it_user692274 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Infrastructure Architect at a wellness & fitness company with 501-1,000 employees
Vendor
Valuable features include one-click upgrade and data locality.
Pros and Cons
  • "Data locality provides super-fast data access and ultra-low latency."
  • "To receive a performance enhancement by merely clicking the one button upgrade is the true value of the platform and what I look forward to the most."

    How has it helped my organization?

    Our 125 seat VDI implementation went from barely usable, to a good alternative, to desktops. The performance of our server apps has never been better.

    What is most valuable?

    One-click upgrade and data locality are valuable features. The one-click upgrade provides simple management and upgrades. Data locality provides super-fast data access and ultra-low latency.

    What needs improvement?

    The focus on performance improvements over new features is more important to me. It is always fun to play with new buttons in the platform.

    In reality, it is hard for me to find flaws in this platform because it is without comparing. For me, the fact that I run all of my workloads on Nutanix, which is a software defined datacenter platform, the biggest advantage for me is performance increases with updates. I was once asked what does "Software Defined" mean to me. My response was "a platform that allows for your next feature or performance upgrade to be as easy as a software patch or update."

    To receive a performance enhancement by merely clicking the one button upgrade is the true value of the platform and what I look forward to the most. I do understand that new features provide the wow in the platform and I completely understand this value. However, for a datacenter admin, performance increases without cost, and sometimes unexpectedly delivered, is real wow.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    There have been no stability issues so far.

    Buyer's Guide
    Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI)
    April 2024
    Learn what your peers think about Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
    770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    There were no issues with scalability. It's built for scale.

    How are customer service and support?

    Nutanix support is second to none. There has never been an issue when interacting with them.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    We previously used Vblock, a converged solution. We switched for many reasons. Footprint, power, cooling, savings, and support time.

    How was the initial setup?

    I did the setup myself in less than 45 minutes from box to data.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    You get what you pay for here.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    We evaluated VMware VXRail/Rack and SimpliVity. We did PoCs. The hands-down winner was Nutanix!

    What other advice do I have?

    Do a PoC and judge for yourself. It costs nothing but time.

    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    PeerSpot user
    PeerSpot user
    Hyperconverged specialist with Nutanix & CEO at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
    Consultant
    It provides a distributed storage fabric and setup was simple.

    What is most valuable?

    • Distributed storage fabric

    How has it helped my organization?

    We don’t need to be SAN or virtualization experts J

    What needs improvement?

    • Manage virtualization layer with Hyper-V

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have used it for three years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    I have not encountered any stability issues.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    I have not encountered any scalability issues.

    How are customer service and technical support?

    Technical support is 10/10.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    We previously used DataCore, but scaling it is too difficult.

    How was the initial setup?

    Initial setup was too simple. Our datacenter was on in two hours.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    Pricing and licensing is so correct compared with other solutions.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    I have not evaluate other options because for the past three years, Nutanix has been the leader in hyperconverged solutions.

    What other advice do I have?

    Choose Nutanix for the simplicity and performance ahead of other products.

    Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: We are a reseller of Nutanix products.
    PeerSpot user
    Buyer's Guide
    Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI)
    April 2024
    Learn what your peers think about Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
    770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    it_user327513 - PeerSpot reviewer
    Technical Director at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
    Consultant
    Metro availability with synchronous replication is most appreciable for my customer, but cloning VMs in Prism would be nice.

    What is most valuable?

    • Metro availability
    • Fingerprinting

    How has it helped my organization?

    Metro availability with synchronous replication is most appreciable for my customer. Its benefit is high avaibility in production.

    What needs improvement?

    Maybe more functions for Prism with VMmware, for example, cloning VMs in Prism, exactly like Acropolis.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I've used them for almost three years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    One time, with IPMI not reachable for CVM. I troubleshot this problem with Nutanix US support.

    How are customer service and technical support?

    It's at a high level.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    No previous solution was used.

    How was the initial setup?

    It is small but complex. Howerver, if you have a good skills with virtualization solutions, and Linux systems, you can install it without any problems.

    What about the implementation team?

    I installed the solution alone. My advice is to read the Nutanix documents before your installation.

    What was our ROI?

    I have am immediately gain, as it has lower hardware maintenance costs, and lower electricity consumption.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    I have evaluated SimpliVity OmniCube.

    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    PeerSpot user
    it_user302127 - PeerSpot reviewer
    Network Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
    Vendor
    It centralizes management, so we can build clouds anywhere, but they should replace all the hard drives with SSD.

    Valuable Features

    All the software-defined, hyper-converged, and cloud-based infrastructure provide our network with VMs and storage.

    Improvements to My Organization

    It centralizes management, so we can build clouds anywhere. Regardless of the hardware platform, it still works.

    Room for Improvement

    The processing power is OK, but for the future it needs to be better. Replacing all the hard drives with SSD would dramatically improve performance.

    Stability Issues

    • Very good compression
    • QoS is very good

    Scalability Issues

    It's highly scalable because it's all in the cloud.

    Customer Service and Technical Support

    We often use technical support, but usually we grab an account manager who sends an entire team.

    Initial Setup

    It was very easy.

    Other Advice

    The solution you choose will depend on your budget. If you want to build a hybrid cloud, and have a good balance between cost and performance, then Nutanix is good option.

    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    PeerSpot user
    it_user234735 - PeerSpot reviewer
    Technology Consultant, ASEAN at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
    Consultant
    Reduces complexity but does not use RAID and there is no RAID Controller.

    Nutanix is hyper-converged infrastructure, which is currently a major concern in the world of IT. New players are appearing in hyper-converged infrastructure like Simplivity, VMware EVO: Rail, EMC ScaleIO, and so forth.

    Waht is Hyper-Converged?

    Hyper-Converged is the solution to combine Computer (Server), Storage and Networks in one solution or in one hardware. This solution will reduce complexity of the management and also the price. So like in Nutanix, the 2 U Server, in which there are four independent servers (nodes), who each have 2 Socket CPU, RAM, 2x10GbE, 2x1GbE, 6 Disks. Bringing the total in 2U Server (Series NX-3450) there are 80 CPU Cores, 2TB RAM (assuming 512GB per node), 8x10GbE and 16TB SATA Row, Row 3.2TB SSD.

    Storage in Nutanix (Converged Storage), reduces the complexity of the storage layer, because it does not need LUN, Volume, Zoning, etc as when we configure FC Storage. Storage in Nutanix is NFS, NFS is the benefit of reducing the overhead of the disk groups and LUNs.

    Nutanix Architecture

    Inside there is a term Nutanix nodes and blocks.Block is a 2U rack mount chassis in which there are four nodes.Hardware Nutanix is OEM Super Micro or Dell.

    In each of these nodes are Nutanix Controller VM (CVM). CVM is a storage appliance or controllers which use VMware Direct Path for direct access to the LSI Disk Controller. This is what allows the CVM to control the disks directly without passing through the hypervisor (ESXi or Hyper-V or KVM). Nutanix does not use RAID and no RAID Controller therein. Nutanix Distributed Files System (NDFS) algorithm is owned (proprietary) by Nutanix system for distributing files or replicating data to each Node. NDFS is a similar technology as used by Googles Files System, Facebook and other Web-Scale Technology.

    Hypervisor is installed in the SATA DOM (Disk on Motherboard) module. So there is a flash chip in the motherboard 64GB per node (read article unboxing Nutanix). CVM is a VM running on the hypervisor, which has the configuration of 8 vCPUs and 16-24GB RAM.CVM has two vNICs that one vNIC to connect to the production network and one vNIC to connect to a private vSwitch. Private vSwitch VMkernel adapters have and currently do not have physical network adapter (Punic). Private network used for communication from the host to the CVM for mounting NFS datastore of Nutanix Storage Cluster.CVM uses public vNIX for communication between the CVM in other nodes and also for monitoring cluster plus replicate data.

    The figure below is a diagram per Node:

    And the image below is a diagram per Cluster Nutanix:

    And some of the questions often asked are:

    1. What happens when CVM failure in one node? Autopathing will redirect IO to the CVM in other nodes in the same cluster.
    2. What happens when a disk failure on one node?Nutanix Storage Cluster will "sustain" the current single disk failure, and the system will redistribute data through Cluster.When the rebuild or redistribution is complete it will Cluster Healthy back.This process is very fast (ms).
    3. What happens when one node failure?The process is almost the same as point 2, the data will redistribute within the Cluster.Only this process Nutanix uses MapReduce to speed up the process.If we have three nodes in one cluster, then only allowed one node failure.Therefore, at least 3 nodes required to form 1 Nutanix Cluster.

    Management Console

    Management Console in Nutanix is PRISM.PRISM is a web interface as shown below.

    The first time we log in, then the initial menu as shown above.Visible top left is the ESXi hypervisor is installed, if you use Microsoft Windows, the look is Hyper-V.Then also seen versions of ESXi, below is the total storage capacity, a total of VMs (VMs 230), total node (5) and total blocks (2).In the middle column visible performance monitoring IOPS, bandwidth, CPU and Memory.And the rightmost column is the Events and Alerts.

    Top left corner there is a drop down menu (Home), then I moved to the Storage menu Diagram View.It will appear as shown below.

    Now we move to the VM menu, which will give us the details of the VM is running in the cluster.Seen there total VM, total CPU and Memory.Then there is also a report by IOPS, Latency IO, Memory Usage and CPU Usage.

    Then we move to the VM Table, it is seen in detail per-VM, as shown below. If we look at the information that there is, then I think this function together with VMware vCenter Ops, which did not exist just Forecast Analysis. Here we can search the VM and then perform analysis per-VM performance based on CPU, Memory, IOPS, Latency, or Network.

    And now we move to the Storage menu Diagram.Seen all information relating to such Usage Storage, IOPS, bandwidth IO, IO Latency. And in the top right corner, there are two menus of "Container" and "Storage Pool".

    Storage Pool, is the union of all disks that exist in all Nodes.Container is as Datastore. We can make some Container in 1 Storage Pool.As with traditional storage, we can make some LUNs in 1 Disk Group.

    Interestingly here is Nutanix without RAID but using NDFS, no volume or LUNs. For example, we will create one Container, then I click menu in the top right corner Container, the menu will appear below.

    Interestingly, we we would like to mount the new container to multiple hosts / nodes, we just need to do the check as shown below.Imagine if we use the SAN, must do Zoning first, then setting WWN ID to each of the hosts, and so on.

    And we can compress or dedup the container that we have made, and only one click then completed as shown below. Interesting is it not it?

    And no less, that is build-in replication. We can do replication N-Way means can perform replication to 3rd place (A-> B-> C) upto 6th place (A-> B-> C-> D-> E-> F). Which greatly facilitates that we can do per-VM based and fixed per block-level replication. Imagine in traditional storage, replication must be done LUN to LUN.So if there are 50-VM per LUN, then total all 50 VM will be replicated to the LUN in the DR Site.Replication in Nutanix, can be integrated with VMware SRM.

    Likewise reviews Nutanix, although not as complete but could be an additional complete our knowledge. And we will come back to a Nutanix detailed discussion at a later time.

    Thanks to Nutanix for allowing me to "box-test" Nutanix lab in Singapore.
    I would like to thank the team for greater Nutanix Reviews their help in providing the access to Reviews their lab and willingness to answer questions during our process.

    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    PeerSpot user
    Enterprise Solutions Executive (AWS Certified Solutions Architect) at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
    Real User
    Simple to manage, excellent support, and highly reliable
    Pros and Cons
    • "The most valuable features of Nutanix Acropolis AOS are ease of management, hyper-convergence platform, and it has robust operations."
    • "There are other services that Nutanix has that could be improved, but I'm not very familiar with the other services of Nutanix, such as Era and Flow. However, they seem a bit hard for us to implement and integrate with the Nutanix Acropolis AOS and other Nutanix tools. We would not dare to implement those other Nutanix solutions into Nutanix Acropolis AOS right now. The implementation of that tool could be the problem, I am a bit hesitant to implement the other tools into Nutanix Acropolis AOS."

    What is our primary use case?

    We are a cloud provider and we are giving cloud services via Nutanix Acropolis AOS, such as core virtual services. This is why we implemented Nutanix Acropolis AOS into our data center.

    How has it helped my organization?

    Nutanix Acropolis AOS has improved our organization because of the ease of management. We don't have to deal with any other solutions besides Nutanix Acropolis AOS. If it was a three-tiered architecture, we would have to struggle with the HBA cards from the upgrade, storage area, networks, switches, and other hardware. We only need to deal with the physical servers and the Nutanix on top of it. This is why it's very easy to manage, and that is saving us a lot of time for our technical operations.

    What is most valuable?

    The most valuable features of Nutanix Acropolis AOS are ease of management, hyper-convergence platform, and it has robust operations.

    What needs improvement?

    There are other services that Nutanix has that could be improved, but I'm not very familiar with the other services of Nutanix, such as Era and Flow. However, they seem a bit hard for us to implement and integrate with the Nutanix Acropolis AOS and other Nutanix tools. We would not dare to implement those other Nutanix solutions into Nutanix Acropolis AOS right now. The implementation of that tool could be the problem, I am a bit hesitant to implement the other tools into Nutanix Acropolis AOS.

    Nutanix could integrate all of its solutions into one package to allow one implementation, such as Nutanix Acropolis AOS and the other related ecosystem solutions. You should be able to integrate them all in one step. The current method is to first install Nutanix Acropolis AOS then you need to install Prism, Era, and Flow. I would like to see a setup that implements all of those Nutanix tools at once.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using Nutanix Acropolis AOS for approximately three years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    The stability of Nutanix Acropolis AOS is very high. We have only had one or two problems in our cluster over the past two years. The problems that we did have were solved very quickly by Nutanix and by our technical service engineers together. I would say that it's robust and problem-free.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    In our cluster, we have more than 50 servers and as the cluster gets larger, there are some stability issues sometimes, but they are not critical. They can improve on the scalability because when one or two servers are down in our cluster, Nutanix Acropolis AOS struggles to balance the load to the other server clusters and it can take some time. In the time it is attempting to balance the clusters some of our customers are affected by the delay problem. It is not critical, but it could be made better to avoid this in the future.

    We have approximately 16 people that are using this solution in my company on a daily basis.

    How are customer service and support?

    The technical support is very good, they solved some problems we had and they worked with our team well.

    The team from Nutanix focuses on the problem and they don't let us go before the problem has been solved. They are very interested in problematic cases and their resolutions.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    I have used VMware and Hyper-V. We have different customers using these other solutions.

    How was the initial setup?

    The initial setup of Nutanix Acropolis AOS is straightforward. The whole process took no more than one day.

    We have added a couple of servers each month onto our platform and it's very straightforward.

    What about the implementation team?

    We have a department in my company that handles the implementation and maintenance of Nutanix Acropolis AOS. We have 15 technicians but we only have two that handle this solution.

    What was our ROI?

    We have seen a return on investment because it's a robust platform. We do not have to deal with Nutanix Acropolis AOS related problems every day or from time to time. It gives a return on investment within a year or two.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    When we purchase a new physical server or a couple of physical servers into our cluster, we always purchase it with Nutanix licensing. We are receiving the license from Nutanix directly and not from the vendor. In the way we're dealing, with the licenses it is a bit costly for us but as the company is getting larger, day by day or year by year, those licensing costs become lower each time for us. We are purchasing the licenses for three years for some of our clusters and for some others for five-year licenses and the licenses are still costly. We have good discounts for the licenses, but it is still expensive.

    What other advice do I have?

    My advice to those wanting to implement Nutanix Acropolis AOS is to know the solution well before they do the implementation. They will have to receive some training about Nutanix Acropolis AOS. It's not easy to implement, but once you get used to it, it is very easy to do the implementation in the later phases. I would recommend people to get the training it is important.

    I rate Nutanix Acropolis AOS an eight out of ten.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    Public Cloud
    Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
    PeerSpot user
    PeerSpot user
    Managing Consultant with 51-200 employees
    Vendor
    Nutanix vs. VMware EVO:RAIL vs. FlexPod

    Originally posted at www.storagegaga.com/dont-get-too-drunk-on-hyper-converged/

    I hate the fact that I am bursting the big bubble brewing about Hyper Convergence (HC). I urge all to look past the hot air and hype frenzy that are going on, because in the end, the HC platforms have to be aligned and congruent to the organization’s data architecture and business plans.

    The announcement of Gartner’s latest Magic Quadrant on Integrated Systems (read hyper convergence) has put Nutanix as the leader of the pack as of August 2015. Clearly, many of us get caught up because it is the “greatest feeling in the world”. However, this faux feeling is not reality because there are many factors that made the pack leaders in the Magic Quadrant (MQ).

    First of all, the MQ is about market perception. There is no doubt that the pack leaders in the Leaders Quadrant have earned their right to be there. Each company’s revenue, market share, gross margin, company’s profitability have helped put each as leaders in the pack. However, it is also measured by branding, marketing, market perception and acceptance and other intangible factors.

    Secondly, VMware EVO: Rail has split the market when EMC has 3 HC solutions in VCE, ScaleIO and EVO: Rail. Cisco wanted to do their own HC piece in Whiptail (between the 2014 MQ and 2015 MQ reports), and closed down Whiptail when their new CEO came on board. NetApp chose EVO: Rail and also has the ever popular FlexPod. That is why you see that in this latest MQ report, NetApp and Cisco are interpreted independently whereas in last year’s report, it was Cisco/NetApp. Market forces changed, and perception changed.

    The most glaring gap of the Gartner MQ is, it does not measure how good each technology is against the competitors, and therefore, boxes like Nutanix and Simplivity, and also the motley crew of so-called EVO:Rail partners, are simply betting on how good they pitch to get into the MQ Leaders Quadrant as part of their agenda.

    It is not common that a vendor would do a bake-off against a competitor because one might fall flat on his/her face if they lose the bake-off. Recently we witnessed the big shouting match between Nutanix and VMware, each trying to out-boast the other with claims and counter claims of how good their performance was. Here is VMware’s Chuck Hollis’ piece and here is Nutanix’s piece (part 4 anyway). It was hounding the blogosphere with so much *bleep* that it felt like a game of Kabaddi. (Look up the game of Kabaddi).

    The dare, double-dare and triple-dare went on for a few weeks between VMware and Nutanix until Storage Review, an online “independent” storage articles and news aggregator, probably got sick of this undignified spat. Storage Review ran the Nutanix’s tests (and blogged about it) and came up with some unexpected results. Nutanix got disillusioned and started to dictate what should be in the performance tests and went through some “innocent” and “hilarious” acts to justify the results. You can read about them here. Page 2 of that article started the “We ask you not to …” comments to Storage Review, which I thought was really funny.

    That’s just it. The Hyper Converged vendors spend a lot of the resource and marketing on hypping up performance, and little of everything else. It is true that storage performance is needed for 25-30% of the active data. However, in any organization, we know very well that 70-75% of the data in the entire data lifecycle is non-active, Tier-3 or archived data. Hyper Converged systems and platforms ignore this passive data space. They do not play with inactive data landscape because the $/GB or $/TB is too expensive.

    Furthermore, if we look at the entire HC thingy more close, it is just Software-Defined because it is just a wonderful piece of proprietary software running on an ODM (original design manufacturer) x86 platform. EMC VSPEX is rumoured to be running on the Quanta systems and Nutanix on Supermicro. Why do we need to pay a premium price for a piece of whitebox hardware?

    We must overcome the hype and read beyond the messages that vendors, partners who tend to oversell their technology. We must look at what is required in our business, in our operations and look at our data requirements. I constantly share that we must look at our data landscape and use the 7 points that I always use to consider a technology – Availability, Performance, Protection, Accessibility, Management, Security and Compliance. Is the HC technology and the solution relevant to your organization’s business?

    So, if you want to Hyper Converged, please Hyper Converge responsibly. Your data landscape architecture will thank you for it.

    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    PeerSpot user
    it_user307227 - PeerSpot reviewer
    it_user307227Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
    Consultant

    Brian - I think your analogy of buying a car is perfect..... for the average driver. I run all season tires on 2 of my 3 vehicles - they perform *adequately* in *most* conditions. However, when I want to drive in harsh conditions, or at a higher performance level, I equip my car with tires that are designed for the conditions. Thus while I happily drive in the blizzard, I pass the GLKs, the Jeeps, etc., because my winter tires are designed for the cold and the snow, while they are sitting in the ditch spinning with their OEM tires.

    I'd like to thank you for pointing out that Nutanix is geared to the "get in and drive" consumer, rather than those who know and understand their processing needs. For those of us who still need a higher performing system, we will continue to assess, design, and implement systems that meet and exceed those needs.

    See all 2 comments
    PeerSpot user
    Solution Consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
    Consultant
    It controls data sets and metadata well with local read/write access and real-time distribution to other hosts, but it slows down in systems with large block sizes in random write.

    What is most valuable?

    • Shadow clone
    • Deduplication fingerprint on ingest

    How has it helped my organization?

    The beauty of this product is that it is very intelligent in controlling the data set and metadata. It fully utilizes the memory, hard disk, and CPU, and leverage big data components such as a Cassandra database as a metadata database to hold each of the nodes for a redundancy issue if there's a node or disk failure.

    Each of the applications can perform data access in read and write locally, and also distribute a second copy of data to other hosts in real time, which ensures data will not be lost if there is a hard disk failure, and this avoids storage I/O bottleneck issues.

    What needs improvement?

    When operating a system which has a large capacity and large block sizes in random write, the performance will slow down a little bit.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I've used it for two and a half years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    No issues encountered.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    No issues encountered.

    How are customer service and technical support?

    Customer Service:

    7/10.

    Technical Support:

    10/10 as Nutanix support provides all our hypervisor support.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    No, because no one is similar to Nutanix in using 100% software define storage.

    How was the initial setup?

    It's very straightforward. It makes a complete workflow and software for operation. In fact, it's so easy it will make implementation engineers obsolete.

    What about the implementation team?

    I implemtented it myself.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    It's very simple and cost effective.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    • VMware vSAN
    • HP CS200
    Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
    PeerSpot user
    it_user292980 - PeerSpot reviewer
    it_user292980Solution Consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
    Consultant

    Very cool system.

    Buyer's Guide
    Download our free Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
    Updated: April 2024
    Buyer's Guide
    Download our free Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.