We performed a comparison between IBM MaaS360 and Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)."Internet-based access with security is what I have found to be most valuable. It is also a stable and scalable solution."
"As the solution is a software as a service, the scalability is unlimited."
"The most valuable features in Microsoft Intune for me are application deployment, Defender deployment, and asset management."
"Microsoft Endpoint Manager is not expensive overall, especially for small environments."
"The Microsoft Windows Autopilot and Defender policies are the most valuable features of this solution."
"The ability to send configurations to our systems is valuable, particularly as we don't have a regular Windows AD server. Our current environment doesn't have a Windows AD, which limits our ability to push GPOs. However, this is where the solution can step in and help us push policies."
"Intune provides full visibility into all active mobile device users. If their devices are noncompliant with our security policies, I have the flexibility to update them remotely."
"The most important thing for me is the autopilot feature."
"The most valuable features of IBM MaaS360 are remote control and setting up a phone."
"Maas360 uses distribution groups to deploy apps, which makes it a bit easier than, for example, Intune."
"Asset management is the most valuable feature and integral for device inventory."
"It allows us to have an updated inventory of all the devices in real-time with the ability to add personalized information."
"The ability to send an iPad out to someone and have them auto-provision it when they are out in the field is fantastic. We don't have to have it all configured before we ship it. This is probably the biggest value add."
"It can change policies based on geolocation or schedules."
"We've found the scalability to be very good."
"Mobile Device Configuration with policy applying: This significantly reduces time of device configuration."
"Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management offers on-premises deployment."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the ability to assign a package to a user on a system If you have your software packages set up via SCCM. It automates the process, which is very convenient, especially since most of our people are remote. Additionally, the overall functionality is good."
"It needs certificate provisioning for S/MIME purposes."
"There is no catalog for mobile access management (MAM) security."
"Reporting could be improved. It needs to be more expensive and robust."
"While Intune works perfectly well, the only potential downside is that the deployment could be a bit complex for some users."
"Additional application deployment options e.g. MSI deployment with more complex parameters or additional side-by-side files, and non-MSI deployment options."
"There are a lot of small use cases where we realized that some technical solution was missing in Microsoft in comparison to other products. For example, it lacks something similar to sensing or location-based rules and configurations."
"Integration with Mac devices requires some improvement."
"There is improvement needed in integrating with the installed Office solutions versions, such as Office 2019. The Office 365 integrates without a problem."
"We opted to go with Microsoft Intune because it just seemed to be a more mature and comprehensive enterprise solution, whereas IBM MaaS360 didn't seem to have the necessary breadth to manage all of our equipment. Along with laptops, I've had some BYODs. IBM MaaS360 just didn't seem as mature in our assessment."
"IBM MaaS360’s threat management feature needs improvement. It could identify even more malicious attacks."
"The reporting and alerting could be improved."
"The interface is clunky and the layout is a bit outdated. Also, I don't think MaaS360 has as many features as Intune. It doesn't integrate with Office as seamlessly as Intune does, which isn't surprising, given that Intune and Office are Microsoft products."
"The price could be lower."
"Zero day support is something they can work on. They can make it a little bit more user-friendly."
"Can be added process of export/import environment configuration to simplify any migration processes."
"The product needs to improve tech support."
"In terms of integration, there is still room for improvement in Matrix42."
"Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management could improve the user interface, it is not very intuitive."
More Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM MaaS360 is ranked 8th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 34 reviews while Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management is ranked 12th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 2 reviews. IBM MaaS360 is rated 7.8, while Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of IBM MaaS360 writes "It lets you separate work and personal data on mobile phones, but the interface is outdated and clunky". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management writes "It is a complete and competitive solution with excellent OEM support". IBM MaaS360 is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, SOTI MobiControl, IBM MobileFirst and Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM), whereas Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management is most compared with Ivanti Neurons for MDM, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Jamf Pro and VMware Workspace ONE.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.