We performed a comparison between Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management and Sophos Mobile based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)."A great solution for anyone wanting a modern endpoint device management solution."
"I like that we can implement conditional access."
"Application deployment and keeping the devices secure no matter where they are, by having this cloud solution — that has been great."
"The Asset Management and Auto Pilot are valuable features."
"Intune can wipe devices. For example, if a disgruntled employee wants to leak the data on their company phone, Intune can terminate their access and wipe the entire device with a click."
"The most valuable feature of Intune is the central dashboard for compliance and policy management."
"If the product works, remote access will be a benefit. To this point we have not had reason to have confidence in achieving that access."
"It supports end-users who tend to lock their devices quite frequently. Its conditional access policy helps us keep the users logged into their devices."
"Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management offers on-premises deployment."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the ability to assign a package to a user on a system If you have your software packages set up via SCCM. It automates the process, which is very convenient, especially since most of our people are remote. Additionally, the overall functionality is good."
"The initial setup process is straightforward and fast."
"They always add more features to this product."
"The solution is quite user-friendly."
"I like the level of interaction that the product offers with the other products in our company's environment."
"In terms of valuable features, we liked the lock feature, the roll-out white feature, and the find feature. I think that Sophos had a GPS locator, so you could figure out where the phone was from a GPS location."
"The most valuable feature is the mobile device management capability. You can easily manage all of your mobile devices."
"The utmost importance lies in mobile security and its performance."
"The management and enrollment process is great, and with the asset management and instant action menu, we can easily maintain and support the users."
"There are a couple of issues with stability."
"There is improvement needed in integrating with the installed Office solutions versions, such as Office 2019. The Office 365 integrates without a problem."
"An issue we have run into with Microsoft Endpoint Manager is that we cannot patch third-party products like Adobe and Chrome with it."
"There are items that require improvements. One is the controls from iOS."
"The reports aren't complete, and it's not easy to build custom reports. For example, Windows Autopilot isn't working well in cases where the computers don't have a good internet connection. Then the option is not good enough."
"The scalability could be improved, and like most other MDM products, Intune is good but not 100% there yet."
"The solution could be improved by the opportunity to connect third-party application databases, such as Chocolatey or another setup store, to Intune."
"The difficulty of the the roll out is surprisingly difficult considering this product is supposed to be an integrated part of the 365 suite."
"In terms of integration, there is still room for improvement in Matrix42."
"Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management could improve the user interface, it is not very intuitive."
"The features of Sophos Mobile could improve. The way the system works together could be better. Additionally, the integration with other Sophos products could improve."
"In terms of what could be improved, the initial configuration and setup of the environment could probably be made a little bit easier. There are so many pieces that go into it. Intune is absolutely insane and Sophos is better, but it still is a bit complex to get it all set up correctly."
"We have experienced issues in updating iOS devices when we set a minimum version requirement policy, and we do not have the option to force automatic installation. This means that the device must be supervised in order for updates to be applied, which we would like to see improved."
"It could be more secure."
"We encounter issues while working with iOS."
"The setup should be made easier."
"They continue to work on integration with mobile device management and mobile security. They are improving the protection but I think that the capabilities still need to be enhanced."
"The product does not work well in iOS."
More Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management is ranked 12th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 2 reviews while Sophos Mobile is ranked 9th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 13 reviews. Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management is rated 8.6, while Sophos Mobile is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management writes "It is a complete and competitive solution with excellent OEM support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos Mobile writes "Stable product with central administration to manage device security ". Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management is most compared with Ivanti Neurons for MDM, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Jamf Pro and VMware Workspace ONE, whereas Sophos Mobile is most compared with Jamf Pro, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, VMware Workspace ONE, Lookout and SOTI MobiControl.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
