Fortinet FortiAuthenticator Reviews

The solution allows connectivity when switching between LAN and Wi-Fi primarily, and it also uses it for free tokens. So we can share tokens across multiple firewalls.

RADIUS server and integration, apart from the fact that it is a type of tool that can become a certificate server, are the valuable features for which I use it.

I'd like to see the interface become more like other FortiGate products. It seems a little bit of an orphaned one. The user interface and clustering are areas with shortcomings that need improvement.

Scalability has room for improvement since it's not really a cluster. It'd be nice with cluster data. There are things where you have to go to each FortiGate to change. So, there needs to be a cluster.

I have been using Fortinet FortiAuthenticator for five years.

The current version is stable. So, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator 6.3.3 is running.

Scalability-wise, it is a fine solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Around 20 customers are using the solution.

Regarding the support team, I would say that we have faced occasional setup issues for which the support was appropriate.

The initial setup is complicated. However, considering the complicated tasks it does, it is fine.

In general, you just spend about three days designing and implementing the solution.

The deployment is done in the customer's environment and as per what they require. So, configure the LDAP integration and SAML integration with the existing sources. Then I started to create the SAML services and RADIUS services for firewalls. I then copy to add the tokens before authenticating the users. Then, they can pull it down from the OTAP service.

The customers need to pay for licenses, and some pay on a yearly basis while others pay on a three-yearly or five-yearly basis. Also, it is not an expensive solution.

I would definitely recommend the solution to those planning to use it. However, I would suggest those planning to use it figure out what they want because you also have a FortiGate product, Fortinet product, and FortiAuthenticator, which can be a bit confusing. There are other products that FortiGate sells. So you have to figure out which solution you want.

I rate the overall solution a nine out of ten.

We use the product network device authentication for Linux and Windows server integrations.

The product is good, cost-effective, and functionally efficient. It has a valuable capability to work as a virtual machine and integrate with Active Directory.

They could expand FortiAuthenticator's capabilities to accommodate a broader range of environments. It needs a user-friendly interface and intuitive console for those needing in-house solutions. Additionally, there should be a mobile-centric approach for remote control capabilities while proceeding.

We have been using Fortinet FortiAuthenticator for more than ten years.

The product is stable in our production environment.

We have 5000 Fortinet FortiAuthenticator users in our organization.

They could improve the response time for severe cases. At present, they reply within a day or two. However, they do provide good solutions.

Positive

We have used Cisco's firewall products before. In comparison, Fortinet is more user-friendly and easy to configure.

We require two administration executives to manage the product.

We provide implementation and maintenance support for all our customers.

The product has affordable pricing compared to other vendors. They offer valuable features considering the cost.

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is a very popular and robust product in the market. They provide integration with third-party applications.

I rate it an eight out of ten.

In my recent job, I worked in tandem with Fortinet to enable 802.1X authentication for the Wi-Fi environment.

The web feature is quite versatile. It serves as the sole server authenticator and is valuable not only with FortiGate products but also within the entire Forti system, making it highly useful for me. However, from my experience, I find the visual data to be less practical. While some features might be more respected than others, it's valuable that, for instance, when a customer has a new lead cluster, I can authenticate or leverage alternative solutions to achieve the desired outcome.

The only issue I encounter is that when not using FortiAuthenticator for an extended period, it's typical to encounter some obstacles in the configuration process that you need to address. It's not a consistent problem, and I can't recall all the specifics. This issue is something I face with the entire product. While it's normal for products to require ongoing attention, this can be a challenge when checking the system.

I have experience with Fortinet FortiAuthenticator.

I recollect instances when customers didn't approach me about their issues, instead opting to submit tickets. From a personal perspective, customer mobility played a role, and sometimes I wasn't fully aware of the problem until later. However, I can't recall many details about these cases.

It's scalable. If the need arises, you can easily set up a cluster with two or more units. Additionally, if you require more licenses or features, you can expand.

It works well for me. I can review the initial check, explain it thoroughly, outline the subsequent steps, and attempt to address the problem. This often involves quickly escalating to technical levels two or three. In situations where I open a general ticket, it's standard to begin with a level one tech who collects information to understand and resolve the issue. The more detailed and accurate the data is, the easier it becomes to find a resolution.

Positive

It is deployed on-premises. One or two days for initial deployment is insufficient. It typically takes a few more days to set up the specific configurations. The standard device configuration is exceptionally fast.

Based on my experience it's been very good. I don't have much knowledge, for instance, about how it compares to Gartner's system and its current position in the market, or whether there are other systems that might have a better position. I've noticed that Fortinet lacks certain features that other solutions have implemented. This leads me to explore and understand other solutions, looking for differences. I've observed that some solutions offer features that Fortinet may excel in, while others may have strengths in different areas. I would rate it an eight out of ten overall. 

We use Fortinet FortiAuthenticator to maintain security, and access, and monitor authentication and authorization processes. It enables the proper functioning of the CA server. We can use various authentication methods, including EFTOS parameters like PKI (Public Key Infrastructure) for the CA server.

The product’s most valuable feature is integration with FortiGate, FortiToken, FortiTalk, and multi-factor authentication. It is inexpensive compared to Cisco and Clear Pass.

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator provides only authentication. It should also enable authorization services. There could be a central management point for both the services similar to Cisco and Clear Pass.

We have been using Fortinet FortiAuthenticator for around a year.

It is a stable product. I rate the stability a ten out of ten.

It is a scalable product. It is suitable for medium and enterprise businesses. Its scalability is a seven or eight out of ten.

Fortinet provides good support services.

Positive

Compared to Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, Cisco is a complicated tool to use. It is difficult to configure as it has many features. It is scalable but needs to be a more stable product.

The initial setup is very easy. It takes an hour to complete.

The product is inexpensive compared to Cisco. I rate its pricing a three to five out of ten.

I recommend Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and rate it an eight out of ten.

My environment is multi-cloud. I have a production workload in Nigeria. I have some data centers in Continental Europe and in the East US in multiple regions. We operate both on-premises and on two different public clouds: AWS and Azure. At the time, because of how Fortinet worked, we connected to our customers via remote access VPN.

Because of the nature of Amazon Infiniti, it had a very big impact in Africa and on how we implemented our SA as the most effective authentication service for our VPN. 

Originally, when people tried to connect, they had to put in their original credentials and send a request back. The issue here started before software tools were being used, and hardware tools had to be used for privacy. We had to have five firewalls and five different token devices. It was very clumsy and not efficient.

We decided to go with FortiAuthenticator because it provides us with a single point of authentication, instead of having an authenticator on each one of the firewalls. Only five to twelve hours are connected on the back and then Citrix will send us an email or a text message. We can then easily and seamlessly use the solution.  

The first valuable feature is being able to see everything on one platform. This includes logs and authentication failure.

The second valuable feature is that the delivery and delivery methodology is toll-free. This includes email configuration, using the mobile app, and text message delivery. There is no need to buy any extra hardware, it is free.

The third valuable feature is that the chip that is applied is free.

We save a lot of money on consolidating tool teams. We have multiple different tool teams. This solution provides us with a single point of authentication for all of the files in all of the teams' environments.

The user interface can be improved.

The technical support team is bad. 

Neutral

The cloud deployment felt limited, but there was valuable information on the Internet. A lot of testing needs to be done, and the deployment is easier for those who understand how to do it on the cloud. We needed support here and the support team could not figure out the issue. Eventually, one of the support team members helped, but there was still an information gap.

It is usually cheap. Without a license, you can use some basic features. You can buy a 20-year license and implement the solution once.

I rate the overall solution a nine out of ten, due to support issues.

I am using Fortinet FortiAuthenticator for SSL and logins.

The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator are easy to configure, secure, and the application has good performance.

It would be helpful to receive a code by yourself for authentication instead of it registered to a phone.

I have been using Fortinet FortiAuthenticator for approximately two years.

I rate the stability of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator a nine out of ten.

Some additional features would be helpful.

Our customers are enterprise-sized companies.

I rate the scalability of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator an eight out of ten.

The support is responsive and the support is in our local language.

I rate the support from Fortinet FortiAuthenticator a nine out of ten.

Positive

The initial setup is simple compared to other solutions. 

I price of the solution is expensive.

I rotate the price of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator a seven out of ten.

We have one person for 100 users of the solution.

I rate Fortinet FortiAuthenticator a nine out of ten.

We primarily use the solution to gain VPN access to the main client site. 

The authentification for the VPN is quite useful.

It is easy to set up.

The product is stable and reliable. 

The solution is reasonably priced.

Technical support has proven to be helpful. 

We had issues trying to integrate the keys properly during the initial setup.

We have only used the solution for about a year or so. We haven't used it for too long just yet.

I have no complaints in relation to the stability. It's reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

We only have around 20 users. Our use case isn't very big. Therefore, we haven't really needed to scale so much. 

We haven't used technical support yet, aside from the migration issue. They were fine. They were able to help us. 

The implementation process is simple and straightforward. It's not overly complex. 

It was deployed in about four hours or so. It doesn't take too long. However, we had many issues when we upgraded the equipment. The keys were not integrated properly and therefore it wasn't completely simple to manage.

We had one engineer handling the deployment. 

I haven't looked into if we have seen any ROI just yet.

The licensing costs are reasonable. It's not overly expensive. We pay either by the number of users or for a certain number of users that fall under a specific licensing tier. 

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. We've been pretty happy with its capabilities overall. This is a very important product if a company wants to use a VPN. It's great for clients that already use Fortinet products. 

We use it for single sign-on. After connecting to VPN it creates an active directory or up session and we know who it is and then we use Fortinet FortiAuthenicator. 

I prefer the passing tool that sent an active directory console to a Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, then Fortinet FortiAuthenticator not passing the locks. If I ask the Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, give me the name of the group. FortiAuthenticator passes the lock, the group name, or the directory.

I would like to see more security features in reference to identity login or identity identification. I would like to see a troubleshooting option. For troubleshooting or viewing the lock of the device set or separate the locks from the connected device. Maybe with any device connected to the Fortinet FortiAuthenticator. And then I need the parsing device and type of locks of this device.

I have been using Fortinet FortiAuthenticator for the past two months. Before that, we were only testing Fortinet FortiAuthenticator.

I believe Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is stable.

We are finding it to be fully scalable at this point one hundred percent.

Technical support is excellent with Fortinet FortiAuthenticator.

Positive

The initial setup was straightforward. The only problem we faced was the POC. We configure only through self-configuration. If we had an integrator or consultant to configure Fortinet FortiAuthenticator it would be easier than doing a self-configuration.

It was easy for me, but I had to read the documents about LDAP authentication. I did an in-house self-configuration. It was time-consuming.

When we buy the Fortinet FortiAuthenticator device there is a comparison between price and security. We have a government organization and we want to buy cheap products.

I would rate Fortinet FortiAuthenticator an eight out of ten.

I like the self-registration capabilities.

The certificate authority aspect is excellent. 

I love that there is a single sign-on for Fortinet products. 

The initial setup is very easy.

It is a stable product.

The solution can scale as necessary.

Technical support is good. 

Fortinet has another product called FortiNAC. These two solutions work together well.

The integration with other products, for example, some SAML authentications, would make it more flexible.

I've used the solution for two years. It hasn't been too long. 

The solution is stable. It's reliable. There aren't any bugs or glitches and we find that it does not crash or freeze.

It can scale if you need it to. The solution can expand. 

In general, Fortinet technical support is good. We have only had the solution for a small amount of time. We haven't used their support that much. Their response time has been very good. 

I found the initial implementation process to be simple and straightforward. I didn't find it to be overly complex. There aren't too many features, unlike an FortiNAC solution, that need to be set up.

I've evaluated the difference between Fortinet and Cisco in the past.

I'd advise new users to configure the backup, routine backup, to get the most out of the product. You can have problems if you don't.

In general, it's a simple product and we've enjoyed it. 

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.

We are resellers of this solution and partners of Fortinet. I'm the managing director and we are based in South Africa. 

I really like the two-step authentication, it provides a higher level of security that we didn't have previously. Just having a password is not good enough anymore. 

There are some issues with integration. We also have a problem that the cost of the solution is linked to the dollar and that can result in significant unexpected price rises. 

I've been using this solution for a year. 

The solution is scalable, we have over 1,500 users. 

We had great technical support from an external company. 

The initial setup was relatively easy. There were some issues we had with the LDAP integration, but it was solved quite quickly. We had some outside assistance for the deployment. 

The actual cost is fair but when our exchange rate in South Africa goes through the roof, then the price changes quickly. It would assist us if the cost could be standardized or fixed. The exchange rate has a significant impact on us. 

I recommend this solution, it does what it's meant to. I rate FortiAuthenticator nine out of 10.