This firewall is part of the security solution that is implemented in medium-sized enterprises.
We are using it for endpoint and user security for laptops and mobile phones.
This firewall is part of the security solution that is implemented in medium-sized enterprises.
We are using it for endpoint and user security for laptops and mobile phones.
The most valuable feature is the Intercept X. It is the advanced features that are used for malware detection and antivirus. It's similar to antivirus on steroids.
It's simple to use and has a simple interface. It's generally straightforward and configuration-wise, it's not complex.
It's a very simple product to use and that's why you find it is used mostly in small to medium-sized enterprises. They don't have the manpower that a large organization can have, in terms of the skilled workforce when it comes to cybersecurity. They just need something that is simple to use, simple to manage, and simple to administer, but effective at the same time. That's the main selling point for Sophos.
I have not used their SD-WAN product or the SD-WAN feature, so I don't know how scalable the SD-WAN is. But, I hope just that the SD-WAN is up to par with FortiGate.
The integration is an area that can improve a bit. One of the other solutions that I have used that is highly interoperable is Fortinet. It's easy to integrate with other products.
Sophos can definitely improve with the interoperability between solutions.
I have been using Sophos XG for a year and a half.
We are using the latest version.
It is very stable. I've not had any issues with it.
In terms of bugs, I've not had any bugs, or I've not encountered any bugs when deploying Sophos or administering Sophos products.
In terms of scalability, it's very scalable because they have different sized firewalls for different requirements or different specifications.
It is also able to do high availability, so it's very scalable.
Currently, in our organization, we have coverage with Sophos Intercept X Endpoint Protection. We have 49 employees. We plan to continue to use this solution.
We are currently subscribed to a three-year product and will be using it for a duration of three years.
I have not had any cases where I had to log technical support, but I believe it would be fast enough in case I needed to reach out to them.
We are also using Fortinet FortiGate Firewall.
The initial setup is very simple.
For a normal deployment with basic configuration in a medium-sized enterprise, it can take a day and a half.
If it's a complex network design then it might be three to four days.
It only requires one person to deploy and maintain this solution.
We used an implementor and an integrator, but usually, I do it by myself.
The features in Sophos XG are the same features you would find in Palo Alto or Fortinet.
I just like it the way it is. I wouldn't recommend any changes to it, because what they have is working and it's working very well. It is a product that I definitely recommend to others.
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
Orchestration of the firewall is the most valuable feature. It is a fast and agile solution. It is good with protection. It is also very easy to deploy and manage, and its user interface is easy to use.
They can lower its price. It is very expensive. We are looking for a less expensive solution depending on our budget. They can also improve it in terms of firewall protection.
I have been using this solution for three years.
It is very stable.
It is very agile.
We didn't have any other similar solution previously.
It is very easy to deploy.
It is very expensive.
I would rate Sophos XG a nine out of ten.
Our main use case of this solution is to support internal clients with virus scanning on laptops and on critical processors.
An area of improvement would be the reporting as diagnostic graphs take a long time to load and refresh. If there could be an option to show only select graphs, it may speed up the graphics.
Most of the time we don't use the disk usage, memory or CPU graphs. The main graph we watch is the bandwidth usage.
Additionally, their previous update contained many bugs. They need to ensure that, before releasing a new version, there are not so many bugs.
I have been using this solution for two years.
The solution is stable.
We previously used Caveo Systems, but that was about 10 years ago.
The initial setup is very easy. The licensing and setting up of firewall rules takes some time, but the full deployment took about an hour.
The pricing is economical.
I recommend the solution due to its ease of use and pricing.
It can be used as a firewall, SD-WAN enabler, and secure web gateway. You can also use it for unified threat management, email detection, mobile device management, and wireless management. I use it in the cloud and on-premises, and I have its latest version.
It is stable, flexible, and easy to use. It has got a web management portal that can be accessed from anywhere.
I would like to have more artificial intelligence in the web monitoring service that comes with it. It should alert us when particular events happen. It has already got some of that. I know that it is more of a service, and Sophos is already looking at it. It is called SIEM.
I have been using this solution for a few years.
We have roughly 700 users who use this firewall.
I have interacted with them a few times. I am very satisfied with their technical support.
We were using FortiGate.
It is easy to install. I have done the installation in less than a day.
We did it ourselves. We have two people for its deployment. We have one engineer and one admin.
It is not that expensive compared to the other solutions. It is about the same price range as Fortigate, which we used previously. Licensing is on a yearly basis.
I would recommend this solution. We're very happy with the product. It works very well, and we don't have too many issues.
I would rate Sophos XG a nine out of ten.
We use the Sophos XG firewall as part of our security solution.
The first area that needs to be improved is customer support.
If I'm implementing a connection on the DMZ or WAN, I should be able to dive deep into the implementation, specifying what needs to be implemented or not. For example, I should be able to configure specific details for the DMZ, and not have to follow the templates that they provide.
We have had problems with the stability that affected business operations.
We have been using Sophos XG for three years.
The issue of stability is the reason that I'm trying to move away from using Sophos as our firewall. There were times where Sophos randomly cut some users off of the internet, which adversely affected business operations. It is important because our business relies on throughput and service, like the uptime of e-commerce servers.
Scalability depends on the specifications during the time of order, prior to first implementing the firewall. With respect to my organization, scalability has been okay. It comes down to the amount of money that is spent.
We have 1,200 users in the company.
Customer support needs to be improved. The time they take to resolve issues is too long.
The initial setup was straightforward. It took us less than 30 minutes. Normally, it depends on the size of your organization, so for mine, the installation was less than 15 minutes. By 30 minutes I was finished even with the setup and configuration.
For our company, the price was reasonable.
We are now thinking about incorporating the Fortinet next-generation firewall.
My advice for anybody who is considering Sophos is that a business with a lot of throughput and data traffic should look for another firewall.
I would rate this solution a six out of ten.
For the primary use cases, we use SSL VPN access for rolling remote access. We use web filtering and we use the intrusion prevention that comes with network protection.
The user interface is very user-friendly and very helpful.
The VPN access for users is also a great thing, especially nowadays when working from home.
Categorization or uncategorized websites is an area that needs improvement.
Having a web portal where you could make requests for the categorization of non-categorized items, would be beneficial.
The DLP rules don't cover countries such as Serbia. You cannot make custom rules. That could be added so that we could detect content that is not supposed to leave the company via email, and so that the rules could be customized by the clients.
We only have predefined rules and most of them are not for Serbia or countries from the Region.
We have been using Sophos from the time they acquired Astaro, before that it was UTM, then they released the XG firewall.
We are using the latest version.
It's a stable solution. We have not experienced any issues.
It's a scalable product. In the office, we have four users in our organization.
Our experience with technical support has been positive.
We have support from the local distributor. We have rarely had the need to contact technical support but when we have, we have had quick responses from them.
The initial setup is very straightforward and the implementation takes a relatively short amount of time. The fine-tuning takes a little bit more time but in general, it can be deployed and implemented quickly.
Also, the upgrades, backups, and recovery are very easy.
We are Sophos partners, we sell them and implement them ourselves.
We only need one engineer to deploy and maintain this solution. If you have a bigger deployment then you need two engineers.
Licensing fees are on a yearly basis.
I can recommend this solution to others who are interested in using it.
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
The most valuable feature is the VPN aspect. It has been beneficial for my users who work from home. Connectivity and from a security aspect. The security aspect of this is quite good. It measures up to the standard that I expect.
From a Firewall perspective and then user management, easy to manage and the user experience, profile, are giving me what I am expecting.
During this COVID era, the VPN has really been helpful. We can seamlessly connect to the applications remotely and work from home.
In the Firewall, the Intrusion Prevention System can be improved. Now because COVID has come to stay, people tend to work from home, and cybersecurity has been on the high side.
It can improve more on the security aspect of this so that it can combat any major threat or common bug. I am not saying that the security has become compromised, as it is usually active, but they can improve on it.
Local and technical support can be improved.
When firmware updates are complete, there were issues with connectivity and VPN users. Recently, I stopped updating the firmware because I didn't want to obstruct the connectivity of the staff working remotely at different locations.
I have stopped doing any updates until the issue can be addressed.
I have been using Sophos XG for approximately 12 months.
When you compare with Barracuda, Sophos is quite a bit cheaper.
With Sophos, you can upgrade on what you need and upgrade as time goes on. I think that it's relatively open, compared to other products.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
We are a solution provider and Sophos XG is one of the security products that we implement for our customers. We always provide them with the latest version.
The number of ports, especially on the entry-level appliances, should be increased.
The price of adding ports should be reduced to make it more competitive.
The vendor needs to create materials to show the differences between Sophos products and those from other vendors.
Network management needs to be included in the package.
As it is now, it only supports ten multiple users, which is something that should be increased.
I have been working with Sophos XG for approximately two years.
This solution is stable.
This is a scalable product and we have approximately 150 users.
We get our support from the local distributor.
Prior to Sophos XG, we used products from Fortinet and Forcepoint.
The Forcepoint product is doing well. We have a different perimeter firewall for our data center that uses it because we use different vendors for different sites.
This is an on-premises appliance and the installation is straightforward. It can be deployed in less than an hour. However, according to the number of users and the number of ports that will be connected, the design may vary. This makes it difficult to estimate the time required to do a full implementation of the product.
We have four people in charge of maintenance, although they do not work exclusively with Sophos. We have another appliance from another vendor. The entire team, including their manager, is about 10 people.
The price is in the mid-range and it is very good for small to medium-sized businesses. One license opens everything.
Overall, this is a good product and I would recommend it for small to mid-sized customers.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.