We performed a comparison between ManageEngine Endpoint Central and Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)."We use a local Active Directory, but we weren't able to manage all our on-site systems without a solution like Intune, and we needed to deploy software like VPNs and other things. It's seamless now to to this through Intune."
"It provides control over all mobile devices that are being connected to the corporate network."
"Remote Wipe and Autopilot is one of the best features."
"I like the fact that it's integrated with the rest of the Microsoft products, so customers can manage it from their Office 365 portal or Azure portal."
"Easy to use."
"We have one MDM that works with Windows, iOS, and Android."
"With on-premises Active Directory, the main challenge was that we had no control when a user was working from home. We didn't know what exactly a user was doing and whether the AV was up to date or not. Intune provides better control of their machines."
"Microsoft Endpoint Manager is not expensive overall, especially for small environments."
"Very good, functional solution for endpoint management."
"The stability is very good."
"The solution is stable."
"The stability is great."
"Honestly, I have to say all features together have become the Swiss army knife of desktop management. They all work hand in hand. Software deployment saves an unbelievable amount of time installing an application on hundreds of computers."
"The dashboard has been very useful."
"The patch manager is good, and it's easy to use."
"Has good functionality and is user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the ability to assign a package to a user on a system If you have your software packages set up via SCCM. It automates the process, which is very convenient, especially since most of our people are remote. Additionally, the overall functionality is good."
"Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management offers on-premises deployment."
"It would be great to see on-premises mailboxes and for the solution to have geofencing capabilities."
"We faced issues with macOS support. The product should have better inventory and asset management."
"Intune doesn't provide much control over Windows servers. It's something we struggle with."
"Microsoft Intune could enhance its patch management for various devices, ensuring regular updates and tracking of device privileges."
"The solution could be improved by the opportunity to connect third-party application databases, such as Chocolatey or another setup store, to Intune."
"The reporting and cost have room for improvement."
"The reporting could be improved, as it's pretty poor compared to other products of this type."
"It's only good for a Microsoft environment."
"Improvement of the chats on the web communication through the WAN would be helpful."
"ManageEngine Desktop Central should keep up with some of the features that other major vendors are providing, such as Microsoft."
"The pricing is lower than other well-respected solutions in this category."
"Each of their products is an independent product, and they don't have anything to do with each other. It is a suite of packages. They all run independently, and they all are a little different because they were acquired differently. They could standardize their portfolio."
"I would like to have the option to install the agent remotely."
"The reports provided by the product are an area of concern where improvements are required. The visibility provided by the reports is not very attractive."
"The performance sometimes lags a bit because the solution is demanding on system resources."
"The solution is expensive."
"Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management could improve the user interface, it is not very intuitive."
"In terms of integration, there is still room for improvement in Matrix42."
More ManageEngine Endpoint Central Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
ManageEngine Endpoint Central is ranked 4th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 59 reviews while Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management is ranked 12th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 2 reviews. ManageEngine Endpoint Central is rated 8.2, while Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of ManageEngine Endpoint Central writes "An in-depth and intuitive product with good cross-platform capabilities, but they should have a more global support channel". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management writes "It is a complete and competitive solution with excellent OEM support". ManageEngine Endpoint Central is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus and SOTI MobiControl, whereas Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management is most compared with Ivanti Neurons for MDM.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.