Asana Reviews

I use Asana for task management and project management.

I find the collaboration features to be the most usable. The dashboards provide an overview of tasks, showing how much has been completed and what remains. I can add external users to access their projects, share files, leave comments, and tag people. Asana's automation allows me to automate deadlines and send notifications to the right people about approaching deadlines.

The integration with email should be more seamless. When I'm writing an email and want to tag someone in Asana for a task, the process should be smoother. It would be easier if I could assign tasks directly from my email without needing to open Asana.

My team and I have been using Asana for more than a couple of years.

The deployment process is straightforward. Once the IT department approves it, it doesn't take much time. It's a matter of installing it and starting to work on it. Training the people might take a couple of weeks, but overall, it's quick.

Asana is quite stable; it is a tool I can trust.

I would rate the scalability of Asana as eight out of ten.

The technical support is of high quality. Asana provides decent support with blogs and new trends.

Before Asana, I used Google Sheets and occasionally Slack. Asana improved our processes because Google Sheets required manual input with no dashboards, while Asana offered a more convenient solution.

The initial setup is quite a simple process, not difficult at all.

The deployment was done in-house.

I have seen a return on investment with Asana. However, due to its pricing, I need to be careful about adding each user and feature.

The pricing of Asana is slightly high. To add one user is expensive, which makes me cautious about upgrading or adding more users.

I would recommend Asana to others. Overall, I would rate it eight out of ten.

Hybrid Cloud

My primary use case for Asana is project management. Asana allows me to invite team members to the same project, including external members, to follow up and contribute or observe.

Asana provides a stable environment, which is one of its pros.

I find the interface of Asana easy to interact with. It has a desktop client, which is a feature I hoped Microsoft would have, allowing interaction over the web interface.

There is room for improvement in integrating Asana with different technology vendors. The reporting and exportation of project results need enhancement. The interface has drawbacks, such as the requirement of manual input of personal data into project forms. Overall, the application form should automatically populate user data like email address and phone number.

I have used Asana for less than a year. I started using it this year.

I have not faced any stability issues since I started using Asana. I never encountered any glitches.

There are no limitations on the number of projects or the data entry. The limitation only applies to the number of users based on purchased licenses.

The Asana team interacts frequently with the PMO office to help with modification required or challenges faced.

Neutral

The initial setup of the desktop client was easy to install and use.

I installed the desktop client of Asana myself. I wasn't part of the IT team and thus not responsible for the integration. I am just a user of the platform.

Asana is overpriced based on its offering. On a personal level, I would not recommend it to myself. Due to its cost, I wouldn't select Asana if I were to buy a single license for managing my projects.

I have no information or interaction with other solutions. Compared to Asana, Microsoft might have a better chance of utilizing and integrating AI.

Compared to Asana, Microsoft might have a better chance of utilizing and integrating AI for improved functionality.

I'd rate the solution found out of ten.

Public Cloud

Other

I use Asana for advanced use cases, including managing software development and other projects.

With one particular project, we manage the development activities with around twenty people on the project team and about five hundred tasks, for which Asana helps to manage our sprint planning.

The most valuable features of the solution are the different views, including the list view, table view, dashboard, and the ability to add fields or customize by adding some specific fields for a project.

The calendar view in Asana has shortcomings and can be improved. The other element is the ability to natively be able to add additional connectors to better manage the planned time versus the actual time for each task.

The timesheet aspect is an additional feature I like to see in Asana since we now use another application called Toggl for managing our time cards. It would be better if we could do what we do in Toggl directly in Asana since it would be easy to plan activities.

I have been using Asana for a year and a half. I use the solution's latest version.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

The initial setup was straightforward.

The solution is deployed on the cloud.

I have not specifically seen any ROI using the product. We use it as a part of different tools, so it is like looking at the ROI for an email, which is a part of the tools we need.

To those planning to use Asana, I would say there are many similar applications. It can be hard to choose from applications like monday.com, Asana, ClickUp, and others since they are all good for collaborative project management for smaller projects, which have not quite reached the level in terms of capabilities to manage very large projects. I have managed projects ranging from 25 million USD to 50 million USD, and I feel Asana cannot operate at that level.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

My team was seeking for a tool to provide direction, so I tried out a few. 

Although there is a learning curve with every program, Asana stands out for having an easy-to-use UI. The templates are also excellent for getting us started, and Asana's extensive customization capabilities are a significant benefit. There are so many wonderful features to discover, and as my use case grows, I look forward to implementing new features. 

Teams may cooperate and produce solid projects of all types using Asana.

The product's flexibility is its strongest feature; we can utilize it however we like to finish the project. 

It’s a great way to communicate plans and progress across the business and is flexible about how much detail I include and how I present it. I especially like the way I can share different perspectives with different people and the flexibility in how I present information. 

My team especially loves the Priority Poker feature: making prioritizing cooperation fun and easy, and helping me stick to my strategy and goals. I can modify it to fit my team’s needs and easily extend my process at anytime easily.

Some customizations and functions are still not available, however, so far, they haven't been a deal killer. Asana appears to be open to suggestions, and as they are continually making improvements, these might be implemented in the future. 

It takes some time to get used to and is initially difficult to navigate Asana. It gets much better as you get to know about Asana. Since you can’t set up an advanced search to distinguish between tasks, folders, and projects, I also have trouble with the search feature.

I've used the solution for two plus years.

I adore how Asana allows us to be consistent and open with our staff. To keep track of all of our jobs, we used too many spreadsheets and manila folders, which frequently went missing and required workers to search the office for lost files. 

On-premises

I use Asana mainly for project management and teamwork.

The solution's user interface is very good. The solution's alerts and notifications also help a lot. The additional feature of integrations with other tools is also very useful.

More features can be added.

I have been using Asana for almost six years.

Asana is a completely stable solution, and I haven't had any issues with the solution's stability.

Asana is a scalable solution. We have been expanding and adding many team members and haven't faced any challenges with the solution's scalability. Less than 100 people are currently using Asana in our organization, but we're planning to increase the usage soon.

The solution's initial setup is very, very simple. I am also working as an admin for Asana for my team. The solution's implementation involves a couple of clicks, and you are onboarded.

We implemented Asana through an in-house team. The solution's deployment was very simple and didn't take more than a few weeks.

The solution's notifications and integration supports remote collaboration by updating the team on how the project is moving ahead. You can integrate Asana with Microsoft Teams. You can set up the alerts, which is very beneficial for getting updates.

Project management covers the whole delegation and accountability portion of Asana. It tells us when a particular subpart of the project was assigned to a person and when it was moved to the next phase. We are working with the software version of Asana.

The solution's delegation and tracking features are very beneficial, considering that we work in a hybrid model. Sometimes we are in the office, and sometimes we are not. It helps a lot when you don't have to chase people, and you can directly refer to Asana's board and understand what's going on. Asana has completely adapted to the evolving needs of our projects over time.

Our focus while implementing the solution was mainly to cover the project management of our teams by ensuring the stages and required alerts. We ensured that the dashboards were up to mark during our planning conversations. These things were considered while doing the implementation.

I would recommend Asana to other users based on their use cases. Users looking for a project management and collaboration tool should choose Asana.

Overall, I rate Asana a nine out of ten.

Asana is a tool that helps project managers do their tasks, follow up on them, and track the processes. They can also have feedback on the performance of those tasks. Asana helps project managers to plan for risk management.

Asana is a very simple interface for project managers to figure out, providing all the functions they need. Asana is one interface that contains multiple functions such as object key results (OKRs), time plans, metrics, and risk management. All these functions can help you to easily implement your project from the initiation to the evaluation stage.

When you have access to Asana as a project manager, you will find everything you want inside it. In some cases, if we use alternatives, we have to jump from one program to another and some apps to complete everything. However, Asana is an interface that includes everything you want.

It would be great if Asana could create a library for each project within the interface. For example, if you are working on ten projects and need to make daily changes to all of them, having a separate library for each project would be helpful.

Asana is a pretty stable solution.

Asana is a scalable solution. When it comes to project management, scalability is limited to the function you do. If we go to time planning, you can do the time planning for a one-year project or one hundred. It's the same. The solution's scalability is very high.

Currently, I am using Asana in our organization.

I’ve previously used MS Project and Oracle Primavera. Primavera is very difficult to adopt and use. MS Project is used for simple projects, providing only a chart and time planning. However, plenty of functions and apps you need for project management are missing in MS Project. You can run simple projects using MS Project, but it cannot help with complex projects.

You don't need to set up Asana because it's cloud-based, and you can work online.

Currently, I'm using Asana for free. The solution's free version can be used for basic functions. When my colleagues start using it, I will contact Asana and find the most efficient plan for us.

Since Asana is a cloud system, we always use the latest version of the solution.

Users can go ahead with Asana because it's easy. It's a stable and scalable solution that has all the functions you need for your project management. The solution can save your progress when you are offline so that you can find everything when you're back. This feature can be helpful when you have internet issues.

Overall, I rate Asana a nine out of ten.

I use Asana to create portfolios, tasks, and subtasks and collaborate with others. It is integrated into my daily workflow, where when a new task is assigned to a project, we note it, set up starting and due dates and completion dates, and assess complexity and workload indicators.

The dashboard is the most valuable feature because other features are more or less common with similar platforms. The dashboards are really insightful and easy to use.

The main dashboard, where there is a list, needs improvement. It should have some memory because if you navigate back and forth, it does not show your last position. It should remember where you were, so it returns you to the same part of the list, instead of the first item, to avoid losing flow.

I have been working with Asana for about six months.

During the initial setup, I found it was close to easy, rating it a nine out of ten.

I would rate Asana eight out of ten overall.

Public Cloud

Other

We use the solution to create some tasks. Each task is assigned to somebody here.

The way it handles the task is good. The whole team needs to organize all our tasks using Asana. It helps to clarify and allows us to prioritize tasks effectively.

The solution could have a bigger pop-up when someone assigns a task or have a notification similar to Facebook, where you see a number indicating the notifications you receive. This way, you can see the notification when you use Asana. Perhaps a larger notification or a different color could make it easier for everyone to identify that they have a task assigned.

I have been using Asana for a year. We are using the desktop version of the solution.

The solution is scalable.

Technical support is very useful.

Positive

The initial setup is straightforward. 20 members, including the manager, were involved in the development.

I rate the initial setup an eight out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy.

The pricing is reasonable. We paid and received equal functionality.

I recommend the solution. You can view and manage your tasks, assign each task to the appropriate team member, and track the progress and status of each task.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

The solution is a task management app. It is good for project management.

The tool has a lot of integrations. It’s popular and has good task management features.

The messaging feature could be better.

I've never had challenges with the product’s stability. For the period we used it, it was stable.

The tool is scalable, but we have to remember that we have to pay for it. Our organization had a team of 15 to 20 people using the solution. A project manager managed the solution. We did not need a developer.

The initial setup was straightforward. I come from a technical background. Everything is straightforward for me. The setup was very simple. We had to download the app and add the tasks.

We deployed the tool in-house. We just have to sign up and download the app to deploy the solution. If we want to use the cloud version, we can get on the website and add users and tasks. It is that simple.

My organization would have seen a return on investment in the solution. If they didn’t, they would have stopped using it.

We paid a monthly licensing fee for the product.

Bitrix24 is pretty fast, but Asana is fine too. Asana is better than Trello as a task manager.

Asana is good at what it does. However, I still prefer Bitrix24 over Asana. People looking to use the solution must go ahead and use it. It is not a bad tool. Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.

For our company, we use Asana for project management. Since my company caters to a lot of enterprise clients, ticket management services are based on the preferred choice of our clients.

I lead a team of software developers in my company, so we use Asana for sprint planning, allocating tasks, monitoring bugs, and a few more tasks.

Asana launched a dashboard a year ago. What I like the most about Asana is its API integrations because we use a lot of cluttered toolsets in our company since we need to cater to different clients, for which its integration gives us a lot of flexibility. We use Notion for the documentation, whereas we use Asana for the task, and we have written many automation scripts for our benefit.

The mobile application of Asana has to be improved a lot because no one wants to do a complete project management task on mobile. While on my mobile phone, I would like to get an update quickly or a short task notification so that I don't forget anything, for which the mobile interface is very clumsy.

I don't have anything related to the additional features required in the solution on top of my mind because my company hasn't even used 50 percent of the tool's feature set. We have customized the tool based on our processes. We are using whatever we need in the tool, so I don't have any suggestions for adding features to Asana.

I have been using Asana for two and a half years. I am just a user of the solution.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten since I haven't faced any challenges regarding the product's stability.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten since I haven't faced any challenges regarding the product's scalability, and our company hasn't explored its scalability involving a billion tasks.

I have a 45-member team working under me using Asana.

The solution's technical support is not very prompt or strong, which may be because they have to reach out to a lot of users. Though we only got the opportunity to interact with the product's technical support team once or twice, our experience was not good. We weren't happy with the technical support team because of the response time they took to provide us with a solution to our issue, and we had only reached out to the support team since we had no clue on how to resolve the issue in the product. We were expecting experts from Asana's technical support team to resolve the issue within an hour, but it took them 48 hours to resolve it.

ClickUp and Jira are part of the project management tools we use in our company.

The ease or complexity of Asana's initial setup process depends on the use cases for which the product is chosen. The initial set of phases can be a no-brainer for a simple project creation or for some setup using an existing project template. In our company, we use Asana for Complex use cases, like getting it integrated into a dashboard from Notion or a ticketing system from Jira, for which we need a bit of technical intervention.

The solution is deployed on the cloud.

The internal team in my company, who reports to me, managed the initial setup phase of the product.

I can describe Asana's pricing as a sweet spot since it is neither very high nor very low, especially regarding the value Asana adds to its products. I like the flexibility provided in Asana's pricing policies. In our company, we use 50 percent of the features provided by Asana, because of which we only pay 50 percent of Asana's total cost.

I recommend the product to its other potential users.

I rate the overall product a nine out of ten.