Microsoft Intune Reviews

It is good data protection - protecting your endpoints, information on those endpoints, and information stored centrally in Office 365. It focuses on endpoint protection, configuration, and visibility. 

You need to know what you have and where it is before you can consider protection. As an MDM umbrella covering all mobile devices, we can instantly see across all of them and centrally manage policies.

The most obvious example of improvement is full hard drive encryption. You want all your endpoints encrypted, and if a device is lost or stolen, you want to be able to wipe it remotely or disable it remotely. MDM allows all of these features. 

We can ensure all devices are encrypted, check instantly and get reports, reset them, wipe them, or block them remotely at any time from anywhere in the world. These are powerful and crucial tools for incident management and data and information governance. You need to be able to protect what you need to protect.

It's very powerful for onboarding employees. It's also powerful for integrating other software applications or pushing out solutions. For example, we use Intune, or sometimes MDM, to ensure all our computers have CrowdStrike installed. MDM automates the installation process, and we get reports confirming its success.

We can also use it to push out other important security software and see any unauthorized software present on the machines. Although we primarily use CrowdStrike for that purpose. CrowdStrike can scan every computer, identify potential threats, and prevent the installation of unauthorized software in the first place. 

So, MDM is great for integration in terms of onboarding new staff remotely and securely. It confirms the computer matches all our policies and flags any non-compliance issues. Based on compliance, we can even stop non-compliant devices from connecting to our network through conditional access policies. It's all very automated within Office 365. It integrates everything together, by design.

It's excellent. Top-class product. 

Fundamentally, MDM is the ability to centrally manage all of our endpoints in terms of the policies applied to them, along with all the actions we can perform on the devices themselves. 

We need to harmonize policies across all machines, update them in real time, and get reports. So, all endpoints constantly communicate with Intune, allowing us to view, disable, restart, and push new policies at any moment. It's this centralized control over a distributed network of endpoints that's crucial.

Because our endpoints were remote-first, not centrally located, how else would you manage a large network of computers scattered across individual homes? An MDM solution is the only way. That's why it's so valuable. 

We can manage and standardize security across your environment, identify problems, receive alerts, and so on. That's its purpose, and that's also why it's so good.

The reporting is excellent. You can draw what information you want in the reports. So, that's also excellent. I would rate the rating capabilities a ten out of ten as well.

It's hard to point to an area of improvement because, like most Microsoft cloud services, they're constantly evolving and adapting. Keeping up with the changes can be more challenging than finding features that are missing.

The only thing to consider is complexity. Think about Excel. It can do everything imaginable, but it's not necessarily the easiest software to use. You need to know how to use it.

Similarly, while Intune might have all the functions you need, finding or configuring them can be difficult, especially for new users. The key is user experience, making essential features easier to find. It's easy to get lost in the complexity.

However, I've never found a crucial function missing in Intune. It just can be challenging to navigate sometimes. They're always working on making it more user-friendly, but it's a difficult task for something so complex. So, improving user experience would be my suggestion for improvement.

In future releases, I would like to see better integration with Apple products. While they integrate reasonably well already, it's never quite as seamless or up-to-date as it is with Windows. That would be helpful because many companies have a mix of devices. So, better integration with macOS.

 I have been working with this product since the beginning, forever.

When I joined the company, everything was already in Office 365. No physical network, and no domain controller. All devices are connected by the internet, not a physical office network.

I've never had any issues with stability. I'd rate it a nine out of ten because I rarely give anything a perfect ten. But it's very stable. I haven't experienced any stability issues.

It's perfectly scalable. I'd rate the scalability a ten out of ten.

There are around 200 end users using it in my company. 

The customer service and support are excellent. 

Positive

We use a family of products. We don't want to put all our eggs in one basket. For example, we use software from other providers for security awareness training, phishing protection, and so on. 

However, as a Microsoft Gold Partner, we're heavily integrated with Office 365, Microsoft Defender for Security Center, and everything that goes along with Azure and Office. We essentially have a suite of different tools depending on the specific need.

For our Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) or physical endpoint security on laptops, we also use CrowdStrike. Our approach involves leveraging different options depending on their strengths.

Some vendors like CrowdStrike claim they can do everything, but we prefer specialization. We want different providers to handle different aspects of our security.

We have Microsoft Defender, which provides access to threat intelligence and also offers endpoint protection. While Defender is a competitor to CrowdStrike, we avoid using its endpoint protection functionality to maintain our distributed security approach. However, we utilize Microsoft Intune for Mobile Device Management (MDM).

And through Intune, we can push out policies that enforce specific security standards on all our computers, such as encryption.

We leverage it for managing device security policies. Additionally, all our devices access Office 365.

We use Microsoft security features within Office 365, SharePoint, and OneDrive. 

As with everything in IT, once you reach a certain level of complexity, which Intune does, the rule is: everything is easy when you know how, and everything is difficult when you don't.

Especially with something as complex as MDM, if you don't know everything, it can be very difficult. But if you do, it can be easy. So, it depends. There are very few people who know absolutely everything.

So, there is a difficulty there, but once you know how to do it, it's easy. Like user experience is not necessarily intuitive.

The pricing is not cheap, especially with inflation. They've had to increase their prices. It's not excessive, but alright. So, it's reasonable, but it would be better if it were lower.

In my experience, it would be difficult to find a competitor. It's kind of the gold standard because it's Microsoft dealing with Windows. They have an inherent advantage.

If a third-party vendor tries to offer a competing MDM solution, they're always a bit behind the curve. They don't have first access to all updates or the roadmap for future developments. There's always an element of catching up. 

On the other hand, Microsoft can bake these changes into the product as they make them. So, on that basis, it's quite simply the best.

Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. 

I use Intune to control and protect my laptop. It keeps things secure, manages apps, and ensures everything follows the rules. Overall, I am quite satisfied with it.

Intune has positively impacted IT productivity in our organization. It centralizes device information and software installations, allowing us to quickly identify and address vulnerabilities. For example, we can easily find all vulnerable devices and take prompt actions to secure them by patching vulnerabilities in software.

Intune has contributed to reducing the risk of security breaches in our organization. When we identify vulnerabilities, Intune allows us to quickly quarantine and patch them, minimizing the potential for security threats.

The most valuable feature of Intune is the central dashboard for compliance and policy management. It is also handy for asset management and it covers all the basics we need right now.

There is room for improvement, particularly on the Apple side. Enhancements for managing MacOS more comprehensively would be beneficial. While it is good, there are still features missing compared to the management capabilities we have for other operating systems.

I have been using Microsoft Intune for three years.

Overall, the product has been stable.

I would rate the scalability of Intune as a nine out of ten. I'm sure that with better Mac OS support, it could be a perfect ten. In our company, three admins manage around 1,000 devices using Intune.

We don't rely on technical support extensively, but when needed, Microsoft provides satisfactory assistance. I would rate their support at an eight out of ten. Improvements could be made in response speed and overall competence, but as long as they maintain good technology support, it is sufficient for our needs.

Positive

We work with various Microsoft products, including Office 365 Enterprise licenses, Azure, and numerous other licenses and services. Our setup involves multiple tenants and subscriptions, covering a wide range of Microsoft offerings.

I was involved in some areas of the deployment, and it was quite straightforward, especially on the client side where we handled it internally. Rolling it out to nearly 1,0000 computers took some time, just under a year. We managed it with a team of three people.

The pricing for Intune is competitive.

Intune does a good job handling Microsoft tools, but not everything is in one place. We have used Microsoft products for ten years, and while Intune does its job well, it doesn't bring all our endpoint and security tools together. It is part of the picture, but not the whole thing.

Intune provides complete visibility and control across various device platforms, which is crucial for me, as it ensures effective IT management. Intune significantly helps our IT operations by giving a clear view of the overall status of the laptops and endpoints we currently use. The user experience of Intune is good.

Intune plays a role in securing hybrid work, but it is more about configuration. Microsoft Defender handles the security aspects, and while Intune shows the steps, it doesn't secure the environment on its own.

The cost savings from Intune in our organization are significant, potentially in the tens of thousands, depending on the severity of security incidents.

Using Intune has allowed us to consolidate vendors as we no longer require third-party MDM software, enabling us to stick with the same vendor.

The consolidation of vendors, primarily through using Intune, has positively impacted our security posture. It allows us to view the overall status in one centralized place. The consolidation didn't affect licensing costs; there was no change.

Intune has become increasingly important in our cloud journey. Integrating Intune capabilities with Microsoft 365 for both cloud and on-premises-managed devices is valuable. We use it regularly, and while it is hard to quantify its exact impact, it plays a significant role in our operations.

Overall, I would rate Microsoft Intune as a nine out of ten.

I use Microsoft Intune to manage and secure all our devices from one central platform. It helps me enroll and configure devices, deploy applications, and enforce security policies.

We chose Microsoft Intune to enhance endpoint management, leveraging Azure Active Directory for robust authentication. Intune's cloud-based solutions streamline device and application management, providing a user-friendly interface while ensuring strong security measures and policy compliance.

Intune has significantly bolstered our organization's security by consistently applying the latest security policies and conducting regular assessments. Its proactive approach ensures that our security measures remain robust and up-to-date.

It has significantly increased overall IT productivity in the company by enhancing efficiency and operational effectiveness. For example, its continuous monitoring and detection capabilities prevent unauthorized access attempts and streamline resource creation processes.

Microsoft Intune has notably reduced the risk of security breaches in our organization. It has significantly elevated our security posture, which is evident in the increased security score it has provided.

Microsoft Intune has helped our company save costs, especially with the implementation of policies like BYOD. This has been a significant cost-saving measure for us.

The standout features of Intune are its excellent mobile device management and highly effective application management capabilities. They streamline our operations and significantly enhance security measures.

In terms of improvement, Microsoft Intune could enhance its patch management for various devices, ensuring regular updates and tracking of device privileges. Performance reports would also be valuable for better monitoring and management.

I have been working with Microsoft Intune for five years.

Intune is a quite stable product.

We have 2,000 users currently utilizing Intune. It is highly scalable.

I would rate Microsoft's technical support as a nine out of ten.

Positive

Before Microsoft Intune, we were using SCCM, which is a more traditional approach. We switched to Intune for its modern and comprehensive capabilities, as SCCM lacked certain functionalities and agility.

The initial setup of Intune was straightforward, taking just one day to deploy. Our implementation strategy focused on identifying and securing all available assets, including desktops and mobiles. The setup was managed by one person.

Endpoint Privilege Management, through enforcing the least privileged access, enhances user productivity by safeguarding sensitive resources and data. This proactive approach aligns with auditor-defined policies, ensuring secure privileged account life cycles and minimizing operational costs. It simplifies management while providing robust protection.

Endpoint Privilege Management strengthens our security against attacks by limiting privileged access. For real-time protection, it defends against malware threats on all devices, including new or remote ones.

Intune helped us consolidate vendors, enhancing security without significantly affecting license costs, as it operates on an enterprise model. This streamlining has improved our overall vendor engagement.

Intune's integration with Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Security is crucial for our cloud journey. It provides the flexibility for users to bring their own devices and work from anywhere, aligning with our automation scaling needs.

My advice for people who are considering using Microsoft Intune is to go for it. It offers excellent scalability, accommodating any number of devices, and it is straightforward to set up, providing effective plug-and-play functionality. Overall, I would rate it as a nine out of ten.

We've experimented with and deployed Autopilot for building and deploying software through Intune, utilizing Intune policies to modify Azure AD joined systems, now referred to as Entra joined. This covers the entire scope of Intune that we've explored and implemented.

We are a consulting company with extensive experience in deploying Intune. We utilize Intune for hybrid join Entra machines. For clients who have the necessary licenses, while Intune is not a full-fledged Remote Monitoring and Management solution, it can serve as an effective replacement for RMM if you are a Managed Service Provider.

While more mature tools exist for securing hybrid work and protecting data on BYOD and company devices, Intune is a viable option for clients who want to leverage MDM with their Premium or E3 license, especially if cost is a major concern. Despite some challenges with Samsung Knox and iOS devices, Intune has shown improvement, and these issues are less frequent. As Microsoft doesn't have a native phone, limitations are inevitable.

The Mobile Device Management in Intune is a valuable feature.

Microsoft recently separated Defender into Security. Intune does not centralize all endpoint and security management tools into one place. It used to be more centralized.

The Microsoft support has been subpar for some time now. Troubleshooting issues often require us to involve a partner, which isn't an ideal or easily manageable solution given the challenges with Microsoft support. We need a reliable partner, but that partnership might still require Microsoft's assistance.

We've faced significant pushback with Copilot as our clients aren't seeing a favorable cost-benefit analysis. Many are opting for ChatGPT Enterprise instead of integrating Copilot into their workflows. We initially expected significant value from Copilot, but Microsoft's pricing is excessive, and the product itself is not exceptional. It remains quite rudimentary in its current state.

Microsoft should not rely on partners to fix issues. While users can open tickets with Microsoft, they often cannot resolve the problems themselves and must engage a partner. This is not an à la carte solution. Perhaps when Copilot eventually becomes available, it will address this. It's not Intune's fault, as it is used frequently.

I have been using Microsoft Intune for ten years.

The technical support is not good.

Negative

We tried numerous solutions prior to Intune, but Microsoft's inclusion of it within their licensing model incentivized us to adopt it. Since we were already paying for the license, it made sense to leverage its full potential and maximize our investment.

If you're subscribing to Premium or E3, there are no additional costs for Intune, it's included. However, with lower-tier plans, you don't get the full suite of security features. Depending on your specific licenses, you might have some level of Advanced Threat Protection, Endpoint Detection Response, or other Defender tools, but not the complete package. Generally, for around 300 users, you get decent protection with Defender for desktop and server – it's a good value. But with E5 licenses, you're at the enterprise level, and you get what you pay for, so expect add-ons. I don't think Microsoft would position Intune as a primary security product anymore, given their recent cloud changes and the focus on Defender. Intune is useful for patching, but it's not a comprehensive security solution in itself. That's why Microsoft has rebranded their security offerings under security.microsoft.com.

I rate Intune six out of ten.

Many of our clients with premium or E3 or above licenses use Intune because it's included in their Microsoft solution. They prefer to leverage a Microsoft product over a third-party alternative. Additionally, Intune allows us to maximize the value of our clients' existing licenses. Therefore, if a client has a premium license, has under 300 users, or is on E3 or above, there's no reason to use another solution when Intune is readily available.

Microsoft recently transitioned from Intune to Endpoint, then back to Intune. Additionally, they moved certain security aspects of Purview into a separate deployment, as is the case with their ATP Defender Suite. This shift signifies a move away from a single, unified management interface to a more distributed model.

We use the enterprise application management feature to roll out apps. While there are better tools available for app discovery, deployment, and automatic updating, Intune's inclusion in the Microsoft bundle keeps costs down. Although Intune may not be the ideal solution for automated application deployment or MDM, its integration with Microsoft licenses makes it a worthwhile option, especially with the expectation of future improvements from Microsoft.

We use the Advanced Endpoint Analytics but it is no longer in Intune. It's been moved over to the security portal for Defender.

The endpoint analytics feature, which helps proactively detect and remediate anomalies and endpoints, is now part of Microsoft Defender formerly known as Advanced Threat Protection. Gartner rates it very highly. To perform threat hunting, we need the appropriate licensing, such as a P2 Defender license. This functionality is not available within Intune. We are transitioning from the older Advanced Threat Protection to the newer Microsoft Defender platform. Previously, configuration was done through Intune, but now we manage it through the Microsoft security site.

My advice for any organization that is already paying for a Premium or above Microsoft license is to deploy Intune because it makes financial sense. Intune is not a bad tool but if they run into any issues, the Microsoft support is no good so they need to rely on a good partner to help resolve the issue.

Microsoft cannot fully replicate the functionality of a Remote Monitoring and Management tool. However, it could incorporate certain RMM features into its existing products or develop new tools that complement RMM solutions.

By implementing Intune, we are exposing aspects of our infrastructure to the cloud that traditionally would remain on-premises. This means relying heavily on Microsoft's infrastructure and security. As we saw a few years ago with the Department of Justice's issues, which were clearly Microsoft-related, placing all our trust in one provider can lead to potential problems. However, despite these concerns, we have not encountered any security issues with Intune to date. But at the end of the day, we are maximizing our license.

Intune deployment is straightforward if you're well-prepared, whether for a hybrid setup or a purely Azure-based one. Packaging new apps is generally well-documented, but troubleshooting can be trickier. There are helpful PowerShell scripts available, though they might not be easy to find.

One plan that we are currently testing for the near future is related to our BYOD fleet. Instead of opting for MDM, we have decided to use Microsoft Intune to manage access to our company through BYOD. Moreover, we plan to use Microsoft Intune to perform autopilot PC deployments in the near future.

We had two distinct issues we needed to resolve with Microsoft Intune for two different use cases. Firstly, for the BYOD scenario, we needed Intune to ensure a sufficient level of security while enabling users to bring their personal mobile devices. Secondly, we aimed to automate PC deployment, even when users are not connected to the network, due to the COVID pandemic and the increase in remote work. Currently, to reimage a machine, users must be on the network. Our goal is to enable them to reimage their machines from home, using autopilot.

We found that Microsoft Intune met our expectations for the BYOD section, and we are optimistic about its potential for PC deployment through autopilot. The main advantage is that Intune performs its intended functions effectively.

As a Microsoft 365 user, we found Microsoft Intune to be a practical choice since it was already included in the bundle. The solution was effective, so we didn't need to look for other options or invest in additional tools. Intune performed the necessary tasks efficiently, making our decision straightforward.

The UI is not user-friendly and has room for improvement.

I have been using the solution for four years.

We have not had a single outage in the last four years. Microsoft Intune is extremely stable.

Microsoft Intune is auto-scalable in the cloud.

The initial setup was straightforward. The deployment required two people from the third party and two of our architects, one for security and one for the network.

We used a third party and our architect for implementation.

We have seen a return on investment because we were able to quickly deploy and start using Intune.

Intune is included in the Microsoft 365 licensing package that we have.

We assessed VMware and found its MDM to be promising. However, since we were already utilizing other Microsoft solutions, and Intune was capable of meeting our requirements, we did not require further evaluation of additional solutions.

I give the solution an eight out of ten.

We have around 10,000 people in over 20 different countries whose devices are managed by Microsoft Intune.

There is no maintenance required for the solution.

I highly recommend Microsoft Intune to others.

Essentially, we use it to manage devices. We are looking at potentially moving away from VMware and bringing mobile devices and tablets into Intune along with desktops and laptops, which we currently manage, so that it serves as an all-in-one active asset list where we can look at the health of the entire technical estate. We can manage against threats. We can roll out apps, policies, et cetera. We can also manage logins, reset logins, et cetera, and it's an all-in-one, 24/7 solution.

Microsoft Intune has absolutely improved the way our organization functions. We're currently going through the AAD migration, so we are transitioning away from the old on-premise domain to Azure. The ability to take devices that were locally managed via AD but weren't managed via Intune is brilliant. We can see who last logged in, who it's managed by, which OS is there when it was last updated, etc. It gives us a micro overview of what's happening there.

Generally, we find it quite useful. We don't use it to the full extent. We've only got a P1 license, but generally, the application health and the ability to create and manage policies are valuable. We can split them very quickly into groups, multiple policies, etc. So, it's those core basics that we use, but they work very well.

It's very informative when there is an error. It allows us to backtrace where the error is and resolve that ourselves. It's a bit of a Swiss Army penknife. We find that it fixes most issues.

I'd like some more reporting so that I don't have to delve into PowerShell and I can pull more of the local device information such as memory, apps installed, etc. It would be nice to be able to see the apps that are present there but might not be managed. For example, if they installed 7Zip, it could report that back via an installed program or feature to see what was currently installed. Generally, it works, and nobody complains about it.

I've been using this solution for a couple of years.

Sometimes, they can take a little while to come back in showing that they are compliant. Typically, they may show us as not compliant even when we are. Typically, we find that it takes a couple of hours or a couple of days at worst for the machines to show as being compliant for them to settle down, but generally, it does what it says on the tin. We can set the policy, and we can put a machine or put a device into a group. That policy gets defined or pushed out, and it works. We can then move on to the next job. From my perspective, it works well, and that's why I'm just looking forward to using more Azure technologies moving forward.

It's deployed across multiple locations, departments, teams, and endpoints.

I haven't had any experience with them.

At the moment, we're using VMware AirWatch, which isn't my first choice purely because it's a super segmented platform. We are predominantly, about 95%, Microsoft. It feels a bit of an oversight not having a solution on a Microsoft platform where we've got full transparency and can make live changes. Currently, we have to go through our outsourced IT to make the changes and then we have to wait to see those changes rather than me or a colleague being able to make those changes in a live environment, so it would be my personal preference to get that moved over, which we're looking at. 

I wasn't a party to why they used AirWatch. I presume it was bundled in with the Microsoft service partner's offering originally. The IT team here is quite new. I've only been in the post for about a month, and my IT manager has only been in the post for about two months. We're just making sure that everything is easy to use and easy to manage, and it's cost-efficient for the charity moving forward.

Essentially, the way it was set up, it wasn't set up as a hybrid model. At the moment, we have got on-premises, and we have a cloud, but they're not joined. There is no passthrough, which is interesting. A lot of the on-premise has been copied over to the cloud. We are now taking the cloud to default, and the overall plan is to mothball the servers and reuse those as very high-powered desktops wherever possible. I just predominantly use the cloud.

I was not involved in its deployment, but in terms of maintenance, typically, our MSP makes the changes, but I've got GA rights to make anything that is critical. Generally, there are about 20 people at the Microsoft solution partner, and there are four of us on the IT team. There are less than 30 people in total.

I'm not sure. Certainly, it has been at least three years since the software has been rolled out, but it's not particularly well maintained by the solution partner. So, it's hard to measure the ROI. It does have merit, but in our particular sector, it's just overkill. We just need to make small and light changes whilst having effective security. We don't need corporate class, biometric/conditional access level security. Whilst we have multiple offices, they're very small. They're all under 20 users, and there's a lot of work from home. So, as long as we've got encryption, a form of AV, an anti-spam, and good account security, it certainly staves off a lot of the threats.

Personally, I feel that we haven't had the ROI purely because we're paying about £13,000 for under 300 users a year, which is a little bit top-sized. My personal feeling is to make a business case to switch to Microsoft Defender. Obviously, we've got P1 in our business premium licensing, so we've got a very basic protection at the moment that we don't use. We've got a large number of credits, and we could use those credits to switch over for a year to a higher project and see where we go from there.

Generally, it's not too bad. Obviously, a cheaper price would be great. Typically, we are in touch with the partner to provide non-profit discounts wherever possible. Generally, we get favorable discounts, so it's not too bad. Obviously, we're looking at decreasing those wherever we can to bring value back to the public purse because it's all charity based. It's all publicly funded.

Create a test group and create test policies, and then just test, test, and test before anything is rolled. It's the usual IT gambit. Test everything, and then just test it again before you roll it out.

I worked for a couple of MSPs before. I've seen it in very remote areas. I'm very impressed with it. Whilst it seems almost fashionable to criticize Microsoft, Intune is pretty much a well-laid-out product. It does what it says it's going to do. There is a lot of dependence on Microsoft products being pushed to it, and that's probably my only criticism. It would be good if Intune was a bit more open-source, but that would lead to more complications. It's a bit of a complicated beast, but generally, I like it.

I'd rate Microsoft Intune a nine out of ten. I'm happy with it.

We use Intune to manage mobile devices and applications. I'm not solely using Intune for the agents installed on each machine. I use the Microsoft Endpoint Manager solution primarily for device configuration, device compliance, and mobile application management.

I have 80 different clients, and their environments vary. We have people that work in offices across multiple foreign countries and domestically. Most have a strictly cloud-based deployment, but a few have a private cloud that we host ourselves. Some have their own data centers. I've got a couple of clients with hybrid environments. None of them are entirely on-prem. Everybody is using a hybrid cloud or completely on the cloud.

Intune helps us from a compliance standpoint by making it easier for system admins to configure devices and ensure they conform to business policies. It gives us more visibility into where the devices are and their postures.

I try to use conditional access policies for every client I can. It's essential for a zero-trust security posture. Conditional access policies make it possible. This dramatically reduces the risk of unpatched devices connecting to our corporate network.

The conditional access policies, compliance, and updates affect employees positively. Once the value is explained to them, they don't complain much about MFA.

You can use Endpoint Manager to see whether or not a device is compliant and apply conditional access policies in Entra to only allow connections to your environment from compliant devices. That significantly reduces your risk from unpatched software because that device cannot connect to your machine or environment. Using those two features together definitely helps protect us.

It saves some time. Either way, you will have to manage an Active Directory environment, but Intune allows you to manage devices over the internet. You don't need to worry if the machines are connected to a VPN or on-site.

The most valuable feature is probably mobile device management. Small businesses are coming under greater scrutiny and requirements for compliance as time goes on. We don't have to worry about a VPN because we can manage these devices, control company data, and lock users out. If needed, we can remotely wipe devices and switch them. 

It's a big deal to be able to assure an insurance company or auditor that our endpoint devices are effectively managed. Intune is a solid solution if you use Microsoft and Microsoft 365 products.

Intune's third-party patch management could be better. It should be easier for an average system admin to keep non-Microsoft applications updated. 

I have used Intune for about six years now.

Intune is highly stable. 

Intune is highly scalable. Thus far, I haven't had to expand it to a thousand users, but the scalability appears to be readily available.

I rate Microsoft support a nine out of ten. I enjoy working with them, and I'm often surprised at how good they are. 

Positive

I've used Rocky MDM and Google MDM. Microsoft is the primary platform on which we do business. Intune works better with the Windows operating system, desktop applications, and SharePoint. It also reduces vendor complexity. I don't require multiple vendors, which reduces my costs because many features are baked into it. 

I log into fewer systems daily. Microsoft's virtual monopoly on productivity applications in your average small business makes them the right choice in most situations.

Deploying Intune is pretty straightforward. It doesn't matter whether you use autopilot or manual deployment. Each machine is enrolled in Intune automatically if it's connected to Azure AD with the correct user licensing. It's a relatively painless enrollment process.

Intune involves some maintenance, like any solution. You must ensure it's still working correctly and helping you achieve your business goals for compliance and configuration of your endpoints.

Meraki and Google are relatively common in small businesses. Many small businesses use Meraki for wireless and networking solutions, so that is one MDM option. Also, small businesses often start with Google and transfer to Microsoft 365 once they mature. Google is already in the environment. I don't sell anything as an IT guy, so I don't care what solution my clients use. I choose what's best for them in that particular instance.

I have tried Okta, but I haven't used it seriously as an MDM solution. I've only used Okta as an SSO provider. I didn't realize they did MDM solutions. I don't understand the point of Okta. If you have Azure AD and Entra, I can't fathom why you would bother with Okta. It seems redundant to me.

I rate Microsoft Intune a nine out of ten. Don't underestimate the solution, and spend time learning about it. Intune has some powerful capabilities. Often, small businesses acquire systems but never fully utilize them because nobody has the time to dive deeply into them. It's a big solution with a lot of features. 

We are currently using Intune, and we are also deploying it for customers. We use Intune to manage our mobile devices. We manage our Android and iOS devices with it, and at the same time, we also use Intune to manage our macOS and Windows devices.

During the pandemic, there were devices that we couldn't control. For example, we wanted to manage BYOD and make sure that they are secured so that when they access our corporate resources, our data, computers, users, and mobile devices are protected. We use Intune to publish some of our company applications and at the same time push down our restriction policy and configuration profiles, such as VPN.

We are a vendor, and we deploy the Intune solution. We see that our clients have benefited from this solution. They're able to manage devices that were previously not managed. They are able to secure those devices. It also improves the productivity of the users. They can work from wherever they are and leverage their own devices to access company resources. So, productivity-wise, users are more productive when it comes to Intune.

Based on my experience, I find Intune very flexible for managing Windows devices. We can use scripting, and we can make use of the self-service portal or the company portal to publish some of the applications for Windows.

I'd suggest adding more features for macOS in Intune. There should be more functionality for managing macOS. There should be a better capability for pushing things down on macOS. Currently, Intune is not capable of managing macOS at the same level as Windows.

It has been four years since I've been using Intune.

I'd rate it an eight out of ten in terms of stability because it sometimes breaks. That's mainly because Windows OS keeps on changing because of upgrades and things like that, and there are some instances where it's not supported, or it has not been tested fully on a specific version of OS.

We haven't yet gone down to the scalability part. It meets the needs of our customers. What they have right now in the cloud is sufficient and satisfies the requirements. So, scalability is not a problem.

Some of the deployments are done across sites, so there are multiple sites.

I have interacted with their support. I'd rate them a ten out of ten.

Positive

We have previously used MobileIron and Jamf Pro.

The deployment model for Intune is cloud basically, but for other MDM solutions, it's on-prem because the government and healthcare sectors prefer to use the on-prem solution.

The deployment duration depends on the project timeline and the complexity of the deployment. A fresh Intune deployment is straightforward. We just need to do the configuration and create configuration profiles. For example, for Windows OS, we can enroll 1,000 devices in a month or something like that depending on the availability of the machine. Everything is configured in the backend, so they just need to power on the device, and everything works as expected, and everything is pushed down.

The number of people required depends on how many machines need to be deployed and users' availability. The model that we're having right now is that for a new device, it's straightaway delivered to the user. So, there is no involvement of IT because it's an autopilot deployment. When a user powers on a device, the configuration kicks in. The users just log in using their user accounts, and that's all. So, one IT person is enough to configure the backend.

We implement it in-house. It does require some maintenance, but that's taken care of by another party.

It's affordable. It's cheaper if you have an Office 365, E5, or E3 subscription because everything is there.

I evaluated VMware Workspace ONE, which is similar to Intune. They both can manage multiple OSs. 

While evaluating, I'd advise evaluating each and every feature of Intune and using multiple operating systems, such as Android, iOS, Windows, and macOS. You should see the capabilities of Intune and also check how to integrate Intune with other solutions. For example, for security, there is endpoint protection, etc. You need to check that because one of the requirements is to make sure that the computers and the mobile devices are secure, but Intune cannot secure your device itself. It's just an MDM solution. It only restricts some of the functionality. It cannot do more in terms of security. You need another solution to secure your devices, and you must check that your security solution can be integrated with Intune.

I'd rate Intune an eight out of ten.