IBM Workload Automation Room for Improvement
GR
reviewer936228
Manager- Projects at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
The performance of the previous versions could be better. We encountered certain issues with the lower version of it, the 9.2. Things have greatly stabilized since then. However, as with any IBM tool, things are a bit tricky. I would give a rating of four or five out of ten, as we encountered certain issues with the domain controller with the lower versions.
It would be nice if we could get support for earlier versions. Generally speaking, IBM insists that we move on to their latest one.
In respect of the dependency diagrams, the job dependencies across the business process should be improved.
View full review »RE
reviewer1813530
Systems Engineer Lead at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees
This solution does have bugs and could be improved in this regard. However, these bugs are resolved relatively quickly.
There should be more custom documentation, specifically around Java APIs. There should also be more training.
In terms of features, we are currently using only 50% of its features. We don't use all features that are available, but there is always room for improvement in all of the tools.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Workload Automation
June 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, BMC, Broadcom and others in Workload Automation. Updated: June 2022.
609,272 professionals have used our research since 2012.