What is our primary use case?
Whenever we face any challenges related to the movement of virtual machines from one cluster to another, we are using Prism Pro. It makes our life easy because with the help of the Prism Pro, we can manage the movement of virtual machines between clusters. We can validate and do complete health checks of physical hosts and logical hosts, as well as of the complete compute storage and other components. All those are converged and are a part of a single solution. With the help of Prism Pro, we are able to simplify our operations and administrative tasks.
It is deployed in an on-premises data center. Both data centers have a couple of pairs of clusters, and the clusters are interconnected, just like the data centers are connected. Both clusters are replicated between themselves to have their data synchronized and updated so that in the event of a failure in one of the data centers, the other data center can take over.
How has it helped my organization?
Its top benefits include:
- Time savings
- Simplification of operations
- Environment stability
- Application accessibility
We can assess the performance and the capabilities of the host. We can initiate sessions, and we can evaluate those sessions with the help of the Prism Pro dashboard, which helps with capacity planning. We can forecast our capacity planning, and we have complete infrastructure visibility through the dashboard to get an understanding of how to utilize our hardware and applications in a better way to gain maximum performance. It helps with ROI and achieving long-term goals. It also increases employee productivity and workforce satisfaction.
It saves cost. After using this solution, we have clear-cut savings of more than 40%. It also saves time. We were able to see the results within 45 days from the time of its deployment.
It simplifies the administration and reduces human errors. It simplifies operation by providing a single dashboard. It also encourages the use of more automation.
Its integration with third-party tools is very easy. We have complete visibility. We can very nicely use the solution in our ITSM model. We are using third-party tools from different vendors for more insights, and with the help of automation, we are able to do application optimization, alert optimization, etc.
We are using it to manage VMware and Nutanix. The important part is that we don't have to depend on a multi-vendor management prototype. We can extend support to third-party vendors as well.
It reduces our overall power consumption. We follow the go-green environmental approach. We like to utilize the resources in a more efficient way. With this solution, we are able to save power.
The fact that NCM is sold as one product with multiple tiers is very important for us. A single-vendor solution is easy to manage. A heterogeneous type of environment is very difficult to manage because we require different types of skill sets, and managing the solution becomes more complex.
What is most valuable?
We are using Prism Pro, and the features related to the reporting capabilities, health checks, and automated alerts to Nutanix call-home are very important. We are using it as a management and reporting tool, and we are able to get a complete overview or summarized form of clusters that we are using in the production.
It has been helpful for forecasting and planning. It has also been helpful for analytics. With the help of this solution, we can have a better understanding of how much storage we are utilizing and how many processes are currently in use. Based on this information, we get a better understanding of how much expansion we need going forward, which is very important because ultimately it saves cost. It simplifies operations and helps with more revenue and productivity. It brings stability to our production environment. With the help of forecasting and capacity planning, we can achieve all of our long-term organizational goals.
It is more cost-centric as compared to other solutions. It provides us with a holistic view of all the applications that we are using, and the most important point is that everything is converged. It is a one-box solution. It fits well with our requirements, and we are happy to have this type of solution in our production environment.
What needs improvement?
For Nutanix, there are options to go with different types of hardware vendors for using the AOS operating system. We can deploy it on Dell, Lenovo, or IBM servers. If Nutanix had its own server, it would be good.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using this solution for the last two years. We have been using the Nutanix Cloud Manager version for the past several months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
There have been no issues related to its stability. We haven't faced any challenges in our deployed solution. On a periodic basis, we receive notifications from Nutanix about any vulnerabilities. Whenever a vulnerability is identified, we immediately get a notification to apply a patch and fix it. The system is up to date, and there are no vulnerabilities. It is stable, and we haven't faced any challenges in accessing applications. The overall performance related to the CPU memory, IO processes, and storage is at an optimal level, and we don't have any challenges. We are good.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
In terms of scalability, it is very flexible. There are no challenges. It is a highly scalable solution, and expansion and migration are very easy. Everything is good.
How are customer service and support?
Their technical support is excellent. If we need any support, they have 24/7/365 support. There are multiple ways to reach the support, and we get immediate assistance. In case of any criticality, they are able to manage the issue. They were able to resolve small, moderate, and high-level issues in a quick manner. We didn't face any issues related to escalations or unavailability with them.
Their knowledge is wonderful. Their technical teams are well-equipped in terms of skills. I would rate them a 10 out of 10.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Before this deployment, we were not using any similar solution.
How was the initial setup?
It was straightforward because there was no migration or extension involved. We were using the solution as a first-time solution. So, everything had to be put in place new, and everything went well. We didn't face any challenges in terms of setup, deployment, and support. The deployment went well in a simplified case-to-case manner, and the operations have been very smooth. It didn't take more than 60 days.
Apart from the post-sales training where our resources got trained by Nutanix, our technical team members are also getting trained on a regular basis. We have regular schedules for technical training of our teams.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Its acquisition and support cost is nominal. It is not too high, and it is not too low. It is within the budget, and there are no issues on that part.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We looked at solutions from Cisco, Dell, and Nutanix. That's all. We chose Nutanix because of the cost and also because of the complete package. It included a multi-year support contract, and it is an all-in-one-box type of solution.
It is easy to migrate and expand. Most of the things are web-based. So, it is easy for anyone to understand and stabilize the operations. Our applications ran very well on the platform during the PoC. They are running well now too. These were the factors for using this solution.
This solution is very unique for our office. No other vendor has this type of solution in place, even though they are claiming to have a converged solution. As per our understanding and observation, Nutanix has a unique and excellent solution in place.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate it a 10 out of 10 because everything is stable, and we are able to achieve all of our objectives. We are happy customers.
Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.