Most of the features are pretty good.
The code merging capability is something that we use very frequently. Merging code is a big factor for us because most of our teams use GitLab.
Most of the features are pretty good.
The code merging capability is something that we use very frequently. Merging code is a big factor for us because most of our teams use GitLab.
The integration could be slightly better.
The interface should be more user-friendly.
We have been working with GitLab for more than five years.
It is a stable product. We have not had any issues with respect to instability.
With approximately 30 users, we are not a large company. I found the scalability to be okay but I haven't tested it extensively.
We have experience with GitLab support and we found the service to be good. There is not much of a lag in terms of addressing queries.
I would rate the support a five out of five.
Positive
I also use GitHub and I am more comfortable with GitLab.
The initial setup is simple.
This product is not very expensive but the price can be better. As such, I would rate GitLab a four out of five in terms of pricing.
Overall, this is a good product that has a lot of features. There are several features that I don't use personally but other members of my team do.
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
GitLab is used for pipeline development, automation, and deployment.
It is easy to manage.
GitLab integrates well with other platforms.
The automation is good.
While I don't have any specific complaints about GitLab, there are always things that could be better.
Better support, for example, could be provided. The technology could be made simpler to use, it should not be overly complex.
It should be used by a larger number of people. They should raise awareness.
I have been working with GitLab for three years.
GitLab has a good level of stability. I haven't had many problems.
GitLab is used by between 500 and 600 people.
Support is good.
I have used a variety of tools, including Ansible, Terraform, Bitbucket, and Bamboo.
I don't mind the price because I use the free version.
The licensing fee could be less expensive.
I would recommend this solution to anyone who is interested in using it.
GitLab is very good. I would rate GitLab a nine out of ten.
Our primary use case is for source management.
I have found the most valuable feature is security control. I also like the branching and cloning software.
I would like to have some features to support peer review. It would be nice if I can input some comments and share them with the teams. But I am not sure if it is already included in some paid versions.
I have been working with GitLab now for the past three or four years now.
The stability of the current solution I would rate as a nine on a scale of one to ten.
The scalability on a scale of one to ten is around an eight or nine. We currently have around one hundred individuals using this solution on a daily basis.
The initial setup was straightforward.
We are currently using the open-source version.
I would recommend using GitLab and rank it a seven out of ten.
Our company uses the solution to manage code, Wiki, and repository management for multiple projects on Truck It In. The solution helps us manage our experience with projects. We currently have twenty-two developers using the solution.
We are in the process of executing the pipelines to use the solution for CI/CD.
The interface is much more user friendly than competitor products.
The merge request tool is very valuable.
It is easy to perform code and peer reviews.
Key features allow creation of well-presented Wiki that includes ideas, development, and domains.
The solution should expand features to match other tools such as Coverity, Veracode, or SonarQube with its static code analysis tool so third-party integrations are not required.
There can be a lapse of fifteen minutes to a day when updates are pushed. We do receive email notification of upcoming lapses and push progress, so that helps.
I have been using the solution for eight months.
The solution is stable with no failures or issues in the version controlling or epic creation processes.
The solution is scalable. We can manage issues or epics, make Kanban with proper backlog, and move any processes with no problems. It is scalable in terms of managing our experience and using it as a project management tool.
We have not needed technical support.
The setup is straightforward with good user interface. Third-party integrations can be a bit of a hassle.
We implemented the solution in-house.
We use Spring Boot at the back end with IntelliJ for IDs. IntelliJ is a good tool that integrates our projects with the solution through a well-managed synchronization process.
The solution has a better user interface than GitHub and Bitbucket.
We also use ClickUp which is a great tool for managing tickets and stream planning. We follow Agile methodologies so ClickUp is quite helpful to us.
SonarQube has a new integration with the solution so we use its static code analysis tool.
The solution is valuable for developers because it includes version controlling, pipelines, CI/CD, and integrations. When moving from the development side to the production side it is important to ensure that code is bug-free with no errors. We have less issues on the production side because we take full advantage of the solution.
The solution currently requires third-party integrations for CI/CD so I rate it a seven out of ten.
We use this solution for source code management, and also team collaboration for the application lifecycle.
It has improved the way our organization functions.
It is very easy to use.
This product is always evolving, and they listen to the customers.
It solves what the customers what.
It would be really good if they integrated more features in application security.
I would also like to see scanning for some vulnerabilities and allow people to have a one-stop glance at the state of the security application
I have been working with GitLab for more than five years.
We are always using the latest version.
It's stable, and we have not experienced any issues with bugs or glitches.
It's a scalable solution. It's easy to scale.
We have used many solutions before GitLab.
The initial setup is straightforward.
The price is okay.
My advice is to work on the processes that are in the environment. Know what you need to do and what you need to deliver the software. You have to ask the question: What do you need to deploy the software?
Always take security into account from the beginning.
While this is a good tool that is always evolving and there are new updated security standards that are being published and improved upon, it is always a good idea to have another solution to compare with to get better at using it. You can always have a combination of all of them, which would something that I would be interested in.
We are always evaluating to see if there is a solution that can do the job better.
You need to have a well-defined set of processes and that will help them adapt GitLab.
Overall, it's a great product and it does a good job.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
We use Gitlab for CICD work.
Git hosting has an integration with ACD which is why we liked this solution in the first place.
This solution could be improved by adding modifications such as slack notifications.
I have been using this solution for four years.
This is a stable solution.
This is a scalable solution although the CICD may be tricky to scale.
I have previously used Bit Bucket and Github. Bit Bucket has some issues in our country. At the time we had banning issues within our government and only GitLab was. Bit Bucket is too slow and we had to wait for five minutes just to enter the platform.
Bit Bucket pipelines are not that easy to consider and it was harder to use than GitLab. Gitlab is also more customizable. GitHub is more expensive than GitLab and didn't offer CICD.
The initial setup is straightforward.
I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.
Because GitLab uses an education license for cloud, there is unlimited storage for each account, so it's very useful. It is very flexible and easy because you can store data on cloud.
GitLab should include more features because, during the pandemic, companies like Google introduced more features. The integration and storage capabilities could be better. This would be very handy for educators and students.
We used this solution at my previous company for a few years. They initially deployed it on-premises but fully migrated to cloud because all the data was not fully backed. We had around 500 clients and 500 accounts.
It is 100% stable.
I believe it's scalable. It is suitable, and there was no need for exploration.
We used a lot of technical support for standard settings.
It is subjective. I cannot compare GitLab with Azure because it is based on experience.
We had to read the manuals first before we could set up. The manuals are helpful for consultants as we needed their expertise to complete the setup. In addition, they can ensure there is no downtime.
It has a very good price and is good for general sidetracking.
I rate this solution a ten out of ten.
I am using GitLab for many purposes, such as CI/CD.
I have found the most valuable features of GitLab are the GitClone, GitPush, GitPull, GitMatch, GitMit, GitCommit, and GitStatus.
GitLab could improve by having more plugins and better user-friendliness.
I have been using GitLab for four years.
GitLab is a stable solution based on version control.
The scalability of GitLab is good. We can have multiple Amazon AWS enrollments.
We have approximately eight people using this solution in my company.
We use the support when we are doing integration. We have a blog where we can open a ticket and receive support.
The initial setup of GitLab is easy. If there is a server the implementation will take 30 minutes to one hour. In the case, there is no server, then we can install the Docker box with the related supporting office installation. This will take approximately two hours.
This is an open-source solution.
We are using this solution because of our client's requirements.
I would advise others to prepare the documentation for their team members.
I rate GitLab a nine out of ten.