piece is about the package deployment, where we recommend, or have helped, customers in deploying and converting their Win32 application. These are the two main areas in terms of automating the enrollment and Win32. Another use case in terms of the Apple, which is being used more by the customers, is where we recommend them to go for the zero touch process by using the AD.

Intune's feature that I have found most valuable is its auto-pilot feature. The main thing is that it keeps building it. Also Intune's capability in terms of Mac, which is slowly increasing, although the customers are moving towards vMOX and leaving the Intune just because of its limited capability with Mac, though it has already been enhanced. More features include the conditional access and the app production policies with respect to BYOR devices. These have been increased a lot in terms of security.

In terms of what can be improved, I am looking for better enhancements regarding Apple management, not only on the mobile device, but also on the laptop.

Other than that, it already has good capability with Windows, and it is already very good for the mobile device. The only area that is missing is for the Mac products.

I am using Microsoft Intune for the last two, three years.

In terms of maintenance, since it is a cloud product, it automatically gets updated by Microsoft. So there is no maintenance required for the upgrade part. But definitely the maintenance part that we track is the software asset management - that the devices are there and that the patches are deployed on a timely basis. We also do maintenance on the dashboard reporting feature in terms of whether the devices are compliant or not compliant.

In terms of performance, devices will be automatically enrolled and all the applications will be deployed. So it will be ready to use once they log in with their Azure-ready credentials. That is zero touch for them. In terms of having integrations in place with other tools, any issues they face will have proactive or automated actions to resolve their issues, instead of raising them and going through the long process of raising a ticket and the resolution.

Scalability is good.

In my experience, the customers who are mostly going for the Intune are small, medium and large companies. We have seen a mix. These days we have seen a large base of customers having more than one device. So it could be suitable for any size company.

Not too much to say on support. It is pretty fast. But in some of the instances we did not get much or a proper resolution where we had to troubleshoot a lot. But in most of the cases, support was good.

Initial setup is a simple process. It is a cloud solution. It is easy to deploy and easy to integrate with other tools as well. If we have to integrate with on-prem or Azure-ready through an AD connector, it is easy. Also, it is capable of integrating with other tools.

In terms of deployment, having things in the VM or physical VM or physical system in place and the ports enabled, as the main infrastructure is all in the cloud, is only part of connecting with the Azure already and the AD connectors, and does not take much time. With full testing, it takes one day if all things are in place.

Their price is really good. That is the reason customers move here, because as part of the Office 365 package, they always get the E365 as well, which makes it easy for them to manage their devices without having additional licenses for Intune.

That is the best part.

The main differences between Intune and other products are, like I mentioned, in terms of the Mac. If the customers are majorly moving and adopting Mac laptops while they are using the Intune, they are leaving for other platforms, like Workspace ONE and vMOX. That is the reason for moving and the major difference I have seen these last couple of months. But at the same time, if there is not much dependency on Mac devices, they are moving from other platforms to Intune, also.

My advice to anyone considering Intune would be to definitely test it and have devices enrolled at least in a pilot phase. They will get feature compatibility, the policies, and the auto-pilot feature. So, I would recommend to do at least a POC, and then decide.

On a scale of one to ten, I can rate Intune an eight.

We are using it to protect our devices. We are using it for protecting our corporate data on the phone and for GDPR compliance. 

We are using its latest version.

It is helpful for protecting our corporate data on the phone. In the event a phone is stolen, we can remotely wipe the phone or destroy the data on it.

It also helps us with our GDPR compliance. We also have the GDPR module on the cloud that links to all the endpoints, laptops, mobile phones, and tablets. So, we can also remotely protect the data on the phones, wherever they are.

Intune makes it possible for us to reach all the endpoints and have them protected at all times. We have what is called Defender now, but it used to be called Advanced Threat Protection.

The ability to manage devices with different sets of policies is most valuable.

We haven't really gone through all the features of Intune. We are just discovering them. Every day, we see a new feature that we want to apply, but what will be great for Intune is to be able to deploy apps in a simple fashion. We should be able to easily install various apps on the Windows platform, iOS, and Android. Currently, we have to write some scripts. It's not as straightforward as we would like it to be. It should be simplified so that we can do it just with three clicks—next, next, finish—without needing to write a script.

I have been using this solution for about six years.

So far, it has been good because what we tend to do is get high-end phones with lots of processing power, RAM, and storage. That way, its capacity is never an issue.

It is scalable. It is a multi-user license, and because there are templates for policies, it's easy to just assign what you have set up for executives, for ordinary users, for marketers, etc.

We have about 150 users who use this solution. I work with this on a daily basis.

I would rate them a 10 out of 10 because they knew what the problem was, and they walked us through resolving it. I am satisfied with their support.

Positive

The first one we used was VMware AirWatch. The reseller overestimated our requirements, and we got a very expensive package. It was about $57,000 every year, and eventually, we found out they had a package for $6,000 every year that did exactly what we wanted, so we had to drop it. We had spent two years on VMware AirWatch with the expensive module.

We switched to Intune because we were already on a Microsoft subscription for Office 365, and the add-on wasn't that expensive.

It was simple. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of the setup. It took about a week.

It is a cloud product. It doesn't require any maintenance from our side. We get an update every time they upgrade a feature.

We did it internally. We just went through the documentation.

It's affordable for the protection it gives. There are no additional costs.

I would advise getting a Microsoft partner to deploy it for you. It's a lot quicker. 

I would definitely recommend this product. I would rate it a 10 out of 10.

The solution is primarily used to manage iOS, Android, and also Windows 10 or Windows 11. It's to manage end-user devices.

The best thing about Intune for the customers is simply that it's included in the different plans of Microsoft 365. If a customer needs Office or collaboration tools, Intune is included. It's for free. If the company has another MDM, normally they are paying for it. This product is included in the license of Microsoft 365. We find that the customers, in general, want to change the solution, to move from another classical MDM to Intune due to the fact that they save money.

If you need only to load a specific profile and you don't have deep security functionalities, etc, Intune is very nice and good.

The initial setup is very simple.

If you need some restrictions or some integrations or you need integrations with security options, or if your mobile terminals are industry-special or ruggerized, bar code readers, printers attached, this might not be the best option. If your MDM has to be really specific, perhaps Intune is not the better option. You have to consider MobileIron or Workspace ONE or MaaS360 or similar.

They need to integrate more with security options. When the customers want some specific security functionality they begin to think about other platforms. 

The stability is very good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's pretty reliable. 

Scaling is simple. It depends on the licensing. If you have licenses for that, the only thing you have to do is to continue with the enrollment of the terminals. It's very easy. You have to assign the terminals to a group of users with different restrictions or policies and that's it.

With the CSP licenses, we as a cloud service provider, are obliged to provide services. With our service, we provide support to the licenses. When we sell licenses differently, in the LSP scheme, then we have to sell the premium service for the customers.

I don't use it directly. That said, I know the ratings of the services that we provide for our services. The only thing that I should say is that normally when we have an SLA with a customer for Microsoft, there is a specific response time that we can provide as a service provider. They do not consider that. They say, "Our service is this. This is our SLA." Then, our service level agreement is eight hours. 

Sometimes, when you offer a service level agreement with a customer, the support of the manufacturer or of the vendor is included. It's the only thing that, if you are providing services on an end-to-end basis, you have to consider. Sometimes, when you call Premier Support and you say, "Please, I need a solution before six hours," it doesn't matter for them. They say, "I have not six. I have eight, so don't call me if I'm in the eight hours."

It's very simple to set up. To set up the terminals, it's very easy. You have a manual, and it's very easy to follow. You can configure functionalities for specific users or a specific group of users or things like that. It's great.

The time it takes to deploy depends on the number of terminals and it also depends on the number of different groups. Perhaps you have to configure the different policies for different groups. That might take longer than a straightforward setup. In an installation with, for example, 1,000 terminals, it typically takes less than a month -three weeks or so.

I don't personally handle the deployment myself, however. I offer it to clients. I'm not the one to actually do the manual work of implementing it. 

The amount of people we need to deploy a solution depends on the number of terminals that we have to manage.

Some customers configure everything at the beginning and nothing changes over time. That said, we have other customers that they are continuously asking for changes. This group of customers will likely need three people more to handle maintenance. For every 1,000 devices, you typically need one and a half full-time employees.

In terms of ROI, it depends. If you have licenses included in your plan for M365, Microsoft 365, from the very beginning, if you have to sell that, it depends on the business case that you can do. It's different if you buy a CSP or LSP license.

One kind is considered as a cost and another is considered as an investment. The LSP is an investment. 

In the products and services space, from a pay-per-use perspective, I don't see a relationship between this product and ROI. 

There are different kinds of licenses. We sell two licenses from Microsoft, the LSP or the CSP. The service that we have with Microsoft is based on the CSP kind, so the payment is monthly, considered as an expense, not an investment o asset. It depends on if you buy a set of licenses only for Intune - which can be sold separately, or can be included in M365.

We are gold partners with Microsoft.

I would rate the solution at a nine out of ten.

For simple installations, for simple management, perhaps Intune is fine. However, for more complex installations, it might not be enough.

We use it to manage our mobile phone in the business, and we also use it to manage our Windows PCs.

It's managed through our IT company, so they have the latest version. I have admin access to it, but I haven't had time to be in the portal so much.

We have one person based abroad, and it was a lot easier to get him standardized than it would be if we had to get his computer shipped down and configured that way.

For our office workers who are not based in Norway, when we order the PC, we can do some of the settings for them. These are standardized settings. We can set them up exactly as they are in Norway so that they're the same. 

The reports that are generated aren't so great. They don't give a lot of meaning so far, but that could be down to user knowledge than the actual reporting side of things. I'm not a big user of it, but I was a bigger user of MaaS360, and we used to be able to run weekly and monthly reports. In the case of any deviations. we'd get a warning immediately. That's not so easy to do or to get in place for Intune. This could be just a user issue, but when I compare both, that's the only thing that's lacking for me.

I have probably been using it for eight months.

So far, we have had no issue. We only have an installer for one user abroad, and he hasn't had any issues. It is stable there, and the phones also work fine. 

It is scalable. We can add more users, and there are no extra costs.

We're probably not the best users of it. We have one person based abroad, and we are probably going to have more.

We go to our own IT support, and they contact them. I'm not familiar with the deal that they have. They're a big IT team over here. They probably have an agreement, and they're prioritized in the queue for Microsoft Intune. There has been no downtime, and we haven't had any issues so far.

We've switched over from MaaS360 to Intune. We took the decision that Intune is better for Windows and IBM products.

I personally preferred IBM. I always outsourced the IT, but I preferred IBM. I liked the interface with IBM. I like being able to push out and seeing which updates were not available and which ones had to be pushed out. It was a lot easier to use. So, I preferred IBM, but I'm not really using Intune. It's outsourced to our IT.

It was quite extensive, and it took a few days for them to set it up.

We have outsourced IT for it. They did it themselves.

It's monthly for us, but it's built into the license cost that we pay our IT each month. It's maybe 129 Kroner per head, which translates to £10.

There are some additional costs. Our IT had to set up and configure their own server, so there is an extra cost for that, but I'm not sure what that costs.

I would advise setting aside the relevant time because it is time-consuming. It probably needs to map to all your devices so that you have a proper overview of all different applications that are needed on PC and mobile. I wasn't really involved in the migration. So, I only know what they needed, and from their side of things, I had to gather the information based on our MaaS360 database.

I would rate it a seven out of 10.