We are using ManageEngine OpManager, password manager, desktops and endpoint management, and the services plus and a plus product. We monitor the server utilization and hardware performance of the server, RAM, processor, IO, and disk utilization.

Desktop central products, with dashboards that offer good information, are part of our monitoring.

For bandwidth management, we currently use other products such as SolarWinds. We also utilize the automated reporting features for trends and session monitoring from the end user to server, including routers and firewalls to identify network issues promptly.

I am working on two projects. Currently, I am with one of my clients on the task of ManageEngine manager. They want us to simply batch ManageEngine. I recommended ManageEngine batch OpManager, and I have to report to them why they should choose the batch manager. I am searching for reports and working on service management, operation management, and access management.

OpManager has so many good options. You can manage your entire network with it. PRTG doesn't have that capability. It has scripts you can run, but not the options OpManager has. There are so many other little options that are very good.

We manage a client's network. We put all applications/devices into ManageEngine OpManager. This allows us to manage everything from a single interface.

It's not just about endpoint devices; it also improves switches and servers. For example, if we have the same switches across our organization, we can apply a patch to all of them at the same time. It is really easy. 

We use the solution for network and server monitoring. We are using the product for basic functionalities. We use it to monitor and check whether there are any issues in the environment.

We use OpManager for live monitoring, receiving alerts in real-time, capacity management, and immediate identification of any issues. It automatically raises tickets for the relevant teams to take action. 

We have configured it to cover various areas within our IT department, including applications, networks, databases, and servers.

Our primary use case for the solution is monitoring all the infrastructure in our company.

We primarily use the solution for monitoring servers, networks, and security.

We use the solution for monitoring devices, health checks, performing some level of monitoring tasks, availability management, and capacity management. We also use it for some level of network bandwidth utilization. The technical reports available in ManageEngine OpManager suffice our specific needs.

Our primary use case is securing the appliance. I look after security compliance within my organization.

We use the product to monitor service equipment. 

We use the solution to monitor URLs and online infrastructures.

The primary use is for network infrastructure monitoring, however, there are three editions. There is the professional, there is the enterprise, and there is the OpManager Plus. Personally, I prefer the OpManager Plus since it monitors everything including network routers, switches, servers, virtual machines, virtual machine hosts, storage, and firewalls, and all-in-one solution. I generally prefer OpManager Plus edition.

We primarily use the solution to monitor devices. It has the ability to monitor uptime and performance.

We use this solution for monitoring across applications, network performance, databases, and operating system performance.

We are using ManageEngine OpManager to manage our virtual machine and the host machine.

I am using ManageEngine OpManager as a managing tool.

I primarily use ManageEngine OpManager to monitor servers and network devices. 

I used it about six months ago. We implemented it in the last company I worked with. We were using it for patching, rolling out images, and other similar things.

We were using the most recent version.

We use the solution to monitor links. It also helps us to track servers and monitor logs. 

We use it to monitor the network of our customers. Some have several branches around the country, and all their firewalls and switches are monitored by ManageEngine OpManager. We can see the exact time when a desk branch goes down and goes up again. We can also see if the tunnel interface is down because the customer is using site-to-site VPN.

We use the solution to monitor multiple vendors as well.

We use this solution to monitor alerts from network devices. I'm a system administrator and we  are customers of ManageEngine.

We use OpManager for the health checkup of our own server's network devices and applications. We use the basic options.

We use OpManager for monitoring our network devices.

We use ManageEngine OpManager to monitor our link status, latency, and errors.

We primarily use the solution for network monitoring, that is, firewall routing, switching, and application monitoring.

We are mainly using it for Windows operating systems.

OpManager monitors the uptime and the performance of the network, servers, and applications. Additionally, it monitors the condition of the RAM, the CPU, and memory. It also monitors any inbound applications. We get notifications of any downloads or devices making unauthorized requests. It runs the processes on both sides. If it finds something we get an alert. It will tell us what the problem is and give us directions as to how to fix it.  

Right now, we are using ManageEngine OpManager for network monitoring. We also use it for server and application monitoring. We monitor parameters of servers like CPU, RAM, and hard disk.

I have used the solution for monitoring and reporting. 

My personal use case is for network management, traffic flow, am any kind of alerts. Anything you can think of, you can program through OpManager or anything on the network you can think of, you can program through OpManager. We run monthly and weekly reports and all of those are programmed and then in a week or a month, it's in your inbox. Your CIF log scan goes through it all.

We primarily use the solution for monitoring, managing our active directory and to deploy patch management.

We primarily use the solution to monitor our servers.

We primarily use the solution for monitoring connectivity and server resource utilization among other things.

Our primary use case of this solution is for monitoring the hardware resources for the servers.

We use this solution for monitoring our local network and servers. We have on on-premises deployment.

This solution is being used by Saudi Customs, and there are different classifications of ports. We have land ports, airports, and dry ports. In total, we have almost forty-two remote sites with a semi-centralized data center. We have both on-premises and cloud-based deployments in a distributed system.

We primarily use the solution for analysis and network cables.

We use the product as a network monitoring system. We have ten people who are using the system from the admin and end-user level. The platform is used daily and we are looking at extending it to other areas of the business to do different types of monitoring. We have dashboards that we put up that we leverage off and we want to get more systems incorporated.

For enterprise clients:

• Platform monitoring
• Network device monitoring
• Fault monitoring
• Alerting
• Device configuration backups. 

We are using it for network monitoring. We monitor customer networks with it and the performance is extremely good. The distributed network has a lot of features that our customers really appreciate.

The main use of ManageEngine OpManager is for monitoring our servers and network devices.

Our primary use case for the solution is configuring logs.