No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Nishith Joshi - PeerSpot reviewer
Dev Ops Engineer at Data Elicit Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
Real User
Top 5
Apr 23, 2026
Automation has replaced manual file transfers and now secures and accelerates daily workflows
Pros and Cons
  • "The main benefits I have seen from using GoAnywhere MFT are that it removes all manual efforts through automation and reduces manual file transfer because we have scheduled our jobs."
  • "The number one thing I would like to see improved in GoAnywhere MFT is the learning curve."

What is our primary use case?

We use GoAnywhere MFT for securely transferring files between systems and automating workflows. Our company generates a daily report file, so instead of manually sending it, we use GoAnywhere to automate picking the file from a folder, encrypt it for security, and transfer it securely to another server or partner systems using protocols such as SFTP. We have scheduled it to run daily, so manual effort is not needed.

What we use and what we appreciate most about GoAnywhere MFT is its automation capability through projects. We can create a workflow that handles the entire file transfer process, picking up the file, encrypting it, and sending it securely without any manual effort. Once it is scheduled, everything runs automatically.

Workflows are integrated with our processes; whenever our boss wants to see reports, they run automatically at 5:30 or 6:00 PM, and all the data is stored in SharePoint using this workflow.

GoAnywhere MFT provides plenty of connectors for file transfer protocols such as SFTP and FTS. Additionally, it provides cloud storage connectors such as Amazon S3, which we use for storage as a database. We have also connected it with other databases such as MySQL and email services for sending or receiving files via email and SMTP. Overall, it excels at connecting with servers, making file transfer flexible.

As I mentioned earlier, we use Amazon S3 for cloud storage, where we store all the data, and we utilize daily workflows and operations from SharePoint. GoAnywhere MFT plays a crucial role in our organization every day for our meetings and cron jobs.

We have multiple automations or processes happening within our organization that run on different platforms with different servers and APIs. For instance, we have one project for daily report transfers, another for handling partner file uploads, and another project for backup. Although they are scheduled at different times, they are all event-based. Multiple automations are handled with different projects for different use cases.

What is most valuable?

The main benefits I have seen from using GoAnywhere MFT are that it removes all manual efforts through automation and reduces manual file transfer because we have scheduled our jobs. Daily reports and files are transferred automatically without human effort. The second benefit is its security, as sensitive files are transferred using secure protocols. Our organization utilizes its tracking and visibility; we can track files using logs, making it easy for us to monitor whether a job succeeds or fails.

Additionally, we appreciate the strong security features, such as support for SFTP and encryption, which makes it reliable for transferring sensitive data. The combination of automation and security is particularly valuable to us.

We definitely use GoAnywhere MFT's secure forms, which allow users or external partners to submit data or uploads through a secure web form. Using HTTPS improves our security since it is encrypted.

In our organization, GoAnywhere MFT's secure forms have improved both our security and efficiency in how we receive files from external users. Earlier, people used emails or shared drives to send files, which had risks such as data exposure or missing files. Using GoAnywhere MFT secure forms, we secure submissions through HTTP-based forms where data is encrypted during transport. This eliminates dependency on email, reduces our risk of attachment leaks or size limits, and provides better tracking since every submission is logged.

We definitely use GoAnywhere MFT's GoFast feature to accelerate data transmission.

Using GoAnywhere MFT's GoFast feature has improved our operations because it breaks files into multiple chunks and transfers them simultaneously instead of sending them in a single stream, allowing for multi-threading. This results in savings on both time and money. It significantly reduces our transfer time compared to normal SFTP, especially when transferring very large files such as backups or bulk data.

I have definitely seen a return on investment with GoAnywhere MFT, as 20 to 30% of costs have been saved by its implementation.

GoAnywhere MFT has definitely saved me time in connecting securely with third parties that we need to collaborate with.

What needs improvement?

The number one thing I would like to see improved in GoAnywhere MFT is the learning curve. It has a bit of a learning curve initially, especially in understanding how to design workflows. Additionally, I think the user interface can feel slightly complex for beginners, so they should add more documentation about the UI and how to onboard or design workflows.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using GoAnywhere MFT for a total of one year, including my time in college and my previous internship. I have been working in my current organization for the past eight months.

Buyer's Guide
GoAnywhere MFT
May 2026
Learn what your peers think about GoAnywhere MFT. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2026.
893,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I have not had any crashes, downtimes, or performance issues with GoAnywhere MFT. It is highly stable for us because it supports high availability setups such as clustering and load balancing by default, providing consistent performance and minimal downtime.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I find GoAnywhere MFT scalable.

How are customer service and support?

I would rate GoAnywhere MFT's customer service and technical support team an 8 out of 10 because when we raise a support ticket, they respond within five to six hours and resolve our problems. So far, there are no issues with the support.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I did not previously use a different MFT solution. We were completely reliant on manual efforts before switching to GoAnywhere MFT. Now we are consistent with it because it provides more performance and requires less work, significantly reducing our manual efforts.

How was the initial setup?

My experience with the deployment was straightforward.

What about the implementation team?

The deployment was done in-house. We did not use an integrator, reseller, or consultant.

What was our ROI?

Comparing per week, GoAnywhere MFT saves us 20 to 30% of manual efforts, which translates to saving 20 to 30% of our time.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Regarding pricing, it is affordable. My business team handles that aspect, so I do not know much about it, but in our meetings, we have discussed that it is quite reasonable for us, which is why we are using it.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

If a colleague at another company mentions they find GoAnywhere MFT's feature set appealing but the price high, I would say that if they are looking to automate work or perform daily operations without depending on manual effort, they should definitely switch to GoAnywhere MFT because it saves a significant amount of time and boosts employee productivity.

What other advice do I have?

We have not used GoAnywhere MFT Agents because of the cost yet, but we are planning to use that in the future. My advice to other organizations considering GoAnywhere MFT is that it is a budget-friendly tool, and if they want to shift from manual efforts, then GoAnywhere MFT is the right choice because it supports multiple automations through its concept of projects. This transition will definitely reduce workload and manual efforts, allowing teams to save time and increase productivity. I would be interested in a solution that centralizes all our processes. I would give this review a rating of 9 out of 10.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Last updated: Apr 23, 2026
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Cyber Security Analyst at TalaKunchi
Real User
Top 5
May 9, 2026
Automation has reduced manual file transfers and provides secure, auditable data exchanges
Pros and Cons
  • "GoAnywhere MFT is valued most for automation plus security plus visibility and enterprise file movement rather than just basic file transfer."
  • "Customer support for GoAnywhere MFT is generally good but a bit mixed depending on urgency."

What is our primary use case?

My main use case for GoAnywhere MFT is secure managed file transfers between internal systems and external partners. I am securely automating and managing file transfer SFTP, FTP, and API between enterprise systems and external partners, especially for scheduled data exchange and compliance workflows.

What is most valuable?

The best features of GoAnywhere MFT from a real user perspective include strong end-to-end secure file transfer SFTP, FTPS, HTTPS, AS2 with encryption and audit trails, powerful workflow automation for replacing scripts with scheduled or trigger-based jobs, and an easy centralized management dashboard to monitor all file transfers in one place. Built-in compliance and auditing reporting for tracking every transfer and user action, good integration support with databases, cloud storage like S3, Azure, and enterprise apps, reliable error handling plus retry for scheduling which reduces manual intervention, and the option for secure ad-hoc file sharing via a web portal without the need for email attachments are all appreciated. GoAnywhere MFT is valued most for automation plus security plus visibility and enterprise file movement rather than just basic file transfer.

GoAnywhere MFT has helped improve our organization mainly by reducing manual file transfer work, improving reliability of data exchanges, and giving better visibility into all file movement. It has also reduced errors from scripts or human handling and made compliance auditing much easier since everything is logged and traceable in one place.

With GoAnywhere MFT, we have seen a clear drop in manual effort. What used to take multiple daily manual transfers now runs automatically, saving a few hours per week per process. We have also had noticeably fewer transfer failures and rework since workflows are standardized and monitored, which has improved overall reliability and reduced troubleshooting time.

What needs improvement?

GoAnywhere MFT could be improved mainly in usability and modern experience; some parts of the admin console feel dated and could be more intuitive, especially for new users. Deeper built-in analytics and more modern dashboarding for transfer insights, instead of relying on external reporting tools, would make monitoring and optimization even easier.

Additional improvements for GoAnywhere MFT would include better real-time observability and alerting, such as more granular alerts and cleaner dashboards without needing much customization. A smoother cloud-native experience, especially for hybrid setups, and faster onboarding templates for common workflows would make it easier for teams to adopt and scale quickly.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using GoAnywhere MFT for one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Overall, GoAnywhere MFT is considered very stable in an enterprise environment; in day-to-day use, it typically runs reliably with minimal downtime, and once workflows are properly configured, transfers execute consistently without much manual intervention. Most issues people run into are usually related to configuration or infrastructure rather than the core platform itself. GoAnywhere MFT does need regular patching and proper setup, especially because it sits in a sensitive security layer for file transfer plus external connectivity. When managed correctly, it is generally seen as a dependable system for high-volume file movement.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability in GoAnywhere MFT is generally strong and enterprise-ready. It scales well through clustering, load balancing, and distributed job processing; as file transfer volumes grow, you can handle more load by adding resources or nodes instead of redesigning workflows. It is designed to support high concurrency and large data movements while still keeping performance stable under load. We have been able to grow transfer volumes and add new partners without major architectural changes, just scaling infrastructure and tuning job throughput when needed.

How are customer service and support?

Customer support for GoAnywhere MFT is generally good but a bit mixed depending on urgency. From our experience, the support team is knowledgeable and usually helpful in resolving issues, especially for configuration and workflow-related problems. However, for critical or time-sensitive issues, response times can sometimes be slower than expected, so instant support is not always available when you need it most.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Before adopting GoAnywhere MFT, we mainly relied on a mix of custom scripts, SFTP, cron jobs, and some basic file transfer tools. We switched because the script-based approach became hard to maintain at scale, too many failures were manual to track, there was no central visibility, and troubleshooting was time-consuming. Moving to GoAnywhere gave us centralized control, better monitoring, and much more reliable automation.

How was the initial setup?

My advice would be if you are planning to use GoAnywhere MFT, then spend time upfront designing your workflows and access controls properly. Do not rush the setup; it really pays off later because once it is configured well, it runs very reliably with minimal intervention. Also, make sure you standardize the file naming, error handling, and notifications early on because that makes scaling and troubleshooting much easier as usage grows.

What about the implementation team?

Overall, GoAnywhere MFT is a reliable enterprise MFT tool that does its core job—secure, automated file transfers—very well. It is not the most modern-looking platform, but in real operations, that matters less compared to stability, security, and auditability, where it performs strongly. Once properly set up, it becomes a set-it-and-monitor-it kind of system that reduces a lot of manual effort.

What was our ROI?

There has been a clear ROI, mainly in time savings and reduced manual effort. With GoAnywhere MFT, we replaced a lot of manual file transfers and script maintenance with automated workflows. That alone has saved several hours per week per team, especially for recurring jobs that used to require someone to monitor or trigger them manually. We have also seen fewer production issues and failures, which indirectly saves time because less effort goes into troubleshooting missing or failed transfers. In practice, it has also reduced the need for dedicated effort just to watch file jobs since alerts and retries are automated. The ROI is less about one big number and more about consistent operational time savings, reduced errors, and less manual intervention across hundreds of transfers.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

From what I have seen with GoAnywhere MFT, the pricing and licensing are generally considered mid-to-high range but reasonable for enterprise use. Setup cost is usually not very low because it is a full MFT platform, and most organizations go through a proper implementation phase. Licensing is typically module-based and subscription or perpetual, depending on the agreement. Cost increases with features, number of servers, and trading partners. Overall, you are paying for stability, security, and automation capabilities rather than a cheap file transfer tool.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Before settling on GoAnywhere MFT, we did evaluate a few other managed file transfer options, mainly Progress MOVEit, Axway Managed File Transfer, IBM Sterling Secure File Transfer, and JSCAPE MFT Server. We chose GoAnywhere MFT mainly because it balanced ease of workflow automation, strong security controls, and simpler administration compared to some of the heavier enterprise tools like IBM or Axway, which felt more complex to manage for our use case.

What other advice do I have?

In our setup, GoAnywhere MFT is deployed in a hybrid environment, mostly on-premises for core internal file transfers with some integration into cloud storage and external partners for secure data exchange.

We use a hybrid setup with Microsoft Azure alongside the on-premise instance of GoAnywhere MFT, mainly for external integrations, cloud storage endpoints, and some partner file exchanges.

GoAnywhere MFT integrates with our existing security setup by enforcing encryption for all transfers, using secure protocols such as SFTP, HTTPS, and aligning with our authentication controls such as AD/LDAP-based access. It also fits into our audit and compliance framework because every file transfer is logged, tracked, and can be reported on, which makes it easier to meet internal security policies and external compliance requirements.

It handles scalability fairly well in our setup by allowing us to scale up processing through additional resources and distributing workloads across scheduled jobs. As file transfer volume grows, we mainly just tune performance such as job concurrency and scheduling, and extend infrastructure when needed, without having to redesign workflows, which keeps scaling fairly straightforward.

GoAnywhere MFT supports compliance mainly through end-to-end encryption, detailed audit logs, and access controls. In our case, it helps with requirements such as GDPR-style data handling by ensuring every file transfer is tracked, who sent what, when, and where, and nothing moves without proper authentication. The audit trail is especially useful during reviews or compliance checks because everything is centrally logged and easy to report on.

Integrating GoAnywhere MFT with our existing enterprise systems is fairly straightforward overall, especially for standard protocols such as SFTP, FTP, and API-based transfers. Most of the effort is in configuring workflows and security mappings rather than actual connectivity. Once set up, it integrates cleanly with databases, cloud storages, and internal applications without needing heavy custom development.

User access in GoAnywhere MFT is handled through integration with our directory services such as AD, LDAP, so permissions are centrally managed instead of being maintained separately inside the tool. We control access using roles and group-based policies, which makes it easier to ensure only the right teams can view or run specific file transfer workflows, and it stays aligned with our overall security structure.

It handles errors through built-in job monitoring, detailed logs, and automated retry and recovery options. If a transfer fails, it clearly flags the job with error details, and depending on the configuration, it can automatically retry the transfer or trigger alerts so we can fix the issue quickly. This reduces manual tracking and makes recovery much faster and more controlled. I would rate this product an 8 out of 10 overall.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Last updated: May 9, 2026
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
GoAnywhere MFT
May 2026
Learn what your peers think about GoAnywhere MFT. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2026.
893,438 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Sufiyan S - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Technical Support Executive at digital track
Real User
Top 5
Apr 23, 2026
Automation has reduced manual file transfers and provides secure, centralized data workflows
Pros and Cons
  • "Overall, GoAnywhere MFT has been a reliable and value-added addition to my environment."
  • "One area where GoAnywhere MFT can improve is around ease of use and initial setup."

What is our primary use case?

I primarily use GoAnywhere MFT for secure file transfer and automation of data exchange between internal systems and external partners. On a daily basis, it helps me to schedule and manage file transfers, ensuring data is delivered reliably and on time. It also simplifies the handling of sensitive data with built-in encryption and compliance features.

A common use case is automating a daily file transfer between our internal system and an external partner. For example, I schedule a workflow that collects transaction data, encrypts it, and securely sends it to a partner via SFTP. At the same time, it can pick up the incoming files, validate them, and move them to the appropriate internal system. The whole process runs automatically without manual intervention, which saves time and ensures consistency.

GoAnywhere MFT fits seamlessly into my daily operations by acting as a central platform for all file transfer activities. It allows me to standardize workflows, reduce manual dependency, and ensure consistent data handling across teams. The automation and scheduling features help me to stay on track without constant monitoring.

What is most valuable?

The best features of GoAnywhere MFT mainly revolve around automation, security, and centralized control, which make daily operations much smoother. One of the most valuable features is its workflow automation, where I can create multi-step processes and schedule file transfers without manual effort. This saves a lot of time and reduces errors in repetitive tasks. Another key feature is its strong security, including encryption and secure protocols such as SFTP and FTPS, which ensures sensitive data is always protected during transfers.

Workflow automation has made a big difference by removing a lot of manual work from my daily tasks. For example, earlier I had to manually pick up the files, rename them, and send them to the partner. Now, the entire process is automated. Files are collected, processed, and transferred on a schedule without any intervention. This saves a lot of time and reduces the chance of human error. On the security side, features such as encryption and secure protocols have helped me confidently handle sensitive data. I no longer worry about data exposure during transit. Built-in audit logs also give me clear visibility into every transfer.

A feature worth mentioning is the centralized dashboard and monitoring, which makes it easy to track all file transfer activities in one place. I can quickly check job status, identify any issues, and take action without digging into multiple systems.

What needs improvement?

One area where GoAnywhere MFT can improve is around ease of use and initial setup. While it is powerful, the configuration and workflow setup can feel a bit complex for new users and usually requires some learning time. Another improvement could be the user interface, which can sometimes feel a bit outdated or less intuitive compared to modern tools. Overall, the tool is functionally very strong, but improving usability, integration, and the setup experience would make it more efficient and accessible for teams.

GoAnywhere MFT already covers most of my needs very well, but a few enhancements could make it even better. For example, having more out-of-the-box templates and common workflows would help me speed up the implementation. This kind of improvement would further simplify usage and make an already strong platform more efficient for teams.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with GoAnywhere MFT for five plus years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

GoAnywhere MFT is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

GoAnywhere MFT handles scalability really well, especially for growing environments and high workloads. It also supports high availability, meaning if one node goes down, others continue processing without disruption. Overall, it scales smoothly as business needs grow, whether onboarding new partners, increasing data volume, or handling peak loads, without requiring major changes to the existing setup.

How are customer service and support?

Customer support is very good, and the engineers give a very positive response. Cases are resolved as soon as possible after they are raised. There is nothing negative with the customer support.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Earlier I was using a mix of basic scripts and manual file methods for handling data exchange. While it worked, it required a lot of monitoring and was prone to errors and delays. I switched to GoAnywhere MFT mainly to bring everything onto a centralized platform with better automation, security, and visibility. Its scheduled workflows and securely managed transfers made a big difference compared to my previous approach.

What was our ROI?

I have definitely seen a clear return on investment after implementing GoAnywhere MFT. For example, a lot of manual file transfers have been successfully automated, which has saved several hours of work every week for the team. In similar real-world cases, organizations have reported saving hundreds of hours per month by automating workflows and reducing manual intervention. Overall, the biggest measurable gains for me have been time saved, reduced errors, and better resource utilization, all contributing to a strong ROI.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

My experience with pricing and licensing has been quite positive overall. GoAnywhere MFT allows a flexible, modular licensing model, so I can only pay for the features and components I actually needed, which helped to control costs. In terms of value, I have seen a good return on investment because it reduces manual work and operational overhead. Overall, the pricing feels justified for the reliability, security, and efficiency it brings to daily operations.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Before finalizing GoAnywhere MFT, I did evaluate a few other managed transfer solutions to compare the overall features. For example, Progress MOVEit, JSCAPE MFT Server, and Cylu Integration, which are commonly used alternatives in the same space. After comparing these, I chose GoAnywhere MFT because it provides a good balance of automation, ease of use, and centralized management along with strong security features. It fit well in my existing environment and required less complexity to implement compared to some other options.

What other advice do I have?

My advice would be to start by very clearly understanding your file transfer workflow and requirements before implementation. This will help you design efficient automation from the beginning and get the most value out of the platform.

Overall, GoAnywhere MFT has been a reliable and value-added addition to my environment. It has helped me bring structure and consistency to the file transfer process while reducing the manual effort across the team. In general, it is a well-rounded solution that continues to support growing needs and improves efficiency in day-to-day operations.

I use a hybrid setup, combining on-premise infrastructure with cloud integration. I primarily use Amazon Web Services (AWS) as a part of my hybrid setup.

I have rated this product a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Last updated: Apr 23, 2026
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
reviewer2773707 - PeerSpot reviewer
Cloud Engineer - ll at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
Real User
Top 5
Oct 30, 2025
Has enabled secure file transfers for daily SOC analysis and supports cloud connectivity
Pros and Cons
  • "We are the core users in our organization that use this application to transfer files between organizations in a secure manner, protecting data at rest and data in transit."
  • "We had a few activities or events in the past where threat actors or hackers targeted MFT solutions or systems or software by exploiting zero-day vulnerabilities."

What is our primary use case?

I work as a SOC analyst in my organization, and we usually use GoAnywhere MFT to transfer files from one premises or cloud environment to our systems for analysis. We install the GoAnywhere agent on the cloud environment to transfer files from that system to our local machine for analysis.

In our case, we usually obtain user logs or system logs for analysis or to review the system logs for any compromises at the endpoint. The data is not much in the GB range; we can say it probably stays in the MB range. We do not use the GoFast feature, but there are a few cases in the past where my team used that feature, though I do not have details about it now.

For the deployment process of GoAnywhere MFT, we have a specific team dedicated to deploying this software and all the agents that we require. We are the core users in our organization that use this application to transfer files between organizations in a secure manner, protecting data at rest and data in transit. We use the encryption protocol provided by the software to secure our data and use GoAnywhere MFT to conduct our SFTP work.

Approximately, my team has 37 members total, including three teams: the main SOC team, the FR (first response team), and the cloud security supporting team. We are 12 members in the CSS team, and I am sure that 12 members use GoAnywhere MFT. The FR team also uses it, with approximately 15 to 16 members in that team. The total is around 28 to 30 members that use this. I do not know about the upper management and what they use, but if they purchased GoAnywhere MFT, they probably use it as well.

What is most valuable?

GoAnywhere MFT provides us with significant security features. We used previous software, possibly FileZilla, but we did not get any AES in-transit encryption in that software. With GoAnywhere MFT, we are getting in-transit encryption with the AES standard protocol or algorithm.

We use a hybrid model for GoAnywhere MFT deployment.

What needs improvement?

The UI in GoAnywhere MFT does not require improvements, but the backend side where file transfers occur should have one system used to transfer files from end-to-end, from end server to end system. We had a few activities or events in the past where threat actors or hackers targeted MFT solutions or systems or software by exploiting zero-day vulnerabilities. I would say that part should not occur with GoAnywhere MFT in the future. From 2023, I do not think there was any occurrence until now, but in the future, there should not be any because we transfer valuable data from our end-user system to our systems for analysis and all the reports that we generate. There should not be any vulnerability so that a threat actor will not gain access to our data or other things.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using GoAnywhere MFT for approximately eight to nine months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

For the stability of GoAnywhere MFT during file transfer, I faced a fail event. I am not sure if it is about a downtime or if it is a bug that the software has, or perhaps it is a connectivity issue at the end user. I rate this for stability at 9 out of 10 because there should be a scope for improvement.

I can say 9.5, or 9 to 9.5 out of 10 for the stability of GoAnywhere MFT.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

From the scalability perspective of GoAnywhere MFT, I did not transfer or use much data on the software because we transfer less than 1 GB of data within the systems or the cloud environment that we have. I can say during this range, it is the best experience. We had the best experience with the software and did not face any specific issue with it.

For scalability of GoAnywhere MFT, I am not sure about the perspective of highly transferring 100 to 200 GB of data. However, I can say with a 1 GB or 2 GB data transfer perspective, it is 9.3 out of 10.

How are customer service and support?

I did not get a chance to connect with technical support for GoAnywhere MFT because I have not had any incident that required engaging support. We use the software seamlessly to fulfill our goals and have all the resources and technology we want. I did not connect with technical support, but my senior probably did in the past, and I do not have details about that experience. On the UI perspective and software perspective, I give GoAnywhere MFT 9.5 out of 10. On technical support, it is probably the best one. We did not face any issue as far as I know.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We previously used IBM software and FileZilla for file transfer. Compared to those options, the user interaction and UI that GoAnywhere MFT provides is much better. I am not very familiar with the previous software, but the latest one that we have, GoAnywhere MFT, is the easiest and best MFT solution that we have right now. I think it is easy to use.

How was the initial setup?

I did not use any connector to integrate the software with our environment. We do use GoAnywhere MFT software logs loaded in our SIEM tool, Splunk. We have to examine the errors and where the transfer failed and what the issue was.

What about the implementation team?

For the deployment process of GoAnywhere MFT, we have a specific team dedicated to deploying this software and all the agents that we require.

What was our ROI?

GoAnywhere MFT is likely for the updates only when it comes to maintenance.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I do not have any information about the pricing for GoAnywhere MFT, such as which package my organization received or which subscription they obtained. However, it is good software to use. I do not have details about the pricing. It is managed by the management team in the SOC.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I did not get a chance to explore all the solutions available in GoAnywhere MFT. Based on how much I have used this software in my field or in my day-to-day work, I would rate it at 9.5 out of 10.

What other advice do I have?

We do not use the secure forms in GoAnywhere MFT. I can recommend GoAnywhere MFT to other users. Previously we used an SFTP solution because it is specifically built for SFTP file transfer. Now with this software, it provides connectivity with the cloud, automation, and scripting capabilities. We can say it is the best solution for cloud security and the SOC analysts that we usually work with.

From the improvement perspective, I can say that for the configuration and automation part, my end team was using GoAnywhere MFT for all the vulnerability management and patches. From our team perspective, we use this for file transfer. It was a good experience with this software because it has multiple use cases. My team is using this software, probably because someone recommended it or they found this software through a recommendation from senior members. It is a good solution. We have a base of the software that is required for security, including Splunk and CrowdStrike. I can say it is the best one in the market.

On my side, we use the SOPs that were made by our own team. We did not go to the main actual product website that they have as the documented website because we have a specific use case and we know how to use GoAnywhere MFT, and all the knowledge transfer is conducted from team member to team member. The documentation is clear, similar to the AWS documentation that I use. I can say it is clear and easy to understand. My overall rating for this product is 9 out of 10.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Last updated: Oct 30, 2025
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Associate Engineer Emerging Technology at Progression Infonet Pvt Ltd
Real User
Top 5
Mar 18, 2026
Automation has simplified secure file transfers and supports nontechnical users effectively
Pros and Cons
  • "When I compare GoAnywhere MFT with those other products, I would say that GoAnywhere MFT is a very simple and very reliable product for my customers who are already using it."
  • "For support on small tasks, small issues, or simple queries, Fortra responds within one or two days; however, for this type of issue, they might take approximately one or two weeks, and sometimes they do not even provide us with a reply."

What is our primary use case?

I have spent mostly one year of experience with GoAnywhere MFT, primarily in automation. Automation is what I appreciate most because we have approximately 20 to 30 customers who rely on automation since they prefer not to perform manual work. The automation capabilities in GoAnywhere MFT have made a significant difference for our customers.

After joining my organization, I spent nearly six months in training where I examined GoAnywhere MFT cases and issues. I did not solve them initially; instead, I observed my teammates and learned what they were doing and how they were fixing issues. After completing my training in GoAnywhere MFT, my main focus became GoAnywhere MFT exclusively. Following my training completion, I was promoted to associate engineer in emerging technology. I have now completed approximately one year of experience with GoAnywhere MFT.

In my organization, we have two or three products that work primarily with managed file transfer protocol, similar to GoAnywhere MFT. When I compare GoAnywhere MFT with those other products, I would say that GoAnywhere MFT is a very simple and very reliable product for my customers who are already using it. Since my customers are not technical, they want a very simple and convenient interface for use. There are other products in the market that we also use, but I would rate GoAnywhere MFT as an eight out of ten when compared to others.

We primarily use HTTPS and SFTP protocols. We mainly use SFTP because our customers use HTTPS, SFTP, and FTPS. They are using those three protocols and my workflows and work are conducted within these protocols only.

What is most valuable?

I have spent mostly one year of experience with GoAnywhere MFT, primarily in automation. Automation is what I appreciate most because we have approximately 20 to 30 customers who rely on automation since they prefer not to perform manual work. The automation capabilities in GoAnywhere MFT have made a significant difference for our customers.

In my organization, we have two or three products that work primarily with managed file transfer protocol, similar to GoAnywhere MFT. When I compare GoAnywhere MFT with those other products, I would say that GoAnywhere MFT is a very simple and very reliable product for my customers who are already using it. Since my customers are not technical, they want a very simple and convenient interface for use. There are other products in the market that we also use, but I would rate GoAnywhere MFT as an eight out of ten when compared to others.

During this one year of experience, I gained exposure to more products, including Secure Form, which behaves as a secure form in GoAnywhere MFT. Those products are also similar, but because of GoAnywhere MFT's secure form, I can say in simple terms that they are very simple and very easy to understand. Any of our customers can easily understand how to use it and how to securely form any type of information they want for their users. I can confidently say that Secure Form is also a very good feature of GoAnywhere MFT that our users are utilizing.

What needs improvement?

Recently, two or three customers, including some very valuable customers, faced a scheduler failed issue. In the past one week, they experienced issues where their schedulers failed in the evening in GoAnywhere MFT. After raising a case, approximately two weeks passed, but we did not receive a response to our email. Their response time for these types of cases is somewhat low.

Previously, GoAnywhere MFT was sold as a subscription-based product permanently. However, they recently made changes to GoAnywhere MFT to perpetual plans. We have 30 to 50 customers, and they must take a plan for a perpetual arrangement on a yearly basis. They must take a subscription for GoAnywhere MFT to use it. Previously, customers only had to make a one-time payment to use GoAnywhere MFT.

I preferred the previous deal when GoAnywhere MFT was sold as a one-time payment with permanent subscription-based access. They changed to perpetual plans, and this type of change is not appreciated by our customers. I notice this because I work in the technical department, primarily handling technical issues and tackling implementation, scheduling, automation, bug fixes, logs, and maintenance.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with GoAnywhere MFT for approximately one year.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Determining scalability requirements is difficult. In the initial phase, we must confirm what the customer needs. First, we must understand what the customer wants, including how many users they want to securely transfer files to. After understanding those requirements, we must think about how many MFT instances we require and how many Gateways we need to configure because load balancing is also required, as too many users can cause issues.

I can provide an example from approximately two or three days ago when one customer faced an issue. They have two MFTs and two Gateways. With two MFTs and two Gateways, they have 500 users and 5,000 automations and schedulers. What they experienced was that approximately in the evening from 3:00 to 4:00 PM, one cluster automatically restarted because of maintenance or a patch activity on the AWS machine. After that activity, their cluster one stopped, and the second one remained working. However, GoAnywhere MFT started behaving anomalously in a very strange way. Their scheduler got stuck, and they had to manually run the schedulers. Automations of schedulers were not working, and they faced this type of issue two or three days ago. I am currently working on that issue.

We fixed this issue by restarting those MFTs in parallel, after which it resolved. This was necessary because the customer is paying for the service.

How are customer service and support?

Our organization is a partner of Fortra, which is the GoAnywhere MFT product company. We are a partner of that company and we serve mostly Indian users. When customers raise any issue, case, or problem they are facing, they first contact us. After that, we raise the case to Fortra. There is a cycle we must follow for any resolution of issues they are experiencing, any feature requests, or any bugs they encounter. Because of that process, two or three days have already passed, but Fortra did not reply to us regarding why this happened and how we should remediate this in the future.

For support on small tasks, small issues, or simple queries, Fortra responds within one or two days. However, for this type of issue, they might take approximately one or two weeks. Sometimes they do not even provide us with a reply. We have to remind them about the case two or three times, and it might take three weeks.

I also have another example related to a support case issue. One of our other customers, HCL, a very large organization, faced some CVE vulnerabilities in their system. They received two vulnerabilities from their security team, and we had to check with Fortra regarding when they got fixed or whether this CVE was a type of issue they were addressing. We raised a case with Fortra, and they took approximately two months to provide a proper report for that CVE. For this type of response, our customer became very disappointed because they are paying substantial money to us and Fortra. I believe that for this type of case, Fortra should reply to us and resolve this type of case as soon as possible.

Out of 10 for support cases of this type, I would rate it as five. By comparing with others, I can say five or maybe 5.5, not more than that.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

What other advice do I have?

GoAnywhere MFT is the primary product we use. We do not use GoFast. We only use GoAnywhere MFT and GoAnywhere Gateway. Most of our customers only use those two products. My overall review rating for GoAnywhere MFT is eight out of ten.

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
Last updated: Mar 18, 2026
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Dasari Vikramaditya - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Developer at Wipro Limited
Real User
Top 20
Jun 21, 2025
Improved data transfer efficiency with some logging and reconnection improvements needed
Pros and Cons
  • "This solution has improved my organization significantly."
  • "In terms of scalability, I would rate it around five, as it needs further scaling. The interface built should be more stable, as performance varies across different browsers and deployed versions."

What is our primary use case?

Our use case involves using it for data transfer and the files that we are moving in and out for the external vendors that we have for the US-based clients such as Vanguard, IVR, and other things that we have.

We use the GoAnywhere MFT agent, which helps extend MFT automation to remote systems. External vendors that have automation on their side can keep their files in the agents we install, making transfers simple and hassle-free.

We used Secure Forms for one project, specifically for UPS file transfers where we created forms and had the integration done for the external vendor for SFTP.

What is most valuable?

The best features of GoAnywhere MFT include the data transfer they provided for the Cloud Connectors regarding the SharePoint connector, where previously it would be a single file transfer, but now it includes multi-file transfers in a single operation. With the integration that they developed with the Cloud Connector configuration version introduced in May this year, I was satisfied with the integrations we developed, and that was a good feature I could see.

Aside from the connectors and integration, we had the agents installed for external vendors, which allows for long-range data transfers and the accommodation of large files for single transfer. This setup is hassle-free and ensures data safety. It also includes some security features such as encryption and decryption, improving security features in this tool.

This solution has improved my organization significantly. Previously, the integration we had was with SOAP-based connectors and other integration tools that were hard to develop in a couple of months. With the introduction of the tool, the vendors that came in were satisfied with the solutions provided, and file transfers were easy, creating a robust solution. Any simple changes from their side take less time and cost, making it a genuine tool for our clients in our US company.

Using Secure Forms has positively affected our operations. Previously, we had single SFTP transfers, but introducing Secure Forms allowed us to handle many files in a single operation. When end users fill out and submit requests via web clients, it creates a hassle-free and easy way for us to work.

What needs improvement?

Regarding areas for improvement, the logging part needs enhancement. Currently, the logging we have includes custom backend Java default coding for error codes. Improving this to provide more precise insights on how connections close would significantly enhance error management in GoAnywhere MFT.

Aside from logging, the timeouts we experience on SSH connectors could be improved. During long-range file transfers, such as 1000 files, the connections tend to break. Providing precise reconnection attempts in the connector would help projects work more efficiently.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution in my company for almost 3 1/2 years, utilizing it for MFT, file transfers, and other integrations that we are dealing with.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

The deployment process was minimal work from the DevOps side. If we establish different environments for our working area on this platform, it is manageable. Having a single platform for all environments would complicate things.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I would rate the stability of the solution at around six.

The minimal bugs we've experienced are manageable, but there have been downtimes we dealt with, especially at the beginning of deployment. Now that downtime has significantly reduced.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

In terms of scalability, I would rate it around five, as it needs further scaling. The interface built should be more stable, as performance varies across different browsers and deployed versions.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

When comparing GoAnywhere MFT with other file management software, I have worked with integration tools such as Mulesoft, Logic Apps, and Thru. Thru is a big competitor of GoAnywhere MFT, but I find it easier to get templates developed with GoAnywhere MFT, and the installation and support from the backend are better compared to other tools. GoAnywhere MFT is a single combined platform for everything.

How was the initial setup?

The solution took more or less 4 months to deploy because we already had inbuilt templates, making subsequent deployment much easier.

Currently, we have around 50,000 web users onboarded. The production users benefit from hassle-free access and security measures such as a 90-day password change or single SSH key usage.

What was our ROI?

The return on investment seen since using GoAnywhere MFT is significant. After onboarding, the number of vendors increased considerably compared to the previous setup, reflecting the brilliant turnaround we've achieved.

Percentage-wise, the ROI is around 15%.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

In terms of pricing, I find it fairly priced.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I can recommend GoAnywhere MFT to more users, as this tool proves precise compared to other integrations we've seen. However, there are other tools such as Thru, which do offer more robustness. Nevertheless, in terms of stability, GoAnywhere MFT is a solid option.

What other advice do I have?

We have done the Cloud Connectors integration, and I worked with the HTTP online tool connector as well. However, I didn't get the chance to work on Salesforce and Dynamics, but I would be interested in exploring those, as they are also good options.

Apart from GoFast, we used the inbuilt connectors only, so I didn't get a chance to work on GoFast.

GoAnywhere MFT saves me time when connecting securely with third parties needed for collaboration. For larger projects, typically around six months, it reduces that time to about three months. Smaller integrations can be completed in more than enough time, often in about 15 days.

Maintenance is good in terms of patching, as GoAnywhere MFT releases patches for each connector and respective gateways they provide. Patching occurs phase-wise, roughly every 3 to 6 months, with a yearly review for thorough maintenance.

I would be interested in being a reference for the vendor. The vendor can contact me if they have any questions or comments about my review.

I rate GoAnywhere MFT an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Network Security Engineer at a outsourcing company with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
Top 5
Apr 26, 2026
Automation has transformed secure report transfers and now saves hours of manual work daily
Pros and Cons
  • "After implementing GoAnywhere MFT, we saw clear improvements in efficiency and reliability, with time saved around a 60 to 70 percent reduction in manual file transfer."
  • "While GoAnywhere MFT is very reliable, there are a few areas where it could be improved."

What is our primary use case?

My main use case for GoAnywhere MFT is secure and automated file transfer, such as sending reports, backups, or business data between servers or third parties.

A recent example of how I use GoAnywhere MFT for secure and automated file transfer is that daily reports are automatically transferred from our internal server to an external partner using secure protocols like SFTP without manual intervention.

There are no other types of files or partners involved in my current implementation.

What is most valuable?

The best features GoAnywhere MFT offers are strong security that includes encryption and secure protocols, automation of file transfers, scheduling jobs and workflows, and centralized management of file transfers.

The automation and centralized management features in GoAnywhere MFT make my daily work much easier by reducing manual effort and giving full control from one place. For a real example, earlier we had to manually transfer files such as reports or backups, but now we have automated these tasks. Files are transferred automatically at scheduled times without any manual intervention.

GoAnywhere MFT has made a positive impact in my organization mainly by improving efficiency and security in file transfer. We have reduced manual work significantly since most file transfers are now automated. Errors have decreased because there is less human involvement, and file transfers are more secure now with encryption and proper protocols. After implementing GoAnywhere MFT, we saw clear improvements in efficiency and reliability. The time saved is around a 60 to 70 percent reduction in manual file transfer.

What needs improvement?

While GoAnywhere MFT is very reliable, there are a few areas where it could be improved. The user interface could be more intuitive, especially for new users. The initial setup and configuration can be somewhat complex, and more customization options in reporting would be helpful. Additionally, better integration with modern DevOps tools and APIs would improve automation further. Making the UI more intuitive and beginner-friendly would reduce the learning curve, and performance tuning in high-volume environments would improve efficiency. More customizable real-time alerts and notifications would also make monitoring easier.

The user interface of GoAnywhere MFT is quite clean and easy to navigate once you have used it, though there is a bit of a learning curve initially.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using GoAnywhere MFT for around six months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

GoAnywhere MFT is generally stable, though there are some caveats.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

GoAnywhere MFT is highly scalable and designed for enterprise environments. It can easily handle growing file transfer volumes, multiple systems, and large workloads without major issues.

How are customer service and support?

Customer support for GoAnywhere MFT is generally good and reliable. The support team is knowledgeable and understands the product very well. They are responsive and helpful in resolving issues.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Before GoAnywhere MFT, we were mainly using manual file transfers and some basic tools such as FTP or SFTP clients. Manual transfers were time-consuming and required constant monitoring. There was a higher chance of errors or missed transfers, and security and compliance were limited with basic tools. We switched to GoAnywhere MFT for automation, better security, and centralized management of file transfers.

What was our ROI?

We have definitely seen a return on investment after using GoAnywhere MFT, mainly through time savings and improved efficiency. There is around a 60 to 70 percent reduction in manual file transfer tasks due to automation, and errors have been reduced by about 50 percent or more. For example, daily file transfers that earlier required manual effort are now fully automated, saving several hours of work each day.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

My experience with pricing and licensing for GoAnywhere MFT is that it is moderately priced and more suited for mid to large organizations. It is not the cheapest solution, but it offers good value considering the features such as automation and security.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Before selecting GoAnywhere MFT, we evaluated a few other managed file transfer solutions, including IBM Sterling Secure File Transfer, Axway Managed File Transfer, and Progress MOVEit.

What other advice do I have?

GoAnywhere MFT is generally stable, though there are some caveats.

My advice for anyone considering GoAnywhere MFT is to first clearly understand your file transfer requirements, such as volume, sensitivity of data, and level of automation needed. Plan your workflows properly before implementation and focus on automation from the start.

My experience with GoAnywhere MFT has been very positive. It is a reliable and secure solution for managing file transfers and automation. While there is some learning curve and room for improvement in UI and setup, the core features, especially automation, security, and centralized management, are very strong. Apart from the things that I have mentioned, there are no other improvements needed for GoAnywhere MFT. I would rate this product an 8 out of 10.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Last updated: Apr 26, 2026
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
reviewer2761626 - PeerSpot reviewer
FI Technical Lead at a university with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 20
Oct 4, 2025
Supports complex file transfers between banks, vendors, and internal systems with reliable performance
Pros and Cons
  • "It has all the things needed to build robust projects, giving you different resources, SFTP, and all the different things you might need to manipulate files."
  • "The feature I find most valuable about GoAnywhere MFT is that it's intuitive—it has all the things needed to build robust projects, giving you different resources, SFTP, and all the different things you might need to manipulate files."
  • "One area for improvement in GoAnywhere MFT is that they don't have a real debugger. You have to manually walk through your projects. If you build a big scripting project, you have no way at the beginning to step through; you can't skip straight to a line, nor can you put a breakpoint and say, 'stop here' as in any normal debugging process."
  • "One area for improvement in GoAnywhere MFT is that they don't have a real debugger. You have to manually walk through your projects."

What is our primary use case?

My use cases for GoAnywhere MFT involve interfacing with both banks and outside vendors since it's the university. We do a lot of interfaces, and many of them come through for the banks using our GoAnywhere MFT product, and we process into our SAP system. 

It's not just banks; we also do outside vendors and outside providers. We handle both ways—into our SAP system through GoAnywhere MFT and out to outside vendors, banks, and hospitals. You name it, we do it.

What is most valuable?

The feature I find most valuable about GoAnywhere MFT is that it's intuitive. 

It has all the things needed to build robust projects, giving you different resources, SFTP, and all the different things you might need to manipulate files. It's somewhat tricky as it's intuitive, however. You have to learn the scripting language. That said, they provide fairly good help.  

We were fortunate enough when we first purchased the product to have them assist us with demos and teaching as a group. They offer online help to look things up. 

For us, it satisfies our needs. We are getting into some more complex matters that I am concerned about, as there are a couple of features I wish they had. Until now, we've been able to accomplish everything we wanted. 

What needs improvement?

We keep asking them to implement a feature for our upcoming project, which would benefit all other companies using the product.

One area for improvement in GoAnywhere MFT is that they don't have a real debugger. You have to manually walk through your projects. If you build a big scripting project, you have no way at the beginning to step through; you can't skip straight to a line, nor can you put a breakpoint and say, 'stop here' as in any normal debugging process. That makes handling complex projects very tedious. We are currently working to streamline a process for about 240 providers—our interface partners—and it's going to be very difficult because every time you run a project, you need to step through each line of code. If you're testing line 98 and are unsure what's going on, you must step through every single line each time you run it. That is its biggest downfall.

What I would love to see in GoAnywhere MFT is the ability to compartmentalize some of the code, allowing you to call different pieces. Instead of building one project all within itself, you could insert modules that you can use in multiple projects. Currently, it's not compartmentalized, and you can't take a piece of code to use elsewhere without copying the entire thing. In my humble opinion, it would be much better if they had a class-based or class-oriented system so that you could easily transfer code from one location to another or use it in other places. You want modularity within the project, but that's not available right now, and this significantly slows down our development operations.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using GoAnywhere MFT for about four years, since we first installed it.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I have never seen any lagging, crashing, or downtime when using GoAnywhere MFT, and that's one of the best things I can say about it.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

From my perspective, working at the university, I find GoAnywhere MFT to be quite scalable. 

We also have a hospital group that works with it, which operates differently, however, they appear to manage tasks well. Yet, it would be even more scalable and useful if they improved the ability to plug in components, allowing you to easily call pieces of code from a project and eliminate the need for repetition. 

To go off the charts and be a leader, they really need a debugger and should focus on enabling the breakdown of modules for integration with other projects. A project isn't just one thing; it should allow for calling additional resources. This would greatly enhance scalability.

How are customer service and support?

If I had to rate the support, I would rate it as an eight on a scale from one to ten. I haven't dealt with them directly. That said, overall, they seem to perform at about an eight level.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

The initial deployment of GoAnywhere MFT was pretty easy for us. Once everything was set up properly, it was not very hard. Out of all the projects I have been involved with over 26 years at the university, that one actually went more smoothly than most. We had a good team working to get everything handled, so I would say it wasn't difficult at all. It took us around a month to set it up.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I have looked into alternatives to GoAnywhere MFT, and I remember examining a couple of options about four or five years ago when we made our decision. There was another one we compared it to. I cannot recall the name. We looked at MOVEit as the other option we evaluated.

What other advice do I have?

We do not use those connectors right now in GoAnywhere MFT. Our processes are very specific to our interface workflows. 

Currently, we're not using it for workflow-type applications, although it might be something we can explore down the line. 

We do not use the Agents or Secure Forms. Regarding data acceleration, we don't use GoFast either. 

We're using it for very specific tasks, and if they explained options for utilizing it for other purposes, I would be open to exploring it. 

I would indeed like to see better advanced documentation in GoAnywhere MFT. 

I would rate GoAnywhere MFT overall as an eight out of ten. It's a great product and could easily reach a ten if it improved certain features.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Last updated: Oct 4, 2025
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free GoAnywhere MFT Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: May 2026
Product Categories
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Buyer's Guide
Download our free GoAnywhere MFT Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.