No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
it_user1719516 - PeerSpot reviewer
Remote Network Support Analyst Level 2 at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
MSP
Nov 30, 2021
It lets you access and run scripts on any device across the whole site
Pros and Cons
  • "I also like how Datto integrates seamlessly with the Autotask ticketing system."
  • "Datto Remote Monitoring is a little more robust compared to Automate, with components that let you audit inventory, see which customer has which device or what devices haven't been rebooted within the last 30 days, and access and run scripts on any device across the whole site."
  • "Sometimes we have some downtime when Datto is doing updates. Maybe it's because of the cloud service they use. I'm not sure if they're going through AWS or Azure or what. That's happened, but the outages have been few and far between."
  • "Sometimes we have some downtime when Datto is doing updates."

What is most valuable?

Datto Remote Monitoring is a little more robust compared to Automate. Datto has components that let you audit inventory and stuff like that. You can see which customer had which device or what devices haven't been rebooted within the last 30 days. It lets you access and run scripts on any device across the whole site. 

For example, I had to do updates for a credit union on the first Sunday of every month, so I created an MSI script, added that to a component, and ran that component across all the devices. It updates every device instead of requiring me to each one manually. I can also access the Splashtop agent through Datto, go to the command line, and do it that way, which takes only an hour or two. 

If you make the component, you can save it to Datto. Once you save it, you can go to that particular site, check the component list, click that one, click the site, check the site off, and send. You can set it up to send you an alert if it fails. If you don't want to build your own components, you can use the ones Datto provides you. Every month, the component store updates with different components, like removing passwords, Kaspersky removal, BitDefender removal, etc.

I also like how Datto integrates seamlessly with the Autotask ticketing system. It was simple to get it configured. They implemented something within Datto to where you could go straight to the RMM management console and pick up the ticket associated with a particular device or the history of tickets that was involved with that device. You could add a device to a ticket by clicking on the device within the ticket unless a person sent the ticket for somebody else, like if an administrator sent the ticket for one of their users there. But, a lot of the time, when the users send a ticket in, they send it from the device that has the issue. Within the ticket, we can click the actual device that was in there. 

What needs improvement?

Sometimes we have some downtime when Datto is doing updates. Maybe it's because of the cloud service they use. I'm not sure if they're going through AWS or Azure or what. That's happened, but the outages have been few and far between. But sometimes, we kind of needed it when it happened because it gave us a valid excuse to take a break.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using Datto Remote Monitoring for the past four years. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I think Datto is a good fit for any environment. It definitely works for small businesses. At my other company, we had probably over 100 clients from different companies. Some of them were bigger than others. We had some mom-and-pop operations with a five-user office. Another one had 70 employees, but some had 200. We had clients in New York and Italy that probably had over 1,000. 

Buyer's Guide
Datto Remote Monitoring and Management
March 2026
Learn what your peers think about Datto Remote Monitoring and Management. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.
885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

How are customer service and support?

I had to deal with Datto support a few times because their Concord platform was down. I've also called with questions about how to do something. The tech support was very fast, especially when you do an online chat. If you call, you might have to wait for like two minutes. When you use the chat, they'll respond right away. If there is a Datto outage or something like that, you can find out quickly. They get right back to you with a message like, "Oh yeah. We apologize for the inconvenience. We've just about finished running updates," or, "Yeah, we are aware that this went down, and we have our engineers working on getting this figured out."

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used N-able during my first year at the company, but then we switched to Datto. That was good for me because I never really got used to N-able. If it were the other way around— if I were more accustomed to ConnectWise — it would probably be the same conversation. I'd be like, "Oh yeah, ConnectWise this, ConnectWise is that." You have the automation, and then you have the Manage tool portion, which is like Autotask. It's like a ticketing system, except it's very different, and it's a little bit more robust. That makes it a little more challenging to understand. You can add this, or you can do that. I'm learning new stuff every day. They were like, "Well, Jamalle, you know you can do this." I'm like, "Oh no, I didn't know that."

But once I got it down, I'm sure I could utilize ConnectWise like I'm supposed to. But I will say Datto was a lot simpler. I think ConnectWise might have them beat in terms of automation, except their scripting system is funny. They have their own scripting engine within ConnectWise Automate. With Datto, you could decide what script you wanted to put in, like PowerShell, Command Line, Python, and Ruby. You could even use JavaScript, which we didn't use because we mainly were providing a lot of Microsoft solutions, so we tried to stick to the Microsoft platform. We have Mac customers here, but they still had to adhere to Microsoft policies when connecting to the networks, accessing Windows servers, and different things like that. 

Datto made it easier to utilize different things where sometimes you didn't even have to get on the computer. It's the same with ConnectWise. You can just run a script and call the customer back to tell them everything is fine. You didn't have to get on the computer, and the whole thing took like two minutes. It probably takes you longer to fill out the ticket than it does to help the customer.

How was the initial setup?

Setting up Datto was pretty straightforward. I can't remember if I had a hard time when we first installed it, but I don't think so. We were using a different ticketing system outside of Autotask at the time.  To maintain and manage the solution, we have around eight techs. Four of them are on the help desk, and we have a couple on-site. Then we have the Level Twos doing projects or dealing with escalation. 

What other advice do I have?

I'd give Datto RMM a nine out of 10. It's one of the top solutions that I've seen so far. Then again, I haven't dealt with too many. If you talk to me in two years, I might have something better to say about ConnectWise.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1160955 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sales & Marketing at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Jan 8, 2022
Outdated CRM functionality and has issues with bugs, but it's relatively easy to use
Pros and Cons
  • "The project management and task management features work well. It's a decent product in that regard."
  • "The project management and task management features work well; it's a decent product in that regard and is relatively simple to use."
  • "The CRM capabilities are not very good. It's clunky and could work a lot better than it does. There are no marketing add-ins, for example."
  • "This is not a product that I recommend."

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use this product for project management, task management, billing, and CRM.

What is most valuable?

The project management and task management features work well. It's a decent product in that regard.

It is relatively simple to use.

What needs improvement?

The CRM capabilities are not very good. It's clunky and could work a lot better than it does. There are no marketing add-ins, for example. It's an older way of doing things.

Adding some workflow to the CRM then that would be better.

If they had math that worked when trying to calculate percentages and/or dollars and cents on projects, that would be a lot better. You have to put down a large box. You can't break it down into quarterly, for example. It doesn't map out well if you're trying to do a subscription model and build something up.

For how long have I used the solution?

We began using this product when it was Autotask, which was purchased by Datto.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

There are some issues with bugs. There are enough bugs to keep you honest.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have fewer than 50 users, so we haven't tested how well it scales.

What other advice do I have?

This is not a product that I recommend. My advice for anybody who is looking into implementing it is to choose another product. Get something else.

I would rate this solution a four out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Datto Remote Monitoring and Management
March 2026
Learn what your peers think about Datto Remote Monitoring and Management. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.
885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.
PeerSpot user
Chief Operating Officer, and HIPAA Privacy Officer at dmi Networking
Real User
Top 20
May 22, 2018
The best features with the best Mac support
Pros and Cons
  • "AEM support is great for Macs."
  • "The alerting system helps us determine what are high level alerts, and what are alerts which can wait for a day or two. We catch RAID failures, hot servers, bad drives (or predicted failures on drives), etc."
  • "We felt that AEM had the best features with the best Mac support."
  • "We would like to see a little more functionality when monitoring network devices, such as switches and routers."
  • "Be prepared to spend a lot of time on conversions if you have a lot of clients."
  • "We would like to see a little more functionality when monitoring network devices, such as switches and routers."

What is our primary use case?

We manage dental clients with our MSP model. We use Autotask Endpoint Management to maintain, monitor, and connect to over 1500 devices. AEM will alert us based upon customized alerts that we have set up, as well as some of the built-in alerts which come with it. We are able to have high level alerts text the on-call technician's phone and respond to downed servers very quickly. 

This service also tells us when servers are running hot and are ready for dust to be blown out.

How has it helped my organization?

  • AEM improved our organization as we switched from N-able. N-able had very poor Mac support, and since we have a lot of Macs, AEM came in handy as their support is great for Macs. 
  • It shaved off some costs. Although, it is pretty comparable in pricing to N-able. 
  • We like their support team much more than N-able.

What is most valuable?

The alerting system: It helps us determine what are high level alerts, and what are alerts which can wait for a day or two. We catch RAID failures, hot servers, bad drives (or predicted failures on drives), etc.

We also find the scripting to be very valuable. Instead of some proprietary scripting language, such as what is seen in N-able, we are able to run batch files, PowerShell, and many other types of scripts.

What needs improvement?

We would like to see a little more functionality when monitoring network devices, such as switches and routers. 

While there is some simple SNMP monitoring of these devices, you can't dig into the traffic stats of the individual ports of switches (as far as I am aware). The setup of SNMP devices is pretty confusing and requires a lot of research as to what certain codes mean. This could definitely be streamlined a bit.

For how long have I used the solution?

One to three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

None at all

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

None at all.

How are customer service and technical support?

Tech support has been really good whenever we have had an issue, which is very uncommon.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used N-able prior to AEM. We switched because we bought several products from them that we were not satisfied with, but were unable to cancel. Also, their sales team was very high pressure. 

Finally, the cost for onboarding new licenses was expensive and we needed loans to cover new professional licenses. AEM is a lot more scalable as you just pay per agent instead of having to purchase expensive licenses.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is straightforward. All you need is admin rights on the server to push out the agent on a domain. 

If the client is not on a domain, we would send them a small batch file to add an administrative user that we could then use to push it out over the network. It was a little cumbersome for those clients not on a domain.

What about the implementation team?

We conducted the implementation all in-house.

What was our ROI?

Less than six months.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Be prepared to spend a lot of time on conversions if you have a lot of clients. 

We had to pay out some overtime for a few problematic sites. Sites on domain networks are incredibly easy to install. We learned a few tricks that streamlined the process, but in the beginning, it was a bit tedious. 

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We used N-able and Kaseya in the past. We also demoed LabTech. 

We felt that AEM had the best features with the best Mac support.

What other advice do I have?

It is a great piece of software, so if you are on the fence, I would trial it.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Datto Remote Monitoring and Management Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: March 2026
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Datto Remote Monitoring and Management Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.