We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Testim Room for Improvement

MC
Director Test Services at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

The accessibility reporting features could be more robust to be reported at the script level and allow users to map down to the step level.  

Some lists have values that are returned in different orders and once captured within a validation, the sort order can change. Is there a way for Testim to ignore the sort order and validate the list?  

Sharing steps across projects would be helpful for teams as some products are similar in features and configurations, so sharing steps upfront instead of recording them would benefit our teams. 

View full review »
Automation Developer at Tipalti

The UI could use a better design with a better user experience in mind, for instance - instead of going in and out of the editor every time I want to view test data for a test, I could just view the test data in the table, or the ability to copy steps through tests.

Reports are looking good but missing a lot of information and customization options. for example - ability to create custom reports for a specific test/suite/plan for a specific time range, or seeing additional information about failed tests in the report without entering the editor (see comment above).

User actions should not be limited (e.g. not being able to delete shared steps, only being able to hide them).

View full review »
PS
Senior Test Analyst at Colgate

There are common properties between multiple elements that we should be able to edit - such as 'when this step fails,'  'when to run this step,' and 'override timeout'. I should be able to update these properties if I select multiple elements. 

e.g. I added multiple validations on a single page, now i want to override the time out for all the validations. currently i have to select each element and check the 'override timeout', what is expected is I will select all the validations and change timeout for all at once.

View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Testim, SmartBear, SeleniumHQ and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: January 2022.
563,327 professionals have used our research since 2012.
QA Manager at Fieldin

The API testing integration is a bit lacking and can be improved. Also, if the product will allow testing of mobile apps (native) that would be great.

View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Testim, SmartBear, SeleniumHQ and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: January 2022.
563,327 professionals have used our research since 2012.