Okta Platform Reviews

My main use case for Okta Platform is single sign-on.

As a specific example of how I use Okta Platform for email sign-on in my organization, we log in to our browser and then enter our username and password, and then we receive a Google Authenticator code, a six-digit code which we enter, and then we can log in.

Okta Platform offers features that allow you to log in to multiple applications, including GitLab, Looker, Workday, and many more with single sign-on.

Out of those applications, single sign-on is the feature I find most valuable because it saves a significant amount of time for the user. If any new user is onboarded into the company, instead of giving them access to all the applications individually, we add them into the Okta Platform group and that is all that is needed. They can access all the company-based applications within approximately one minute.

Okta Platform has positively impacted our organization as it eliminates the manual intervention work of providing access to new users who join the company to multiple applications. Instead of that process, providing access to Okta Platform allows them to access all our applications. The time saved is approximately two to three hours.

I do not see any bugs or improvements needed in Okta Platform because it functions perfectly, and I have not faced any issues with Okta Platform in my career.

I have been using Okta Platform for seven years.

Okta Platform is stable.

Okta Platform's scalability is good.

I have not faced any issues, so I have never contacted customer support.

I did not previously use a different solution before Okta Platform.

I have not set up Okta Platform in my organization because when I joined, it was already deployed.

There is no specific team mentioned for the implementation.

I have seen a return on investment because only a few people are required to manage Okta Platform, and it saves a significant amount of time for us, approximately four to five hours.

There is no information provided regarding the setup cost.

There is no mention of any alternate solutions being considered.

If you are looking for single sign-on, then Okta Platform is the best option; you can confidently go with it.

Okta Platform could be a little faster. I have given this solution an overall rating of 10 out of 10.

Public Cloud

Google

Okta Platform serves as a single sign-on tool in our daily operations. We use Okta Platform because we have access to numerous applications, and it is impractical to add all websites to a favorites bar or remember all the passwords for these applications, tools, and websites. We have configured Okta Platform for every person, allowing them to connect to the tools and applications through single sign-on.

The best features Okta Platform offers are the ease of use and the ease of access.

The ease of use comes from the very user-friendly interface, which allows us to select the application we need to sign on to easily. The ease of access stands out because it can be accessed through one link only.

Okta Platform has positively impacted our organization because our staff can connect to all tools and applications we use from a single location, which has saved us time.

When we have a new joiner who does not know the links for our tools or applications, they spend time asking other users and may engage in lengthy conversations. Because of that, we advise the new joiner to sign in to Okta Platform, and they will find all the applications and tools they need.

Okta Platform can be improved by enhancing the mobile application because sometimes it has issues. Specifically, sometimes the OTP is not received for the mobile application.

I have used Okta Platform for approximately one and a half years.

My advice to others looking into using Okta Platform is that it saves money and effort and saves time, making it a great solution for your company. I rate this product 9 out of 10.

Hybrid Cloud

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

As an integrator, I work with Okta Platform.

Okta Platform can be used for IAM and IGA; it is a cloud-based solution for Identity and Access Management, as well as Identity Governance and Access.

As an integrator, I find Okta Platform user-friendly with a good number of connectors, making it easy to integrate with applications, and it is easy for SSO implementation and MFA implementation.

Lifecycle Management is configurable in Okta Platform; you can configure the joiners, movers, and leavers process with this product.

Okta Platform is a cloud-based platform, so you do not have to take care of installations as you would with on-premises solutions for SailPoint or Oracle Identity Management, which is a big difference.

Based on requirements, context-aware policies of Adaptive MFA are configurable, which is a plus point, as you can configure it based on certain requirements, such as adaptive authentication based on behavioral patterns and logging in from one place to another.

It is time-saving, which is definitely linked with money; a lesser number of users are required to do the manual work, so it has that impact on money as well.

I have not encountered any negative points for this product.

For log monitoring, after a certain period of time, logs are deleted, such as after three months, and you have to configure it using a separate or external SIEM connector, such as Splunk or Cortex XSOAR, because after 90 days, the logs will be deleted, so we have to take an export manually or add one external log monitoring solution.

If the organization is big, I can say Okta Platform is affordable; however, for small-scale industries, I would not recommend it, but for medium and enterprise organizations, it is good.

I have been using Okta Platform for approximately one to one and a half years.

Okta Platform is a stable product.

Okta Platform is a scalable product.

I can rate Okta Platform support at approximately eight or nine out of ten.

Positive

I have worked with Oracle Identity Management and SailPoint as other access management tools before.

I have not worked with Universal Directory in my case, and I have not worked on it recently.

Okta Platform is an IGA solution, so in terms of PAM capabilities, it is not working as PAM for storing passwords or secret vaults, such as Delinea or CyberArk; it is a completely different product.

Public Cloud

Other

We are currently using Okta Customer Identity as a managed service platform. We are building a platform where our customers can subscribe to different products of Okta Customer Identity, such as Access Manager, Entity Manager, and Okta Privileged Access. Our customers purchase subscriptions and create a PO number, which we use to perform technical implementations.

Okta Customer Identity is a SaaS-based application, making it easy to configure compared to competitors. It offers around eight thousand five hundred out-of-the-box connectors, providing an edge over other tools. It eliminates the need for configuring connectors using REST APIs as they are readily available. The Entity Manager is integrated with SSO, and Okta Customer Identity offers a wide range of protocols for federated single sign-on and token exchange. Okta Customer Identity also provides excellent documentation and training resources.

In Okta Identity Governance and Okta Privileged Access, some features are still being developed. Integration with Active Directory servers, Cisco routers, and switches is not currently available. Additionally, integration with platforms like DB2 and Oracle or SaaS-based databases is still in progress. These features need further development for full functionality.

The support from Okta Customer Identity is excellent, and I would rate it eight out of ten.

Positive

Okta Customer Identity is known for its easy configuration and deployment.

Okta Customer Identity is considered cheaper compared to other tools in the market, such as IBM and CyberArk products. Further details on costs would require consultation with our sales team.

I compared Okta Customer Identity with solutions like IBM Security Access Manager and CyberArk. While CyberArk is a fully functional tool with all features, Okta Customer Identity is more affordable and offers comparable functionality.

I rate Okta Customer Identity as nine out of ten. The Privileged Access Manager part is still in development but is expected to be in line with competitors like CyberArk or BeyondTrust soon.

Public Cloud

Other

We are an advertising company with around 400 employees in four different countries: Peru, Chile, Mexico, and Brazil. We have implemented Okta Customer Identity to enforce security in our applications and ensure all users access them securely. We use Okta Customer Identity for various applications like Office 365 and several other applications essential to our business.

Okta Customer Identity focuses on providing top-notch identity management solutions. One of its most valuable features is its easy integration with various applications through its extensive application directory, offering hundreds or thousands of applications ready to configure. This integration is significantly easier compared to Microsoft Entra ID, where we encountered numerous issues. We particularly value its real-time reporting capabilities. For example, we detected cyberattacks from countries like Russia and Asia and were able to block those IP addresses and configure our system for more security. These advanced security features and reporting capabilities make it easy to manage.

Okta Customer Identity is continuously improving its solution. Since we started using it in 2019, we have observed numerous enhancements to increase security.

We have been using Okta Customer Identity for more than five years in our company.

We had an issue a couple of years ago that was swiftly resolved by the support team, showing their efficiency. They also offer a comprehensive knowledge base on their website, which is very helpful for addressing any issues or queries.

Neutral

We evaluated Microsoft Entra ID but chose Okta Customer Identity because it is easier to integrate with various applications. Microsoft Entra ID presented many challenges and it was more difficult to manage integration processes.

The initial setup of Okta Customer Identity is straightforward due to its well-architected solution. It is intuitive and user-friendly for administrators to manage.

Okta Customer Identity is expensive compared to other solutions, but we believe the investment is justified given the rising cybersecurity threats. Despite the cost, it's cheaper than the potential financial loss from a security breach.

We evaluated Microsoft Entra ID.

Overall, I would rate Okta Customer Identity a ten. Okta Customer Identity is solely focused on identity management, which makes them excel in this area.

Private Cloud

Other

It is for Single Sign-on and Multi-Factor Authentication.

It is very easy to log in to all my various corporate accounts through Okta Platform. This helps me because I do not need to have any password. I just simply log into Okta Platform which has a single sign-on capability.

This helps us whenever our employees, our new employees come into the company. On first login, when they come into the company, they have access to all our corporate accounts already once they have their corporate account. They can log into their various productivity and corporate applications. This helps ease the burden from our IT support team to have to onboard someone manually. When someone leaves the company, having an IT team have to remove their access one by one is a very difficult process. Okta Platform Lifecycle Management helps us offboard those employees who have left the company more easily.

It would be great if there were a way to save even my social media passwords and other passwords through Okta Platform and single sign-on through Okta Platform in the future. I do not think they have this capability just yet.

I have been using this for six years.

There were some alternatives like JumpCloud and Ping Identity that we were evaluating. However, since we are a partner, we prefer Okta Platform. There is a bias towards Okta Platform.

I would say the setup difficulty was in the middle, depending on circumstances. For us, it was quite simple because we had everything in place. We just needed to integrate the Single Sign-on and the directory with our Google Workspace or our current IDP. It was pretty straightforward and took a couple of days.

Regarding pricing, as mentioned, we are a partner, so we do get a special big discount as a partner versus other customers.

There were some alternatives like JumpCloud and Ping Identity that we were evaluating.

Okta Platform is a great product and one of the best. We are a partner and have been using it for six years. We have four engineers on our team. We do not use the PAM and do not need it. I would rate this product nine out of ten.

Public Cloud

Other

Customers' workforce often operates within multiple scenarios and setups. For instance, some customers may use Microsoft Active Directory. For example, out of 5,000 employees, only 2,000 might be integrated into AD, while the rest could have access managed directly within specific applications by their respective owners. Users are burdened with managing multiple usernames and passwords, needing to input both separately whenever accessing an application. Moreover, there's a lack of visibility regarding which users possess privileged access, and whenever users change roles, it becomes challenging for customers to update access across various application layers due to the absence of centralised control. To address these issues, Okta Workforce Identity offers a solution. By consolidating identity and access management into a centralised repository, it streamlines access control, providing users with appropriate access levels based on their profiles. This centralised approach simplifies management for customers, enhancing security and efficiency.

Okta controls all the users. It has context-based access from the user and type of device. It identifies the risk and can do a step of authentication when that user is trying to access some sensitive application from an unknown device.

Okta offers single sign-on for those who prefer Microsoft or a single sign-on solution. They have integrated multiple applications with Azure. It still follows the old practice of creating usernames and passwords within the application for some legacy applications. We aim to address this issue by presenting an alternative. Instead of managing multiple username and password combinations. Azure can also integrate with IBM solutions. This creates a unified point of access once they adopt solutions like IBM's within their organisation.

If Okta Workforce Identity has a strong integration with other OEM solutions and can leverage intelligence from those OEMs to enable automatic restricted access for users, it would be highly appreciated. For instance, if it can integrate with DLP and EDR solutions, and if the DLP detects suspicious user activities, it should automatically restrict access to sensitive applications or prompt for multi factor authentication.

I have been using Okta Workforce Identity as an integrator.

The product is stable.

It is highly scalable. More than 2,000 users are using this solution. It is being used by some customers for their end customers, such as online e-commerce portals.

We work with all types of clients, but this particular solution is tailored for mid-scale enterprise customers. They should have at least 5,000 users and several hundred applications for this solution to be effective. The environment and the persona should be at a mature stage. In some organisations, there will be an IT manager, senior IT manager, and head of IT, who will be responsible for both infrastructure and security.

Whenever we need information, we receive the required support from Okta. So, if I need clarification regarding integration, communication, or any related matters, I can get support from the local IT team.

Positive

The initial setup requires the expertise of the professional services team.

Okta Workforce Identity is expensive due to currency differences, particularly between INR and USD.

I rate the product’s pricing a seven to eight out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

MFA must be implemented to access critical applications. Cost management is essential, as it's impractical to cover payments for all users across all applications. Therefore, a risk-based approach is necessary, where MFA is implemented selectively based on requirements from the same vendor or platform. This facilitates easier deployment, management, and provides a single dashboard view for identifying and managing risks effectively. It also enables the identification of the riskiest users within the organisation.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

We use the solution for authentication purposes to access our applications.

The solution has improved our employee onboarding process. The tool has two layers. If something is compromised, there is another layer of protection for our enterprise application.

Single sign-on is a valuable feature. We can log in to Microsoft and Google applications. The additional layer of protection and the multi-factor authentication process helps secure our on-prem solutions. The layer before the production will be exposed to the internet. Our IT operations have improved a lot. The operation has become more automated and augmented. We face no challenges in integrating the product with our legacy systems.

The product is expensive compared to other tools.

I have been using the solution for more than one year.

I rate the tool’s stability a nine out of ten. The stability is great. The tool is robust.

The tool is highly scalable. I rate the scalability a ten out of ten. We have more than 500 users. The product is used every day.

We have a team to raise tickets to the support team if we face any issues. The process is pretty straightforward.

Positive

The initial setup is pretty straightforward. I rate the ease of setup eight to nine out of ten. The deployment took two to three weeks. One person is enough to operate and maintain the solution.

Small and medium businesses cannot afford the tool. There are no additional costs associated with the tool. The vendor must reduce the price over time.

We used Microsoft Active Directory before. We evaluated Ping Identity, too.

We do not use the tool for remote access management. I will recommend the product to others. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

On-premises