Dynatrace Reviews

We have all our infrastructure in the cloud. 

This tool helps us gather information from all hosts and services, then cross reference the information.

Although, we are still implementing it, we have some servers using Dynatrace. We have been using it to find bugs in our production environment.

The cloud integration, because it allows us to monitor serverless services as well as Docker containers, etc. 

I also like the "session replay".

They could improve their price ranges, as there is no option for startups or testing.

It has all the things an enterprise needs.

The primary use case is for application performance and analytics. We use it to monitor our on-prem Windows and Linux apps as well as our AWS and Azure cloud instances.

• Faster MTTR
• A proactive Ops team

We used to rely on multiple operations tools to monitor and obtain bits and pieces. Now, we have it all in a single pane of glass.

• Artificial intelligence
• Log analytics
• Being able to identify and correlate issues, and avoid them occurring in the future.

It needs certain UI changes to make going back to certain Windows easier. Certain windows open up in a different category with different set values and throw you off if you are not used to it.

We are using it in our AWS environment for monitoring health and application performance for roughly 400 instances running thousands of Docker containers.

• Improved visibility on performance and application issues.
• Automatic instrumentation of new services and technology without the need to install specific agents or modules.

• OneAgent
• AI-powered problem analysis
• Pre-configured alerts
• AWS integration
• API interface 

• SSO options are missing.
• JIRA integration should be enriched and more granular.
• Filters should have a “negative” option.

Our primary use case is performance improvements and understanding the customer struggle. Dynatrace gives us real-time data that we can use within the office to display data.

• Greater insight into the customer experience and front-end user experience. 
• Bespoke dashboards and reports which help our business to grow.

• Bespoke business transactions providing greater performance insight. 
• Adaptable business transactions which can accommodate new developments.

• Needs a greater meta data capture.
• Usability on the front-end for non-technical people. Although, it does prove great support and problem solving collaboration.

• Application monitoring
• Software performance issues
• Learning application functions
• Tracking issues

Provides more visibility into applications.                                                                     

• AI functions
• Problem visibility, etc.                                                                

• Provide even more details about problems.
• Needs a clearer view for Smartscape.                                      

Customers want to monitor .NET applications and real user monitoring on online banking applications for desktop and mobile.

Dynatrace shows the customer path, common errors on desktop and mobile, and allows us to achieve faster page loads.

PurePath does deep dive analysis, has dashboards, and provides real user experience monitoring. It has allowed us to do analysis which was never possible before.

• Provide much better alignment between AppMon and Dynatrace. 
• Add support for Ruby.
• Make sure older frameworks, like PHP 5.3, are supported.

Our core application is still running on a Java Client-server based architecture. We provide that application as a service by hosting it (hybrid cloud approach). 

We needed a tool that would provide insights into the application and support troubleshooting activities in order to reach our SLA objectives.

It has delivered on its promises and is now the single trusted source of information for various actors of the service support processes.

Its ability to correlate a large source of information to pinpoint a root cause. This speeds up issue resolution and allow us to better reach our objectives.

Dynatrace SaaS still lacks configuration API or command line which would allow moving configuration from one tenant to the other.

We mainly use the tool to do performance monitoring of our customer environments. Internally, we check how our software behaves when we are developing it.

Developers love the tool, because it is easy to use. They can immediately see how their code behaves.

PurePaths are the best. We can see everything that we need from them. Problem detection is also giving us valuable information.

Waiting for the session replay, because it seems to bring the end user interactions available for the developers.