We compared CylancePROTECT and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business based on our users reviews in five parameters. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Comparison Results: After reviewing both CylancePROTECT and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, it is clear that CylancePROTECT stands out for its easy deployment, accurate threat detection, and powerful machine-learning capabilities. However, it does receive criticism for its pricing, lack of user-friendliness, and inadequate support. On the other hand, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business offers a user-friendly interface, efficient management, and strong overall performance. Areas of improvement for Kaspersky include pricing, deployment efficiency, and support. Despite mixed reviews on pricing and support for both products, CylancePROTECT places a greater emphasis on AI-based threat detection, while Kaspersky prioritizes user-friendliness and control.
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"I like FortiClient EMS. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. You can also simulate phishing attacks."
"Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"Additionally, when it comes to EDR, there are more tools available to assist with client work."
"A user can continue to add endpoints and the solution will continue to perform well."
"Specifically for a Windows domain environment, the product can be customized and pushed via GPO or SCCM without issue."
"Two or three years ago when the WannaCry virus struck, the people that were on Cylance were the ones that weren't affected."
"Has good RAM capacity for the power I need"
"I like the AI and mathematical components that they use."
"The most valuable features are script blocking and macros within Word documents for stopping unwanted applications from running in the background."
"We are quite security-focused. Blackberry Protect as an endpoint solution for our service really delivers what we are expecting."
"The most valuable feature of CylancePROTECT is the support."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is a cost-effective solution."
"The initial setup was extremely straightforward and very easy."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business detects malware and is easy to configure."
"The hardware hardware detection is the most valuable feature. The feature where you can block and unblock mobile devices is also good."
"It offers very good security protection."
"The performance is good. It doesn't use a lot of resources, which is crucial for us."
"The most valuable feature is the central view. With this view, I can see all of the data."
"This solution is stable."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"Once, we had an event that was locked and blocked, but information about it came to us two or three days later."
"We'd like to see more one-to-one product presentations for the distribution channels."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"It is hard to manage."
"The product needs to continue to offer better alerts. In particular, around false positives. It needs to reduce them from happening."
"The AI of CylancePROTECT has room for improvement. I'm on a trial license of SentinelOne, and its AI is much better than what's on CylancePROTECT."
"The initial deployment was quite complicated."
"CylancePROTECT's dashboard could be more user-friendly."
"While you are working, you are finding these things that were supposed to be waived have come back to being blocked. That's frustrating."
"The price for this EPP platform is expensive and could be improved."
"I would say one thing that they might need to bring in is protection for mobile devices."
"The solution could be a lot lighter. You really feel it when the laptop starts."
"The licensing fees could be reduced."
"I would like to see better reporting."
"There were issues with the cloud management."
"I would like to see integration to many different systems easier."
"It would be preferable if the product were more proactive and more modern in its approach to security and protection."
"As far as improvements, maybe the licensing could be cheaper, but I think this solution is pretty okay."
"It needs more computer resources. They should have more anti-spam features."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Pricing and Cost Advice →
CylancePROTECT is ranked 27th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 39 reviews while Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is ranked 11th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 110 reviews. CylancePROTECT is rated 8.0, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CylancePROTECT writes "Ensures advanced AI-driven threat detection to provide robust endpoint security, effectively preventing both known and unknown threats with minimal impact on system performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business writes "Easy to setup, stable and good security use cases". CylancePROTECT is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Trellix Endpoint Security, whereas Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Fortinet FortiClient, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform and Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security. See our CylancePROTECT vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.