We performed a comparison between IBM MaaS360 and SAP Mobile Secure based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)."Technical support, in general, has been quite helpful."
"We have found the solution is capable of scaling."
"The technical support of Microsoft Intune is good."
"It works well if you have a Microsoft environment."
"I like that it's very good and very simple. I found that we just needed to have a proper subscription for an Intune tenant, and from the subscription, if we have the right role assigned, like the global admin role or the owner role, we can use Microsoft cloud resources. With the help of that, we can do many things like setting up Microsoft Intune in the cloud to create our virtual machines. All these can be done, and the steps are very simple. I really liked it. I like features like Windows Auto-Enrollment. I like it very much because whenever you supply it to the end-user, it will be ready to use immediately. The end-user only needs to provide the user credentials, and then they are good to go. I also really like Cloud PC, which was recently launched on Azure."
"Conditional access has helped us tailor and enforce our security policies in the mobile space."
"It provides control over all mobile devices that are being connected to the corporate network."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Intune is having all our devices compliant with our policies."
"The most valuable features are mobile device management and security (which allows you to quarantine infected devices)."
"We introduced the product as part of the SOC-2 requirement. The tool's most valuable features include keeping the operating system updated, tracking software inventory, controlling computer administrators, and the ability to wipe a computer in case of a security threat. It helps us to be compliant, and it is one of the reasons we implemented it."
"My customers value the ability to control all their devices from a central point in IBM MaaS360."
"The ability to send an iPad out to someone and have them auto-provision it when they are out in the field is fantastic. We don't have to have it all configured before we ship it. This is probably the biggest value add."
"The product’s most valuable feature is email, browser, and application security."
"Maas360 uses distribution groups to deploy apps, which makes it a bit easier than, for example, Intune."
"The most valuable features of IBM MaaS360 are remote control and setting up a phone."
"It can change policies based on geolocation or schedules."
"Everything is available to you from your handset."
"There needs to be more support for Mac operating systems."
"Reporting could be improved. It needs to be more expensive and robust."
"The closest Microsoft Intune can be to GPOs, the better. There needs to be more granularity on application deployments. However, they have done better recently with the application deployments."
"The policies we had in SCCM and AD offered features that are missing from Microsoft Intune."
"The current Intune reporting functionality could benefit from some improvements."
"The security features should be improved."
"The solution requires Mac support."
"There is room for improvement, particularly in terms of compatibility, extending beyond the well-known major brands."
"IBM MaaS360 can improve the location reporter. There is a 15-minute delay and this does not allow for any usefulness."
"The price could be lower."
"Zero day support is something they can work on. They can make it a little bit more user-friendly."
"Sometimes IBM MaaS360 seems buggy...The solution's technical support team is sometimes slow to respond and not competent enough."
"Its integration with Microsoft Teams could be better."
"When we have MaaS360 installed on smartphones, it consumes the battery of the device at a much faster pace. This is one of the areas of improvement that I would like to highlight. We have also observed that in the contact list, a lot of duplication is happening. A single contact is duplicated three or four times, which also consumes more memory resources. If they can work on improving it for these aspects, it will have a more positive impact not only on the way the application is being consumed by the user but also on user satisfaction. A lot of new features are being deployed or rolled out by companies that are competitors of IBM MaaS360. IBM will have to ensure that all those features are on board so that we have a complete suite of features in the platform, rather than deploying multiple diverse solutions to cater to the requirements of our customers."
"Local technical support would be helpful."
"Can be added process of export/import environment configuration to simplify any migration processes."
"We would like it if SAP could integrate the transactional mode as well so that users can perform transactional jobs by mobile-only."
Earn 20 points
IBM MaaS360 is ranked 8th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 34 reviews while SAP Mobile Secure is ranked 26th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM). IBM MaaS360 is rated 7.8, while SAP Mobile Secure is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM MaaS360 writes "It lets you separate work and personal data on mobile phones, but the interface is outdated and clunky". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Mobile Secure writes "Easy to use and set up with easy mobile access to reports". IBM MaaS360 is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, SOTI MobiControl, Jamf Pro, IBM MobileFirst and Cisco Meraki Systems Manager (MDM+EMM), whereas SAP Mobile Secure is most compared with .
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.