One Identity Manager Reviews

We are tech consultants who deploy One Identity for our clients. Our clients use One Identity for provisioning and deep provisioning users. It is also used for the recertification process and access review. We have integrated One Identity for 15 to 20 clients. Soon, we expect to deploy it for another five to 10. 

The performance could be better. I also think One Identity could improve its documentation for developers. Many of One Identity's features aren't fully documented. We don't have enough information on how to use them.

I have used One Identity Manager for the past six years.

I rate One Identity nine out of 10 for stability.  We haven't seen any downtime. It has worked smoothly since it went into production. 

Deploying One Identity can be straightforward or complex depending on the environment. The time needed to deploy varies with the scope of the project.

We typically have some meetings with the client to understand what they need to integrate with One Identity. We develop custom connectors and move to the production stage if everything is working. 

I rate One Identity Manager eight out of 10. My recommendation to new users is to be patient because it's hard to understand without adequate documentation. It gets easier with time and practice. 

My company has a lot of use cases for One Identity Manager. In my previous company, I've been maintaining the tool, so I used to go to clients who needed improvements and support in terms of provisioning, and I provided those services. Now, in my current company, I'm in the Identity Management team, and my company is using its old Identity system with One Identity Manager, particularly for provisioning, access management, compliance, and certification, apart from identity management.

In terms of what the most valuable feature of One Identity Manager is, that would be hard to say because the tool is great overall. There's not really one feature you'd prefer over other features, but what's really great, in my opinion, is the fact that the provisioning is really stable and accurate, and it's a process my company trusts. This means that without a lot of maintenance, I can be pretty sure that as soon as my alternative source gives a new identity or gives new information about a particular identity, everything will be transformed and executed the right way. My company has tried other solutions and there's always a struggle with the provisioning system in terms of knowing what systems work, but with One Identity Manager, this issue doesn't happen. It's also a really stable system which I like.

Having new features for web developers in the One Identity Manager shop is an area for improvement. Another area for improvement in the tool is its ServiceNow connection as ServiceNow is a major ITSM system player, but the current out-of-the-box feature proposed by One Identity Manager can only make simple incident requests to the system. My company is now in full ICL design, so it prefers for all concerns or requests to be sent properly to ServiceNow, so my company can have better control over the incident requests and be able to sort those out.

The tool fits all my needs today, except for the ServiceNow connector. That's the only additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of One Identity Manager.

I've been using One Identity Manager for three and a half years.

Stability is one of the main qualities of One Identity Manager. It could run even if people go on a holiday for weeks, and nobody would be worried about the tool breaking down. One Identity Manager could work for months even if you don't look at it or check it. It's a well-designed tool.

One Identity Manager is a scalable tool and its scalability is one of the reasons why my company chose it. The tool is capable of evaluation, and it has a lot of different connectors that come out of the box, so as soon as you know what you're doing, it's easy to extend the parameter and add new target systems to it. With One Identity Manager, you can have systems ready for future use. My company has never reached a point where it says: "Okay. There's nothing more you can do with this tool."

I've contacted the support team for One Identity Manager several times. For level one support, particularly when something is broken and I need help, the team's been really quick and accurate. Most of the time, I get the first answer or first contact resolution in less than half an hour as written in the contract, and the support team has really found a quick solution. Every time I face an incident, the team finds a solution to it within an hour. Sometimes it could take a few hours to resolve which is when the One Identity Manager support team provides new patches to implement, for example, the issue started at seven at night and patching would be done at eight in the morning the next day.

For major incidents, I would rate support a five out of five, but if it's just a little incident that does very little harm and is in development, issue resolution would take longer. The support team for One Identity Manager handles major incidents perfectly, so I have no complaints, but if you just have a little incident that appears on your development system and is not really that important, it could take days and days before a technician is sent onsite. This is why my company prefers to work with a partner that is more open to decision, and though the One Identity support team is really there to save your life, it's not there for every incident or situation that you come across.

My company decided to use One Identity Manager because of the large variety of connectors available that lets you connect everything you need, even for future use, as well as the reputation of One Identity Manager in terms of stability. Another reason for choosing the tool is the online forum and YouTube channel that allow engineers to learn more about One Identity Manager without the need to ask a partner each time, so you can be independent of the vendor or partner. The support you get is also another reason my company went with the tool.

Whether the initial setup for One Identity Manager is easy or difficult is hard to say because of other systems that have less functionality but are easier to deploy, and you won't face the same challenges that you'd face when setting up One Identity Manager. It's recommended for you to have knowledgeable engineers who can support you during the setup, especially if you don't have the knowledge on how to set the tool up. Setting up the tool may not be as easy, but considering all the things One Identity Manager can do for you, it's not such a big deal.

If you just want to basic features to be up and running with One Identity Manager, deployment could take a few weeks, for example, if you just want to use an authoritative source and have provisioning, active directory, exchange, and other basic features set up in your company. For a company that has really stable jobs to provision, with role mining that isn't difficult, the tool could be ready and working within a few weeks, but for a large company with a really, really large variety of jobs and regulations, deployment of One Identity Manager could take a few months.

You can get ROI from One Identity Manager. It's worth the money because my company wants to be agile, and if tomorrow, the head of the company says, "Okay, let's open a new area," with One Identity Manager, I can say, "Okay. If you say there'll be three hundred people, tomorrow, I'm able to create accounts with the rules needed for those to work, and it won't be a mess."

With One Identity Manager, even inexperienced people in the team can easily understand how each role works, and if you have a great conception of each role, you can just hire or transfer within days without being worried about whether or not each person has everything he needs to work.

I'm unable to discuss licensing costs for One Identity Manager.

I'm using the latest version of One Identity Manager.

In my company, the tool is still in the deployment stage, but within a few months, all people in the company will be users of One Identity Manager, particularly the portal. There'll be about five thousand users of the tool within my company.

My advice to anyone using One Identity Manager for the first time is to make an audit on your company with an independent partner to be sure if you need the tool because One Identity Manager won't be worth it for every company. You have to match it to your needs, or else you'll never get your money's worth. For example, in a stable company or one that has similar jobs, the tool won't be used a lot. If you have three to ten job types and all of those would be the same after many years, One Identity Manager won't be the tool you need. You can just go for a cheaper tool that can do the job for you, but if you have a complex company and you have to face a lot of regulations, and if you want to adapt more quickly, One Identity Manager is a good choice.

I'm rating One Identity Manager nine out of ten because it fits my need, and though it's complex, it's a learnable product. It also helps my company become more agile and also helps it face new challenges. One Identity Manager is the tool I need, and I like it. The tool helps my company and also helped the previous company I worked for, so I have no complaints about it. It's a tool I like working with.

I didn't give One Identity Manager a perfect score because the connection with ServiceNow isn't there yet, so that's an area for improvement. When you send in an incident or put in a request that's not a standard request on One Identity Manager, you have to make an exception in the way your company should work, and this is another area for improvement in the tool that I also don't like. My company came up with a workaround or a solution to this, but a company such as One Identity should be able to propose a solution out-of-the-box.

My company is both a customer and a partner of One Identity Manager. I say partner because a representative from One Identity comes to my company every two months and listens to feedback about the pros and cons of the tool. I say customer because my company pays for the One Identity Manager license, and if there's an issue, my company makes a request and lets the support team know what makes us unhappy.

One Identity Manager is a central identity provider and authorization provider, and I've been using it for multiple customers who use it as a central identity provider.

In terms of the most valuable feature of One Identity Manager, it's not like one feature is useful without the other features. It's not a tool, but it's more an overall integrated solution that is helpful and not specifically one solution on its own. The best points of One Identity Manager would be its process orchestration and synchronization manager.

The philosophy behind One Identity Manager has always been that there's not one way of working and that you can set it up according to your own identity and access management philosophy, but what would make it better is by shortening the setup time and the learning curve time. If the team could create some best practices with a wizard to set the solution up within companies, that would be a killer feature and would help make identity access management more approachable. That would also help companies that don't have the resources or a dedicated team to set up One Identity Manager.

What I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is the addition of just released application governance parts. That would sound promising. It would also be interesting if the team sets up best practice startup wizards, so you could set up One Identity Manager according to selectable best practice wizards instead of setting it up completely by yourself.

I've been working with One Identity Manager and its predecessor Quest since 2014.

One Identity Manager is a stable solution, although like any vendor bugs occur. It is frustrating there's no bug tracker available of known issues. It would be very helpful to know what bugs are currently acknowledged to prevent continuity issues and wasted troubleshooting time. 

In terms of the scalability of One Identity Manager, I mostly had experience with companies that had five to ten thousand identities in place, and now, I've been working with a setup in a larger enterprise environment with tens of thousands of users, and my impression is that everything is going much slower than what I was used to on the smaller scale, but I'm not completely familiar how it was set up. I know too little about the setup to judge the scalability of One Identity Manager.

I've contacted the technical support team for One Identity Manager multiple times. Sometimes support is excellent, and sometimes, it's just okay. Support asks for a lot of information that's not always necessary.

Neutral

Installing One Identity Manager nowadays is getting more and more straightforward, but in terms of configuration and setup, that's complex.

The time it takes to deploy the solution would depend on the organization. I've been involved in multiple projects and there were projects where One Identity Manager was deployed faster than others, so deployment time would depend a bit on the complexity of the organization and internal processes, but in theory, you could set it up within a week. Mostly it would take companies months to get the solution up and running.

I'm aware there's a license cost for One Identity Manager, but I'm not part of the team who handles licensing, so I'm unable to give pricing information.

I'm a freelancer, so I work for multiple customers and I work for three customers that are using One Identity Manager, so I can't give the exact number of users, but big teams use it.

I'm using One Identity Manager because it's what my customers selected.

My advice to anyone looking into using One Identity Manager is to start playing around on the virtual setup to get familiar with it, in particular, make a small domain, set some target systems up, and get familiar with the setup.

I would rate One Identity Manager eight out of ten because it's very stable and very customizable. For the last two years, the solution has improved and cut back on technical depth, and it can stand on its own two feet, but there's still space to improve. Overall, One Identity Manager is one of the best in the market.

I'm an identity and access management consultant, so I'm not a partner or a reseller of One Identity Manager.

This solution creates the roles for the NDSS, including onboarding of accounts. It's an end-to-end solution in that the customer will request some permissions, and it will enter treatment for that user, then push the data or automatically onboard admin accounts for that user.

The most valuable features are that it has a lot of capabilities, can integrate with a lot of systems, including automated onboarding like CyberArk, and allows you to integrate different entities.

One area that could be improved is the speed of performance - it's often a bit slower because of the size of its database.

I've been using this solution since 2017.

It's a stable solution.

OIM can be scaled.

We subscribe to premium support from Dell IBM. It's pretty good but can take a while to respond with a solution, sometimes up to a week if it's a major issue.

It depends on the expectations and scope, but OIM is easy to deploy and can be completed for a medium organization in six months to a year.

I used a consultant integrator for deployment.

Licenses are available on a three or five-year basis.

I would recommend OIM to other users and would score it seven out of ten.

We used One Identity Management for 15,000 employees of a financial services firm. In addition to the IM functionality, we leveraged One ID for Identity Governance - including access certifications.

We had automated provisioning of users based on HR data. This automatically created 4-5 base accounts and birthright access for users. In addition to that, we leveraged the IT shop to request roles for users which, for the most part, automatically provisioned access to users.

In addition to this, we used the Attestation features of the product to aid in our User Access Reviews.

There were significant productivity benefits over our previous platform with the increased automation which took the process of onboarding staff down from days to minutes. It allowed user self-service for additional access. The approval process was tracked and auditable.

It also improved our security controls with tighter de-provisioning, where we would automatically terminate a user's access when they left the company. In addition, regular user access certification campaigns were undertaken to review staff access and to ensure staff only had the access required to perform their role.

As the team supporting the platform, one of the key features One Identity Manager has that was very valuable was the administration interface which allowed a quick easy overview of staff, their entitlements, and how they had were entitled to access.

Centralizing identity management allowed for a centralized governance model. 

The IT shop is a great tool that allows a simple interface for users to see their access, be able to request additional access, and view the workflow approval process to understand where their request is and what any hold-ups may be. 

The blessing and curse with One Identity Manager was its flexibility and the ability to solve business problems in a number of ways. We fell into that trap of over-customization which made upgrading the product difficult. An improvement would be to offer guides on how you should set up a base configuration. There should also be integration guides to key systems like Active Directory.

In addition to that, we had some slowness with the IT shop when we had significant amounts of data, users, etc., in the system and there were some slow database queries that needed to be optimized and patched. This caused some slowness when running Attestation campaigns. 

I used the solution for over 6 years.

Overall, the tool was stable. Our issues were mostly around customizations and bad data.

The tool is scalable and can include a number of the usual infrastructure scalability options.

Technical support was good, for the most part, especially when the local support team understood our level of expertise. If we were raising a problem it was a real problem and we were put through to the level 3 support quickly.

We had a previous Identity Management Solution and we swapped it out as the old solution had little investment in its user interface and we needed a better interface for our users to be able to self-service effectively.

It was a complex setup process, however, it was the first time it was done in the country 7 years ago. Getting the product installed was straightforward. It would be important to follow a proper SDLC with requirements being a key initial piece of the puzzle to help you maintain costs.

We used a mix of vendor and in-house resources on the project. Like the in-house resources, the vendor at the time had no prior knowledge of the tool so it was a learning journey for both sets of resources.

When we started the journey 7+ years ago, there was a limited skill set in the market, and that is still the case today. 

Like all Identity Management projects, setting firm requirements upfront is important to maintain costs.

We did evaluate other options, however, I wasn't involved in that process.

Look to limit customizations where you can; it can be easier to customize the tool in the short term, however, it can result in significant technical debt and effort in the future.

We use it to manage all identities within the company. We use it to monitor users when onboarding and offboarding. We also use it for all the related accounts, such as SAP accounts and AD, to give permissions to our employees within these systems.

We do all the privileged management as well within One Identity Manager, which mainly consists of monitoring and control of users, especially who's changing what.

There are users within SAP, the so-called "firefighters," who need to have a little bit more access to SAP. They are the ones who are allowed to switch down modules, put down the systems, and so on. They require high-privilege access. One Identity helps us to monitor those activities and ensure that we make the changes that are required so the users will have those permissions.

When we have a request from HR for onboarding a new employee, before having One Identity, we had all manual processes. If the user was going to be assigned to a specific application, we needed to contact the responsible person on that team to open multiple tickets, multiple requests. Today, those activities, are completely managed by the Service Desk. That means we have reduced the time it takes for the onboarding process enormously. It used to take two or three weeks to do a full onboarding, but today we can do it in two or three days, providing access to the systems.

The solution has reduced Service Desk calls by 75 to 85 percent. In terms of automation with this system, we now have 94 percent coverage of our users and systems. That means we increase security as well, and not only reduce calls to the Service Desk.

In addition, when it comes to compliance, One Identity is used to cross-reference between the identities and accesses. This has improved the detection time of security events and has helped us with both data protection and compliance. One Identity is a main driver and helper in improving this area.

It's the automation. With One Identity you can have multiple accounts and everything is managed in the same system. You don't need to manage different systems at different times. With just one, you can do everything. It saves a lot of time for us and simplifies things.

In terms of the policy and role management features, through the automation that we have within the system, we are able to simplify those processes. The role management is really a great solution because we assign and define roles within the system and then apply them to the identities that we create for our employees.

It is definitely a flexible solution. The connection with multiple systems is what makes it flexible. We can create the accounts flexibly, enabling access to other systems. In addition to Active Directory, it can extend to SAP, to Salesforce, to Office 365, etc.

We are currently on an old system, an old version. We're working on upgrading to the latest version. So when it comes to cloud-IT strategy, for example, at the time we implemented this version it was not yet a consideration. We are now starting to develop this area, and One Identity will play a key role in our cloud strategy.

Most of the issues that we are suffering from today will be fixed with the new version.

The more we have integrations with other systems, for creation of user accounts for different applications, the simpler the scalability and the usability of the system will be. That's what will make our lives easier.

I've seen that in the new version we're going to have connectors related to ServiceNow. That's a huge feature that will be important for us because we're using that system. Salesforce integration, more integration with SAP and with the internet of things would be good.

We also have system devices that we could manage as identities, so that would be a feature to add.

Three to five years.

The system we are using is five years old and we have had no issues at all. It is fully stable.

It's scalable. We grew over the last year. We integrated companies within the group, which included creating more and more users in the system. Scaling is pretty simple. We didn't have to make major changes to the system itself. It was something that the system could support easily, especially from a functional point of view. 

It can scale vertically and horizontally without any problems. With the upgrade, we are scaling up technically, adding more servers, and it's pretty easy as well.

We are working with a One Identity partner. This is really important. One of the most important things to do when going with One Identity is to choose a partner wisely. We are currently working with a partner and we're still evaluating that. It needs to be assessed a little bit better and to ensure that they can support us. It has nothing to do with One Identity support itself. The important thing is ensuring that the partner is able to support requests. That's what we are currently assessing and evaluating.

We are working with IPG because our headquarters are based in Germany. We have a history with them. We are currently ensuring that they are capable of providing the support that we require, and especially provide us the agility and flexibility we need.

The partner is important because the implementation of the systems and the configuration of the systems are done by the partner. It is key for One Identity to ensure that the partners can do the work properly.

We had nothing before using One Identity.

We implemented One Identity in 2015 with the main goal of controlling SAP access and users, especially the privileged access in SAP and the segregation of duties. That's what we wanted to control. One Identity was the best system at the time, with really exceptional out-of-the-box functionality. It was mainly done, at that time, for SAP. It was a risk and compliance issue that was fixed with One Identity.

We are seeing return on investment although I can't quantify it. If we just think about the reduction in the onboarding time which is impacting other teams, that is an area of ROI. And especially with the Service Desk, there has already been a benefit and a return of investment in terms of resources.

The tool is one of the best tools, out-of-the-box. It has great integration, especially for companies using SAP. On the other side, choose the right partner and don't look at only one system, but other systems as well. If a company is looking for a system to control SAP, don't focus on your SAP. Look at one system which is able to manage in general, and with good integrations. One identity is one of those systems.

It is also important to have a defined process. We establish it and then, with the use of the tool, we apply it.

I would rate the solution at nine out of ten. I like the out-of-the-box functionality. You don't need to do specific customizations; you can quickly use the system as it comes. And the solution has flexibility.

We are managing the entire trend for our identity management, from HR hire until offboarding. We use it for managing all the IT accounts in the company, which has hundreds of thousands of identities.

At the time of the onboarding, this is solution that we have interfacing with HR. On the same day an employee is hired, an account is created and available for the manager when the end user arrives. The opposite is true. The moment employment is terminated, the same day everything is disabled, then later deleted.

We have integrated it directly with SAP, since our HR source of information is SAP and more than 80 percent of our business is run on SAP. Therefore, we have the largest SAP installation in the world. It's fully integrated, so we are creating, managing, and provisioning in SAP, as it is the core of our business. We are synchronizing for SoD, so it's working well. We are using different aspects of the integration.

The overall capabilities of the identity governance and administration (IGA) solution for identity management.

The flexibility of the solution: We are able to use what is out-of-the-box, customize and prioritize it, then further develop it to meet our needs. Our use for it is very complex, but we are able to achieve success with One Identity.

The back-end, its capabilities, and workflows are very good.

I would like a more friendly web UI. This is something that they are already starting to work on. 

Because of our volume, the monitoring of the solution, several job servers, and DBQs has been very time consuming for us.

I would also like it to have an easier integration with phones.

With the current version, the stability is very good. With the previous version, it was not good. We are now in version 8, and it's really stable and performing.

Without this solution, because of our sheer size, we cannot manage our own house.

We are paying for premium support, which is expensive. However, we do receive very good, fast support.

What we implemented is very broad. We implemented basic identity management: workflow, self-service, and shopping for roles. We also implemented SoD. To implement all of this and because of our size, we had to work with partners and One Identity, which was a complex process.

We have seen a little ROI when there was a restructuring reduction in the market for user management teams, but not enough to cover the cost of the project. The focus was on security compliance, not on return on investment.

This solution has helped to reduce help desk calls. We are a very big company, so we have implemented thousands of role-based access controls which give rights to the users. Based on their movements, we are removing or assigning access. We also have the entire onboarding process fully automated. We have removed more than 90 percent of all manual requests for accounts.

This solution has helped to increase employee productivity when it comes to provisioning users. E.g., We can give users access in under a day. It is now based on how long it takes for HR to perform the action to onboard the employee.

We started an RFP in 2013 or 2014. Then, the end of the process was in 2015, we selected One Identity Manager by comparing it against many other vendors.

Define what you are researching. Write down use cases you need. Then, ask for a demo with you data, so you can see actual results.

We are working on our IT cloud strategy. We are starting to do cloud provisioning integrated with our identity management.

We use it for compliance, but not directly for GDPR.

We are using the policy and role management features.

The primary use case is managing business applications.

We have centralized a large number of access management functions. Therefore, you have one place where you can have control and have automated on/off boarding processes for people joining and leaving. We have done a lot of things, covering a lot of applications.

This solution helps with compliance by having a way of controlling an audit trail, knowing how things are done, and knowing how to control who has access to what.

• Publishing capabilities
• Connectors
• This solution is quite flexible. We have a lot of customization since we have our own business processes. 
• We use it to manage our users in SAP.

Maybe it is going this way with the angled frame work, but we really want to be able to watch and control things, so we can change things and know what the impact will be. 

Most importantly for automatic testing and rollouts, we need an easier way of connecting applications and an easier way of onboarding applications. At the moment, the process is very technical. People associate this as a technical and development thing. In the end, onboarding applications should be a business problem, not a development problem. They have take the technical work out of it. That is why we have to completely custom build a framework. Our work is not about connecting 20 or 50 target systems, as we have to connect thousands, which is difficult to do one-by-one. 

The end user experience needs improvement. One of the things the end users complain most about is the shopping cart, because they are not really on eBay or Amazon buying things. They just need access to business applications. Why do they have to click so many times? We probably have around 20 calls a day because a user hasn't got access, not realizing they haven't completed the shopping cart. So, I would recommend removing the shopping cart.

Stability has been a challenge. With version 8, especially post go-live, we had a lot of problems. We were doing care everyday on One Identity Manager for a good month and a half, just fixing things. Therefore, stability was not great at that time.

It is not really scalable. We had to put in a lot of customization to make it scalable. We ended up putting in a lot of instances to build it up to our scale, not only for performance capability, but for change capability. Therefore, if you have to scale for a large amount of people with several different themes, changing the configuration in One Identity can be hard to coordinate. Everyone has to have their own environments to work in; you cannot work in a joint environment easily.

The policy and role management features are a bit hard to scale. The whole model for who can do what and how to set it up is not so well-governed for a larger organization. The demos are always shown for a 100 or 1000 people, but when it is a large number, it is quite difficult to maintain.

The technical support lacks the knowledge on custom deployments. They have good knowledge on the base product, but they lack the knowledge on the custom deployments. 

Their attitude is a bit strange. Quite often, we have to prove that there is a problem with the product rather than having them prove that there is not a problem with the product.

We had some audit issues. We had a distributive access management landscape (fragmented landscape) that we wanted to centralize, because we had a lot of in-house built tools (very narrow scope of tools) that only did one thing. It was expensive to run a lot of different tools, and we wanted to replace it with one tool.

The initial setup was complex. There are a lot of processes, which have to be covered, with a lot of users. Everyone is affected in the organization. It is not an easy thing to standardize, so it is quite complex. Then, we have five different port identity systems working together. This also makes it quite complex with the data replication between them. Therefore, it was not a straightforward thing to do. However, access management isn't a straightforward thing to do.

The SAP integration is quite cumbersome and long. It took many years. With the new addition of the SAP client to the new system, it is not so difficult anymore. However, there are some challenges with the new SAP technologies where they are not really supported by the One Identity tools.

We have used several consultants for the deployment. We used One Identity Professional Services, Data Consulting, Mphasis, Microsoft, and other smaller ones, which usually come through an umbrella company.

We have improved our security.

It has increase employee productivity when it comes to provisioning and controlling access in the system. It previously used to be distributed between a lot of things. Now, we can do them all in a central way. We are now more automated. End users know where to go to access critical business applications. In the past, it was email-based, textile-based, phone calls, and service tickets, so it was hard to know how to get access.

We have a different product for privileged account governance.

Evaluate how you can do the rollout, how will you approach the rollout, and if you have other application. Check how you are going to do the rollout and plan for it, then evaluate the products against it.

It has increased our help desk calls a lot. We probably have between 60 and 100 access calls related to access management processes in One Identity Manager a day.

One Identity Manager has not impacted our cloud strategy and its management.